[1. C. A. Marchaj, Sailing Theory and Practice. 1964.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. L. Larsson and R. Eliasson, Principles of Yacht Design. 2013.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. N. L. Skene, Elements of yacht design. The Rudder Publishing Company, New York, 1904.]Search in Google Scholar
[4. A. Karczewski and J. Kozak, “Variant designing in the preliminary small ship design process,” Polish Marit. Res., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 77–82, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.1515/pomr-2017-0052.10.1515/pomr-2017-0052]Search in Google Scholar
[5. L. Xiao, J. C. Alves, N. A. Cruz, and J. Jouffroy, “Online speed optimization for sailing yachts using extremum seeking,” 2012, doi: 10.1109/OCEANS.2012.6404876.10.1109/OCEANS.2012.6404876]Search in Google Scholar
[6. S. S. Knudsen, “Sail Shape Optimization with CFD,” pp. 1–118, Aug. 2013, Accessed: Sep. 12, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://findit.dtu.dk/en/catalog/2292741078.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. A. H. Day, “Sail optimisation for maximal speed,” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., vol. 63, no. 1–3, pp. 131–154, Oct. 1996, doi: 10.1016/S0167-6105(96)00073-6.10.1016/S0167-6105(96)00073-6]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Sugimoto, “A method for optimizing sail design,” Sport. Eng., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 35–48, Feb. 1999, doi: 10.1046/j.1460-2687.1999.00017.x.10.1046/j.1460-2687.1999.00017.x]Search in Google Scholar
[9. A. Laveron-Simavilla, V. Lapuerta, S. Franchini, and A. Sanz, “Sail optimization for upwind sailing: application in a Tornado, the Olympic class catamaran.”]Search in Google Scholar
[10. M. Biancolini, M. Sacher, and U. Cella, A CFD-based wing sail optimisation method coupled to a VPP. 2015.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. S. Shankaran and T. Jones, “IMPROVING THE DESIGN OF SAILS USING CFD AND OPTIMIZATION ALGORITHMS,” Jun. 2020.]Search in Google Scholar
[12. A. Zamarin, T. Matulja, and M. Hadjina, “Methodology for Optimal Mast and Standing Rigging Selection of a Racing Yacht Using AHP and FEM,” Brodogradnja, vol. 64, pp. 11–21, Mar. 2013.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. J. Wallace et al., Optimal Rig Design Using Mathematical Programming. 2006.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. S. Malpede and F. Nasato, “A fully integrated sail-rig analysis method,” RINA - Int. Conf. - Innov. High Perform. Sail. Yachts, Pap., pp. 203–210, Jan. 2010.10.3940/rina.innovsail.2010.22]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Polish Register of Shipping, “Rules for the Classification and Construction of Sea-Going Yachts, Part VII - Rig (available only in polish),” 1999. https://www.prs.pl/uploads/jac_c7.pdf (accessed Jul. 01, 2020).]Search in Google Scholar
[16. G. S. Lloyd, “Rules for Classification and Construction I Ship Technology 3 Special Craft 3 Yachts and Boats up to 24 m,” 2003. Accessed: Jul. 29, 2020. [Online]. Available: www.gl-group.com.]Search in Google Scholar
[17. “Rhino 6 for Windows and Mac.” Accessed: Jun. 29, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.rhino3d.com/.]Search in Google Scholar
[18. “Grasshopper - New in Rhino 6.” 2019, Accessed: Jun. 29, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.rhino3d.com/6/new/grasshopper.]Search in Google Scholar
[19. R. Vierlinger, “Multi Objective Design Interface,” vol. 2013, no. April, pp. 1–61, 2013, doi: 10.13140/RG.2.1.3401.0324.]Search in Google Scholar
[20. M. T. M. Emmerich and A. H. Deutz, “A tutorial on multiobjective optimization: fundamentals and evolutionary methods,” Nat. Comput., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 585–609, Sep. 2018, doi: 10.1007/s11047-018-9685-y.10.1007/s11047-018-9685-y610530530174562]Search in Google Scholar
[21. E. Zitzler, M. Laumanns, and L. Thiele, “{SPEA2}: Improving the {S}trength {P}areto {E}volutionary {A} lgorithm,” EUROGEN 2001. Evol. Methods Des. Optim. Control with Appl. to Ind. Probl., pp. 95–100, 2002, doi: 10.1.1.28.7571.]Search in Google Scholar
[22. D. E. Goldberg, Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning. 1989.]Search in Google Scholar
[23. R. Vierlinger and A. Hofmann, A Framework for Flexible Search and Optimization in Parametric Design. 2013.]Search in Google Scholar
[24. S. Bechikh, M. Kessentini, L. Ben Said, and K. Ghédira, “Preference Incorporation in Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization: A Survey of the State-of-the-Art,” Adv. Comput., vol. 98, pp. 141–207, 2015, doi: 10.1016/bs.adcom.2015.03.001.10.1016/bs.adcom.2015.03.001]Search in Google Scholar
[25. K. Deb and H. Jain, “An evolutionary many-objective optimization algorithm using reference-point-based nondominated sorting approach, Part I: Solving problems with box constraints,” IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 577–601, 2014, doi: 10.1109/TEVC.2013.2281535.10.1109/TEVC.2013.2281535]Search in Google Scholar
[26. P. K. Shukla, C. Hirsch, and H. Schmeck, “A Framework for Incorporating Trade-Off Information Using Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms,” in Parallel Problem Solving from Nature, PPSN XI, 2010, pp. 131–140.10.1007/978-3-642-15871-1_14]Search in Google Scholar
[27. J. Szlapczynska and R. Szlapczynski, “Preference-based evolutionary multi-objective optimization in ship weather routing,” Appl. Soft Comput. J., vol. 84, p. 105742, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105742.10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105742]Search in Google Scholar
[28. International Yacht Brokers, “s/y DISCOVERER (Challenge 67’) yacht brochure.” 2019.]Search in Google Scholar
[29. “Navtec Catalog.” https://www.oysterbayboatshop.com/library/nav/index.html#p=4 (accessed Jun. 30, 2020).]Search in Google Scholar
[30. “Continuous vs Discontinuous Standing Rigging.” https://info.upffront.com/blog/continuous-vs-discontinuous-standing-rigging (accessed Nov. 23, 2020).]Search in Google Scholar
[31. J. Kozak and W. Tarełko, “Case study of masts damage of the sail training vessel POGORIA,” Eng. Fail. Anal., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 819–827, Apr. 2011, doi: 10.1016/j. engfailanal.2010.11.016.10.1016/j.engfailanal.2010.11.016]Search in Google Scholar
[32. “SailboatData.com - the worlds largest sailboat database.” https://sailboatdata.com/(accessed Aug. 05, 2020).]Search in Google Scholar
[33. S. Ghelardi, A. Garavaglia, C. M. Rizzo, and M. Paci, “On the rig dock tuning of large sail yachts,” Ocean Eng., vol. 183, pp. 384–397, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.04.080.10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.04.080]Search in Google Scholar
[34. L. Samson and M. Kahsin, “A method to determine the tightening sequence for standing rigging of a mast,” Polish Marit. Res., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 47–55, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.2478/pomr-2019-0065.10.2478/pomr-2019-0065]Search in Google Scholar