[Aldrick, Philip, and Angela Monaghan. “House Prices will Fall Over Next Five Years.” The Daily Telegraph, 28 July 2010, p. 1. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gray, Louise, and Harry Wallop. “Energy Revolution could Put Bills Up by a Third.” The Daily Telegraph, 28 July 2010, p. 1, 2. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[MacIntyre, Donald. “Emboldened Hamas Renews Calls for the End of Israel.” The Independent, 15 December 2011, p. 34. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Norton-Taylor, Richard. “Blair Brought Military Close to Seizing Up, Says Ex-Army Chief.” The Guardian, 29 July 2010, p. 14. Print.10.1177/0306422010371896]Search in Google Scholar
[Paton, Graeme. “Powers to Punish Out-Of-School Louts.” The Daily Telegraph, 6 October 2010, p. 9. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ramesh, Randeep. “Coalition Report Urges ‘Back to Work’ Tests for Cancer Patients.” The Guardian, 7 December 2011, p.1, 20. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Watt, Nicholas, and Vikram Dodd. “Pakistan Fury Over Cameron Terror Charge.” The Guardian, 29 July 2010, p. 1, 2. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Whitehead, Tom. “People Power could Stop Pubs Opening Late.” The Daily Telegraph, 28 July 2010, p. 4. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ali, Marwah K. et al. “Pronouns and Ideology in Newspaper Discourse.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature 6.3 (2017): 168–179. Print.10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.6n.3p.168]Search in Google Scholar
[Bakhtin, Mikhail M. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Translated by Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1981. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bakhtin, Mikhail M. Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. Translated by Caryl Emerson. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1984. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Baumgarten, Nicole. “Metadiscourse and the Construction of Speaker Identities in L2 Academic Presentational Talk.” Subjectivity in Language and Discourse. Eds. Nicole Baumgarten et al. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2012. 157–191. Print.10.1163/9789004261921_009]Search in Google Scholar
[Baumgarten, Nicole et al. “Introduction.” Subjectivity in Language and Discourse. Eds. Nicole Baumgarten et al. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2012. 1–13. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bazzanella, Carla. “The Significance of Context in Comprehension: The ‘we Case’.” Foundation of Science 7 (2002): 239–254. Print.10.1023/A:1019657025835]Search in Google Scholar
[Bell, Allan. The Language of News Media. Oxford: Blackwell, 1991. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Benvenise, Emile. Problems in General Linguistics. Translated by Mary E. Meek. Coral Gables: University of Miami Press, 1971. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Biber, Douglas et al. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman, 1999. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Borthen, Kaja. “On How we Interpret Plural Pronouns.” Journal of Pragmatics 42 (2010): 1799–1815. Print.10.1016/j.pragma.2009.02.008]Search in Google Scholar
[Bull, Peter, and Anita Fetzer. “Who are we and Who are you? The Strategic Use of Forms of Address in Political Interviews.” Text and Talk 26.1 (2006): 3–37. Print.10.1515/TEXT.2006.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Cillia, Rudolf de et al. “The Discoursive Construction of National Identities.” Discourse and Society 10.2 (1999): 149–173. Print.10.1177/0957926599010002002]Search in Google Scholar
[Cock, Barbara de. “Why we can be you: The Use of 1st Person Plural Forms with Hearer Reference in English and Spanish.” Journal of Pragmatics 43 (2011): 2762–2775. Print.10.1016/j.pragma.2011.04.009]Search in Google Scholar
[Conboy, Martin. The Language of Newspapers: Social and Historical Perspectives. London: Continuum, 2010. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fina, Anna de. “Pronominal Choice, Identity, and Solidarity in Political Discourse.” Text 15.3 (1995): 379–410. Print.10.1515/text.1.1995.15.3.379]Search in Google Scholar
[Dijk, Teun A van. “Ideology and Discourse Analysis.” Journal of Political Ideologies 11.2 (2006): 115–140. Print.10.1080/13569310600687908]Search in Google Scholar
