Error Mitigation Algorithm Based on Bidirectional Fitting Method for Collision Avoidance of Unmanned Surface Vehicle

1. Li W. F., Ma W. Y., Simulation on Vessel Intelligent CollisionSearch in Google Scholar

Avoidance Based on Artificial Fish Swarm Algorithm. PolishSearch in Google Scholar

Maritime Research, 2016, 23:138-143.10.1515/pomr-2016-0058Search in Google Scholar

2. Campbell S., Naeem W., Irwin G.W., A review on improvingSearch in Google Scholar

the autonomy of unmanned surface vehicles through intelligentSearch in Google Scholar

collision avoidance maneuver. Annual Reviews in Control, 2012, 36(2):267-283.10.1016/j.arcontrol.2012.09.008Search in Google Scholar

3. Larson J., Bruch M., Halterman R., Rogers J., Webster R., Advances in Autonomous Obstacle Avoidance for UnmannedSearch in Google Scholar

Surface Vehicles. Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center, San Diego, CA, 2007.Search in Google Scholar

4. U.S. department Homeland Security/U.S. Coast Guard, “Navigation Rules,” Paradise Cay Publications, 2010.Search in Google Scholar

5. Kim, H., Park, B., Myung, H., Curvature path planningSearch in Google Scholar

with high resolution graph for unmanned surface vehicle.Search in Google Scholar

Robot Intelligence Technology and Applications, 2013, 208:147-154.Search in Google Scholar

6. Riccardo P., Sanjay S., Jian W., Andrew M., Robert S., Obstacle Avoidance Approaches for Autonomous NavigationSearch in Google Scholar

of Unmanned Surface Vehicles. Journal of Navigation, 2017, 71(1): 1-16.Search in Google Scholar

7. Kuwata Y., Wolf M. T., Zarzhitsky D., Huntsberger T. L., Safe maritime autonomous navigation with COLREGS, usingSearch in Google Scholar

velocity obstacles, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 2014, 39(1):110-119.10.1109/JOE.2013.2254214Search in Google Scholar

8. Zhao Y. X., Wang L., Peng Sh., A real-time collision avoidanceSearch in Google Scholar

learning system for Unmanned Surface Vessels. Neurocomputing, 2016, 182:255-266.10.1016/j.neucom.2015.12.028Search in Google Scholar

9. Park J. H., Kim J. W., Son N. S., Passive target tracking of marineSearch in Google Scholar

traffic ships using onboard monocular camera for unmannedSearch in Google Scholar

surface vessel. Ectronics letters, 2015, 51(31):987-989.10.1049/el.2015.1163Search in Google Scholar

10. Wang H., Mou, X. Zh., Mou W., Vision based Long RangeSearch in Google Scholar

Object Detection and Tracking for Unmanned Surface Vehicle.Search in Google Scholar

Proceedings of the 2015 7th IEEE International ConferenceSearch in Google Scholar

on Cybernetics and Intelligent Systems and Robotics, Automation and Mechatronics, Cambodia, 2015:101-105.Search in Google Scholar

11. Lazarowska A., Swarm Intelligence Approach to Safe ShipSearch in Google Scholar

Control. Polish Maritime Research, 2015, 22(4): 34-40.10.1515/pomr-2015-0068Search in Google Scholar

12. Zhong K., Lei X., Li SQ., Wiener filter preprocessing forSearch in Google Scholar

OFDM systems in the presence of both nonstationary andSearch in Google Scholar

stationary phase noises. EURASIP Journal on Advances inSearch in Google Scholar

Signal Processing, 2013(7):1-9.Search in Google Scholar

13. Widrow B., Hoff M., Adaptive switch circuits. IRE Wescom, Convertion Record, Part 4, 1966:96-104.Search in Google Scholar

14. Wang X., Liu J. H., Zhou Q. F., Real-Time Multi-TargetSearch in Google Scholar

Localization from Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. Sensors, 2016, 17(1):33-43.10.3390/s17010033529860628029145Search in Google Scholar

15. Dichev D., Koev H., Bakalova T., An Algorithm for ImprovingSearch in Google Scholar

the Accuracy of Systems Measuring Parameters if MovingSearch in Google Scholar

Objects, Metrology and Measurement Systems, 2016, 23(4):555-565.10.1515/mms-2016-0041Search in Google Scholar

16. Borodachev S. M., Recursive Least Squares Method ofSearch in Google Scholar

Regression Coefficients Estimation as a Special Case of KalmanSearch in Google Scholar

Filter. International Conference on Numerical Analysis andSearch in Google Scholar

Applied Mathematics, Rhodes, 2015:23-29.Search in Google Scholar

17. Singer R. A., Estimating Optimal Tracking Filter PerformanceSearch in Google Scholar

for Manned Maneuvering Targets, IEEE Transaction onSearch in Google Scholar

Aerospace and Electronic Systems, l970, 6(4):473-483.Search in Google Scholar

18. Zhou Zh., Liu J. M., Tan X. J., MCS Model Based on JerkSearch in Google Scholar

Input Estimation and Nonlinear Tracking Algorithm. JournalSearch in Google Scholar

of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2013, 39(10): 1397-1402.Search in Google Scholar

19. Zhu W., Wang W., Yuan G., An Improved Interacting MultipleSearch in Google Scholar

Model Filtering Algorithm Based on the Cubature KalmanSearch in Google Scholar

Filter for Maneuvering Target Tracking. Sensors, 2016, 16(6): 805-815.10.3390/s16060805493423127258285Search in Google Scholar

20. Afshari H. H., Al-Ani D., Habibi S., A New Adaptive ControlSearch in Google Scholar

Scheme Based on the Interacting Multiple Model (IMM)Search in Google Scholar

Estimation. Journal of Mechanical Science & Technology, 2016, 30 (6):2759-2767.10.1007/s12206-016-0237-zSearch in Google Scholar

21. Jin B., Jiu B., Su T., Switched Kalman Filter-InteractingSearch in Google Scholar

Multiple Model Algorithm Based on Optimal AutoregressiveSearch in Google Scholar

Model for Manoeuvring Target Tracking. IET Radar SonarSearch in Google Scholar

and Navigation, 2015, 9(2): 199-209.10.1049/iet-rsn.2014.0142Search in Google Scholar

22. Yousef, M. T., Ali, H. E. I., Habashy, S. M., Adaptive ControllerSearch in Google Scholar

based PSO with Virtual Sensor for Obstacle Avoidance inSearch in Google Scholar

Dynamic Environments, Radio Science Conference, 2014, 228-235.Search in Google Scholar

23. Liu Y. Ch., Bucknall R., Path Planning Algorithm forSearch in Google Scholar

Unmanned Surface Vehicle Formations in a Practical MaritimeSearch in Google Scholar

Environment, Ocean Engineering, 2015, 97:126-144.10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.01.008Search in Google Scholar