1. bookVolumen 10 (2022): Edición 1 (June 2022)
Detalles de la revista
License
Formato
Revista
eISSN
2353-3773
Primera edición
15 Dec 2015
Calendario de la edición
2 veces al año
Idiomas
Inglés
Acceso abierto

Ratification of the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA): Towards A New Structure of Political Conflict?

Publicado en línea: 09 Jul 2022
Volumen & Edición: Volumen 10 (2022) - Edición 1 (June 2022)
Páginas: 21 - 34
Detalles de la revista
License
Formato
Revista
eISSN
2353-3773
Primera edición
15 Dec 2015
Calendario de la edición
2 veces al año
Idiomas
Inglés

Baker, A. 2005. “Who wants to globalize? Consumer tastes and labor markets in a theory of trade policy beliefs.” American Journal of Political Science 49 (4): 924–938.10.1111/j.1540-5907.2005.00164.x Search in Google Scholar

Boix, C. 2000. “Partisan Government, International Economy and Macroeconomic Policies.” World Politics 53 (1): 38–73.10.1017/S0043887100009370 Search in Google Scholar

Buonanno, L. A. 2017. “The new trade deals and the mobilisation of civil society organizations: comparing EU and US responses.” Journal of European Integration 39(7): 795–809, DOI: 10.1080/07036337.2017.1371711 Abierto DOISearch in Google Scholar

Duina, F. 2019. “Why the excitement? Values, identities, and the politicization of EU trade policy with North America.” Journal of European Public Policy, DOI:10.1080/13501763.2019.1678056. Abierto DOISearch in Google Scholar

Dür, A., Eckhardt, J. and Poletti, A. 2019. “Global value chains, the anti-globalization backlash, and EU trade policy: a research agenda.” Journal of European Public Policy DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2019.1619802. Abierto DOISearch in Google Scholar

Garrett, G. 1998. Partisan Politics in the Global Economy. New York: Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511625633 Search in Google Scholar

Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. 2018. “Cleavage theory meets Europe’s crises: Lipset, Rokkan, and the transnational cleavage.” Journal of European Public Policy 25 (1): 109–35, DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2017.1310279. Abierto DOISearch in Google Scholar

Hübner, K., Balik, T. and Deman A-S. 2017. “EU and trade policy-making: The contentious case of CETA.” Journal of European Integration 39 (7): 843–57.10.1080/07036337.2017.1371708 Search in Google Scholar

Iversen, T. 1999. Contested Economic Institutions. New York: Cambridge University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Jamal, A., and Milner, H. V. 2019. “Economic self-interest, information, and trade policy preferences: evidence from an experiment in Tunisia.” Review of International Political Economy 26 (4): 545–572, DOI: 10.1080/09692290.2018.1563559. Abierto DOISearch in Google Scholar

Davor Jančić, D. (2016) “The Role of the European Parliament and the US Congress in Shaping Transatlantic Relations: TTIP, NSA Surveillance, and CIA Renditions”, Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 54(4): 896–912.10.1111/jcms.12345 Search in Google Scholar

Jančić, D. (2019) “EU-Canada Relations and CETA: A Tale of Legislative Trade Diplomacy” Davor Jančić (pp: 465–484) in: Raube, K., Wouters, J. and Müftüler-Baç, M. (2019) Parliamentary Cooperation and Diplomacy in EU External Relations (Cheltenham: EE Elgar, pp: 465–484).10.4337/9781786438850.00040 Search in Google Scholar

Jančić, D. 2017. “TTIP and legislative‒executive relations in EU trade policy.” West European Politics 40 (1): 202–21, DOI: 10.1080/01402382.2016.1240407. Abierto DOISearch in Google Scholar

Jungherr, A., Mader, M., Schoen, H. and Wuttke, A. 2018. “Context-driven attitude formation: the diff erence between supporting free trade in the abstract and supporting specific trade agreements.” Review of International Political Economy 25 (2): 215–242, DOI: 10.1080/09692290.2018.1431956. Abierto DOISearch in Google Scholar

Katzenstein, P. 1985. Small States in World Markets. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Kriesi, H. 2010. “Restructuration of partisan politics and the emergence of a new cleavage based on values.” West European Politics 33 (3): 673–85.10.1080/01402381003654726 Search in Google Scholar

Kriesi, H. 2014. “The Populist Challenge.” West European Politics, 37 (2): 361–378, DOI: 10.1080/01402382.2014.887879. Abierto DOISearch in Google Scholar

Laponce, J. 1981. Left and right: Top: the Topography of Political Perceptions. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. Search in Google Scholar

Laursen, F. and Roederer-Rynning, C. 2017a. “Writing the Rules of 21st Century Trade: The EU and the New Bilateralism (special issue).” Journal of European Integration 39 (7). Search in Google Scholar

Laursen, F. and Roederer-Rynning, C. 2017b. “Introduction: the new EU FTAs as contentious market regulation.” Journal of European Integration 39(7): 763–779, DOI: 10.1080/07036337.2017.1372430. Abierto DOISearch in Google Scholar

Leblond, P. and Viju-Miljusevic, C. 2019. “EU trade policy in the twenty-first century: change, continuity and challenges.” Journal of European Public Policy 26 (12), 1836–1846, DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2019.1678059. Abierto DOISearch in Google Scholar

Loo, G. van der and Wessel, R. A. 2017. “The non-ratification of mixed agreements: Legal consequences and solutions” Common Market Law Review vol 54(3): 735 – 770.10.54648/COLA2017059 Search in Google Scholar

Manow, P. 2018. Die Politische Ökonomie des Populismus, Berlin: Suhrkamp Verlag. Search in Google Scholar

