This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Alessa L., Kliskey A., Brown G., 2008. Social–ecological hotspots mapping: A spatial approach for identifying coupled social–ecological space. Landscape and Urban Planning 85(1): 27–39. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.09.007.AlessaL.KliskeyA.BrownG.2008Social–ecological hotspots mapping: A spatial approach for identifying coupled social–ecological spaceLandscape and Urban Planning851273910.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.09.007Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Anselin L., 1998. Interactive techniques and exploratory spatial data analysis. In: P. Longley, M. Goodchild, D. Maguire, D. Rhind (eds.), Geographical Information Systems: Principles, Techniques, Management and Application. John Wiley & Sons, New York: 253–266.AnselinL.1998Interactive techniques and exploratory spatial data analysisLongleyP.GoodchildM.MaguireD.RhindD.(eds.)Geographical Information Systems: Principles, Techniques, Management and ApplicationJohn Wiley & SonsNew York253266Search in Google Scholar
Arnstein S.R., 1969. A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Planning Association 35(4): 216–224. DOI: 10.1080/01944366908977225.ArnsteinS.R.1969A Ladder of Citizen ParticipationJournal of the American Planning Association35421622410.1080/01944366908977225Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Babelon I., Ståhle A., Balfors B., 2016. Toward Cyborg PPGIS : exploring socio-technical requirements for the use of web-based PPGIS in two municipal planning cases, Stockholm region, Sweden, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 60(8): 1366–1390. DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2016.1221798.BabelonI.StåhleA.BalforsB.2016Toward Cyborg PPGIS : exploring socio-technical requirements for the use of web-based PPGIS in two municipal planning cases, Stockholm region, SwedenJournal of Environmental Planning and Management6081366139010.1080/09640568.2016.1221798Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Bąkowska E., Kaczmarek T., Jankowski P., Zwoliński Zb., Mikuła Ł., Czepkiewicz M., Brudka C., 2016. Geo-questionnaire in urban planning – preliminary results of the experimental application in Poland. Rozwój Regionalny i Polityka Regionalna 35: 37–54.BąkowskaE.KaczmarekT.JankowskiP.ZwolińskiZb.MikułaŁ.CzepkiewiczM.BrudkaC.2016Geo-questionnaire in urban planning – preliminary results of the experimental application in PolandRozwój Regionalny i Polityka Regionalna353754Search in Google Scholar
Brown G., 2006. Mapping Landscape Values and Development Preferences: a Method for Tourism and Residential Development Planning. International Journal of Tourism Research 113(8): 101–113.BrownG.2006Mapping Landscape Values and Development Preferences: a Method for Tourism and Residential Development PlanningInternational Journal of Tourism Research113810111310.1002/jtr.562Search in Google Scholar
Brown G., 2012a. Public Participation GIS (PPGIS) for Regional and Environmental Planning: Reflections on a Decade of Empirical Research. URISA Journal 25(2): 7–18.BrownG.2012aPublic Participation GIS (PPGIS) for Regional and Environmental Planning: Reflections on a Decade of Empirical ResearchURISA Journal252718Search in Google Scholar
Brown G., 2012b. An empirical evaluation of the spatial accuracy of public participation GIS (PPGIS) data. Applied Geography 34: 289–294. DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.12.004.BrownG.2012bAn empirical evaluation of the spatial accuracy of public participation GIS (PPGIS) dataApplied Geography3428929410.1016/j.apgeog.2011.12.004Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Brown G., Fagerholm N., 2014. Empirical PPGIS/PGIS mapping of ecosystem services: A review and evaluation. Ecosystem Services 13: 119–133. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.10.007.BrownG.FagerholmN.2014Empirical PPGIS/PGIS mapping of ecosystem services: A review and evaluationEcosystem Services1311913310.1016/j.ecoser.2014.10.007Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Brown G., Kelly M., Whitall D., 2014a. Which “public”? Sampling effects in public participation GIS (PPGIS) and volunteered geographic information (VGI) systems for public lands management. