[
1. R. Goonesekere and Y. Guo, “Unmanned Underwater Drone Design for Ocean Exploration,” in ASME 2018 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, 2018.10.1115/IMECE2018-87649
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. L. Mayer, M. Jakobsson, G. Allen, B. Dorschel, R. Falconer, V. Ferrini, et al., “The Nippon Foundation—GEBCO seabed 2030 project: The quest to see the world’s oceans completely mapped by 2030,” Geosciences, vol. 8, p. 63, 2018.10.3390/geosciences8020063
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. S. Marini, N. Gjeci, S. Govindaraj, A. But, B. Sportich, E. Ottaviani, et al., “ENDURUNS: An Integrated and Flexible Approach for Seabed Survey Through Autonomous Mobile Vehicles,” Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, vol. 8, p. 633, 2020.10.3390/jmse8090633
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. R. Veugelers, M. Cincera, R. Frietsch, C. Rammer, T. Schubert, A. Pelle, et al., “The impact of horizon 2020 on innovation in Europe,” Intereconomics, vol. 50, pp. 4-30, 2015.10.1007/s10272-015-0521-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. I. Segovia, A. Pliego, M. Papaelias, and F. P. G. Márquez, “Optimal Management of Marine Inspection with Autonomous Underwater Vehicles,” in International Conference on Management Science and Engineering Management, 2019, pp. 760-771.10.1007/978-3-030-21248-3_57
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. R. Danovaro, J. Aguzzi, E. Fanelli, D. Billett, K. Gjerde, A. Jamieson, et al., “An ecosystem-based deep-ocean strategy,” Science, vol. 355, pp. 452-454, 2017.10.1126/science.aah717828154032
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. S. Sokolov, A. Zhilenkov, A. Nyrkov, and S. Chernyi, “The use robotics for underwater research complex objects,” in Computational intelligence in data mining, ed: Springer, 2017, pp. 421-427.10.1007/978-981-10-3874-7_39
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. R. Danovaro, C. Corinaldesi, A. Dell’Anno, and P. V. Snelgrove, “The deep-sea under global change,” Current Biology, vol. 27, pp. R461-R465, 2017.10.1016/j.cub.2017.02.04628586679
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. A. Aguzzi, “’Broken access’ publishing corrodes quality,” Nature, vol. 570, pp. 139-140, 2019.10.1038/d41586-019-01787-231190018
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. J. Aguzzi, D. Chatzievangelou, S. Marini, E. Fanelli, R. Danovaro, S. Flögel, et al., “New high-tech flexible networks for the monitoring of deep-sea ecosystems,” Environmental science & technology, vol. 53, pp. 6616-6631, 2019.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. M. Rovere, A. Mercorella, E. Frapiccini, V. Funari, F. Spagnoli, C. Pellegrini, et al., “Geochemical and geophysical monitoring of hydrocarbon seepage in the Adriatic Sea,” Sensors, vol. 20, p. 1504, 2020.10.3390/s20051504708559732182919
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. U. Neettiyath, B. Thornton, M. Sangekar, Y. Nishida, K. Ishii, A. Bodenmann, et al., “Deep-Sea Robotic Survey and Data Processing Methods for Regional-Scale Estimation of Manganese Crust Distribution,” IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, vol. 46, pp. 102-114, 2020.10.1109/JOE.2020.2978967
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. M. Esposito, M. Martinez-Cabanas, D. P. Connelly, D. Jasinski, P. Linke, M. Schmidt, et al., “Water column baseline assessment for offshore Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage (CCS) sites: Analysis of field data from the Goldeneye storage complex area,” International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, vol. 109, p. 103344, 2021.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. GEBCO, “General Bathymetric Chart of Oceans,” Available online: https://www.gebco.net/ (accessed on June 2021). 2021.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. IHO, “International Hydrographic Organization.,” Available online: https://iho.int/ (Accessed on June 2021), 2021.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. IOC, “Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission.,” Available online: http://www.ioc-unesco.org/ (Accessed June 2021), 2021.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. R. B. Wynn, V. A. Huvenne, T. P. Le Bas, B. J. Murton, D. P. Connelly, B. J. Bett, et al., “Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUVs): Their past, present and future contributions to the advancement of marine geoscience,” Marine Geology, vol. 352, pp. 451-468, 2014.10.1016/j.margeo.2014.03.012
