Acceso abierto

Insights of C. S. Lewis Concerning Faith, Doubt, Pride, Corrupted Love, and Dying to Oneself in Till We Have Faces

Perichoresis's Cover Image
Perichoresis
A Multi-Angle Examination of C. S. Lewis's Till We Have Faces. Theological, Philosophical, Ethical, and Literary Insights from one of Lewis's Greatest Novels. Issue Editor: Zachary Breitenbach

Cite

Lewis CS (1960) The Four Loves. San Diego, CA: Harcourt. Search in Google Scholar

Lewis CS (1970) God in the Dock. In Hooper W (ed) God in the Dock: Essays on Theology and Ethics. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, pp. 263-268. Search in Google Scholar

Lewis CS (2002) The Great Divorce. In The Complete C. S. Lewis Signature Classics. New York, NY: HarperCollins, pp. 463-541. Search in Google Scholar

Lewis CS (2002) A Grief Observed. In The Complete C. S. Lewis Signature Classics. New York, NY: HarperCollins, pp. 647-688. Search in Google Scholar

Lewis CS (1970) Is Theism Important? In Hooper W (ed) God in the Dock: Essays on Theology and Ethics. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, pp. 186-191. Search in Google Scholar

Lewis CS (2000) Mere Christianity: A Revised and Amplified Edition, with a New Introduction, of the Three Books Broadcast Talks, Christian Behaviour, and Beyond Personality. New York, NY: HarperCollins. Search in Google Scholar

Lewis CS (1970) Myth Became Fact. In Hooper W (ed) God in the Dock: Essays on Theology and Ethics. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, pp. 54-60. Search in Google Scholar

Lewis CS (2002) The Problem of Pain. In The Complete C. S. Lewis Signature Classics. New York, NY: HarperCollins, pp. 543-646. Search in Google Scholar

Lewis CS (1956) Till We Have Faces: A Myth Retold. San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace. Search in Google Scholar

Lewis CS (1970) Work and Prayer. In Hooper W (ed) God in the Dock: Essays on Theology and Ethics. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, pp. 104-107. Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2284-7308
Idioma:
Inglés
Calendario de la edición:
3 veces al año
Temas de la revista:
Theology and Religion, General Topics and Biblical Reception