[
Abernathy, W. J., & Utterback, J. M. (1978). Patterns of industrial innovation. Technology Review, 64, 254-228.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Amin, S., & Aslam, S. (2017). Intellectual Capital, Innovation and Firm Performance of Pharmaceuticals: A Study of the London Stock Exchange. Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, 16(2), 2017.10.1142/S0219649217500174
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Andreeva, T., & Garanina, T. (2016). Do all elements of intellectual capital matter for organizational performance? Evidence from Russian context. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 17(2), 397-412.10.1108/JIC-07-2015-0062
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Auh, S., & Menguc, B. (2005). Balancing exploration and exploitation: the moderating role of competitive intensity. Journal of Business Research, 58, 1652-61.10.1016/j.jbusres.2004.11.007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baregheh, A., Rowley, J., Sambrook, S., & Davies, D. (2012). Food sector SMEs and innovation types. British Food Journal, 114(11), 1640-1653.10.1108/00070701211273126
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Battilana, J., & Casciaro, T. (2013). Overcoming resistance to organizational change: strong ties and affective cooptation. Management Science, 59(4), 819-836.10.1287/mnsc.1120.1583
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bekkers, V., Edelenbos, J., & Steijn, B. (2011). Innovation in Public Sector: Linking Capacity and Leadership. Palgrave Macmillan.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. (2002). Process management and technological innovation: A longitudinal study of the photography and paint industries. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 676–707.10.2307/3094913
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2003). Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28, 238–256.10.5465/amr.2003.9416096
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bernal, P., Maicas, J.P., & Vargas, P. (2019). Exploration, exploitation and innovation performance: disentangling the evolution of industry. Industry and Innovation, 26(3), 295-320.10.1080/13662716.2018.1465813
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Boiko, K. (2021). R&D activity and firm performance: mapping the field. Management Review Quarterly, 1, 1-37.10.1007/s11301-021-00220-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Calantone, R.J., Garcia, R., & Droge, C. (2003). The effects of environmental turbulence on new product development strategy planning. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 20(2), 90-103.10.1111/1540-5885.2002003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Canibano, L., Garcia-Ayuso, M., & Sanchez, P. (2000). Accounting for intangibles: a literature review. Journal of Accounting Literature, 19(1), 102-130.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cao, Q., Gedajlovic, E., & Zhang, H. (2009). Unpacking organizational ambidexterity: Dimensions, contingencies, and synergistic effects. Organization Science, 20, 781–796.10.1287/orsc.1090.0426
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chen, M., Yang, Z., Dou, W., & Wang, F. (2018). Flying or dying? Organizational change, customer participation, and innovation ambidexterity in emerging economies. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 35, 97-119.10.1007/s10490-017-9520-5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cheng, J.H., Lin, L.W., & Lee, L.C. (2019). Influence of ambidextrous governance mechanisms and risk management on repurchase intention in social commerce. Internet Research, 29(6), 1301-1323.10.1108/INTR-12-2018-0538
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chiang, C.C., & Mensah, Y.M. (2004). The determinants of investor valuation of R&D expenditure in the software industry. Review of Quantitative Finance Account, 22(4), 293-313.10.1023/B:REQU.0000032600.07130.fc
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Child, J., Hsieh, L., Elbanna, S., Karmowska, J., Marinova, S., Puthusserry, P., Tsai, T., Narooz, R., & Zhang, Y. (2017). SME international business models: the role of context and experience. Journal of World Business, 52(5), 664-679.10.1016/j.jwb.2017.05.004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Constant, F., Calvi, R., & Johnsen, T.E. (2020). Managing tensions between exploitative and exploratory innovation through purchasing function ambidexterit. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 26(4), 6-45.10.1016/j.pursup.2020.100645
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Corrado, C.A., Hulten, C.R., & Sichel, D. (2005). Measuring Capital and Technology: An Expanded Framework, in Measuring Capital in the New Economy, Vol. 65, Ed.s. Carol A. Corrado, John Haltiwanger, and Daniel Sichel, (11-45). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Corrado, C.A., Hulten, C.R., & Sichel, D. (2009). Intangible Capital and U.S. Economic Growth. Review of Income and Wealth, 5(3), 661-85.10.1111/j.1475-4991.2009.00343.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Corrado C.A., & Hulten, C.R. (2010). Measuring intangible Capital. How Do You Measure a “Technological Revolution?, American Economic Review, 10(1), 99-104.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dai, L., Maksimov, V., Gilbert, B.A., & Fernhaber, S.A. (2013). Entrepreneurial orientation and international scope: the differential roles of innovativeness, proactiveness, and risktaking. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(4), 511-524.10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.07.004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dai, Y., Roundy, P.T., Chok, J.I., Ding, F., & Byun, G. (2016). Who knows what?’ in new venture teams: transactive memory systems as a micro-foundation of entrepreneurial orientation. Journal of Management Studies, 53(8), 1320-1347.10.1111/joms.12211