[Dontcheva-Navratilova, Olga. Coherence in Political Speeches. Brno: Masaryk University, 2011. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dori-Haconen, Gonen. “Establishing Social Groups in Hebrew: ‘We’ in Political Radio Phone-In Programs.” Constructing Collectivity: ‘We’ Across Languages and Contexts. Ed. Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2014. 187–206. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Du Bois, Inke. “Grammatical, Pragmatic and Sociolinguistic Aspects of the First Person Plural Pronoun.” Subjectivity in Language and Discourse, Eds. Nicole Baumgarten et al. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2012. 319–338. Print.10.1163/9789004261921_015]Search in Google Scholar
[Duszak, Anna, Editor. Us and Others: Social Identities Across Languages, Discourses and Cultures. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2002. Print.10.1075/pbns.98]Search in Google Scholar
[Fairclough, Norman. Language and Power. London: Longman, 1989. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Feez, Susan et al. Media Literacy. Surry Hills: Adult Migration Education Service, 2008. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fetzer, Anita. ““Judge us on What we Do”: The Strategic Use of Collective we in British Political Discourse.” Constructing Collectivity: ‘We’ Across Languages and Contexts. Ed. Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2014. 331–350. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fetzer Anita, and Peter Bull. “‘Well, I Answer it by Simply Inviting you to Look at the Evidence.’ The Strategic Use of Pronouns in Political Interviews.” Journal of Language and Politics 7.2 (2008): 271–289. Print.10.1075/jlp.7.2.05fet]Search in Google Scholar
[Fortanet, Inmaculada. “The Use of we in University Lectures: Reference and Function.” English for Specific Purposes 23.1 (2004): 45–66. Print.10.1016/S0889-4906(03)00018-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Fowler, Roger. Language in the News: Discourse and Ideology in the Press. London: Routledge, 1991. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Givon, Talmy. English Grammar: A Function-Based Introduction. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1993. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Halliday, Michael A. K., and Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Hodder Arnold, 2004. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Harwood, Nigel. “Political Scientists on the Functions of Personal Pronouns in their Writing: An Interview-Based Study of ‘I’ and ‘we’.” Text & Talk 27. 1 (2007) 27–54. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Harwood, Nigel. “‘We do not Seem to Have a Theory …The Theory I Present Here Attempts to Fill this Gap’: Inclusive and Exclusive Pronouns in Academic Writing….” Applied Linguistics 26.3 (2005) 343–375. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Helmbrecht, Johannes. “Grammar and Function of we.” Us and Others: Social Identities Across Languages, Discourses and Cultures. Ed. Anna Duszak. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2002. 31–49. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ińigo-Mora, Isabel. “On the Use of the Personal Pronoun we in Communities.” Journal of Language and Politics 3.1 (2004): 27–52. Print.10.1075/jlp.3.1.05ini]Search in Google Scholar
[Knight, Naomi K. “Wrinkling Complexity: Concepts of Identity and Affiliation in Humour.” New Discourse on Language: Functional Perspectives on Multimodality, Identity, and Affiliation. Eds. Monika Bednarek and James R. Martin. London: Continuum, 2010. 35–58. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Knox, John S. et al. “Khao Naa Nung: A Multi-Modal Analysis of Thai Language Newspaper Front Pages.” New Discourse on Language: Functional Perspectives on Multimodality, Identity, and Affiliation. Eds. Monika Bednarek and James R. Martin. London: Continuum, 2010, 80–110. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kuo, Chih-Hua. “The Use of Personal Pronouns: Role Relationships in Scientific Journal Articles.” English for Specific Purposes 18.2 (1999): 121–138.10.1016/S0889-4906(97)00058-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Leech, Geoffrey, and Mick Short. Style in Fiction: A Linguistic Introduction to English Fictional Prose. London: Pearson Education, 2007. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Leeuwen, Theo van. “The Representation of Social Actors.” Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis. Eds. Carmen R. Caldas-Coulthard and Malcolm Coulthard. London: Routledge, 1996. 32-70. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Linell, Per. Approaching Dialogue: Talk, Interaction and Contexts in Dialogical Perspectives. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1998. Print.10.1075/impact.3]Search in Google Scholar