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 57(2): 190–214. DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2012.741045.BrownG.KellyM.WhitallD.2014aWhich “public”? Sampling effects in public participation GIS (PPGIS) and volunteered geographic information (VGI) systems for public lands managementJournal of Environmental Planning and Management57219021410.1080/09640568.2012.741045Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Brown G., Kyttä M., 2014. Key issues and research priorities for public participation GIS (PPGIS): A synthesis based on empirical research. Applied Geography 46: 122–136. DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.11.004.BrownG.KyttäM.2014Key issues and research priorities for public participation GIS (PPGIS): A synthesis based on empirical researchApplied Geography4612213610.1016/j.apgeog.2013.11.004Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Brown G., Pullar D.V., 2012. An evaluation of the use of points versus polygons in public participation geographic information systems using quasi-experimental design and Monte Carlo simulation. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 26(2): 231–246. DOI: 10.1080/13658816.2011.585139.BrownG.PullarD.V.2012An evaluation of the use of points versus polygons in public participation geographic information systems using quasi-experimental design and Monte Carlo simulationInternational Journal of Geographical Information Science26223124610.1080/13658816.2011.585139Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Brown G., Raymond C.M., 2014. Methods for identifying land use conflict potential using participatory mapping. Landscape and Urban Planning 122: 196–208. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.11.007.BrownG.RaymondC.M.2014Methods for identifying land use conflict potential using participatory mappingLandscape and Urban Planning12219620810.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.11.007Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Brown G., Reed P., 2009. Public Participation GIS: A New Method for Use in National Forest Planning. Forest Science 55(2): 166–182.BrownG.ReedP.2009Public Participation GIS: A New Method for Use in National Forest PlanningForest Science552166182Search in Google Scholar
Brown G., Reed P., 2012. Social Landscape Metrics: Measures for Understanding Place Values from Public Participation Geographic Information Systems (PPGIS). Landscape Research 37(1): 73–90. DOI: 10.1080/01426397.2011.591487.BrownG.ReedP.2012Social Landscape Metrics: Measures for Understanding Place Values from Public Participation Geographic Information Systems (PPGIS)Landscape Research371739010.1080/01426397.2011.591487Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Brown G., Reed P., Harris C.C., 2002. Testing a place-based theory for environmental evaluation: an Alaska case study. Applied Geography 22: 49–76.BrownG.ReedP.HarrisC.C.2002Testing a place-based theory for environmental evaluation: an Alaska case studyApplied Geography22497610.1016/S0143-6228(01)00019-4Search in Google Scholar
Brown G., Schebella M.F., Weber D., 2014b. Using participatory GIS to measure physical activity and urban park benefits. Landscape and Urban Planning 121: 34–44. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.09.006.BrownG.SchebellaM.F.WeberD.2014bUsing participatory GIS to measure physical activity and urban park benefitsLandscape and Urban Planning121344410.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.09.006Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Brown G., Weber D., 2011. Public Participation GIS: A new method for national park planning. Landscape and Urban Planning 102(1): 1–15. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.03.003.BrownG.WeberD.2011Public Participation GIS: A new method for national park planningLandscape and Urban Planning102111510.