[1. Eberhard, A.M., Pedroni, V., Volpe, M. & Ferreira, M.L. (2004). Immobilization of catalase from Aspergillus niger on inorganic and biopolymeric supports for H2O2 decomposition. Appl. Catal. B: Enviro. 47, 153–163. DOI: 10.1016/j. apcatb.2003.08.007.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Tarhan, L. (1995). Use of immobilized catalase to remove H2O2 used in the sterilisation of milk. Process Biochem. 30, 623–8. DOI: 10.1016/0032-9592(94)00066-2.10.1016/0032-9592(94)00066-2]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Venkateshwaran, G., Somashekar, D., Prakash, M.H., Agrawal, R., Basappa, S.C. & Joseph, R. (1999). Production and utilization of catalase using Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Process Biochem. 34, 187–191. DOI: 10.1016/S0032-9592(98)00087-9.10.1016/S0032-9592(98)00087-9]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Sirbu, T. (2011). The searching of active catalase producers among the microscopic fungi. An. U. O. Fasc. Biol. 2, 164–167.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Choi, M.M.F. & Yiu, T.P. (2004). Immobilization of beef liver catalase on eggshell membrane for fabrication of hydrogen peroxide biosensor. Enzyme Microb. Tech. 34, 41–47. DOI: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2003.08.005.10.1016/j.enzmictec.2003.08.005]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Yu, M.A., Wei, Y.M., Zhao, L., Jiang, L., Zhu, X.B. & Qi, W. (2007). Bioconversion of ethyl 4-chloro-3-oxobutanoate by permeabilized fresh brewer’s yeast cells in the presence of allyl bromide. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biot. 34, 151–156. DOI: 10.1007/s10295-006-0179-z.10.1007/s10295-006-0179-z]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Malik, M., Ganguli, A. & Ghosh, M. (2012). Modeling of permeabilization process in Pseudomonas putida G7 for enhanced limonin bioconversion. Appl Microbiol. Biot. 95, 223–231. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-012-3880-z.10.1007/s00253-012-3880-z]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Scherrer, R., Louden, L. & Gerhardt, P. (1974). Porosity of the yeast cell wall and membrane. J. Bacteriol. 118, 534–540.10.1128/jb.118.2.534-540.1974]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Zlotnik, H., Fernandez, M.P., Bowers, B. & Cabib, E. (1984). Saccharomyces cerevisiae mannoproteins form an external cell wall layer that determines wall porosity. J. Bacteriol. 159, 1018–1026.10.1128/jb.159.3.1018-1026.1984]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Joshi, M.S., Gowda, L.R., Katwa, L.C. & Bhat, S.G. (1989). Permeabilization of yeast cells (Kluyveromyces fragilis) to lactose by digiton. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 11, 439–443. DOI: 10.1016/0141-0229(89)90140-3.10.1016/0141-0229(89)90140-3]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Gowda, L.R., Bachhawat, N., & Santhoor, G.B. (1991). Permeabilization of bakers’ yeast by cetyltrimethylammonium bromide for intracellular enzyme catalysis. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 13, 154–157. DOI: 10.1016/0141-0229(91)90172-7.10.1016/0141-0229(91)90172-7]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Sekhar, S., Bhat, N. & Bhat, S.G. (1999). Preparation of detergent permeabilized bakers’ yeast whole cell catalase. Process Biochem. 34, 349–354. DOI: 10.1016/S00329592(98)00105-8.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Vrsalovic Presecki, A., Zelic, B. & Vasic-Racki, D. (2007). Comparison of the L-malic acid production by isolated fumarase and fumarase in permeabilized baker’s yeast cells. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 41, 605–612. DOI: 10.1016/j. enzmictec.2007.05.007.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Abraham, J. & Bhat, S.G. (2008). Permeabilization of baker’s yeast with N-lauroyl sarcosine. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biot. 35, 799–804. DOI: 10.1007/s10295-008-0350-9.10.1007/s10295-008-0350-918415131]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Kaur, G., Panesar, P.S., Bera, M.B. & Kumar, H. (2009). Hydrolysis of whey lactose using CTAB-permeabilized yeast cells. Bioproc. Biosyst. Eng. 32, 63–67. DOI: 10.1007/s00449008-0221-9.]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Mutanda, T., Wilhelmi, B.S. & Whiteley, C.G. (2008). Response surface methodology: Synthesis of inulooligosaccharides with an endoinulinase from Aspergillus niger. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 43, 362–368. DOI: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2008.06.005.10.1016/j.enzmictec.2008.06.005]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Panesar, P.S. (2008). Application of response surface methodology in the permeabilization of yeast cells for lactose hydrolysis. Biochem. Eng. J. 39, 91–96. DOI: 10.1016/j. bej.2007.08.017.]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Khataee, A.R. (2009). Application of central composite design for the optimization of photodestruction of a textile dye using UV/S2O82– process. Pol. J. Chem. Technol. 11(4), 38–45. DOI:10.2478/v10026-009-0041-y.10.2478/v10026-009-0041-y]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Balasubramanian, A. & Venkatesan, S. (2012). Optimization of process parameters using response surface methodology for the removal of phenol by emulsion liquid membrane. Pol. J. Chem. Technol. 14(1), 46–49. DOI: 10.2478/v10026-012-0058-5.10.2478/v10026-012-0058-5]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Montgomery, D.C. (2001). Design and analysis of experiments. New York, NY, USA: Wiley.]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Delrio, L.A., Gomezortega, M., Leallopez, A. & Lopezgorge, J. (1977). More sensitive modification of catalase assay with clark oxygen-electrode-application to kinetic study of pea leaf enzyme. Anal. Biochem. 80, 409–15. DOI: 10.1016/00032697(77)90662-5.]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Olczak, I., Grubecki, I. & Wójcik, M. (2010). Optimization of permeabilization process of Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast by methanol. Inż. Ap. Chem. 49(2), 89–90.]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Akhnazarova, S. & Kafarov, V. (1982). Experiment optimization in chemistry and chemical engineering. Moscow, Russia: Mir Publications.]Search in Google Scholar