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Danneels, E. (2002). The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 1095-1121.10.1002/smj.275
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Davila, T., Epstein, M. J., & Shelton, R. (2007). The creative entreprise: Managing innovative organizations and people. London: Preager Publishing.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dess, G.G., & Beard, D.W. (1984). Dimensions of organizational task environments. Administration Science Quarterly, 29, 52-73.10.2307/2393080
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Droge, C., Calantone, R., & Harmancioglu, N. (2008). New product success: is it really controllable by managers in highly turbulent environments?. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25(3), 272-286.10.1111/j.1540-5885.2008.00300.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fang, C., Lee, J., & Schilling, M.A. (2010). Balancing exploration and exploitation through structural design: the isolation of subgroups and organizational learning. Organization Science, 21, 625-642.10.1287/orsc.1090.0468
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gelb, D.S., & Siegel, P. (2000). Intangible assets and corporate signaling. Review of Quantitative Finance Account, 15(4), 307-323.10.1023/A:1012046823636
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The Antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 209–226.10.2307/20159573
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gomezel, A.S., & Aleksic, D. (2020). The relationships between technological turbulence, flow experience, innovation performance and small firm growth. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 21(3), 760-782.10.3846/jbem.2020.12280
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Greve, H. R. (2007). Exploration and exploitation in product innovation. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16, 945–975.10.1093/icc/dtm013
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gupta, A. K., Smith, K., & Shalley, C. E. (2006). The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 693–706.10.5465/amj.2006.22083026
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Habersang, S., Kueberling-Jost, J., Reihlen, M., & Seckler, C. (2019). A process perspective on organizational failure: a qualitative meta-analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 56(1), 19-56.10.1111/joms.12341
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Han, I., & Chuang, C. (2011). The impacts of R&D investment on company performance: US vs Taiwanese technology intensive industry. Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies, 14(1), 171-194.10.1142/S0219091511002184
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hanvanich, S., Sivakumar, K., & Hult, G.T.M. (2006). The relationship of learning and memory with organizational performance: the moderating role of turbulence. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(4), 600-612.10.1177/0092070306287327
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Harmancioglu, N., Sksjrvi, M., & Hultink, E.J. (2020). Cannibalize and combine? the impact of ambidextrous innovation on organizational outcomes under market competition. Industrial Marketing Management, 85, 44-57.10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.07.005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hartono, R., & Sheng, M.L. (2016). Knowledge sharing and firm performance: the role of social networking site and innovation capability. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 28(3), 335-347.10.1080/09537325.2015.1095289
]Search in Google Scholar
[
He, Z., & Wong, P. (2004). Exploration and exploitation: an empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15(4), 481-94.10.1287/orsc.1040.0078
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hughes, M. (2018). Organisational ambidexterity and firm performance: burning research questions for marketing scholars. Journal of Marketing Management, 34(2), 178-229.10.1080/0267257X.2018.1441175
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hung, K.P., & Chou, C. (2013). The impact of open innovation on firm performance: the moderating effects of internal R&D and environmental turbulence. Technovation, 33(11), 368-380.10.1016/j.technovation.2013.06.006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ireland, R. D., Hitt, M. A., & Sirmon, D. G. (2003). Strategic entrepreneurship: The construct and its dimensions. Journal of Management, 29, 963–98910.1016/S0149-2063(03)00086-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jansen, J.J.P., Van den Bosch, F.A.J., & Volberda, H.W. (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. ERIM Report Series Research in Management, 52(11), 1661-1674.10.1287/mnsc.1060.0576