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. W. Shi, J. Cao, Q. Zhang, Y. Li, and L. Xu, “Edge computing: Vision and challenges,” IEEE internet of things journal, vol. 3, pp. 637-646, 2016.10.1109/JIOT.2016.2579198
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. M. Jahanbakht, W. Xiang, L. Hanzo, and M. R. Azghadi, “Internet of underwater Things and big marine data analytics—A comprehensive survey,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 2021.10.1109/COMST.2021.3053118
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. B. Shi, Y. Su, D. Zhang, C. Wang, and M. S. AbouOmar, “Research on Trajectory Reconstruction Method Using Automatic Identification System Data for Unmanned Surface Vessel,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 170374-170384, 2019.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. R. Al-Zaidi, J. Woods, M. Al-Khalidi, and H. Hu, “An iot-enabled system for marine data acquisition and cartography,” Transactions on networks and Communications, vol. 5, 2017.10.14738/tnc.51.2796
]Search in Google Scholar
[
22. R. Al-Zaidi, J. C. Woods, M. Al-Khalidi, and H. Hu, “Building Novel VHF-Based Wireless Sensor Networks for the Internet of Marine Things,” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 18, pp. 2131-2144, 2018.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
23. R. M. Alkan, M. H. Saka, İ. M. Ozulu, and V. İlçi, “Kinematic precise point positioning using GPS and GLONASS measurements in marine environments,” Measurement, vol. 109, pp. 36-43, 2017.10.1016/j.measurement.2017.05.054
]Search in Google Scholar
[
24. T. Liu, Y. Yuan, B. Zhang, N. Wang, B. Tan, and Y. Chen, “Multi-GNSS precise point positioning (MGPPP) using raw observations,” Journal of geodesy, vol. 91, pp. 253-268, 2017.10.1007/s00190-016-0960-3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
25. J. Tegedor, O. Ørpen, T. Melgård, D. Łapucha, and H. Visser, “G4 Multi-constellation Precise Point Positioning service for high accuracy offshore navigation,” TransNav: International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, vol. 11, 2017.10.12716/1001.11.03.05
]Search in Google Scholar
[
26. N. Goyal, M. Dave, and A. K. Verma, “Protocol stack of underwater wireless sensor network: classical approaches and new trends,” Wireless Personal Communications, vol. 104, pp. 995-1022, 2019.10.1007/s11277-018-6064-z
]Search in Google Scholar
[
27. A. Song, M. Stojanovic, and M. Chitre, “Editorial underwater acoustic communications: Where we stand and what is next?,” IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, vol. 44, pp. 1-6, 2019.10.1109/JOE.2018.2883872
]Search in Google Scholar
[
28. K. F. Haque, K. H. Kabir, and A. Abdelgawad, “Advancement of Routing Protocols and Applications of Underwater Wireless Sensor Network (UWSN)—A Survey,” Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks, vol. 9, p. 19, 2020.10.3390/jsan9020019
]Search in Google Scholar
[
29. N. Zhang, “Architecture Research and Design of the IoT Middleware for Marine Logistics,” Journal of Coastal Research, vol. 94, pp. 196-199, 2019.10.2112/SI94-041.1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
30. F. P. G. Márquez, I. P. G. Pardo, and M. R. M. Nieto, “Competitiveness based on logistic management: a real case study,” Annals of Operations Research, vol. 233, pp. 157-169, 2015.10.1007/s10479-013-1508-z
]Search in Google Scholar
[
31. M.-H. Jeon, Y.-J. Jo, S.-H. Kim, and C.-H. Oh, “Design of GPS based LPWA module for marine IoT applications,” presented at the INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUTURE INFORMATION & COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING, 2018.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
32. J. Aguzzi, D. Chatzievangelou, S. Marini, E. Fanelli, R. Danovaro, S. Flögel, et al., “New High-Tech Flexible Networks for the Monitoring of Deep-Sea Ecosystems,” Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 53, pp. 6616-6631, 2019/06/18 2019.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
