Use of the AHP Method for Preference Determination in Yacht Design

1 G. Di Bucchianico and A. Vallicelli, “User-centered approach for sailing yacht design,” in Human Factors and Ergonomics in Consumer Product Design, vol. 2, W. Karwowski, M. Soares, and N. Stanton, Eds., 2011, pp. 445–463. Search in Google Scholar

2 S. Tavakoli, D. Khojasteh, M. Haghani, and S. Hirdaris, “A review on the progress and research directions of ocean engineering,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 272, p. 113617, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j. oceaneng.2023.113617. Search in Google Scholar

3 T. Song, T. Tan, and G. Han, „Research on preventive maintenance strategies and systems for in-service ship equipment,” Polish Maritime Research, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 85–96, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.2478/pomr-2022-0009. Search in Google Scholar

4 A. Mancuso, A. Saporito, and D. Tumino, “Parametric hull design with rational Bézier curves,” in Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH, 2021, pp. 221–227 doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-70566-4_36. Search in Google Scholar

5 S. Khan, E. Gunpinar, K. M. Dogan, B. Sener, and P. Kaklis, “ModiYacht: Intelligent CAD tool for parametric, generative, attributive and interactive modelling of yacht hull forms,” in SNAME 14th International Marine Design Conference, IMDC 2022, Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, 2022, doi: 10.5957/IMDC-2022-311. Search in Google Scholar

6 J. R. Binns and P. A. Brandner, “Dynamic interaction of breaking waves and inverted sailing yachts: Explaining the efficacy of mast height retention relative to vertical centre of gravity,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 35, no. 17–18, pp. 1759–1768, Dec. 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2008.08.013. Search in Google Scholar

7 G. Guelfi and E. Canepa, “New development in 6-DOF algorithms for sailing yacht velocity prediction program and new insight in appendages force modelling,” Master’s Degree in Nautical Engineering, 2013. Search in Google Scholar

8 C. A. Marchaj, Aero-Hydrodynamics of Sailing. Adlard Coles Nautical, 2000. Search in Google Scholar

9 B. Augier, P. Bot, F. Hauville, and M. Durand, “Dynamic behaviour of a flexible yacht sail plan,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 66, pp. 32–43, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2013.03.017. Search in Google Scholar

10 T. Matulja, L. Jedretić, and M. Hadjina, “Influence analysis of deck equipment positioning on performances in sailing,” pp. 101–109. Search in Google Scholar

11 C. M. Rizzo and D. Boote, “Scantling of mast and rigging of sail boats: A few hints from a test case to develop improved design procedures,” 2010. Search in Google Scholar

12 M. Pawłusik, R. Szłapczyński, and A. Karczewski, “Optimising rig design for sailing yachts with evolutionary multi-objective algorithm,” Polish Maritime Research, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 36–49, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.2478/pomr-2020-0064. Search in Google Scholar

13 W. Karwowski, M. M. Soares, and N. A. Stanton, “Human factors and ergonomics in consumer product design uses and applications,” CRC Press. 2011. Search in Google Scholar

14 N. Kalkan, “Human factors and ergonomic considerations for super-fast boat design,” 2015. [Online]. Available: http://mybroadband.co.za/photos/showfull. Search in Google Scholar

15 S. Ö. Felek, “Parametric sailing yacht exterior and interior design,” 2020, doi: 10.14744/tasarimkuram.2019.30085. Search in Google Scholar

16 D. Harris, S. Mccartan, B. Verheijden, H. Groningen, and M. Lundh, “European Boat Design Innovation Group: The marine design manifesto. Human factors in safety management systems view project next generation civil flight deck concepts view project,” 2014. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280065046. Search in Google Scholar

17 M. Bilski, “Selected Human Factors in Marina Design,” Procedia Manuf., vol. 3, pp. 1646–1653, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j. promfg.2015.07.482. Search in Google Scholar

18 T. Bosma, “A human factor’s approach to mega yacht concept design,” Master of Philosophy, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, 2013. Search in Google Scholar

19 R. Gill, “Approaches to design,” Des. Stud., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 141–145, Jan. 1980, doi: 10.1016/0142-694X(80)90020-4. Search in Google Scholar

20 P. von Buelow, ‘Using Evolutionary algorithms to aid designer of architectural structures,” in Creative Evolutionary Systems, Elsevier, 2002, pp. 315–336. doi: 10.1016/ B978-155860673-9/50050-1. Search in Google Scholar

21 L. Larson, R. E. Eliasson, and M. Orych, Podstawy Projektowania Jachtów, 4th ed., vol. 1. Warszawa: Almapress, 2014. Search in Google Scholar

22 B. Branowski, M. Zabłocki, P. Kurczewski, and A. Walczak, „Selected issues in universal design of yachts for people with disabilities,” Polish Maritime Research, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 4–15, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.2478/pomr-2021-0030. Search in Google Scholar

23 E. Miszewska, M. Niedostatkiewicz, and R. Wisniewski, “The selection of anchoring system for floating houses by means of AHP method,” Buildings, vol. 10, no. 4, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.3390/BUILDINGS10040075. Search in Google Scholar

24 M. Naujok, Boat Interior Construction: A Bestselling Guide to DIY Interior Boatbuilding, 2nd ed., vol. 1. Adlard Coles Nautical, 2002. Search in Google Scholar

25 T. L. Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation (Decision Making Series), vol. 1. McGraw-Hill, 1980. Search in Google Scholar

26 W. C. H. Beck, A. Prusak, and P. Stefanów, “Budowa i analiza modeli decyzyjnych krok po kroku AHP-analityczny proces hierarchiczny,” 2014. Search in Google Scholar

27 G. Khatwani and A. K. Kar, “Improving the cosine consistency index for the analytic hierarchy process for solving multi-criteria decision making problems,” Applied Computing and Informatics, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 118–129, Jul. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.aci.2016.05.001. Search in Google Scholar

28 A. Jozaghi et al., “A comparative study of the AHP and TOPSIS techniques for dam site selection using GIS: A case study of Sistan and Baluchestan Province, Iran,” Geosciences (Switzerland), vol. 8, no. 12, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.3390/ geosciences8120494. Search in Google Scholar

29 F. de Felice and A. Petrillo, “Absolute measurement with analytic hierarchy process: A case study for Italian racecourse,” International Journal of Applied Decision Sciences, vol. 6, no. 3, p. 209, 2013, doi: 10.1504/IJADS.2013.054931. Search in Google Scholar

30 F. de Felice and A. Petrillo, “Multicriteria approach for process modelling in strategic environmental management planning,” International Journal of Simulation and Process Modelling, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 6, 2013, doi: 10.1504/IJSPM.2013.055190. Search in Google Scholar

31 J. Benítez, X. Delgado-Galván, J. Izquierdo, and R. Pérez-García, “Improving consistency in AHP decision-making processes,” Appl. Math. Comput., vol. 219, no. 5, pp. 2432–2441, Nov. 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2012.08.079. Search in Google Scholar

32 J. Krejčí and J. Stoklasa, “Aggregation in the analytic hierarchy process: Why weighted geometric mean should be used instead of weighted arithmetic mean,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 114, pp. 97–106, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2018.06.060. Search in Google Scholar