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.03.003Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Brown G., Weber D., 2012. A place-based approach to conservation management using public participation GIS (PPGIS). Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 56(4): 1–19. DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2012.685628.BrownG.WeberD.2012A place-based approach to conservation management using public participation GIS (PPGIS)Journal of Environmental Planning and Management56411910.1080/09640568.2012.685628Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Brown G., Weber D., Zanon D., De Bie K., 2012. Evaluation of an online (opt-in) panel for public participation geographic information systems surveys. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 24(4): 534–545. DOI: 10.1093/ijpor/eds001BrownG.WeberD.ZanonD.De BieK.2012Evaluation of an online (opt-in) panel for public participation geographic information systems surveysInternational Journal of Public Opinion Research24453454510.1093/ijpor/eds001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Bugs G., 2012. Assessment of Online PPGIS Study Cases in Urban Planning. In: B. Murgante, O. Gervasi, S. Misra, N. Nedjah, A.M.A.C. Rocha, D. Taniar, B.O. Apduhan (eds.), Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2012, Springer: 477–490. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-31125-3_36.BugsG.2012Assessment of Online PPGIS Study Cases in Urban PlanningMurganteB.GervasiO.MisraS.NedjahN.RochaA.M.A.C.TaniarD.ApduhanB.O.(eds.)Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2012Springer47749010.1007/978-3-642-31125-3_36Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Bugs G., Granell C., Fonts O., Huerta J., Painho M., 2010. An assessment of Public Participation GIS and Web 2.0 technologies in urban planning practice in Canela, Brazil. Cities 27(3): 172–181. DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2009.11.008.BugsG.GranellC.FontsO.HuertaJ.PainhoM.2010An assessment of Public Participation GIS and Web 2.0 technologies in urban planning practice in Canela, BrazilCities27317218110.1016/j.cities.2009.11.008Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Bugs G., Kyttä M., 2016. Public Perception Spatial Data from the PPGIS Jaguarão Experiment. In: S. Konomi, G. Roussos (eds.), Enriching Urban Spaces with Ambient Computing, the Internet of Things, and Smart City Design, IGI Global: 257–278. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-0827-4.ch013.BugsG.KyttäM.2016Public Perception Spatial Data from the PPGIS Jaguarão ExperimentKonomiS.RoussosG.(eds.)Enriching Urban Spaces with Ambient Computing, the Internet of Things, and Smart City DesignIGI Global25727810.4018/978-1-5225-0827-4.ch013Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Carver S. 2001. Participation and Geographical Information: a position paper. Position Paper for the ESF-NSF Workshop on Access to Geographic Information and Participatory Approaches Using Geographic Information, Spoleto, 6–8 DecemberCarverS.2001Participation and Geographical Information: a position paperPosition Paper for the ESF-NSF Workshop on Access to Geographic Information and Participatory Approaches Using Geographic InformationSpoleto6–8 DecemberSearch in Google Scholar
Chaix B., Kestens Y., Perchoux C., Karusisi N., Merlo J., Labadi K., 2012. An interactive mapping tool to assess individual mobility patterns in neighborhood studies. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 43(4): 440–450. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.06.026.ChaixB.KestensY.PerchouxC.KarusisiN.MerloJ.LabadiK.2012An interactive mapping tool to assess individual mobility patterns in neighborhood studiesAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine43444045010.1016/j.amepre.2012.06.02622992364Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Corbett J., Keller P., 2006. An analytical framework to examine empowerment associated with participatory geographic information systems (PGIS). Cartographica 40(4): 91–102.CorbettJ.KellerP.2006An analytical framework to examine empowerment associated with participatory geographic information systems (PGIS)Cartographica4049110210.3138/J590-6354-P38V-4269Search in Google Scholar