33. J. Aguzzi, D. Chatzievangelou, M. Francescangeli, S. Marini, F. Bonofiglio, J. del Rio, et al., “The hierarchic treatment of marine ecological information from spatial networks of benthic platforms,” Sensors, vol. 20, p. 1751, 2020.10.3390/s20061751714636632245204
]Search in Google Scholar
[
34. Y. Wu, X. Ta, R. Xiao, Y. Wei, D. An, and D. Li, “Survey of underwater robot positioning navigation,” Applied Ocean Research, vol. 90, p. 101845, 2019.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
35. C. A. Medina, M. R. Pérez, and L. C. Trujillo, “IoT Paradigm into the Smart City Vision: A Survey,” in 2017 IEEE International Conference on Internet of Things (iThings) and IEEE Green Computing and Communications (GreenCom) and IEEE Cyber, Physical and Social Computing (CPSCom) and IEEE Smart Data (SmartData), 2017, pp. 695-704.10.1109/iThings-GreenCom-CPSCom-SmartData.2017.109
]Search in Google Scholar
[
36. B. Xiao, R. Rahmani, L. Yuhong, D. Gillblad, and T. Kanter, “Intelligent data-intensive IoT: A survey,” in 2016 2nd IEEE International Conference on Computer and Communications (ICCC), 2016, pp. 2362-2368.10.1109/CompComm.2016.7925122
]Search in Google Scholar
[
37. C. I. Noshi, A. I. Assem, and J. J. Schubert, “The Role of Big Data Analytics in Exploration and Production: A Review of Benefits and Applications,” in SPE International Heavy Oil Conference and Exhibition, 2018.10.2118/193776-MS
]Search in Google Scholar
[
38. L. Guidi, A. Fernàndez-Guerra, C. Canchaya, E. Curry, F. Foglini, J.-O. Irisson, et al., “Big data in marine science,” Marine Board Future Science Brief, 2020.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
39. R. Kumar, S. P. Singh, and K. Lamba, “Sustainable robust layout using Big Data approach: A key towards industry
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4.0,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 204, pp. 643-659, 2018/12/10/ 2018.10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.327
]Search in Google Scholar
[
40. C. Fraunhofer, “Maritime unmanned navigation through intelligence in networks,” Fraunhofer CML: Hamburg, Germany, 2016.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
41. P. J. B. Sánchez, M. Papaelias, and F. P. G. Márquez, “Autonomous underwater vehicles: Instrumentation and measurements,” IEEE Instrumentation & Measurement Magazine, vol. 23, pp. 105-114, 2020.10.1109/MIM.2020.9062680
]Search in Google Scholar
[
42. Y. Li, T. Ma, R. Wang, P. Chen, and Q. Zhang, “Terrain Correlation Correction Method for AUV Seabed Terrain Mapping,” Journal of Navigation, vol. 70, pp. 1062-1078, 2017.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
43. S. Jiang, “Marine internet for internetworking in oceans: A tutorial,” Future Internet, vol. 11, p. 146, 2019.10.3390/fi11070146
]Search in Google Scholar
[
44. M. J. P. Saiz, “Study and development of a Submarine Optical Communication: TCP Protocol,” 2018.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
45. E. D. Wardihani, E. Purbawati, and E. Supriyanto, “Analysis of multi-source effect in underwater communication,” in 2017 IEEE International Conference on Communication, Networks and Satellite (Comnetsat), 2017, pp. 67-73.10.1109/COMNETSAT.2017.8263575
]Search in Google Scholar
[
46. A. Khoiro, I. Arifin, M. Pratama, and M. F. Adianto, “Design and Development Graphical User Interface on Inertial Navigation System of Submarine,” IPTEK Journal of Proceedings Series, pp. 62-67, 2019.10.12962/j23546026.y2019i3.5844
]Search in Google Scholar
[
47. S. S and B. Maram, “Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks,” 2018, vol. 2, p. 3, 2018-01-05 2018.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
48. V. Khajuria and M. Kaur, “Underwater Wireless Sensor Network: Architecture, Applications and Challenges,” in 2018 2nd International Conference on Trends in Electronics and Informatics (ICOEI), 2018, pp. 939-944.10.1109/ICOEI.2018.8553903
]Search in Google Scholar
[
49. B. Zerr, L. Jaulin, V. Creuze, N. Debese, I. Quidu, B. Clement, et al., Quantitative Monitoring of the Underwater Environment vol. 6: Springer, 2016.10.1007/978-3-319-32107-3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
