Automated MTF measurement in CT images with a simple wire phantom

[1] Verdun FR, Racine D, Ott JG, et al. Image quality in CT: From physical measurements to model observers. Phys Med. 2015;31(8):823-843.10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.08.00726459319Search in Google Scholar

[2] International Atomic Energy Agency. Status of computed tomography: Dosimetry for wide cone beam scanners. IAEA-Human Health Reports No 5. 2011.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Kalender WA, Seissler W, Klotz E, Vock P. Spiral volumetric CT with single-breath-hold technique, continuous transport, and continuous scanner rotation. Radiology. 1990;176(1):181-183.10.1148/radiology.176.1.23530882353088Search in Google Scholar

[4] McCollough CH, Zink FE. Performance evaluation of a multi-slice CT system. Med Phys. 1999;26(11):2223-2230.10.1118/1.59877710587202Search in Google Scholar

[5] McNitt-Gray MF. AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: topics in CT—radiation dose in CT. RadioGraphics. 2002;22(6):1541-1553.10.1148/rg.22602512812432127Search in Google Scholar

[6] Primak AN, McCollough CH, Bruesewitz MR, et al. Relationship between noise, dose, and pitch in cardiac multi–detector row CT. RadioGraphics. 2006;26(6):1785-1794.10.1148/rg.26606506317102050Search in Google Scholar

[7] Wilson JM, Christianson OI, Richard S, Samei E. A methodology for image quality evaluation of advanced CT systems. Med Phys. 2013;40(3):031908.10.1118/1.479164523464323Search in Google Scholar

[8] Anam C, Haryanto F, Widita R, Arif I. New noise reduction method for reducing CT scan dose: Combining Wiener filtering and edge detection algorithm. AIP Conference Proceedings. 2015;1677:040004.10.1063/1.4930648Search in Google Scholar

[9] McCollough CH, Bruesewitz MR, McNitt-Gray MF, et al. The phantom portion of the American College of Radiology (ACR) Computed Tomography (CT) accreditation program: Practical tips, artifact examples, and pitfalls to avoid. Med Phys. 2004;31(9):2423-2442.10.1118/1.176963215487722Search in Google Scholar

[10] Kayugawa A, Ohkubo M, Wada S. Accurate determination of CT point-spread-function with high precision. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2013;14(4):216-226.10.1120/jacmp.v14i4.3905571453923835372Search in Google Scholar

[11] Friedman SN, Fung GSK, Siewerdsen JH, Tsui BMW. A simple approach to measure computed tomography (CT) modulation transfer function (MTF) and noise-power spectrum (NPS) using the American College of Radiology (ACR) accreditation phantom. Med Phys. 2013;40(5):051907.10.1118/1.4800795364398423635277Search in Google Scholar

[12] Judy PF. The line spread function and modulation transfer function of a computed tomographic scanner. Med Phys. 1976;3(4):233-236.10.1118/1.594283785200Search in Google Scholar

[13] Droege RT, Morin RL. A practical method to measure the MTF of CT scanners. Med Phys. 1982;9(5):758-760.10.1118/1.5951247155079Search in Google Scholar

[14] Nickoloff EL Riley R. A simplified approach for modulation transfer function determinations in computed tomography. Med Phys. 1985;12(4):437-442.10.1118/1.5957064033588Search in Google Scholar

[15] Samei E, Ranger NT, Dobbins JT, Chen Y. Intercomparison of methods for image quality characterization. I. Modulation transfer function. Med Phys. 2006;33(5):1454-1465.10.1118/1.2188819Search in Google Scholar

[16] Narváez M, Graffigna JP, Gómez ME, Romo R. Application of oversampling to obtain the MTF of digital radiology equipment. J Phys Conf Ser. 2016;705(1):012057.10.1088/1742-6596/705/1/012057Search in Google Scholar

[17] Takenaga T, Katsuragawa S, Goto M, et al. Modulation transfer function measurement of CT images by use of a circular edge method with a logistic curve-fitting technique. Radiol Phys Technol. 2015;8(1):53-59.10.1007/s12194-014-0286-x25142743Search in Google Scholar

[18] Ichikawa K, Hara T, Niwa S, Ohashi K. Method of measuring modulation transfer function using metal wire in computed tomography. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2008;64(6):672-680.10.6009/jjrt.64.67218648156Search in Google Scholar