Mansfield, E. and Mutz, D. 2009. “Support for Free Trade: Self-Interest, Sociotropic Politics, and Out-Group Anxiety.” International Organisation, 63 (3): 425–457, doi:10.1017/S0020818309090158. Abierto DOISearch in Google Scholar

Mayda, A. M. and Rodrik, D. 2005. “Why Are Some People (And Countries) More Protectionist Than Others?”, European Economic Review 49 (6): 1393–1430, doi: 10.3386/w8461. Abierto DOISearch in Google Scholar

Meissner, K. 2016. “Democratising EU External Relations: The European Parliament’s Informal Role in the SWIFT, ACTA, and TTIP Negotiations.” In: European Foreign Affairs Review, vol. 21(2): 269–288. Search in Google Scholar

Meissner, K. and Rosen, G. 2021. “Exploring Interaction between National Parliaments and the European Parliament in EU Trade Policy” In: Diane Fromage and Anna Herranz-Surrallés (eds.): Executive-Legislative (Im)Balance in the European Union. Hart Publishing, 195–208. (with Guri Rosén)10.5040/9781509930036.ch-011 Search in Google Scholar

Meunier, S. and Czesana, R. 2019. “From back rooms to the street? A research agenda for explaining variation in the public salience of trade policy-making in Europe.” Journal of European Public Policy 26 (12): 1847–1865, DOI:10.1080/13501763.2019.1678058. Abierto DOISearch in Google Scholar

Milner, H. V. and Judkins, B. 2004. “Partisanship, Trade Policy, and Globalization: Is There a Left-Right Divide on Trade Policy?” International Studies Quarterly, 48 (1): 95–119. Search in Google Scholar

O’Rourke, K. H., and Sinnott, R. 2001. The determinants of individual trade policy preferences: International survey evidence. Brookings Trade Forum.10.1353/btf.2001.0011 Search in Google Scholar

Evgeny Postnikov, E. 2020. “Normative power meets realism: EU trade policy scholarship at the turn of the decade”, Journal of European Integration, 42(:6):, 889–895, DOI: 10.1080/07036337.2020.1809774. Abierto DOISearch in Google Scholar

Puntscher Riekmann, S. 2017. “The Struggle for and against Globalisation: International Trade Agreements and the Democratic Question.” In Mega-Regional Trade Agreements: CETA, TTIP, and TiSA. New Orientations for EU External Economic Relations, edited S. Griller, W. Obwexer and E. Vranes. 2017. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Rho, S. and Tomz, M. 2017. “Why don’t trade preferences reflect economic self-interest?” International Organisation 71 (SI): 85–108.10.1017/S0020818316000394 Search in Google Scholar

Ricardo, D. 1817. On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. 1st ed., London: John Murray. Search in Google Scholar

Rodrik, D. 2018. “Populism and the economics of globalization.” Journal of International Business Policy 1 (1–2): 12–33.10.1057/s42214-018-0001-4 Search in Google Scholar

Roederer-Rynning, C. and Kallestrup, M. 2017. “National parliaments and the new contentiousness of trade.” Journal of European Integration, 39 (7): 811–825, DOI: 10.1080/07036337.2017.1371710. Abierto DOISearch in Google Scholar

Rogowski, R. 1989. Commerce and Coalitions: How Trade Affects Domestic Political Alignments. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9780691219431 Search in Google Scholar

Rose, R. 2014. “Responsible Party Government in a World of Interdependence.” West European Politics 37 (2): 253–69. doi:10.1080/01402382.2014.887874. Abierto DOISearch in Google Scholar

Rosen, G. 2019. “Proving Their Worth? The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership and the Members of the European Parliament” Politics and Governance 7 (3):266–278.10.17645/pag.v7i3.2225 Search in Google Scholar

Siles-Brügge, G. 2017. “Transatlantic investor protection as a threat to democracy: the potency and limits of an emotive frame.” Cambridge Review of International Aff airs 30 (5–6): 464–488, DOI: 10.1080/09557571.2018.1461805. Abierto DOISearch in Google Scholar

Sojka, A., Díaz-Lanchas, J. and Steinberg, J. F. 2019. “The Politicization of Transatlantic Trade in Europe: Explaining Inconsistent Preferences regarding free trade and the TTIP.” LSE ‘Europe in Question” Discussion Paper Series.10.2139/ssrn.3530953 Search in Google Scholar

Stolper W. F. and Samuelson P. A. 1941. “Protection and Real Wages.” The Review of Economic Studies 9 (1): 58–73. DOI: 10.2307/2967638. Abierto DOISearch in Google Scholar

Swank, D. 2002. Global Capital, Political Institutions, and Policy Change in Developed Welfare States. Cambridge and NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511613371 Search in Google Scholar

Volkens, A. et al. 2017b. The Manifesto Project Dataset — Codebook. Manifesto Project (MRG / CMP / MARPOR), Version 2017b, Berlin: WZB. Search in Google Scholar

Volkens, A.et al. 2017°. The Manifesto Data Collection. Manifesto Project (MRG / CMP / MARPOR), Version 2017b, Berlin: WZB, DOI: 10.25522/manifesto.mpds.2017b. Abierto DOISearch in Google Scholar

Young, A. R. 2017. “European trade policy in interesting times.” Journal of European Integration 39(7): 909–923, DOI: 10.1080/07036337.2017.1371705. Young, A. R. 2019. “Two wrongs make a right? The politicization of trade policy and European trade strategy.” Journal of European Public Policy 26 (12): 1883–1899, DOI:10.1080/13501763.2019.1678055. Abierto DOISearch in Google Scholar

Zürn, M. 2004. “Global Governance and Legitimacy Problems.” Government and Opposition 39 (2): 260–87, DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00123.x. Abierto DOISearch in Google Scholar

Artículos recomendados de Trend MD

Planifique su conferencia remota con Sciendo