50. S. Jiang, F. Liu, and S. Jiang, “Distance-alignment based adaptive MAC protocol for underwater acoustic networks,” in 2016 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, 2016, pp. 1-6.10.1109/WCNC.2016.7564843
]Search in Google Scholar
[
51. J. Goh, A. Shaw, and A. Al-Shamma’a, “Underwater wireless communication system,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2009, p. 012029.10.1088/1742-6596/178/1/012029
]Search in Google Scholar
[
52. G. Mazurek, “Basic channel parameters of ultrasound transmission in air,” in 2018 22nd International Microwave and Radar Conference (MIKON), 2018, pp. 607-609.10.23919/MIKON.2018.8405300
]Search in Google Scholar
[
53. E. Demirors, D. Unal, G. E. Santagati, and T. Melodia, “High-Data Rate Carrierless Impulsive Communications For Underwater Acoustic Networks,” in Underwater Acoustics Conference and Exhibition, 2019.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
54. A. Krivchenkov and A. Skrunds, “Measurements of the Parameters of a Broadband Satellite Data Channel in the SEVSAT Ship System,” Cham, 2019, pp. 440-449.10.1007/978-3-030-12450-2_41
]Search in Google Scholar
[
55. I. I. Lysogor, L. S. Voskov, and S. G. Efremov, “Survey of data exchange formats for heterogeneous LPWAN-satellite IoT networks,” in 2018 Moscow Workshop on Electronic and Networking Technologies (MWENT), 2018, pp. 1-5.10.1109/MWENT.2018.8337257
]Search in Google Scholar
[
56. S. N. Rao, D. Raj, V. Parthasarathy, S. Aiswarya, M. V. Ramesh, and V. Rangan, “A novel solution for high speed internet over the oceans,” in IEEE INFOCOM 2018 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS), 2018, pp. 906-912.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
57. K. Korcz, “19. Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow of the GMDSS,” International Recent Issues about ECDIS, e-Navigation and Safety at Sea: Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, p. 149, 2017.10.1201/b11342-25
]Search in Google Scholar
[
58. B. Bellalta, “IEEE 802.11ax: High-efficiency WLANS,” IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 23, pp. 38-46, 2016.10.1109/MWC.2016.7422404
]Search in Google Scholar
[
59. J. Ge, T. Li, and T. Geng, “The Wireless Communications for Unmanned Surface Vehicle: An Overview,” Cham, 2018, pp. 113-119.10.1007/978-3-319-97586-3_10
]Search in Google Scholar
[
60. J. Kim, S. Koo, and G. Lee, “Comparison of Speed by Type of Wireless LAN,” in Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Information and Commucation Sciences Conference, 2018, pp. 19-20.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
61. S. Park, J. Kim, S. Yun, and J. Choi, “SIGNAL TRANSMISSION/RECEPTION METHOD IN WIRELESS LAN SYSTEM, AND DEVICE THEREFOR,” ed: US Patent App. 16/461,351, 2020.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
62. K. Korcz, “Maritime radio information systems,” Journal of KONES, vol. 24, 2017.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
63. S. Mun, J. Son, W. Jo, and W. Lee, “An implementation of AIS-based ad hoc routing (AAR) protocol for maritime data communication networks,” in 2012 8th International Conference on Natural Computation, 2012, pp. 1007-1010.10.1109/ICNC.2012.6234623
]Search in Google Scholar
[
64. F. Lázaro, R. Raulefs, W. Wang, F. Clazzer, and S. Plass, “VHF Data Exchange System (VDES): an enabling technology for maritime communications,” CEAS space Journal, vol. 11, pp. 55-63, 2019.10.1007/s12567-018-0214-8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
65. I. Recommendation, “2092-0, Technical characteristics for a VHF data exchange system in the VHF maritime mobile band,” International Telecommunication Union, Geneva, 2015.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
66. P. H. Putman, “Display Interfacing 2018: Getting Around the UHD Speed Bump,” SMPTE Motion Imaging Journal, vol. 127, pp. 51-55, 2018.10.5594/JMI.2018.2838798
]Search in Google Scholar
[
67. D. Anderson and J. Trodden, USB 3.0 Technology: MindShare Press, 2013.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
68. A. Sadat, M. Campbell, H. Ali, and Z. Lin, “Alternate Mode for USB Type-C™: Going beyond USB,” Texas Instruments, 2016.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