Czepkiewicz M., Brudka C., Jankowski P., Kaczmarek P., Zwoliński Zb., Mikuła ł., Bąkowska E., Młodkowski M., Wójcicki M., 2016a. Public Participation GIS for sustainable urban mobility planning: methods, applications and challenges. Rozwój Regionalny i Polityka Regionalna 35: 9–35.CzepkiewiczM.BrudkaC.JankowskiP.KaczmarekP.ZwolińskiZb.MikułaŁ.BąkowskaE.MłodkowskiM.WójcickiM.2016aPublic Participation GIS for sustainable urban mobility planning: methods, applications and challengesRozwój Regionalny i Polityka Regionalna35935Search in Google Scholar
Czepkiewicz M., Jankowski P., Młodkowski M., 2016b. Geo-questionnaires in urban planning: recruitment methods, participant engagement, and data quality. Cartography and Geographic Information Science 44(6): 551–567. DOI: 10.1080/15230406.2016.1230520.CzepkiewiczM.JankowskiP.MłodkowskiM.2016bGeo-questionnaires in urban planning: recruitment methods, participant engagement, and data qualityCartography and Geographic Information Science44655156710.1080/15230406.2016.1230520Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Devillers R., Stein A., Bedard Y., Chrisman N., Fisher P., Shi W., 2010. Thirty years of research on spatial data quality: achievements, failures, and opportunities. Transactions in GIS 14(4): 387–400.DevillersR.SteinA.BedardY.ChrismanN.FisherP.ShiW.2010Thirty years of research on spatial data quality: achievements, failures, and opportunitiesTransactions in GIS14438740010.1111/j.1467-9671.2010.01212.xSearch in Google Scholar
Dragićević S., Balram S., 2004. A Web GIS collaborative framework to structure and manage distributed planning processes. Journal of Geographical Systems 6(2): 133–153.DragićevićS.BalramS.2004A Web GIS collaborative framework to structure and manage distributed planning processesJournal of Geographical Systems6213315310.1007/s10109-004-0130-7Search in Google Scholar
Dunn C.E., 2007. Participatory GIS – a people’s GIS? Progress in Human Geography 31(5): 616–637.DunnC.E.2007Participatory GIS – a people’s GIS?Progress in Human Geography31561663710.1177/0309132507081493Search in Google Scholar
Elwood S., Schuurman N., Wilson M.W., 2011. Critical GIS. In: T.L. Nyerges, H. Couclelis, R. McMaster (eds.), The SAGE Handbook of GIS and Society, SAGE, Los Angeles: 87–106.ElwoodS.SchuurmanN.WilsonM.W.2011Critical GISNyergesT.L.CouclelisH.McMasterR.(eds.)The SAGE Handbook of GIS and SocietySAGELos Angeles8710610.4135/9781446201046.n5Search in Google Scholar
Faber B.G., Wallace W., Cuthbertson J., 1995. Advances in Collaborative GIS for Land-Resource Negotiation. The Proceedings of the GIS’95 Ninth Annual Symposium on Geographic Information Systems Vancouver, B.C. GIS World Inc. 1: 183–189.FaberB.G.WallaceW.CuthbertsonJ.1995Advances in Collaborative GIS for Land-Resource NegotiationThe Proceedings of the GIS’95 Ninth Annual Symposium on Geographic Information Systems Vancouver, B.C. GIS World Inc1183189Search in Google Scholar
Goodchild M.F., Li L., 2012. Assuring the quality of volunteered geographic information. Spatial Statistics 1: 110–120. DOI: 10.1016/j.spasta.2012.03.002.GoodchildM.F.LiL.2012Assuring the quality of volunteered geographic informationSpatial Statistics111012010.1016/j.spasta.2012.03.002Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Gottwald S., Laatikainen T.E., Kyttä M., 2016. Exploring the usability of PPGIS among older adults: challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 30(12): 2321–2338. DOI: 10.1080/13658816.2016.1170837.GottwaldS.LaatikainenT.E.KyttäM.2016Exploring the usability of PPGIS among older adults: challenges and opportunitiesInternational Journal of Geographical Information Science30122321233810.1080/13658816.2016.1170837Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Haklay M., Tobón C., 2003. Usability Evaluation and PPGIS: towards a user-centred design approach. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 17(6): 577–592.HaklayM.TobónC.2003Usability Evaluation and PPGIS: towards a user-centred design approachInternational Journal of Geographical Information Science17657759210.1080/1365881031000114107Search in Google Scholar