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jiang, C.Y., & Zhao, S.M. (2006). The relationship between social capital, company enterprise and company performance: the medium role of organizational learning – a case study of the new and developing enterprises in Jiangsu and Guangdong. Management World, 10, 90-9.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jimenez-Jimenez, D., & Sanz Valle, R. (2011). Innovation, organizational learning, and performance. Journal of Business Research, 64, 408-417.10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.09.010
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kandemir, D., Yaprak, A., & Cavusgil, S.T. (2006). Alliance orientation: conceptualization, measurement, and impact on market performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(3), 324-340.10.1177/0092070305285953
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Knott, A.M. (2002. Exploration and exploitation as complements, in Choo, C.W., & Bontis, N. (Eds), The Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital and Organizational Knowledge (pp 339-358), Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kollmann, T., & Stockmann, C. (2014). Filling the entrepreneurial orientation-performance gap: the mediating effects of exploratory and exploitative innovations. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 38(5), 1001-1026.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lant, T.K., & Mezias, S.J. (1992). An organizational learning model of convergence and reorientation. Organization Science, 3(1), 47-71.10.1287/orsc.3.1.47
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lavie, D., Uriel, S., & Tushman, M.L. (2010). Exploration and exploitation within and across organizations. Academy of Management Annals, 4, 109-155.10.5465/19416521003691287
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Le Mens, G., Hannan, M., & Polos, L. (2015). Organizational obsolescence, drifting tastes and age dependence in organizational life chances. Organization Science, 26(2), 550-570.10.1287/orsc.2014.0910
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lee, G.K. (2008). Relevance of organizational capabilities and its dynamics: what to learn from entrants’ product portfolios about the determinants of entry timing. Strategic Management Journal, 29(12), 1257-1280.10.1002/smj.716
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lee, J., Lee, J., & Lee, H. (2003). Exploration and exploitation in the presence of network externalities. Management Science, 49, 553-70.10.1287/mnsc.49.4.553.14417
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lee, S.U., Park, G., & Kang, J. (2018). The double-edged effects of the corporate venture capital unit’s structural autonomy on corporate investors’ explorative and exploitative innovation. Journal of Business Research, 88, 141-149.10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.049
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lev, B., & Zambon, S. (2003). Intangibles and intellectual capital: an introduction to a special issue. European Accounting Review, 12(4), 597-603.10.1080/0963818032000162849
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lev, B., & Zarowin, P. (1999). The boundaries of financial reporting and how to extend them. Journal of Accounting Research, 37(2), 353-385.10.2307/2491413
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 95-112.10.1002/smj.4250141009
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Li, C. R., Lin, C. J., & Chu, C. P. (2008). The nature of market orientation and the ambidexterity of innovations. Management Decision, 46, 1002–1026.10.1108/00251740810890186
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Li, H., Wu, Y., Cao, D., & Wang, Y. (2021). Organizational mindfulness towards digital transformation as a prerequisite of information processing capability to achieve market agility. Journal of Business Research, 122, 700-712.10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.036
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Liang, T., You, J., & Liu, C. (2010). A resource-based perspective on information technology and firm performance: A meta analysis. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 110, 1138-1158.10.1108/02635571011077807
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lubatkin, M. H., Simsek, Z., Ling, Y., & Veiga, J. F. (2006). Ambidexterity and performance in small to medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration. Journal of Management, 32, 646–672.10.1177/0149206306290712
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21, 135-17310.2307/258632
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lumpkin, G.T., & Dess, G.G. (2001). Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: the moderating role of environment and industry life cycle. Journal of Business Venturing, 16, 429-51.10.1016/S0883-9026(00)00048-3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ma, C., Liu, H., Gu, J., & Dou, J. (2018). How entrepreneurs’ Zhong-yong thinking improves new venture performance. Chinese Management Studies, 12(2), 323-345.10.1108/CMS-10-2016-0219
