Characterization of a commercial EPID-based in-vivo dosimetry and its feasibility and implementation for treatment verification in Malaysia

1. Hizam ND, Ung NM, Jong WL, et al. Medical physics aspects of intensity-modulated radiotherapy practice in Malaysia. Physica Medica. 2019;67:34-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.10.023 10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.10.02331655398 Search in Google Scholar

2. van der Veen J, Laenen A, Nuyts S. Modern radiotherapy techniques versus three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd012904 10.1002/14651858.CD012904 Search in Google Scholar

3. Das IJ, Moskvin V, Johnstone PA. Analysis of treatment planning time among systems and planners for intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2009;6(7):514-517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2008.12.013 10.1016/j.jacr.2008.12.01319560069 Search in Google Scholar

4. Wolff D, Stieler F, Welzel G, et al. Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) vs. Serial Tomotherapy, step-and-shoot IMRT and 3D-conformal RT for treatment of prostate cancer. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 2009;93(2):226-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2009.08.011 10.1016/j.radonc.2009.08.01119765846 Search in Google Scholar

5. Elith C, Dempsey SE, Findlay N, Warren-Forward HM. An introduction to the intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) techniques, tomotherapy, and VMAT. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences. 2011;42(1):37-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2010.11.005 10.1016/j.jmir.2010.11.00531051797 Search in Google Scholar

6. Abolaban F, Zaman S, Cashmore J, Nisbet A, Clark C. Changes in patterns of intensity-modulated radiotherapy verification and quality assurance in the UK. Clin Oncol. 2016;28(8):e28-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clon.2016.01.013 10.1016/j.clon.2016.01.01326880064 Search in Google Scholar

7. Mijnheer BJ, Alber ML. Guidelines for the Verification of IMRT. Brussels: ESTRO; 2008. Search in Google Scholar

8. McCurdy BM. Dosimetry in radiotherapy using a-Si EPIDs: Systems, methods, and applications focusing on 3D patient dose estimation. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2013;444:012002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/444/1/012002 10.1088/1742-6596/444/1/012002 Search in Google Scholar

9. Kavuma A, Glegg M, Currie G, Elliott A. Assessment of dosimetrical performance in 11 Varian a-SI500 Electronic Portal Imaging Devices. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 2008;53(23):6893-6909. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/53/23/016 10.1088/0031-9155/53/23/01619001691 Search in Google Scholar

10. McCurdy BM, Greer PB. Dosimetric properties of an amorphous-silicon epid used in continuous acquisition mode for application to dynamic and ARC IMRT. Medical Physics. 2009;36(7):3028-3039. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3148822 10.1118/1.314882219673202 Search in Google Scholar

11. Mans A, Wendling M, McDermott LN, et al. Catching errors within vivo EPID dosimetry. Medical Physics. 2010;37(6Part2):2638-2644. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3397807 10.1118/1.339780720632575 Search in Google Scholar

12. Ricketts K, Navarro C, Lane K, et al. Implementation and evaluation of a transit dosimetry system for treatment verification. Physica Medica. 2016;32(5):671-680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.04.010 10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.04.01027134042 Search in Google Scholar

13. DOSIsoft EPIgray Edition 2.0 Practical Guide V1.5. Upgraded versions of Patient Quality Assurance Solutions. DOSIsoft. https://www.dosisoft.com/2021/07/22/upgraded-versions-patient-quality-assurance-solutions/. Published July 22, 2021. Accessed July 14, 2022. Search in Google Scholar

14. DOSIsoft EPIgray Edition 2.0.6 Data preparation V3.4. EPIgray®*. DOSIsoft. https://www.dosisoft.com/products/epigray/. Accessed July 14, 2022. Search in Google Scholar

15. Mijnheer B. EPIDs and QA of advanced treatments. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2019;1305:012061. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1305/1/012061 10.1088/1742-6596/1305/1/012061 Search in Google Scholar

16. Francois P, Boissard P, Berger L, Mazal A. In vivo dose verification from back projection of a transit dose measurement on the central axis of photon beams. Physica Medica. 2011;27(1):1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2010.06.002 10.1016/j.ejmp.2010.06.00220615735 Search in Google Scholar

17. Ezzell GA, Burmeister JW, Dogan N, et al. IMRT commissioning: Multiple Institution Planning and dosimetry comparisons, a report from AAPM Task Group 119. Medical Physics. 2009;36(11):5359-5373. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3238104 10.1118/1.323810419994544 Search in Google Scholar

18. Moore JA, Siebers JV. Verification of the optimal backscatter for an aSi electronic portal imaging device. Phys Med Biol. 2005;50(10):2341-2350. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/50/10/011 10.1088/0031-9155/50/10/01115876671 Search in Google Scholar

19. Rowshanfarzad P, McCurdy B, Sabet M, Lee C, O’Connor D, Greer P. Measurement and modeling of the effect of support arm backscatter on dosimetry with a Varian EPID. Med Phys. 2010;37(5):2269-2278. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3369445 10.1118/1.336944520527561 Search in Google Scholar

20. Bojechko C, Ford EC. Quantifying the performance of in vivo portal dosimetry in detecting four types of treatment parameter variations. Medical Physics. 2015;42(12):6912-6918. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4935093 10.1118/1.493509326632047 Search in Google Scholar

21. Celi S, Costa E, Wessels C, Mazal A, Fourquet A, Francois P. Epid based in vivo dosimetry system: Clinical experience and results. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics. 2016;17(3):262-276. https://doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i3.6070 10.1120/jacmp.v17i3.6070569093827167283 Search in Google Scholar

22. Held M, Cheung J, Perez Andujar A, Husson F, Morin O. Commissioning and evaluation of an electronic portal imaging device-based in-vivo dosimetry software. Cureus. 2018;10(2):e2139. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.2139 10.7759/cureus.2139588059129632749 Search in Google Scholar

23. Woodruff HC, Fuangrod T, Van Uytven E, et al. First experience with real-time epid-based delivery verification during IMRT and VMAT sessions. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics. 2015;93(3):516-522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.07.2271 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.07.227126460993 Search in Google Scholar

24. Spreeuw H, Rozendaal R, Olaciregui-Ruiz I, et al. Online 3D epid-based dose verification: Proof of concept. Medical Physics. 2016;43(7):3969-3974. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4952729 10.1118/1.495272927370115 Search in Google Scholar

25. Olaciregui-Ruiz I, Beddar S, Greer P, et al. In vivo dosimetry in external beam photon radiotherapy: Requirements and future directions for research, development, and clinical practice. Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology. 2020;15:108-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2020.08.003 10.1016/j.phro.2020.08.003780761233458335 Search in Google Scholar