Comparison of incident air kerma (k_i) of common digital and analog radiology procedures in Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad province

[1] Huda W, Nickoloff EL, Boone JM. Overview of patient dosimetry in diagnostic radiology in the USA for the past 50 years. Med Phys. 2008;35(12): 5713-5728.10.1118/1.301360419175129Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[2] Bahreyni Toossi MT, Esmaili S. Estimation of entrance surface doses (ESD) for common medical X-ray diagnostic examinations in radiological departments in Mashhad-Iran. In Shielding aspects of accelerators, targets and irradiation facilities-Satif-10. Nuclear Energy Agency of the OECD (NEA): Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development - Nuclear Energy Agency. 2010.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Bouzarjomehri F, Dashti M, Zare M. Radiation exposure of the Yazd population from medical conventional X-ray examinations. Iran J Radiat Res. 2007;4(4):195-200.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Bouzarjomehri F. Patient dose in routine X-ray examinations in Yazd state. Iran J Radiat Res. 2004;1(4):199-204.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Uffmann M, Schaefer-Prokop C. Digital radiography: the balance between image quality and required radiation dose. EurJ Radiol. 2009;72(2): 202-208.10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.05.06019628349Search in Google Scholar

[6] Cousins C, Miller DL, Bernardi G, et al. ICRP Publication 120: Radiological protection in cardiology. Ann ICRP. 2013;42(1):1-125.10.1016/j.icrp.2012.09.00123141687Search in Google Scholar

[7] Salehi Z, Kamil WA. Biswal BM, et al. Monte Carlo radiography simulation for assessment of absorbed radiation dose in femur bone marrow during X-ray radiography for constant mAs and AEC technique. Int J Radiat Res. 2015;13(1):61-65.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Ofori K, Wotorchi-Gordon S, Akrobortu E, et al. Estimation of adult patient doses for selected X-ray diagnostic examinations. J Radiat Res Appl Sci. 2014;7(4): 459-462.10.1016/j.jrras.2014.08.003Search in Google Scholar

[9] Radiation Protection No 18: Medical Radiation Exposure of the European Population. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2015Search in Google Scholar

[10] Salehi Z, Yusoff AL. The absorbed dose in femur exposed to diagnostic radiography. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2013;154(3):396-399.10.1093/rpd/ncs23923012482Search in Google Scholar

[11] Strauss KJ, Kaste SC. The ALARA (As Low As Reasonably Achievable) Concept in Pediatric Interventional and Fluoroscopic Imaging: Striving to Keep Radiation Doses as Low as Possible during Fluoroscopy of Pediatric Patients -- A White Paper Executive Summary. Radiology. 2006;240(3):621-622.10.1148/radiol.240306069816926319Search in Google Scholar

[12] Berkhout WE, Beuger DA, Sanderink GC, et al. The dynamic range of digital radiographic systems: dose reduction or risk of overexposure? Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2004;33(1):1-5.10.1259/dmfr/4067747215140814Search in Google Scholar

[13] Osei EK, Darko J. A survey of organ equivalent and effective doses from diagnostic radiology procedures. ISRN Radiol. 2012;2013 :204346.10.5402/2013/204346Search in Google Scholar

[14] Ramanandraibe MJ, Randriamora TH; Ralaivelo MAL, et al. Patient Doses Assessment for Conventional Radiography in Madagascar. Pharmaceutical and Chemical Journal, 2(3):1-5.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Aliasgharzadeh A, Mihandoost E, Masoumbeigi M, et al. Measurement of Entrance Skin Dose and Calculation of Effective Dose for Common Diagnostic X-Ray Examinations in Kashan, Iran. Glob J Health Sci. 2015;7(5):202–207.10.5539/gjhs.v7n5p202480387826156930Search in Google Scholar

[16] Johnston DA, Brennan PC. Reference dose levels for patients undergoing common diagnostic X-ray examinations in Irish hospitals. Br J Radiol. 2000;73(868):396-402.10.1259/bjr.73.868.1084486510844865Search in Google Scholar

[17] Hart D, Hillier M, Wall B. National reference doses for common radiographic, fluoroscopic and dental X-ray examinations in the UK. Br J Radiol. 2009;82(973):1-12.10.1259/bjr/1256853918852213Search in Google Scholar

[18] Parry RA, Glaze SA, Archer BR. The AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: typical patient radiation doses in diagnostic radiology. Radiographics. 1999;19(5):1289-1302.10.1148/radiographics.19.5.g99se21128910489180Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[19] Webb S. The physics of medical imaging. 1988: CRC Press.10.1887/0852743491Search in Google Scholar

[20] Yukihara EG, McKeever SWS, Akselrod MS. State of art: optically stimulated luminescence dosimetry–frontiers of future research. Radiat Meas. 2014;71:15-24.10.1016/j.radmeas.2014.03.023Search in Google Scholar

[21] Wambani JS, Korir GK, Korir IK, et al., Establishment of local diagnostic reference levels in paediatric screen-film radiography at a children's hospital. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2012;154(4):465-476.10.1093/rpd/ncs27023091220Search in Google Scholar

[22] Lau SL, Mak AS, Lam WT, et al. Reject analysis: A comparison of conventional film-screen radiography and computed radiography with PACS. Radiography. 2004;10(3):183-187.10.1016/j.radi.2004.03.014Search in Google Scholar

[23] Piraino D, Davros WJ, Lieber M, et al. Selenium-based digital radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography of the hands and feet: a subjective comparison. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 199;172(1):177-18410.2214/ajr.172.1.98887649888764Search in Google Scholar

[24] Honey ID, Mackenzie A, Evans DS. Investigation of optimum energies for chest imaging using film–screen and computed radiography. Br J Radiol. 2005;78(929):422-427.10.1259/bjr/3291269615845936Search in Google Scholar

[25] Schaefer-Prokop C, Uffmann M, Eisenhuber E, et al. Digital radiography of the chest: detector techniques and performance parameters. J Thorac Imaging. 2003;18(3):124-137.10.1097/00005382-200307000-0000212867810Search in Google Scholar

[26] Borasi G, Nitrosi A, Ferrari P, et al. On site evaluation of three flat panel detectors for digital radiography. Med Phys. 2003;30(7): 1719-1731.10.1118/1.156927312906189Open DOISearch in Google Scholar