[
1. Boening, DW., 2000. Ecological effects, transport, and fate of mercury: a general review. Chemosphere 40 (12):1335-1351;10.1016/S0045-6535(99)00283-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Bose-O’Reilly, S., McCarty, KM., Steckling, N., Lettmeier, B., 2010. Mercury exposure and children’s heath. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care 40:186–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cppeds.2010.07.002;
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Hong, Y.S., Kim, Y.M., Lee, K.E., 2012. Methylmercury Exposure and Health Effects. J Prev Med Public Health, 45, 353-363. DOI: 10.3961/jpmph.2012.45.6.353;
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Kibria, G., 2014. Trace/heavy metals and its impact on environment, biodiversity and human health – a short review. Technical report 1-5. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.3102.2568/1;
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Jędruch, A., Bełdowska, M., Kwasigroch, U., Normant-Saremba, M., Saniewska, D., 2018. Mercury fractionation in marine macrofauna using thermodesorption technique: Method and its application. Talanta 189. DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2018.07.047;
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Jędruch, A., Bełdowska, M., 2020. Mercury forms in the benthic food web of a temperate coastal lagoon (southern Baltic Sea). Mar Pollut Bull 153, 110968. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.110968;
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. HELCOM, 2013. Climate change in the Baltic Sea area: HELCOM thematic assessments in 2013 Balt sea Environ Proc 137, 66;
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Wang D, Shi X, Wei S (2003) Accumulation and transformation of atmospheric mercury in soil. Sci Total Environ 304:209–214;10.1016/S0048-9697(02)00569-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Pacyna, E.G., Pacyna, J.M., Steenhuisen, F., Wilson, S., 2006. Global anthropogenic mercury emission inventory for 2000. Atmos Environ 40, 4048–4063. DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.03.041;
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Pacyna, E.G., Pacyna, J.M., Sundseth, K., Munthe, J., Kindbom, K., Wilson, S.,Steenhuisen, F., Maxson, P., 2010. Global emission of mercury to the atmospherefrom anthropogenic sources in 2005 and projections to 2020. Atmos Environ 44,2487–2499;10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.06.009
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Pirrone, N., Cinnirella, S., Feng, X., Finkelman, R.B., Friedli, H.R., Leaner, J., Mason, R.,Mukherjee, A.B., Stracher, G.B., Streets, D.G., Telmer, K., 2010. Global mercury emission to the atmosphere from anthropogenic and natural sources. Atmos Chem Phys 10, 5951–5964. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5951-201010.5194/acp-10-5951-2010
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Bełdowska, M., Saniewska, S., Falkowska, L., Lewandowska, A., 2012. Mercury in particulate matter over Polish zone of the southern Baltic Sea. Atmos Environ 46, 397-404. DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.09.046;
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Saniewska, D., Bełdowska, M., Bełdowski, J., Saniewski, M., Szubska, M., Romanowski, A., Falkowska, L., 2014. The impact of land use and season on the riverine transport of mercury into the marine coastal zone. Environ Monit Assess 186, 7593–7604. DOI:10.1007/s10661-014-3950-z;
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Gębka, K., Bełdowska, M., Saniewska, D., Kuliński, K., Bełdowski, J., 2018. Watershed characteristics and climate factors effects on the temporal variability of mercury inthe southern Baltic Sea rivers. J. Environ. Sci. 68, 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j;
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Gębka K., Bełdowska M., Saniewska D., Korejwo E., Saniewski M., 2020a. Meteorological phenomenon as a key factor controlling variability of labile particulate mercury in rivers and its inflow into coastal zone of the sea. Environmental Research 184, 109355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.109355;
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Gębka, K., Saniewska, D., Bełdowska, M., 2020b. Mobility of mercury in soil and itstransport into the sea. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06790-8;
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Svoray, T., Ben-Said, S., 2010. Soil loss, water ponding and sediment deposition variations as a consequence of rainfall intensity and land use: a multi-criteria analysis. Earth Surf Process Landforms 35, 202–216. DOI:10.1002/esp.1901;
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Gębka, K., Beldowska, M., Szymczak, E., Saniewska, D., 2019. Temporal changes in the content of labile and stabile mercury forms in soil and their inflow to the southernBaltic Sea. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.109434.jes.2017.11.030;
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. Hurley, J.P., Benoit, J.M., Babiarz, C.L., Shafer, M.M., Andren, A.W., Sullivan, J.R., i in., 1995. Influences of watershed characteristics on mercury levels in Wisconsin rivers. Int J Environ Sci Technol 29, 1867–1875. DOI: 10.1021/es00007a026;
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. Lacerda, L.D., Bastos, W.R., Almeida, M.D., 2012. The impacts of land use changes in the mercury flux in the Madeira River. Western Amazon. Earth Sciences. DOI: 10.1590/S0001-37652012000100007;