69. A. Li, “USB Type-C for Machine Vision,” Quality, pp. 16VS-17VS, 2018.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
70. J. C. R. Guerrero, I. B. Mabrouk, M. Alhassan, M. Nedil, and T. Ciamulski, “On the Path Loss Model for 5-GHz Microwave-Based Pinless Subsea Connectors,” Progress In Electromagnetics Research, vol. 82, pp. 147-153, 2019.10.2528/PIERL18102705
]Search in Google Scholar
[
71. WiSub. (2018, 13/09/2020). High Performance Pinless Subsea Connector. Available: https://wisub.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/wisub_maelstrom_product_data_sheet_rD_web.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
72. R. A. Atmoko, D. Yang, M. Y. Alfiani, and L. Subiyanto, “Controlling Unmanned Surface Vehicle Using MQTT Protocol,” Journal Of Computer Networks, Architecture and High Performance Computing, vol. 1, pp. 21-28, 2019.10.47709/cnapc.v1i2.229
]Search in Google Scholar
[
73. A. L. Christensen, S. Oliveira, O. Postolache, M. J. o. De Oliveira, S. Sargento, P. Santana, et al., “Design of Communication and Control for Swarms of Aquatic Surface Drones,” in ICAART (2), 2015, pp. 548-555.10.5220/0005281705480555
]Search in Google Scholar
[
74. G. B. Laleci, G. Aluc, A. Dogac, A. Sinaci, O. Kilic, and F. Tuncer, “A semantic backend for content management systems,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 23, pp. 832-843, 2010/12/01/ 2010.10.1016/j.knosys.2010.05.008
]Search in Google Scholar
[
75. M. Kaluža, M. Kalanj, and B. Vukelić, “A Comparison of Back-end Frameworks for Web Application Development,” Zbornik Veleučilišta u Rijeci, vol. 7, pp. 317-332, 2019.10.31784/zvr.7.1.10
]Search in Google Scholar
[
76. Y. Carreno, È. Pairet, Y. Petillot, and R. P. Petrick, “Task Allocation Strategy for Heterogeneous Robot Teams in Offshore Missions,” in Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, 2020, pp. 222-230.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
77. F. Thompson and D. Guihen, “Review of mission planning for autonomous marine vehicle fleets,” Journal of Field Robotics, vol. 36, pp. 333-354, 2019.10.1002/rob.21819
]Search in Google Scholar
[
78. Z. Raja Jawwad, M. Chakkol, M. Johnson, and A. Beltagui, “Organizing for servitization: examining front- and back-end design configurations,” International Journal of Operations & Production Management, vol. 38, pp. 249-271, 2018.10.1108/IJOPM-03-2016-0139
]Search in Google Scholar
[
79. H. Hastie, X. Liu, and P. Patron, “A demonstration of multimodal debrief generation for AUVs, post-mission and in-mission,” presented at the Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction, Tokyo, Japan, 2016.10.1145/2993148.2998525
]Search in Google Scholar
[
80. H. Hastie, X. Liu, Y. Petillot, and P. Patron, “Talking autonomous vehicles: Automatic AUV mission analysis in natural language,” in OCEANS 2017 - Aberdeen, 2017, pp. 1-5.10.1109/OCEANSE.2017.8084617
]Search in Google Scholar
[
81. H. Poranen, G. Marafioti, G. Johansen, and E. Sæter, “User Interface Design Guidelines for Marine Autonomous Operations Involving a Large Number of Actors, Devices and Sensors,” in ASME 2018 37th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, 2018.10.1115/OMAE2018-78774
]Search in Google Scholar
[
82. N. K. Yilmaz, C. Evangelinos, P. F. Lermusiaux, and N. M. Patrikalakis, “Path planning of autonomous underwater vehicles for adaptive sampling using mixed integer linear programming,” IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, vol. 33, pp. 522-537, 2008.10.1109/JOE.2008.2002105
]Search in Google Scholar
[
83. K. Zhang, J. Du, J. Wang, C. Jiang, Y. Ren, and A. Benslimane, “Distributed hierarchical information acquisition systems based on auv enabled sensor networks,” in ICC 2019-2019 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), 2019, pp. 1-6.10.1109/ICC.2019.8761790
]Search in Google Scholar
[
84. C. Yu, X. Xiang, F. Maurelli, Q. Zhang, R. Zhao, and G. Xu, “Onboard system of hybrid underwater robotic vehicles: Integrated software architecture and control algorithm,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 187, p. 106121, 2019/09/01/ 2019.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