]Search in Google Scholar
[
March, J. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87.10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Markides, C. C., & Charitou, C. D. (2004). Competing with dual business models: A contingency approach. Academy of Management Executive, 18, 22-36.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Menguc, B., & Auh, S. (2008). The asymmetric moderating role of market orientation on the ambidexterity-firm performance relationship for prospectors and defenders. Industrial Marketing Management, 37(4), 455-70.10.1016/j.indmarman.2007.05.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Miller, D., & Friesen, P.H. (1983). Strategy-making and environment: the third link. Strategic Management Journal, 4, 221-35.10.1002/smj.4250040304
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Miller, D., Droge, C., & Toulouse, J.M. (1988). Strategic process and content as mediators between organizational context and structure. Academy of Management Journal, 31(3), 544-569.10.2307/256459
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mudambi, R., & Swift, T. (2011). Proactive R&D management and firm growth: A punctuated equilibrium model. Research Policy, 40(3), 429-440.10.1016/j.respol.2010.10.014
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mukherjee, T., & Sen, S. (2018). Sustainable growth rate and its determinants: A study on some selected companies in India. Global Multidisciplinary, 10(1), 100-108.10.18535/afmj/v3i1.10
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ocak, M., & Fındık, D. (2019). The impact of intangible assets and sub-components of intangible assets on sustainable growth and firm value: evidence from Turkish listed firms. Sustainability, 11, 53-59.10.3390/su11195359
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Oliveira, L., Rodrigues, L., & Craige, L. (2010). Intangible assets and value relevance: evidence from the Portuguese stock exchange. The British Accounting Review, 44, 241-252.10.1016/j.bar.2010.08.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Prajogo, D., & McDermott, C.M. (2014). Antecedents of service innovation in SMEs: comparing the effects of external and internal factors. Journal of Small Business Management, 52(3), 521-540.10.1111/jsbm.12047
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Prange, C., & Schlegelmilch, B.B. (2010). Heading for the next innovation archetype?. Journal of Business Strategy, 31(1), 46-55.10.1108/02756661011012778
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G., & Tushman, M.L. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organization Science, 20(4), 685-695.10.1287/orsc.1090.0428
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rothaermel, R.T., & Deeds, D.L. (2004). Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology: a system of new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 201-21.10.1002/smj.376
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Santos, L.L.D., Borini, F.M., & Pereira, R.M. (2020). Bricolage as a path towards organizational innovativeness in times of market and technological turbulence. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 1, 20-39
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25, 217-26.10.5465/amr.2000.2791611
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shanker, R., Bhanugopan, R., VAN DER Heijden, B.I., & Farrell, M. (2017). Organizational climate for innovation and organizational performance: the mediating effect of innovative work behavior. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 100, 67-77.10.1016/j.jvb.2017.02.004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sheng, M.L. (2017). A dynamic capabilities-based framework of organizational sense making through combinative capabilities towards exploratory and exploitative product innovation in turbulent environments. Industrial Marketing Management, 65, 28-38.10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.06.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Siegel, P., & Borgia, C. (2007). The measurement and recognition of intangible assets. Journal of Bussiness and Public Afferis, 1(1), 1-19.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Simsek, Z., Heavey, C., Veiga, J.F., & Souder, D. (2009). A typology for aligning organizational ambidexterity’s conceptualizations, antecedents, and outcomes. Journal of Management Studies, 46(5), 864-894.10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00841.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sirén, C., Kohtamäki, M., & Kuckertz, A. (2012). Exploration and exploitation strategies, profit performance and the mediating role of strategic learning: Escaping the exploitation trap. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 6, 18–41.10.1002/sej.1126
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Skinner, D. (2008). Accounting for intangibles: a critical review of policy recommendations. Accounting and Bussiness Research, 38(3), 191-204.10.1080/00014788.2008.9663332
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Soto-Acosta, P., Popa, S., & Martinez-Conesa, I. (2018). Information technology, knowledge management and environmental dynamism as drivers of innovation ambidexterity: a study in SMEs. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(4), 931-948.10.1108/JKM-10-2017-0448