IAP2 [International Association of Public Participation], 2014. IAP2 Spectrum of Public Participation. International Association for Public Participation. Online: www.iap2.org/resource/resmgr/foundations_course/IAP2_P2_Spectrum_FINAL.pdf (accessed 19 August 2018)IAP2 [International Association of Public Participation]2014IAP2 Spectrum of Public ParticipationInternational Association for Public Participation. Online: www.iap2.org/resource/resmgr/foundations_course/IAP2_P2_Spectrum_FINAL.pdf (accessed 19 August 2018)Search in Google Scholar
Innes J.E., Booher D.E., 2004. Reframing Public Participation: Strategies for the 21st Century. Planning Theory & Practice 5(4): 419–436.InnesJ.E.BooherD.E.2004Reframing Public Participation: Strategies for the 21st CenturyPlanning Theory & Practice5441943610.1080/1464935042000293170Search in Google Scholar
Jankowski, P., Czepkiewicz, M., Młodkowski, M., Zwoliński, Zb. (2016). Geo-questionnaire: A Method and Tool for Public Preference Elicitation in Land Use Planning Piotr. Transactions in GIS 20(6): 903–924. DOI: 10.1111/tgis.12191JankowskiP.CzepkiewiczM.MłodkowskiM.ZwolińskiZb.2016Geo-questionnaire: A Method and Tool for Public Preference Elicitation in Land Use Planning PiotrTransactions in GIS20690392410.1111/tgis.12191Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Jankowski P., Czepkiewicz M., Młodkowski M., Zwoliński Zb., Wójcicki M., 2017a. Evaluating the scalability of public participation in urban land use planning: A comparison of Geoweb methods with face-to-face meetings. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science. DOI: 10.1177/2399808317719709.JankowskiP.CzepkiewiczM.MłodkowskiM.ZwolińskiZb.WójcickiM.2017aEvaluating the scalability of public participation in urban land use planning: A comparison of Geoweb methods with face-to-face meetingsEnvironment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science10.1177/2399808317719709Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Jankowski P., Kaczmarek T., Zwolinski Zb., Bakowska-Waldmann E., Brudka C., Czpkiewicz M., Mikuła Ł., Młodkowski M., 2018. Zastosowanie aplikacji geoankiety i geodyskusji w partycypacyjnym planowaniu przestrzennym – dobre praktyki. Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Poznań: 1–81.JankowskiP.KaczmarekT.ZwolinskiZb.Bakowska-WaldmannE.BrudkaC.CzpkiewiczM.MikułaŁ.MłodkowskiM.2018Zastosowanie aplikacji geoankiety i geodyskusji w partycypacyjnym planowaniu przestrzennym – dobre praktykiBogucki Wydawnictwo NaukowePoznań181Search in Google Scholar
Jankowski P., Kaczmarek T., Zwoliński Zb., Mikuła Ł., Wójcicki M., Bąkowska E., Czepkiewicz M., Młodkowski M., Brudka C., 2017b. Narzędzia internetowe w konsultacjach społecznych w planowaniu przestrzennym. Idea, obszary zastosowań i wdrażanie. Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM, Poznań: 1–58.JankowskiP.KaczmarekT.ZwolińskiZb.MikułaŁ.WójcickiM.BąkowskaE.CzepkiewiczM.MłodkowskiM.BrudkaC.2017bNarzędzia internetowe w konsultacjach społecznych w planowaniu przestrzennym. Idea, obszary zastosowań i wdrażanieWydawnictwo Naukowe UAMPoznań158Search in Google Scholar
Kaczmarek T., Wójcicki M., 2016. Participation in social consultations on physical planning documents. The case of Poznań City. Quaestiones Geographicae 35(2): 71–81.KaczmarekT.WójcickiM.2016Participation in social consultations on physical planning documents. The case of Poznań CityQuaestiones Geographicae352718110.1515/quageo-2016-0016Search in Google Scholar
Kahila M., Kyttä M., 2009. SoftGIS as a bridge builder in collaborative urban planning. In: S. Geertman, J. Stillwell (eds.), Planning Support Systems: Best Practices and New Methods, Springer: 389–412.KahilaM.KyttäM.2009SoftGIS as a bridge builder in collaborative urban planningGeertmanS.StillwellJ.(eds.)Planning Support Systems: Best Practices and New MethodsSpringer38941210.1007/978-1-4020-8952-7_19Search in Google Scholar