85. A. Atyabi, S. MahmoudZadeh, and S. Nefti-Meziani, “Current advancements on autonomous mission planning and management systems: An AUV and UAV perspective,” Annual Reviews in Control, vol. 46, pp. 196-215, 2018/01/01/ 2018.10.1016/j.arcontrol.2018.07.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
86. J.-M. Kwak, S.-H. Kim, and S.-R. Lee, “Design of marine IoT wireless network for building fishing gear monitoring system,” The Journal of Advanced Navigation Technology, vol. 22, pp. 76-83, 2018.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
87. A. Nordrum, “A language for the internet of underwater things [News],” IEEE Spectrum, vol. 54, pp. 9-10, 2017.10.1109/MSPEC.2017.8012224
]Search in Google Scholar
[
88. C. Petrioli, R. Petroccia, D. Spaccini, A. Vitaletti, T. Arzilli, D. Lamanna, et al., “The SUNRISE GATE: Accessing the SUNRISE federation of facilities to test solutions for the Internet of Underwater Things,” in 2014 Underwater Communications and Networking (UComms), 2014, pp. 1-4.10.1109/UComms.2014.7017144
]Search in Google Scholar
[
89. L. S. Dalenogare, G. B. Benitez, N. F. Ayala, and A. G. Frank, “The expected contribution of Industry 4.0 technologies for industrial performance,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 204, pp. 383-394, 2018/10/01/ 2018.10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.08.019
]Search in Google Scholar
[
90. M. Nitti, R. Girau, L. Atzori, and V. Pilloni, “Trustworthiness management in the IoT: The importance of the feedback,” in 2017 20th Conference on Innovations in Clouds, Internet and Networks (ICIN), 2017, pp. 325-327.10.1109/ICIN.2017.7899434
]Search in Google Scholar
[
91. C. Costa, E. Fanelli, S. Marini, R. Danovaro, and J. Aguzzi, “Global Deep-Sea Biodiversity Research Trends Highlighted by Science Mapping Approach,” Frontiers in Marine Science, vol. 7, p. 384, 2020.10.3389/fmars.2020.00384
]Search in Google Scholar
[
92. C. M. Harris, Handbook of acoustical measurements and noise control: McGraw-Hill New York, 1991.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
93. C. J. Deepu, C.-H. Heng, and Y. Lian, “A hybrid data compression scheme for power reduction in wireless sensors for IoT,” IEEE transactions on biomedical circuits and systems, vol. 11, pp. 245-254, 2016.10.1109/TBCAS.2016.259192327845673
]Search in Google Scholar
[
94. S.-W. Jo, J. H. Jang, S. Yu, and W. Shim, “A Validation of Field Test Results for LTE-Maritime,” IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 51, pp. 153-158, 2018/01/01/ 2018.10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.09.485
]Search in Google Scholar
[
95. G. Aloi, G. Caliciuri, G. Fortino, R. Gravina, P. Pace, W. Russo, et al., “A Mobile Multi-Technology Gateway to Enable IoT Interoperability,” in 2016 IEEE First International Conference on Internet-of-Things Design and Implementation (IoTDI), 2016, pp. 259-264.10.1109/IoTDI.2015.29
]Search in Google Scholar
[
96. G. Xu, W. Shen, and X. Wang, “Applications of Wireless Sensor Networks in Marine Environment Monitoring: A Survey,” Sensors, vol. 14, pp. 16932-16954, 2014.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
97. G. Xu, W. Shen, and X. Wang, “Marine environment monitoring using Wireless Sensor Networks: A systematic review,” in 2014 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), 2014, pp. 13-18.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
98. M. Dener and C. Bostancıoğlu, “Smart technologies with wireless sensor networks,” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 195, pp. 1915-1921, 2015.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
99. M. A. Kafi, J. B. Othman, and N. Badache, “A Survey on Reliability Protocols in Wireless Sensor Networks,” ACM Comput. Surv., vol. 50, p. Article 31, 2017.10.1145/3064004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
100. R. Su, D. Zhang, C. Li, Z. Gong, R. Venkatesan, and F. Jiang, “Localization and Data Collection in AUV-Aided Underwater Sensor Networks: Challenges and Opportunities,” IEEE Network, vol. 33, pp. 86-93, 2019.10.1109/MNET.2019.1800425
]Search in Google Scholar
[
101. P. V. Venkateswara Rao, N. Mohan Krishna Varma, and R. Sudhakar, “A Systematic Survey on Software-Defined Networks, Routing Protocols and Security Infrastructure for Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks (UWSNs),” Singapore, 2020, pp. 551-559.10.1007/978-981-15-0135-7_50
