Assessment of the Educational Values of Geomorphosites Based on the Expert Method, Case Study: The Białka and Skawa Rivers, the Polish Carpathians
31 mar 2020
Acerca de este artículo
Publicado en línea: 31 mar 2020
Páginas: 45 - 57
Recibido: 02 oct 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/quageo-2020-0004
Palabras clave
© 2020 Anna Chrobak et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Fig. 8

Results of the assessment of selected geomorphosites_
Criteria | GEOSITE NO. 1 | GEOSITE NO. 2 | GEOSITE NO. 3 | GEOSITE NO. 4 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
E1 | E2 | E3 | Av | E1 | E2 | E3 | Av | E1 | E2 | E3 | Av | E1 | E2 | E3 | Av | |
Ra | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 10.0 | 8.3 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 10.0 | 8.3 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 |
In | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 7.5 | 9.2 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 7.5 | 10.0 | 7.5 | 8.3 |
Rp | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 6.7 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 8.9 | 6.7 | 6.7 | 6.7 | 6.7 | 6.7 | 6.7 | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Dv | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 6.7 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 8.9 | 3.3 | 3.3 | 3.3 | 3.3 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 |
Ge | 10.0 | 6.7 | 10.0 | 8.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 6.7 | 6.7 | 6.7 | 6.7 | 0.0 | 6.7 | 6.7 | 4.5 |
Kn | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Av | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 6.7 | 6.7 | 10.0 | 5.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 |
SUM | 70.0 | 66.7 | 70.0 | 68.9 | 47.6 | 54.2 | 57.5 | 53.1 | 39.2 | 39.2 | 41.7 | 40.0 | 49.2 | 58.4 | 55.9 | 54.5 |
P.value | 1.00 | 0.95 | 1.00 | 0.98 | 0.68 | 0.77 | 0.82 | 0.75 | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.60 | 0.57 | 0.70 | 0.83 | 0.80 | 0.78 |
GROUP | I | I | I | I | II | I | I | I | II | II | II | II | I | I | I | I |
The criteria of a scientific-educational assessment_ Based on Pereira, Pereira (2010) and Brilha (2016)_
SEV | SCIENTIFIC-EDUCATIONAL VALUE |
---|---|
Ra | Rareness in relation to the study area |
0 | It is not one of the most important 5 |
2,5 | One of the most 5 important examples in the study area to illustrate elements or processes |
5 | One of the most 3 important examples in the study area to illustrate elements or processes |
7,5 | Good example in the study area to illustrate elements or processes |
10 | The best example in the study area to illustrate elements or processes |
In | Integrity/Intactness |
0 | Highly damaged as a result of human activities |
2,5 | Damaged as a result of natural processes |
5 | Damaged, but preserving essential geomorphological features |
7,5 | Slightly damaged, but still maintaining the essential geomorphological features/other geomorphological features were created as a result of human activity and/or natural processes |
10 | All geological and geomorphological features are very well preserve |
Rp | Representativeness of geomorphological processes and pedagogical interest |
0 | Low representativeness and without pedagogical interest |
3,3 | With some representativeness, but with a low pedagogical interest |
6,7 | The good example of processes, but hard to explain to non-experts |
10 | The good example of processes and/or good pedagogical resource |
Dv | Number of interesting geomorphological features (diversity) |
0 | 1 |
3,3 | 2 |
6,7 | 3 |
10 | More than 3 |
Ge | Other geological features with heritage value |
0 | The absence of other geological features |
3,3 | Other geological features, but without relation to geosite |
6,7 | Other geological features with relation to geosite |
10 | The occurrence of other geological features with a degree higher than geomorphological features |
Kn | Scientific knowledge on geomorphological issues |
0 | None |
5 | Medium: presentations, national papers |
10 | High: international papers, thesis |
Av | Additional values (historical, cultural, archeological) |
0 | No other scientific or educational values |
3,3 | One scientific or educational value which could be related to the geomorphosite |
6,7 | 2–5 scientific or educational values which could be related to the geomorphosite |
10 | Existence more than 5 scientific or educational values which could be related to the geomorphosite |
Definitions of division into valorization groups_ Based on Warszyńska (1970)_
Group | Point value | Definition |
---|---|---|
I | 0.7–1.0 | An object with very high scientific-educational values |
II | 0.4–0.7 | An object with high scientific-educational values |
III | 0.2–0.4 | An object with medium scientific-educational values |
IV | 0.0–0.2 | An object with low scientific-educational values |