Radiological evaluation of mandibular alveolar reconstruction after retained third molar removal procedures using autogenous dentin matrix (ADM)

1 Krausz AA, Machtei EE, Peled M. Effects of lower third molar extraction on attachment level and alveolar bone height of the adjacent second molar. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;34(7):756-760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2005.02.006 Search in Google Scholar

2 Kugelberg CF. Impacted lower third molars and periodontal health. An epidemiological, methodological, retrospective and prospective clinical, study. Swed Dent J Suppl. 1990;68:1-52. Search in Google Scholar

3 Ash MM, Costich ER, Hayward JR. A study of periodontal hazards of third molars. J Periodontol. 1962;33(3):209-219. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1962.33.3.209 Search in Google Scholar

4 Goodsell JF. An overview of the third molar problem. Quintessence Int Dent Dig. 1977;8(10):11-18. Search in Google Scholar

5 Kugelberg CF. Periodontal healing two and four years after impacted lower third molar surgery. A comparative retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1990;19(6):341-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0901-5027(05)80077-3 Search in Google Scholar

6 Coleman M, McCormick A, Laskin DM. The incidence of periodontal defects distal to the maxillary second molar after impacted third molar extraction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;69(2):319-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2010.10.011 Search in Google Scholar

7 Peng KY, Tseng YC, Shen EC, Chiu SC, Fu E, Huang YW. Mandibular second molar periodontal status after third molar extraction. J Periodontol. 2001;72(12):1647-1651. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2001.72.12.1647 Search in Google Scholar

8 Sammartino G, Tia M, Bucci T, Wang HL. Prevention of mandibular third molar extraction-associated periodontal defects: a comparative study. J Periodontol. 2009;80(3):389-396. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2009.080503 Search in Google Scholar

9 Barbato L, Kalemaj Z, Buti J, et al. Effect of Surgical Intervention for Removal of Mandibular Third Molar on Periodontal Healing of Adjacent Mandibular Second Molar: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis. J Periodontol. 2016;87(3):291-302. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2015.150363 Search in Google Scholar

10 Moussa NT, Dym H. Maxillofacial Bone Grafting Materials. Dent Clin North Am. 2020;64(2):473-490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2019.12.011 Search in Google Scholar

11 Hassan KS, Marei HF, Alagl AS. Does grafting of third molar extraction sockets enhance periodontal measures in 30- to 35-year-old patients?. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;70(4):757-764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2011.09.010 Search in Google Scholar

12 Wu D, Zhou L, Lin J, Chen J, Huang W, Chen Y. Immediate implant placement in anterior teeth with grafting material of autogenous tooth bone vs xenogenic bone. BMC Oral Health. 2019;19(1):266. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-019-0970-7 Search in Google Scholar

13 Kumar V, Rattan V, Rai S, Singh SP, Mahajan JK. Comparative Assessment of Autogenous Cancellous Bone Graft and Bovine-Derived Demineralized Bone Matrix for Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting in Patients With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2022;59(7):833-840. https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656211025197 Search in Google Scholar

14 Mahardawi B, Jiaranuchart S, Tompkins KA, Pimkhaokham A. Efficacy of the autogenous dentin graft for implant placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023;52(5):604-612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2022.10.014 Search in Google Scholar

15 Santos A, Botelho J, Machado V, et al. Autogenous Mineralized Dentin versus Xenograft granules in Ridge Preservation for Delayed Implantation in Post-extraction Sites: A Randomized controlled clinical trial with an 18 months follow-up. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021;32(8):905-915. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13765 Search in Google Scholar

16 Li P, Zhu H, Huang D. Autogenous DDM versus Bio-Oss granules in GBR for immediate implantation in periodontal postextraction sites: A prospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018;20(6):923-928. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12667 Search in Google Scholar