]Search in Google Scholar
[
102. P. Tan, H. Wu, P. Li, and H. Xu, “Teaching management system with applications of RFID and IoT technology,” Education Sciences, vol. 8, p. 26, 2018.10.3390/educsci8010026
]Search in Google Scholar
[
103. S. A. Ahson and M. Ilyas, RFID handbook: applications, technology, security, and privacy: CRC press, 2017.10.1201/9781420055009
]Search in Google Scholar
[
104. G. Kara, “ANALYSIS OF METEOROLOGICAL FACTORS AFFECTING ON MARITIME TRANSPORT SYSTEMS,” PROCEEDINGS BOOK, p. 693, 2016.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
105. P. Gupta, J. Batra, J. Sangwan, and A. Khatri, “Marine Monitoring Based on WSN: Application and Challenges,” International Journal of Advanced Studies of Scientific Research, vol. 3, 2018.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
106. A. Khasawneh, M. S. B. A. Latiff, O. Kaiwartya, and H. Chizari, “Next Forwarding Node Selection in Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks (UWSNs): Techniques and Challenges,” Information, vol. 8, p. 3, 2017.10.3390/info8010003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
107. H. I. Moud, A. Shojaei, and I. Flood, “Current and future applications of unmanned surface, underwater, and ground vehicles in construction,” in Proceedings of the Construction Research Congress, 2018, pp. 106-115.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
108. A. E. Pallares-Calvo, B. E. Carvajal-Gámez, and O. O. Gutiérrez-Frías, “Radio beacon for geo-referenced location at sea using mobile devices,” in Emerging Imaging and Sensing Technologies for Security and Defence III; and Unmanned Sensors, Systems, and Countermeasures, 2018, p. 107990X.10.1117/12.2325812
]Search in Google Scholar
[
109. W. Sun, Z. Wei, B. Hong, and Y. Yang, “A Digital Ocean Cloud Platform Architecture Based on IPv6 Smart Gateway,” in 2019 IEEE 4th International Conference on Cloud Computing and Big Data Analysis (ICCCBDA), 2019, pp. 438-442.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
110. Y. Yang, Z. Wei, and B. Hong, “Research on IPv6 Transition Technology for Digital Ocean,” in 2018 IEEE 4th International Conference on Computer and Communications (ICCC), 2018, pp. 317-320.10.1109/CompComm.2018.8780871
]Search in Google Scholar
[
111. G. Xu, Y. Shi, X. Sun, and W. Shen, “Internet of Things in Marine Environment Monitoring: A Review,” Sensors, vol. 19, p. 1711, 2019.10.3390/s19071711647933830974791
]Search in Google Scholar
[
112. B. Kang and H. Choo, “An experimental study of a reliable IoT gateway,” ICT Express, vol. 4, pp. 130-133, 2018/09/01/ 2018.10.1016/j.icte.2017.04.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
113. S. Yoon and J. Kim, “Remote security management server for IoT devices,” in 2017 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC), 2017, pp. 1162-1164.10.1109/ICTC.2017.8190885
]Search in Google Scholar
[
114. M. Burhan, R. A. Rehman, B. Khan, and B.-S. Kim, “IoT elements, layered architectures and security issues: A comprehensive survey,” Sensors, vol. 18, p. 2796, 2018.10.3390/s18092796616545330149582
]Search in Google Scholar
[
115. Z. Yang, W. Xie, L. Huang, and Z. Wei, “Marine data security based on blockchain technology,” IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 322, p. 052028, 2018/03 2018.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
116. A. J. C. Trappey, C. V. Trappey, U. Hareesh Govindarajan, A. C. Chuang, and J. J. Sun, “A review of essential standards and patent landscapes for the Internet of Things: A key enabler for Industry 4.0,” Advanced Engineering Informatics, vol. 33, pp. 208-229, 2017/08/01/ 2017.10.1016/j.aei.2016.11.007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
117. S. Mukherjee, “Collaborative governance strategies for a strategic offshore IT outsourcing engagement,” Journal of Global Operations and Strategic Sourcing, vol. 10, pp. 255-278, 2017.10.1108/JGOSS-11-2016-0037
]Search in Google Scholar
[
118. L. Chen, “Investing in the IOT-Based Deep Learning that Makes a Competitive Difference: An Industrial View,” in 2017 International Conference on Network and Information Systems for Computers (ICNISC), 2017, pp. 205-207.10.1109/ICNISC.2017.00051
]Search in Google Scholar
