The effect of breast shielding during lumbar spine radiography

1. Valentin J, editor. The 2007 recommendations of the InternationalCommission on Radiological Protection. Orlando: Elsevier, published for the International Commission on Radiological Protection; 2007.Search in Google Scholar

2. European Commission. European Guidelines on Quality Criteria forDiagnosticRadiographicImages(EUR16260EN). Luxembourg: OfficeforOfficial Publications of the European Communities; 2007.Search in Google Scholar

3. Bontrager KL. Textbook of radiographic positioning and related anatomy. 3rd edition. St. Louis (etc.): Mosby Year Book; 1993. p. 243-65.Search in Google Scholar

4. Swallow RA, Naylor E, eds. Clark’s positioning in radiography. 11th edition. London (etc.): Butterworth Heinemann; 1996. p. 166-73.Search in Google Scholar

5. Lipovec V. Rentgenske slikovne metode in protokoli. Ljubljana: Visoka šola za zdravstvo; 2005. p. 257-80.Search in Google Scholar

6. Frank ED, Long BW, Smith BJ. Merrill’s atlas of radiographic positioning& procedures. 11th edition. St. Louis: Mosby/Elsevier; 2007. p. 373-87, 424-35.Search in Google Scholar

7. Fordham LA, Brown ED, Washburn D, Clark RL. Efficacy and feasibility of breast shielding during abdominal fluoroscopic examinations. Acad Radiol 1997; 4: 639-43.10.1016/S1076-6332(05)80269-7Search in Google Scholar

8. Beaconsfield T, Nicholson R, Thornton A, Al-Kutoubi A. Would thyroid and breast shielding be beneficial in CT of the head? Eur Radiol 1998; 8: 664-7.Search in Google Scholar

9. Brnić Z, Vekić B, Hebrang A, Anić P. Efficacy of breast shielding during CT of the head. Eur Radiol 2003; 13: 2436-40.10.1007/s00330-003-1945-112827426Search in Google Scholar

10. Hohl C, Mahnken AH, Klotz E, Das M, Stargardt A, Mühlenbruch G et al. Radiation dose reduction to the male gonads during MDCT: the effectiveness of a lead shield. Am J Roentgenol 2005; 184: 128-30.10.2214/ajr.184.1.0184012815615962Search in Google Scholar

11. Jackson G, Brennan PC. Radio-protective aprons during radiological examinations of the thorax: an optimum strategy. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2006; 121: 391-94.10.1093/rpd/ncl07616782981Search in Google Scholar

12. Clancy CL, O’Reilly G, Brennan PC, McEntee MF. The effect of patient shield position on gonad dose during lumbar spine radiography. Radiography 2010; 16: 131-5.10.1016/j.radi.2009.10.004Search in Google Scholar

13. Botros M, Chang K, Miller R, Krishnan S, Iott M. Recurrent invasive lobular carcinoma presenting as a ruptured breast implant. Radiol Oncol 2012; 46: 23-7.10.2478/v10019-011-0032-5342376922933976Search in Google Scholar

14. Marolt Mušič M, Hertl K, Kadivec M, Podkrajšek M, Jereb S. Rentgenska in ultrazvočna anatomija dojke. Radiol Oncol 2004; 38: S51-S7.Search in Google Scholar

15. Foley SJ, McEntee MF, Achenbach S, Brennan PC, Rainford LS, Dodd JD. Breast Surface Radiation Dose During Coronary CT Angiography: Reduction by Breast displacement and Lead Shielding. Am J Roentgenol 2011; 197: 367-73.10.2214/AJR.10.4569Search in Google Scholar

16. Brennan PC, Madigan E. Lumbar spine radiology: Analysis of the posteroanterior projection. Eur Radiol 2000; 10: 1197-201.10.1007/s00330990027211003420Search in Google Scholar