[Adams, R., Bessant, J., & Phelps, R. (2006). Innovation management measurement: A review. International journal of management reviews, 8(1), 21-47.10.1111/j.1468-2370.2006.00119.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Afuah, A., & Afuah, A. (2003). Innovation management: strategies, implementation and profits. Oxford University Press: New York.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ambec, S., Cohen, M. A., Elgie, S., & Lanoie, P. (2013). The Porter hypothesis at 20: can environmental regulation enhance innovation and competitiveness? Review of environmental economics and policy, 7(1), 2-22.10.1093/reep/res016]Search in Google Scholar
[Arrow, K. J. (1962). The economic implications of learning by doing. The review of economic studies, 29(3), 155-173.10.2307/2295952]Search in Google Scholar
[Baldwin, J. R., & Johnson, J. (1999). Entry, innovation and firm growth. In Are small firms important? Their role and impact (pp. 51-77). Springer, Boston, MA.10.1007/978-1-4615-5173-7_4]Search in Google Scholar
[Baldwin, J. R., & Sabourin, D. (2002). Advanced technology use and firm performance in Canadian manufacturing in the 1990s. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(4), 761-789.10.1093/icc/11.4.761]Search in Google Scholar
[Boddy, C. R. (2016). Sample size for qualitative research. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 19(4), 426-432.10.1108/QMR-06-2016-0053]Search in Google Scholar
[Bunea, O.I., Corboș, R.A., Popescu, R.I., Todircan, M. (2018). The Importance of Promotion Policy in Increasing the Competitiveness of Cultural Organizations in Romania. Case Study: The National Museum of Natural History „Grigore Antipa”. In Proceedings of the 31st International Business Information Management Association Conference - Innovation Management and Education Excellence through Vision 2020. (Vol. 1, No. 11, pp. 372-384).]Search in Google Scholar
[Carstea, G., Corbos, R. A., Popescu, R. I., & Bunea, O. I. (2017). ANALYSIS OF THE INFLUENCE OF SOME INDICATORS ON THE PROFITABILITY OF THE FMCG RETAIL MARKET IN ROMANIA. In Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE (Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 481-492). Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cârstea, G., Deac, V. Popa, I. & Podgoreanu, S. (2002). Analiza strategică a mediului concurenţial. Editura Economică: București.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chow, S. C., Shao, J., Wang, H., & Lokhnygina, Y. (2017). Sample size calculations in clinical research. Chapman and Hall/CRC.10.1201/9781315183084]Search in Google Scholar
[Clark, J., & Guy, K. (1998). Innovation and competitiveness: a review: Practitioners’ forum. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 10(3), 363-395.10.1080/09537329808524322]Search in Google Scholar
[Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological bulletin, 112(1), 155.10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155]Search in Google Scholar
[Corbos, R. A. (2011). Integration and Competition–Appropriate Approaches for Achieving Excellence in Management. Business Excellence and Management, 1(1), 67-73.]Search in Google Scholar
[Crépon, B., Duguet, E., & Mairessec, J. (1998). Research, Innovation And Productivity: An Econometric Analysis At The Firm Level. Economics of Innovation and new Technology, 7(2), 115-158.10.1080/10438599800000031]Search in Google Scholar
[Damijan, J. P., Kostevc, Č., & Rojec, M. (2011). Innovation and firms’ productivity growth in Slovenia: Sensitivity of results to sectoral heterogeneity and to estimation method. In Innovation, Growth and Competitiveness (pp. 165-193). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.10.1007/978-3-642-14965-8_8]Search in Google Scholar
[Dell, R. B., Holleran, S., & Ramakrishnan, R. (2002). Sample size determination. ILAR journal, 43(4), 207-213.10.1093/ilar.43.4.207]Search in Google Scholar
[Dupont, W. D., & Plummer Jr, W. D. (1990). Power and sample size calculations: a review and computer program. Controlled clinical trials, 11(2), 116-128.10.1016/0197-2456(90)90005-M]Search in Google Scholar
[Erkkilä, T., & Piironen, O. (2018). Rankings and Global Knowledge Governance: Higher Education, Innovation and Competitiveness. Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-68941-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Fagerberg, J. (2018). Mobilizing innovation for sustainability transitions: A comment on transformative innovation policy. Research Policy, 47(9), 1568-1576.10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.012]Search in Google Scholar
[Frishammar, J., Richtnér, A., Brattström, A., Magnusson, M., & Björk, J. (2018). Opportunities and challenges in the new innovation landscape: Implications for innovation auditing and innovation management. European Management Journal.10.1016/j.emj.2018.05.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Ghasemi, A., & Zahediasl, S. (2012). Normality tests for statistical analysis: a guide for non-statisticians. International journal of endocrinology and metabolism, 10(2), 486.10.5812/ijem.3505369361123843808]Search in Google Scholar
[Griffith, R., Huergo, E., Mairesse, J., & Peters, B. (2006). Innovation and productivity across four European countries. Oxford review of economic policy, 22(4), 483-498.10.1093/oxrep/grj028]Search in Google Scholar
[Halpern, L., & Muraközy, B. (2012). Innovation, productivity and exports: the case of Hungary. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 21(2), 151-173.10.1080/10438599.2011.561995]Search in Google Scholar
[Harwiki, W., Choiron, A., & Hartini, S. (2018). BATIK CREATIVE INDUSTRY: CREATIVITY, INNOVATION AND COMPETITIVENESS TO ENCOUNTER GLOBAL MARKET. JBFEM, 1(2), 189-196.10.32770/jbfem.vol1189-196]Search in Google Scholar