Kahila-Tani M., Broberg A., Kyttä M., Tyger T., 2015. Let the Citizens Map—Public Participation GIS as a Planning Support System in the Helsinki Master Plan Process. Planning Practice & Research 31(2): 195–214. DOI: 10.1080/02697459.2015.1104203.Kahila-TaniM.BrobergA.KyttäM.TygerT.2015Let the Citizens Map—Public Participation GIS as a Planning Support System in the Helsinki Master Plan ProcessPlanning Practice & Research31219521410.1080/02697459.2015.1104203Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Khakee A. 1998. Evaluation and Planning: two inseparable concepts. Town Planning Review 69(4): 359–374.KhakeeA.1998Evaluation and Planning: two inseparable conceptsTown Planning Review69435937410.3828/tpr.69.4.3803q86489619xm7Search in Google Scholar
Kyttä M., Broberg A., Haybatollahi M., Schmidt-Thomé K., 2015. Urban happiness: context-sensitive study of the social sustainability of urban settings. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 47: 1–24. DOI: 10.1177/0265813515600121.KyttäM.BrobergA.HaybatollahiM.Schmidt-ThoméK.2015Urban happiness: context-sensitive study of the social sustainability of urban settingsEnvironment and Planning B: Planning and Design4712410.1177/0265813515600121Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kyttä M., Broberg A., Tzoulas T., Snabb K., 2013. Towards contextually sensitive urban densification: Location-based softGIS knowledge revealing perceived residential environmental quality. Landscape and Urban Planning 113: 30–46. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.01.008.KyttäM.BrobergA.TzoulasT.SnabbK.2013Towards contextually sensitive urban densification: Location-based softGIS knowledge revealing perceived residential environmental qualityLandscape and Urban Planning113304610.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.01.008Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kyttä M., Kahila M., Broberg A., 2011. Perceived environmental quality as an input to urban infill policy-making. URBAN DESIGN International 16(1): 19–35. DOI: 10.1057/udi.2010.19.KyttäM.KahilaM.BrobergA.2011Perceived environmental quality as an input to urban infill policy-makingURBAN DESIGN International161193510.1057/udi.2010.19Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Leahy M., Hall G.B., 2010. Using open source software components to implement a modular Web 2.0 design for map-based discussions. International Journal of Open Source Software and Processes 2(3): 30–47.LeahyM.HallG.B.2010Using open source software components to implement a modular Web 2.0 design for map-based discussionsInternational Journal of Open Source Software and Processes23304710.4018/jossp.2010070102Search in Google Scholar
Lechner A.M., Raymond C.M., Adams V.M., Polyakov M., Gordon A., Rhodes J.R., Mills M., Stein A., Ives C.D., Lefroy E.C., 2014. Characterizing spatial uncertainty when integrating social data in conservation planning. Conservation Biology 28(6): 1497–1511. DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12409.LechnerA.M.RaymondC.M.AdamsV.M.PolyakovM.GordonA.RhodesJ.R.MillsM.SteinA.IvesC.D.LefroyE.C.2014Characterizing spatial uncertainty when integrating social data in conservation planningConservation Biology2861497151110.1111/cobi.1240925382071Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
McCall M.K., Dunn C.E., 2012. Geo-information tools for participatory spatial planning: Fulfilling the criteria for “good” governance? Geoforum 43(1): 81–94. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.07.007.McCallM.K.DunnC.E.2012Geo-information tools for participatory spatial planning: Fulfilling the criteria for “good” governance?Geoforum431819410.1016/j.geoforum.2011.07.007Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Nyerges T., Aguirre R.W., 2011. Public Participation in Analytic-Deliberative Decision Making: Evaluating a Large-Group Online Field Experiment. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 101(3): 37–41.NyergesT.AguirreR.W.2011Public Participation in Analytic-Deliberative Decision Making: Evaluating a Large-Group Online Field ExperimentAnnals of the Association of American Geographers1013374110.1080/00045608.2011.563669Search in Google Scholar