[Linell, Per. Rethinking Language, Mind, and World Dialogically. Charlotte: International Age Publishing, 2009. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lyons, John. “Subjecthood and Subjectivity.” Subjecthood and Subjectivity: The Status of the Subject in Linguistic Theory. Ed. Marina Yaguello, Ophrys, 1994. 9–17. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Martin, James R. “Beyond Exchange: Appraisal Systems in English.” Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Eds. Susan Hunston and Geoff Thompson. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. 142–75. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Martin, James R. “Innocence: Realisation, Instantiation and Individuation in a Botswanan Town.” Questioning Linguistics. Eds. Ahmar Mahboob and Naomi K. Knight. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2008. 32–76. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Martin, James R. “Semantic Variation – Modelling Realisation, Instantiation, Individuation in Social Semiosis.” New Discourse on Language: Functional Perspectives on Multimodality, Identity, and Affiliation. Eds. Monika Bednarek and James R. Martin. London: Continuum, 2010. 1–34. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Martin, James R. “Tenderness: Realisation and Instantiation in a Botswanan Town.” Odense Working Papers in Language and Communication (Special Issue of Papers from 34th International Systemic Functional Congress). Ed. Nina Nřrgaard. Odense: Institute of Language and Communication at Odense University, 2008. 30–62. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Martin, James R., and Peter R. White. The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2005. Print.10.1057/9780230511910]Search in Google Scholar
[Mitchell, Philip, and James Stewart. “Who are we? Language and Impartiality in BBC Radio Journalism.” Journalism Practice 11.4 (2017): 417–437. Print.10.1080/17512786.2015.1123111]Search in Google Scholar
[Moberg, Ulla, and Goran Eriksson. “Managing Ideological Differences in Joint Political Press Conferences: A Study of the Strategic Use of the Personal Pronoun ‘we’.” Journal of Language and Politics 12.3 (2013): 315–334. Print.10.1075/jlp.12.3.01mob]Search in Google Scholar
[Műhlhausler, Peter, and Rom Harre. Pronouns and People: The Linguistic Construction of Social and Personal Identity. Oxford: Blackwell, 1990. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Palmer, Frank R. Modality and the English Modals. 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 2015. Print.10.4324/9781315846453]Search in Google Scholar
[Pavlidou, Theodossia-Soula. “Collective Aspects of Subjectivity: The Subject Pronoun εμεί□ (‘we’) in Modern Greek.” Subjectivity in Language and Discourse. Eds. Nicole Baumgarten et al. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2012. 33–65. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pavlidou, Theodossia-Soula. “Constructing Collectivity with ‘we’: An Introduction.” Constructing Collectivity: ‘We’ Across Languages and Contexts. Ed. Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2014. 1–19. Print.10.1075/pbns.239]Search in Google Scholar
[Pavlidou, Theodossia-Soula, Editor. Constructing Collectivity: ‘We’ Across Languages and Contexts. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2014. Print.10.1075/pbns.239]Search in Google Scholar
[Petersoo, Pille. “What does ‘we’ Mean?: National Deixis in the Media.” Journal of Language and Politics 6. 3 (2007): 419–436. Print.10.1075/jlp.6.3.08pet]Search in Google Scholar
[Proctor, Katarzyna, and Lily I-Wen Su. 2011. “The 1st Person Plural in Political Discourse – American Q1 Politicians in Interviews and in a Debate.” Journal of Pragmatics 43.13, (2011): 3251–3266. Print.10.1016/j.pragma.2011.06.010]Search in Google Scholar
[Pyykko, Riitta. “Who is ‘us’ in Russian Political Discourse.” Us and Others: Social Identities Across Languages, Discourses and Cultures. Ed. Anna Duszak. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2002. 233–248. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Quirk, Randolph et al. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman, 1985. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak. Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London: Routledge, 2001. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Richardson, John E. Analysing Newspapers: An Approach from Critical Discourse Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2007. Print.10.1007/978-0-230-20968-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Sanders, Jose, and Gisela Redeker. “Linguistic Perspective in Short News Stories.” Poetics 22 (1993): 69–87. Print.10.1016/0304-422X(93)90021-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Scheibman, Joanne. “Inclusive and Exclusive Patterning of the English First Person Plural: Evidence from Conversation.” Language, Culture and Mind. Eds. Michel Achard and Suzanne Kemmer. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 2004. 377–396. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Scheibman, Joanne. “Referentiality, Predicate Patterns, and Functions of We-Utterances in American English Interactions.” Constructing Collectivity: ‘We’ Across Languages and Contexts. Ed. Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2014. 23–43. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schmid, Monika S. “Persecution and Identity Conflicts – the Case of German Jews.” Us and Others: Social Identities Across Languages, Discourses and Cultures. Ed. Anna Duszak. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2002, pp. 341–356. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Silverstein, Michael. “Shifters, Linguistic Categories, and Cultural Description.” Meaning in Anthropology. Eds. Keith Basso and Henry A. Selby. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 1976. 11–55. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Skarżyńska, Krystyna. “WE and THEY in Polish Political Discourse: A Psychological Approach.” Us and Others: Social Identities Across Languages, Discourses and Cultures. Ed. Anna Duszak. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2002. 249–264. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Temmerman, Martina. ““Nail Polish – We’ve Chosen the Nicest Shades for you!”: Editorial Voice and ‘we’ in a Flemish Women’s Magazine.” Constructing Collectivity: ‘We’ Across Languages and Contexts. Ed. Theodossia- Soula Pavlidou. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2014. 247–263. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Temmerman, Martina. “‘Today, we’re all Danes’: Argumentative Meaning of the 1st and 2nd Person Pronouns in Newspaper Editorials on the Muhammad Cartoons.” L’Analisi Linguistica e Letteraria XVI: 289–303 (Special Issue: Word Meaning in Argumentative Dialogue). Ed. Giovanni Gobber et al., 2008. 289–303. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Turrow, Joseph. Media Today: An Introduction to Mass Communication. London: Routledge, 2009. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Urbanova, Zuzana. The Function of Direct Forms of Presentation in the Generic Structure of Newspaper Reports. Unpublished dissertation. Prague: Charles University, 2013. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wagner, Lisa. “Strategic Alignment in the Discourse of Las Madres de la Plaza de Mayo.” Us and Others: Social Identities Across Languages, Discourses and Cultures. Ed. Anna Duszak. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2002. 357–374. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wales, Katie. Personal Pronouns in Present-Day English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[White, Peter R. “Death, Disruption and the Moral Order: The Narrative Impulse in Mass-Media ‘Hard News’ Reporting.” Genre and Institutions: Social Processes in the Workplace and School. Eds. Frances Christie and James R. Martin. London and Washington: Cassell, 1997. 101–133. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[White, Peter R. “Exploring the Axiological Workings of ‘Reporter Voice’ News Stories: Attribution and Attitudinal Positioning.” Discourse, Context and Media 1 (2012) 57–67. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[White, Peter R. “Media Objectivity and the Rhetoric of News Story Structure.” Discourse and Community: Doing Functional Linguistics. Ed. Eija Ventola. Berlin: Verlag, 2000. 379–397. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[White, Peter R. Telling Media Tales: The News Story as Rhetoric. Unpublished dissertation. Sydney: University of Sydney, 1998. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Whitt, Richard J. “Singular Perception, Multiple Perspectives through ‘we’: Constructing Intersubjective Meaning in English and German.” Constructing Collectivity: ‘We’ Across Languages and Contexts. Ed. Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2014. 45–65. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zappavigna, Michele et al. “The Coupling of Gesture and Phonology.” New Discourse on Language: Functional Perspectives on Multimodality, Identity, and Affiliation. Eds. Monika Bednarek and James R. Martin. London: Continuum, 2010. 219–236. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zappavigna, Michele et al. “Syndromes of Meaning: Exploring Patterned Coupling in a NSW Youth Justice Conference.” Questioning Linguistics. Eds. Ahmar Mahboob and Naomi K. Knight. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2008. 164–185. Print.]Search in Google Scholar