Does the process of shrinking concern also small towns? lessons from Poland
, y
26 dic 2019
Acerca de este artículo
Publicado en línea: 26 dic 2019
Páginas: 91 - 105
Recibido: 26 jun 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/quageo-2019-0039
Palabras clave
© 2019 Bartosz Bartosiewicz, Agnieszka Kwiatek-Sołtys, Sławomir Kurek, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Shrinking small towns in Poland: basic information_
Number of population | Number of small towns | Number of shrinking small towns | Share of shrinking small towns |
---|---|---|---|
up to 5,000 | 320 (47%) | 11 (37%) | 3.4% |
5,000–10,000 | 177 (26%) | 10 (33%) | 5.6% |
10,000–15,000 | 107 (15.5%) | 2 (7%) | 1.9% |
15,000–20,000 | 79 (11.5%) | 7 (23%) | 8.9% |
In total | 683 | 30 | 4.4% |
Affiliation of shrinking small towns to the appointed types of changes in the level of social and economic development (Table 4)_
Type 2002 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | – | Błaszki | Świeradów Zdrój | Strzegom, Śląskie, Głuchołazy Ząbkowice | |
B | Dobrodzień | Lipsko, Kazimierza Wielka, Ożarów | Bogatynia, Wołczyn, Siemiatycze | Ziębice, Strzelce Opolskie, Krapkowice, Paczków, Hel | |
C | Poniatowa, Żychlin, Działoszyce, Pienięż- no | Węgliniec | Ozimek | – | |
D | Gozdnica, Korsze, Dąbrowa Białostocka | Ścinawa, Małomice, Sokółka | Łapy | – | |
D | C | B | A | Type 2014 |
Values of part I and I of the indicator calculated with a shift-and-share analysis for the selected 5 shrinking small towns_
Town | Values of part III of the method according to sectors | Real difference in the number of business entities in town between 2002 and 2014 | Hypothetical increase in the number of business entities – part I of the method | Difference be- tween real and hypothetical (part I) change in the number of business entities | Difference between real and hypothetical (part I) change in the number of business entities | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
sector I | sector II | sector III | sector IV | |||||
Błaszki | 0.2 | −0.3 | −0.3 | −0.5 | −72 | 28.360 | −100 | −354 |
Ożarów | −0.2 | −0.3 | −0.3 | −0.5 | −112 | 50.170 | −162 | −323 |
Żychlin | 0.2 | −0.2 | −0.2 | −0.4 | −97 | 72.490 | −169 | −234 |
Sokółka | −0.2 | −0.1 | −0.1 | −0.3 | −49 | 168.633 | −218 | −129 |
Dobrodzień | −0.2 | 0.0 | −0.2 | −0.1 | −4 | 39.420 | −43 | −110 |
The way of singling out 16 types of development levels of small towns in Poland between 2002 and 2014_
Type 2002 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | I | II | III | IV | |
B | V | VI | VII | VIII | |
C | IX | X | XI | XII | |
D | XIII | XIV | XV | XVI | |
D | C | B | A | Type 2014 |
Population dynamics in small towns between 1970 and 2014_
Population dynamics (base year = 100) | 1970–2014 | 1970–1978 | 1978–1988 | 1988–2002 | 2002–2014 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
102 and more | 544 | 482 | 570 | 370 | 179 |
98–102 | 20 | 83 | 33 | 135 | 190 |
over 98 | 73 | 72 | 34 | 132 | 268 |