[19] Anam C, Fujibuchi T, Budi WS, et al. An algorithm for automated modulation transfer function measurement using an edge of a PMMA phantom: Impact of field of view on spatial resolution of CT images. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2018;19(6):244-252.10.1002/acm2.12476623684130338920Search in Google Scholar

[20] Jun-Yan R, Guo-Tao F, Cun-Feng W, et al. Measurement of spatial resolution of the micro-CT system. Chinese Physics C. 2010;34(3):412-416.10.1088/1674-1137/34/3/022Search in Google Scholar

[21] Arabi H, Asl ARK, Aghamiri SM. The effect of focal spot size on the spatial resolution of variable resolution X-ray CT Scanner. Iran J Radiat Res. 2010;8(1):37-43.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Venema HW. Modulation transfer functions of single-slice and dual-slice computed tomography scanners. Med Phys. 1996;23(11):1863-1864.10.1118/1.5978988947898Search in Google Scholar

[23] Löve A, Olsson M-L, Siemund R, et al. Six iterative reconstruction algorithms in brain CT: a phantom study on image quality at different radiation dose levels. Br J Radiol. 2013;86:20130388.10.1259/bjr.20130388383043624049128Search in Google Scholar

[24] Dodge CT, Tamm EP, Cody DD, et al. Performance evaluation of iterative reconstruction algorithms for achieving CT radiation dose reduction – a phantom study. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016;17(2):511-531.10.1120/jacmp.v17i2.5709587504627074454Search in Google Scholar

[25] Anam C, Haryanto F, Widita R, et al. An investigation of spatial resolution and noise in reconstructed CT images using iterative reconstruction (IR) and filtered back-projection (FBP). J Phys Conf Series. 2019;1127:012016.10.1088/1742-6596/1127/1/012016Search in Google Scholar

[26] Sanders J, Hurwitz L, Samei E. Patient-specific quantification of image quality: An automated method for measuring spatial resolution in clinical CT images. Med Phys. 2015;43(10):5330-5338.10.1118/1.496198427782718Search in Google Scholar

[27] Mori I, Machida Y. Deriving the modulation transfer function of CT from extremely noisy edge profiles. Radiol Phys Technol. 2009;2(1):22-32.10.1007/s12194-008-0039-920821125Search in Google Scholar

[28] Garayoa J, Castro P. A study on image quality provided by a kilovoltage cone-beam computed tomography. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2013;14(1):239-257.10.1120/jacmp.v14i1.3888571405223318380Search in Google Scholar

[29] Boone JM, Seibert JA. An analytical edge spread function model for computer fitting and subsequent calculation of the LSF and MTF. Med Phys. 1994;21(1):1541-1545.10.1118/1.597264Search in Google Scholar

[30] CIRS. AAPM CT Performance Phantom Model 610. http://www.cirsinc.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/610-DS-120418.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

[31] Sun Nuclear. CT ACR 464 Phantom. https://www.sunnuclear.com/documents/datasheets/gammex/CTACRPhantom_D013118.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

[32] The Phantom Laboratory. Catphan® 500 and 600 Manual. https://imagingequipment.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Catphan-500600-Manual.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

[33] Anam C, Budi WS, Fujibuchi T, et al. Validation of the tail replacement method in MTF calculations using the homogeneous and non-homogeneous edges of a phantom. J Phys Conf Series 2019;1248:012001.10.1088/1742-6596/1248/1/012001Search in Google Scholar

[34] Yin FF, Giger ML, Doi K. Measurement of presampling modulation transfer function of film digitizers using a curve fitting technique. Med Phys. 1990;17(6):962-966.10.1118/1.5964632280739Search in Google Scholar

[35] Anam C, Fujibuchi T, Toyoda T, et al. An investigation of a CT noise reduction using a modified of wiener filtering-edge detection. J Phys Conf Series. 2019;1217:012022.10.1088/1742-6596/1217/1/012022Search in Google Scholar

[36] Ohkubo M, Wada S, Matsumoto T, Nishizawa K. An effective method to verify line and point spread functions measured in computed tomography. Med Phys. 2006;33(8):2757-2764.10.1118/1.221416816964851Search in Google Scholar

[37] Hsieh J. Computed tomography: principles, design artifacts, and recent advances. Bellingham: SPIE; 2003.Search in Google Scholar