Pánek J., Benediktsson K., 2017. Emotional mapping and its participatory potential: Opinions about cycling conditions in Reykjavík, Iceland. Cities 61(1): 65–73. DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2016.11.005.PánekJ.BenediktssonK.2017Emotional mapping and its participatory potential: Opinions about cycling conditions in Reykjavík, IcelandCities611657310.1016/j.cities.2016.11.005Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Pánek J., Pászto V., Marek L., 2017. Mapping Emotions: Spatial Distribution of Safety Perception in the City of Olomouc. In. I. Ivan, A. Singleton, J. Horák, T. Inspektor (eds.) The Rise of Big Spatial Data, Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography: 211–224. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-45123-7.PánekJ.PásztoV.MarekL.2017Mapping Emotions: Spatial Distribution of Safety Perception in the City of OlomoucIvanI.SingletonA.HorákJ.InspektorJ.(eds.)The Rise of Big Spatial Data, Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography21122410.1007/978-3-319-45123-7Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Perchoux C., Kestens Y., Thomas F., Hulst A. Van, Thierry B., Chaix B., 2014. Assessing patterns of spatial behavior in health studies: Their socio-demographic determinants and associations with transportation modes (the RECORD Cohort Study). Social Science and Medicine 119: 64–73. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.07.026.PerchouxC.KestensY.ThomasF.HulstA. VanThierryB.ChaixB.2014Assessing patterns of spatial behavior in health studies: Their socio-demographic determinants and associations with transportation modes (the RECORD Cohort Study)Social Science and Medicine119647310.1016/j.socscimed.2014.07.02625150652Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Pietrzyk-Kaszyńska A., Czepkiewicz M., Kronenberg J., 2017. Eliciting non-monetary values of formal and informal urban green spaces using public participation GIS. Landscape and Urban Planning 160: 85–95. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.12.012.Pietrzyk-KaszyńskaA.CzepkiewiczM.KronenbergJ.2017Eliciting non-monetary values of formal and informal urban green spaces using public participation GISLandscape and Urban Planning160859510.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.12.012Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Pocewicz A., Nielsen-Pincus M., 2013. Preferences of Wyoming residents for siting of energy and residential development. Applied Geography 43, 45–55. DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.06.006.PocewiczA.Nielsen-PincusM.2013Preferences of Wyoming residents for siting of energy and residential developmentApplied Geography43455510.1016/j.apgeog.2013.06.006Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Rantanen H., Kahila M. (2009). The SoftGIS approach to local knowledge. Journal of Environmental Management 90(6): 1981–1990. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.08.025.RantanenH.KahilaM.2009The SoftGIS approach to local knowledgeJournal of Environmental Management9061981199010.1016/j.jenvman.2007.08.02518556113Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Rinner C., 2001. Argumentation maps: GIS-based discussion support for on-line planning. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 28(6): 847–863. DOI: 10.1068/b2748t.RinnerC.2001Argumentation maps: GIS-based discussion support for on-line planningEnvironment and Planning B: Planning and Design28684786310.1068/b2748tOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Rinner C., Bird M., 2009. Evaluating community engagement through argumentation maps—a public participation GIS case study. