[1. Barton A., Volna E.: Control of Autonomous Robot using Neural Networks. Proceedings of the International Conference on Numerical Analysis and Applied Mathematics 2016 (ICNAAM-2016), vol. 1863, Rhodes, Greece 2016.10.1063/1.4992224]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Burdziakowski P., Szulwic J.: A commercial of the shelf components for a unmanned air vehicle photogrammetry, 16th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2016, Albena, Bulgaria, 201610.5593/SGEM2016/B22/S10.095]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Droeschel D., Schwarz M. Behnke S.: Continuous mapping and localization for autonomous navigation in rough terrain using a 3D laser scanner, Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol. 88, pp. 104-115, 2017.10.1016/j.robot.2016.10.017]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Guan R.P., Ristic B., Wang L.P. et al.: Feature-based robot navigation using a Doppler-azimuth radar, International Journal of Control, vol. 90, issue 4, pp. 888-900, 2017.10.1080/00207179.2016.1244727]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Guerrero J.A., Jaud M., Lenain R. et al.: Towards LIDARRADAR based Terrain Mapping, 2015 IEEE International Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts (ARSO), Lyon, France, 2015.10.1109/ARSO.2015.7428208]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Guo W., Wang S., Dun W.: The Design of a Control System for an Unmanned Surface Vehicle, Open Autom. Control Syst. J., vol. 7, pp. 150–156, 2015.10.2174/1874444301507010150]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Hollinger J., Kutscher B. Close B.: Fusion of Lidar and Radar for detection of partially obscured objects. Unmanned Systems Technology XVII, Baltimore, MD, vol. 9468, 2015.10.1117/12.2177050]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Huang L., Chen S., Zhang J. et al.: Real-Time Motion Tracking for Indoor Moving Sphere Objects with a LiDAR Sensor, Sensors, vol. 17, issue 9, 2017.10.3390/s17091932562116428832520]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Jeon H.C., Park Y.B., Park C.G.: Robust Performance of Terrain Referenced Navigation Using Flash Lidar, Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE/Ion Position, Location and Navigation Symposium (PLANS), pp. 970-975, Savannah, GA, 201610.1109/PLANS.2016.7479796]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Jiang Z., Wang J., Song Q.et al.: Off-road obstacle sensing using synthetic aperture radar interferometry, Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, vol. 11, 2017.10.1117/1.JRS.11.016010]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Jo J., Tsunoda Y., Stantic B. et al.: A Likelihood-Based Data Fusion Model for the Integration of Multiple Sensor Data: A Case Study with Vision and Lidar Sensors. Robot Intelligence Technology And Applications 4, vol. 447, pp. 489-500, 2017.10.1007/978-3-319-31293-4_39]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Jooho L., Joohyun W., Nakwan K.: Obstacle Avoidance and Target Search of an Autonomous Surface Vehicle for 2016 Maritime RobotX Challenge. IEEE OES International Symposium on Underwater Technology (UT), Busan, South Korea, 2017.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Kazimierski, W., Stateczny, A.: Fusion of Data from AIS and Tracking Radar for the Needs of ECDIS. Book Group Author(s): IEEE Conference: Signal Processing Symposium (SPS), Jachranka, Poland, 2013.10.1109/SPS.2013.6623592]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Ko B., Choi H.J., Hong C. et al.: Neural Network-based Autonomous Navigation for a Homecare Mobile Robot. 2017 IEEE International Conference On Big Data And Smart Computing (BIGCOMP), pp. 403-406, Jeju, South Korea, 2017.]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Lil J., Bao H., Han X. et al.: Real-time self-driving car navigation and obstacle avoidance using mobile 3D laser scanner and GNSS. Multimedia Tools and Applications, vol. 76, pp. 23017-23039, part B, 2016.10.1007/s11042-016-4211-7]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Lisowski J: Optimization-supported decision-making in the marine game environment. Mechatronic Systems, Mechanics And Materials II, Book Series: Solid State Phenomena, vol. 210, pp. 215-222, 2014.10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.210.215]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Lisowski J: The optimal and safe ship trajectories for different forms of neural state constraints. Mechanics and Materials II, Book Series: Solid State Phenomena, vol.180, pp. 64-69, 2012.10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.180.64]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Mei J.H., Arshad M.R.: COLREGs Based Navigation of Riverine Autonomous Surface Vehicle. IEEE 6TH International Conference on Underwater System Technology, pp.145-149, Malaysia, 2016.10.1109/USYS.2016.7893915]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Mikhail M., Carmack N.: Navigation Software System Development for a Mobile Robot to Avoid Obstacles in a Dynamic Environment using Laser Sensor, SOUTHEASTCON 2017, Charlotte, NC, 2017.10.1109/SECON.2017.7925336]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Praczyk T.: Neural anti-collision system for Autonomous Surface Vehicle, Neurocomputing, vol. 149, pp. 559-572, 2015.10.1016/j.neucom.2014.08.018]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Specht C, Weintrit A., Specht M.: Determination of the territorial sea baseline - Aspect of Using Unmanned Hydrographic Vessels, Transnav-International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, vol. 10, pp. 649-654, 2016.10.12716/1001.10.04.15]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Specht C. Switalski E., Specht M.: Application of an Autonomous /Unmanned Survey Vessel (ASV/USV) in bathymetric measurements, Polish Maritime Research, No. 24, pp.36-44, 2017.10.1515/pomr-2017-0088]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Stateczny A., Gronska D., Motyl W.: Hydrodron - New Step for Professional Hydrography for Restricted Waters, 2018 Baltic Geodetic Congress (BGC Geomatics), pp. 226–230, Olsztyn, Poland, 2018.10.1109/BGC-Geomatics.2018.00049]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Williams G.M.: Optimization of eye-safe avalanche photodiode lidar for automobile safety and autonomous navigation systems, Optical Engineering, vol. 56, issue 3, 2017.10.1117/1.OE.56.3.031224]Search in Google Scholar