Selected Modern Methods and Tools for Public Participation in Urban Planning – A Review
, y
06 sept 2018
Acerca de este artículo
Publicado en línea: 06 sept 2018
Páginas: 127 - 149
Recibido: 17 ago 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/quageo-2018-0030
Palabras clave
© 2018 Muki Haklay et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Fig. 8

Fig. 9

Fig. 10

Fig. 11

Fig. 12

Fig. 13

Fig. 14

Fig. 15

The complementary case study approach involves three case studies in Dublin, Nottingham, and London (by A_ Corcoran and Z_ Nedovic-Budic)_
Case study elements | Research step | Common methodology | Analysis method |
---|---|---|---|
Stakeholder group | |||
Resilience principle | Pre-design data collection | Focus groups | Content analyses |
Resilience issue | Pre-design data collection | Focus groups | Content analyses |
G-ICT (geographical information and communication technology) | Pre-design data collection | Focus groups | Content analyses |
Prototyping development | Programming | ||
Implementation | Recruitment of prototype users/gathering of content | ||
Evaluation | Controlled experiment | Statistical analysis | |
Focus Groups | Content analyses | ||
Survey | Statistical analysis |
Proposed dimensions of PPGIS design (by M_ Czepkiewicz et al_)_
Socio-institutional context of participation process | Participants Who is participating? | Technology Design considerations for PPGIS GIS tools |
---|---|---|
Rules and norms | Knowledge available to participants | Direction of communication |