Acceso abierto

The Economic Consequences of the Reflexivisation of the Concept of Intellectual Property – A Theoretical Approach


Cite

Green, H. (2016). The Fine Brothers controversy explained. Medium. [online] Available at: https://medium.com/@hankgreen/the-fine-brothers-controversy-explained-long-version-42d3285581d1 [Accessed on 20/02/2024]. Search in Google Scholar

Jora, O.D. (2013). Avataruri ale corporației multinaționale. Exercițiu de analiză proprietariană [Avatars of Multinational Corporation. Essay in Proprietarian Analysis]. Bucharest: ASE Publishing House. Search in Google Scholar

Jora, O.D. (2016). Spiritualitate, materialitate și proprietate. Cultura mea, cultura ta, cultura noastră, cultura lor [Spirituality, Materiality and Property. My Culture, Your Culture, Our Culture, Their Culture]. Bucharest: ASE Publishing House. Search in Google Scholar

Kant, I. (1998). Critique of pure reason (Cambridge edition). Cambridge, England, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Kinsella, S. N. (2000). Is intellectual property legitimate? Austrian Scholars Conference 6 | Law and economics panel. [online] Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/stephan-kinsella-2/publication/265182580_is_intellectual_property_legitimate/links/547337c80cf216f8cfaeb70d/is-intellectual-property-legitimate.pdf [accessed on 19/02/2024]. Search in Google Scholar

Marx, K. and Engels, F. (1998) The Communist manifesto (150th anniversary edition). New York City, New York, U.S.A.: Monthly Review Press. Search in Google Scholar

Medeiros, J. d. (2022). The useless precaution: Or traversing the fundamental fantasy. [e-book] Available through the Patreon website: https://www.patreon.com/collection/202764?view=expanded [Accessed on 20/02/2024]. Search in Google Scholar

Mises, L.v. (1963). Human action: A treatise of economics (4th edition). New York City, New York, U.S.A.: Fox & Wilkes Books. Search in Google Scholar

Rand, A. (1967). Capitalism: The unknown ideal (2nd edition). New York City, New York, U.S.A. Search in Google Scholar

Ricardo, D. (1821). On the principles of political economy and taxation (3rd edition). Kitchener, Ontario, Canada: Batoche Books. Search in Google Scholar

Robinson, A. (2020). Ubisoft changed Gods & Monsters’ name after a trademark challenge from Monster Energy. VGC News. [online] Available at: https://www.videogameschronicle.com/news/ubisoft-changed-gods-monsters-name-after-a-trademark-challenge-from-monster-energy/ [Accessed on 20/02/2024]. Search in Google Scholar

Rothbard, M. (1998). The ethics of liberty (2nd edition). New York City, New York, U.S.A.: New York University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Wisniewski, J. B. (2020). On the impossibility of intellectual property. The quarterly journal of Austrian economics, 23(1), 33-45. [online] Available at: https://cdn.mises.org/qjae_23_1_wisuniewski.pdf [Accessed on 19/02/2024]. Search in Google Scholar

Zizek, S. (1999). “You may!”: Slavoj Zizek writes about the Post-Modern Superego. London Review of Books, 21(6). [online] Available at: https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v21/n06/slavoj-zizek/you-may! [Accessed on 19/02/2024]. Search in Google Scholar

Zizek, S. (2000). The fragile absolute: Or, why is the Christian legacy worth fighting for? London, England, U.K. and New York City, New York, U.S.A.: Verso Books. Search in Google Scholar

Zizek, S. (2016). Can one exit from the Capitalist discourse without becoming a Saint? Crisis and Critique, 3(3), 496-498. [online] Available at: https://www.crisiscritique.org/storage/app/media/2016-11-16/slavoj.pdf [Accessed on 19/02/2024]. Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2558-9652
Idioma:
Inglés