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 36(4): 588–601. DOI: 10.1068/b34084.RinnerC.BirdM.2009Evaluating community engagement through argumentation maps—a public participation GIS case studyEnvironment and Planning B: Planning and Design36458860110.1068/b34084Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Salonen M., Broberg A., Kyttä M., Toivonen T., 2014. Do suburban residents prefer the fastest or low-carbon travel modes? Combining public participation GIS and multimodal travel time analysis for daily mobility research. Applied Geography 53: 438–448. DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.06.028.SalonenM.BrobergA.KyttäM.ToivonenT.2014Do suburban residents prefer the fastest or low-carbon travel modes? Combining public participation GIS and multimodal travel time analysis for daily mobility researchApplied Geography5343844810.1016/j.apgeog.2014.06.028Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Schlossberg M., Shuford E., 2005. Delineating “Public” and “Participation” in PPGIS. URISA Journal 16(2): 15–26.SchlossbergM.ShufordE.2005Delineating “Public” and “Participation” in PPGISURISA Journal1621526Search in Google Scholar
Schmidt-Thomé K., Haybatollahi M., Kyttä M., Korpi J., 2013. The prospects for urban densification: a place-based study. Environmental Research Letters 8(2): 1–11. DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/025020.Schmidt-ThoméK.HaybatollahiM.KyttäM.KorpiJ.2013The prospects for urban densification: a place-based studyEnvironmental Research Letters8211110.1088/1748-9326/8/2/025020Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Schmidt-Thome K., Wallin S., Laatikainen T., Kangasoja J., Kyttä M., 2014. Exploring the use of PPGIS in self-organizing urban development: Case softGIS in Pacific Beach. The Journal of Community Informatics 10(3): 1–12. Online: ci-journal.net/index.php/ciej/article/view/1080/1111 (accessed 7 August 2018).Schmidt-ThomeK.WallinS.LaatikainenT.KangasojaJ.KyttäM.2014Exploring the use of PPGIS in self-organizing urban development: Case softGIS in Pacific BeachThe Journal of Community Informatics103112Online: ci-journal.net/index.php/ciej/article/view/1080/1111 (accessed 7 August 2018)10.15353/joci.v10i3.3443Search in Google Scholar
Sieber R., 2006. Public participation geographic information systems: A literature review and framework. Annals of American Association of Geographers 96(3): 491–507. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2006.00702.x.SieberR.2006Public participation geographic information systems: A literature review and frameworkAnnals of American Association of Geographers96349150710.1111/j.1467-8306.2006.00702.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Slotterback C.S., 2011. Planners’ perspectives on using technology in participatory processes. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 38(3): 468–485. DOI: 10.1068/b36138.SlotterbackC.S.2011Planners’ perspectives on using technology in participatory processesEnvironment and Planning B: Planning and Design38346848510.1068/b36138Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Ståhle A., 2006. Sociotope mapping – exploring public open space and its multiple use values in urban and landscape planning practice. Nordic Journal of Architectural Research 19(4): 59–71.StåhleA.2006Sociotope mapping – exploring public open space and its multiple use values in urban and landscape planning practiceNordic Journal of Architectural Research1945971Search in Google Scholar
Talen E., 2000. Bottomup GIS: A new tool for individual and group expression in participatory planning. Journal of the American Planning Association 66(3): 279–294. DOI: 10.1080/01944360008976107.TalenE.2000Bottomup GIS: A new tool for individual and group expression in participatory planningJournal of the American Planning Association66327929410.1080/01944360008976107Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
de Vries S., Buijs A.E., Langers F., Farjon H., van Hinsberg A., Sijtsma F.J., 2013. Measuring the attractiveness of Dutch landscapes: Identifying national hotspots of highly valued places using Google Maps. Applied Geography, 45: 220–229. DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.09.017.de VriesS.BuijsA.E.LangersF.FarjonH.van HinsbergA.SijtsmaF.J.2013Measuring the attractiveness of Dutch landscapes: Identifying national hotspots of highly valued places using Google MapsApplied Geography4522022910.1016/j.apgeog.2013.09.017Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