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Swanson, Z.L., & Singer, R. (2002). Are investor reactions to R&D influenced by the corporate headquarter’s location. Review of Quantitative Finance Account, 18(1), 5-19.10.1023/A:1013883126643
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tahat, Y.A., Ahmed, A.H., & Alhadab, M.M. (2018). The impact of intangibles on firms’ financial and market performance: UK evidence. Review of Quantitative Finance Account, 50(1), 1147-1168.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tang, Q., Gu, F.F., Xie, E., Wu, Z., & Ghauri, P. (2020). Exploratory and exploitative OFDI from emerging markets: impacts on firm performance. International Business Review, 29(2), 16-31.10.1016/j.ibusrev.2019.101661
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Turulja, L., & Bajgoric, N. (2019). Innovation, firms’ performance and environmental turbulence: is there a moderator or mediator?. European Journal of Innovation Management, 22(1), 213-232.10.1108/EJIM-03-2018-0064
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tushman, M.L., & O’Reilly, C.A. (1996). Ambidextrous organizations: managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38, 8-29.10.2307/41165852
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Uotila, J. (2018). Exploratory and exploitative adaptation in turbulent and complex landscapes. European Management Review, 15(4), 505-519.10.1111/emre.12140
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Uotila, J., Maula, M. V. J., Keil, T., & Zahra, S. A. (2009). Exploration, exploitation, and financial performance: Analysis of S&P 500 corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 30, 221–231.10.1002/smj.738
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Van Ark, B., Hao, J., Corrado, C., & Hulten, C. (2009). Measuring intangible capital and its contribution to economic growth in Europe. EIB Papers, 14, 62–93.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vera, D., & Crossan, M. (2004). Strategic leadership and organization learning. Academy of Management Review, 29, 222-40.10.2307/20159030
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Villalonga, B. (2004). Intangible Resources, Tobin’s q, and sustainability of performance differences. Journal of Economic Behaviour, 54, 205–230.10.1016/j.jebo.2003.07.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wang, M.-C., & Fang, S.-C. (2012). The moderating effect of environmental uncertainty on the relationship between network structures and the innovative performance of a new venture. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 27(4), 311-323.10.1108/08858621211221689
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wang, M.C., Chen, P.C., & Fang, S.C. (2021). How environmental turbulence influences firms’ entrepreneurial orientation: the moderating role of network relationships and organizational inertia. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 36(1), 48-5910.1108/JBIM-05-2019-0170
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wang, Y., & Wang, K.Y. (2017). How do firms tackle strategic change? A theoretical model of the choice between dynamic capability-based and ad hoc problem-solving approaches. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 30(5), 725-743.10.1108/JOCM-03-2016-0045
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wei, Z., Yi, Y., & Yuan, C. (2011). Bottom-up learning, organizational formalization, and ambidextrous innovation. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 24(3), 314-329.10.1108/09534811111132712
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Xu, J., & Wang, B. (2018). Intellectual capital, financial performance and companies’ sustainable growth: Evidence from the Korean manufacturing industry. Sustainability, 10(1), 46-5110.3390/su10124651
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zaheer, H., Breyer, Y., & Dumay, J. (2019). Digital entrepreneurship: an interdisciplinary structured literature review and research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 148, 73-85.10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119735
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zahra, S.A. (1993). Environment, corporate entrepreneurship, and financial performance: a taxonomic approach. Journal of Business Venturing, 8(4), 319-340.10.1016/0883-9026(93)90003-N
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zhou, K.Z., & Tse, Y.D.K. (2005). The effects of strategic orientations on technology- and market- based breakthrough innovations. Journal of Marketing, 69(2), 42-60.10.1509/jmkg.69.2.42.60756
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zhou, Y., Lu, L., & Chang, X. (2016). Averting risk or embracing opportunity? Exploring the impact of ambidextrous capabilities on innovation of Chinese firms in internationalization. Cross Cultural and Strategic Management, 23(4), 569-589.10.1108/CCSM-07-2014-0085
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zhou, Y., Shu, C., Jiang, W., & Gao, S. (2019). Green management, firm innovations, and environmental turbulence. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(4), 567-581.10.1002/bse.2265
]Search in Google Scholar