17 Del Canto-Díaz A, de Elío-Oliveros J, Del Canto-Díaz M, Alobera-Gracia MA, Del Canto-Pingarrón M, Martínez-González JM. Use of autologous tooth-derived graft material in the post-extraction dental socket. Pilot study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2019;24(1):e53-e60. https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.22536 Search in Google Scholar

18 Sánchez-Labrador L, Martín-Ares M, Ortega-Aranegui R, López-Quiles J, Martínez-González JM. Autogenous Dentin Graft in Bone Defects after Lower Third Molar Extraction: A Split-Mouth Clinical Trial. Materials (Basel). 2020;13(14):3090. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13143090 Search in Google Scholar

19 Leung WK, Theilade E, Comfort MB, Lim PL. Microbiology of the pericoronal pouch in mandibular third molar pericoronitis. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 1993;8(5):306-312. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-302x.1993.tb00579.x Search in Google Scholar

20 Ge J, Yang C, Zheng J, Hu Y. Autogenous bone grafting for treatment of osseous defect after impacted mandibular third molar extraction: A randomized controlled trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017;19(3):572-580. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12466 Search in Google Scholar

21 Dodson TB. Is there a role for reconstructive techniques to prevent periodontal defects after third molar surgery? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;63(7):891-896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2005.03.003 Search in Google Scholar

22 de Oliveira GS, Miziara MN, Silva ER, Ferreira EL, Biulchi AP, Alves JB. Enhanced bone formation during healing process of tooth sockets filled with demineralized human dentine matrix. Aust Dent J. 2013;58(3):326-332. https://doi.org/10.1111/adj.12088 Search in Google Scholar

23 Kim YK, Kim SG, Bae JH, Um IW, Oh JS, Jeong KI. Guided bone regeneration using autogenous tooth bone graft in implant therapy: case series. Implant Dent. 2014;23(2):138-143. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000046 Search in Google Scholar

24 Minetti E, Giacometti E, Gambardella U, et al. Alveolar Socket Preservation with Different Autologous Graft Materials: Preliminary Results of a Multicenter Pilot Study in Human. Materials (Basel). 2020;13(5):1153. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13051153 Search in Google Scholar

25 Kabir MA, Murata M, Kusano K, Akazawa T, Shibata T. Autogenous demineralized dentin graft for third molar socket regeneration - A case report. Dentistry. 2015;5(11). https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-1122.1000343 Search in Google Scholar

26 Wachol K, Morawiec T, Nowak-Wachol A, et al. Comparative analysis of implant prosthesis treatment planning and execution following bone repair procedures using dynamic surgical navigation in augmented areas. Coatings. 2022;12(8):1099. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12081099 Search in Google Scholar

27 Kubaszek B, Morawiec T, Mertas A, et al. Radiological and microbiological evaluation of the efficacy of alveolar bone repair using autogenous dentin matrix—preliminary study. Coatings. 2022;12(7):909. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12070909 Search in Google Scholar

28 Morawiec T, Dziedzic A, Niedzielska I, et al. The biological activity of propolis-containing toothpaste on oral health environment in patients who underwent implant-supported prosthodontic rehabilitation. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013;2013:704947. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/704947 Search in Google Scholar

29 Wiatrak K, Morawiec T, Rój R, et al. Evaluation of Effectiveness of a Toothpaste Containing Tea Tree Oil and Ethanolic Extract of Propolis on the Improvement of Oral Health in Patients Using Removable Partial Dentures. Molecules. 2021;26(13):4071. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26134071 Search in Google Scholar

30 Kim YK, Kim SG, Yun PY, et al. Autogenous teeth used for bone grafting: a comparison with traditional grafting materials. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2014;117(1):e39-e45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2012.04.018 Search in Google Scholar

31 Haugen HJ, Lyngstadaas SP, Rossi F, Perale G. Bone grafts: which is the ideal biomaterial? J Clin Periodontol. 2019;46(Suppl 21):92-102. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13058 Search in Google Scholar