[Hashi, I., & Stojcic, N. (2010). The Impact of Innovation Activities on Firm Performance Using a Multi (Stage Model: Evidence from the Community Innovation Survey 4. (Working Paper No. 410/2010). Network Studies and Analyses. Warsaw.10.2139/ssrn.1680935]Search in Google Scholar
[Kamasak, R. (2015). Determinants of innovation performance: a resource-based study. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 1330-1337.10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.311]Search in Google Scholar
[Kim, H. Y. (2013). Statistical notes for clinical researchers: assessing normal distribution (2) using skewness and kurtosis. Restorative dentistry & endodontics, 38(1), 52-54.10.5395/rde.2013.38.1.52359158723495371]Search in Google Scholar
[Kotrlik, J. W. K. J. W., & Higgins, C. C. H. C. C. (2001). Organizational research: Determining appropriate sample size in survey research appropriate sample size in survey research. Information technology, learning, and performance journal, 19(1), 43.]Search in Google Scholar
[Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and psychological measurement, 30(3), 607-610.10.1177/001316447003000308]Search in Google Scholar
[Lee, C. (2004). The determinants of innovation in the Malaysian manufacturing sector: an econometric analysis at the firm level. ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 21(3), 319-329.10.1355/AE21-3E]Search in Google Scholar
[Lehtoranta, O. (2005). Determinants of Innovation and the Economic Growth of Innovators. Tracing the evolution of innovative firms over time.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lööf, H., Peters, B., & Janz, N. (2004). Innovation and productivity in German and Swedish manufacturing firms: Is there a common story?. Problems & perspectives in management, 2, 184-204.]Search in Google Scholar
[Machin, D., Campbell, M. J., Tan, S. B., & Tan, S. H. (2018). Sample Sizes for Clinical, Laboratory and Epidemiology Studies. John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781118874905]Search in Google Scholar
[Mardia, K. V. (1970). Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications. Biometrika, 57(3), 519-530.10.1093/biomet/57.3.519]Search in Google Scholar
[Masso, J., & Vahter, P. (2008). Technological innovation and productivity in late-transition Estonia: econometric evidence from innovation surveys. The European Journal of Development Research, 20(2), 240-261.10.1080/09578810802060751]Search in Google Scholar
[Popescu, R. I., Corboş, R. A., & Bunea, O. I. (2018). STUDY ON THE PERCEPTION OF YOUNG ROMANIANS ON THE ECO-MARKETING AND PROMOTION EFFICIENCY IN INCREASING THE ENVIRONMENTAL NGOs COMPETITIVENESS. Calitatea, 19(S1), 417-422.]Search in Google Scholar
[Popescu, R. I., Corbos, R. A., Comănescu, M., & Bunea, O. I. (2017). Ecological Marketing– Strategic Option for Business Development in Bucharest. ECONOMIC COMPUTATION AND ECONOMIC CYBERNETICS STUDIES AND RESEARCH, 51(2), 67-83.]Search in Google Scholar
[Porter, M. E. (1985). Technology and competitive advantage. Journal of business strategy, 5(3), 60-78.10.1108/eb039075]Search in Google Scholar
[Razali, N.M. & Wah, Y.B. (2011). Power comparisons of Shapiro-Wilk, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Lilliefors and Anderson-Darling tests. Journal of Statistical Modeling and Analytics, 2(1), 21-33.]Search in Google Scholar
[Romanian National Institute of Statistics (2018). Research-Development and Innovation. Retrieved December 10, 2018, from http://statistici.insse.ro/shop/index.jsp?page=tempo2&lang=en&context=37.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schmider, E., Ziegler, M., Danay, E., Beyer, L., & Bühner, M. (2010). Is it really robust? Methodology.10.1027/1614-2241/a000016]Search in Google Scholar
[Shapiro, S.S. & Wilk, M.B. (1965). An Analysis of Variance Test for Normality. Biometrika, 52(3/4), 591-611.10.1093/biomet/52.3-4.591]Search in Google Scholar
[Shieh, G. (2018). Sample size determination for examining interaction effects in factorial designs under variance heterogeneity. Psychological methods, 23(1), 113.10.1037/met000015028493739]Search in Google Scholar
[Singh, A. S., & Masuku, M. B. (2014). Sampling techniques & determination of sample size in applied statistics research: An overview. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, 2(11), 1-22.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tidd, J., & Bessant, J. (2018). Innovation Management Challenges: From fads to fundamentals. International Journal of Innovation Management, 22(05), 1840007.10.1142/S1363919618400078]Search in Google Scholar
[Trott, P. (2008). Innovation management and new product development. Pearson education.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ulusoy, G., Kılıç, K., Günday, G., & Alpkan, L. (2010). Innovation determinants in manufacturing firms.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vakhitova, G., & Pavlenko, T. (2010). Innovation and productivity: A firm level study of Ukrainian manufacturing sector. Discussion Papers, 27.]Search in Google Scholar
[Weinberg, J. M., & Kleinman, K. P. (2003). Good study design and analysis plans as features of ethical research with humans. IRB: Ethics & Human Research, 25(5), 11-14.10.2307/3564600]Search in Google Scholar
[Zehir, C., Can, E., & Karaboga, T. (2015). Linking entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: the role of differentiation strategy and innovation performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 210, 358-367.10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.381]Search in Google Scholar
[Zemplinerová, A., & Hromádková, E. (2012). Determinants of firm’s innovation. Prague Economic Papers, 21(4), 487-503.10.18267/j.pep.436]Search in Google Scholar