]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. Lechler, P.J., Milller, J.R., Hsu, L.C., Desilets, M.O., 1997. Mercury mobility at the Carson River superfund site, west-central Nevada, USA – interpretation of mercury speciation data in mill tailing, soils, and sediments. J Geochem Explor 58, 259-67. DOI: 10.1016/S0375-6742(96)00071-4;
]Search in Google Scholar
[
22. Bełdowski, J., Pempkowiak, J., 2003. Horizontal and vertical variabilities of mercury concentration and speciation in sediments of the GdańskBasin, Southern Baltic Sea. Chemosphere 52:645–654. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(03)00246-7;
]Search in Google Scholar
[
23. Bełdowska, M., Kobos, J., 2016. Mercury concentration in phytoplankton in response to warming of an autumn – winter season. Environ Pollut 215, 38–47;10.1016/j.envpol.2016.05.00227176763
]Search in Google Scholar
[
24. Korzeniewski, K., 1993. The Puck Bay, FRUG: Gdańsk, Poland;
]Search in Google Scholar
[
25. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), 1996. Method 1669. Sampling Ambient Water for determination of Metals at EPA Water Quality Criteria Levels. (Washington);
]Search in Google Scholar
[
26. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), 2002. Method 1631. Revision E: Mercury in Water by Oxidation Purge and Trap, and Cold Vapor Atomic Fluorescence Spectrometry. (Washington);
]Search in Google Scholar
[
27. Bełdowska, M., Saniewska, D., Gębka, K., Kwasigroch, U., Korejwo, E., Kobos, J., 2018. Simple screening technique for determination of adsorbed and absorbed mercury in particulate matter in atmospheric and aquatic environment. Talanta 182, 340–347. DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2018.01.082;
]Search in Google Scholar
[
28. Pemkowiak, J., 1997. Zarys geochemii morskiej. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego. ISBN: 83-7017-717-4;
]Search in Google Scholar
[
29. Pasieczna, A., 2003. Atlas zanieczyszczeń gleb miejskich w Polsce. Państwowy Instytut Geologiczny, Warszawa. ISBN: 83-7372-636-5;
]Search in Google Scholar
[
30. Korejwo, E., Saniewska, D., Bełdowska, M., 2020. Fractionation of mercury in aerosols of the southern Baltic coastal zone. Atmospheric Environment 235:117623. DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117623;
]Search in Google Scholar
[
31. Saniewska, D., Gębka, K., Bełdowska, M., Siedlewicz, G., Bełdowski, J., Wilman, B., 2019. Impact of hydrotechnical works on outflow of mercury from the riparian zone to a river and input to the sea. Mar Pollut Bull 142, 361-376. DOI:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.03.059;
]Search in Google Scholar
[
32. Inglett, P.W., Reddy, K.R., Corstanje, R., 2005. Anaerobic Soils. In: Encyclopedia of Soils in the Environment. Gainesville, FL, USA: Elsevier;10.1016/B0-12-348530-4/00178-8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
33. Rozporządzenie Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady (UE) 2019/1009 z dnia 5 czerwca 2019 r. ustanawiające przepisy dotyczące udostępniania na rynku produktow nawozowych UE, zmieniające rozporządzenia (WE) nr 1069/2009 i (WE) nr 1107/2009 oraz uchylające rozporządzenie (WE) nr 2003/2003;
]Search in Google Scholar
[
34. Shanley, J.B., Mast, M.A., Campbell, D.H., Aiken, G.R., Krabbenhoft, D.P., i in., 2008.Comparison of total mercury and methylmercury cycling at five sites using the smallwatershed approach. USGS Staff – Published Research, US Geology Survey. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2007.12.031;
]Search in Google Scholar
[
35. Shuster, P.F.,Shanley, J.B., Reddy, M.M., Aiken, G.R., Marvin-DiPasquale, M., Roth, D.A., Taylor, H.E., Krabbenhoft, D.P., Dewild, J.F., 2008. Mercury and organic carbon dynamics during runoff episodes from a northeastern USA watershed. Water Air Soil Pollut 187, 89–108. DOI:10.1007/s11270-007-9500-3;
]Search in Google Scholar
[
36. Fryirs, K.A., Brierley, G.J., 2012. Sediment movement and deposition in river systems. In:Geomorphic Analysis of River Systems: an Approach to Reading the Landscape. A John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Publication, pp. 81–115;10.1002/9781118305454.ch6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
37. Murray Hicks, D., Gomez, B., 2016. Sediment transport. In: Mathias Kondolf, G., Piegay, Herve (Eds.), Tools in Fluvial Geomorphology. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, pp. 324–356;10.1002/9781118648551.ch15
]Search in Google Scholar
[
38. Saniewska, D., Bełdowska, M., Bełdowski, J., Saniewski, M., Gębka, K., Szubska, M.,Wochna, A., 2018a. Impact of intense rains and flooding on mercury riverine input to the coastal zone. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 127, 593–602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.12.058;
]Search in Google Scholar
[
39. Bełdowski, J., Bełdowska, M., 2008. Mercury partitioning between solid and suspended phases in the southern Baltic Sea. Rocz. Ochrony Środowska 10, 123–133;
]Search in Google Scholar
[
40. Bełdowska, M., Mudrak-Cegiołka, S., 2017. Mercury concentration variability in the zooplankton of the southern Baltic coastal zone. Progress in Oceanography 159, doi:10.1016/j.pocean.2017.09.009;
]Search in Google Scholar
[
41. Bernard, S., Enayati, A., Redwood, L., Roger, H., Binstock, T., 2001. Autism: a novel form of mercury poisoning. Med Hypotheses 56, 462–471.10.1054/mehy.2000.128111339848
]Search in Google Scholar
