Acceso abierto

Patterns of the Parliamentary Debates: How Deliberative are Turkish Democratic Opening Debates?


Cite

Azmanova, A. (2011): Against the politics of fear: On deliberation, inclusion and the political economy of trust. Philosophy & Social Criticism 37(4): 401–412.10.1177/0191453710396808Search in Google Scholar

Bächtiger, A. (2014): Debate and deliberation in parliament. In The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies: 145–66.Search in Google Scholar

Bachtiger, A. – Steenbergen, M. R. (2004): The real world of deliberation. A comparative study of its favorable conditions in legislatures. EUI Working Paper SPS No. 2004/17.Search in Google Scholar

Bächtiger, A. – Hangartner, D. – Hess, P. – Fraefel, C. (2008): Patterns of parliamentary discourse: How ‘Deliberative’ are German legislative debates?. German Politics 17(3): 270–292.10.1080/09644000802300486Search in Google Scholar

Bachtiger, A. – Niemeyer, S. – Neblo, M. – Steenbergen, M. – Steiner, J. (2010): Disentangling Diversity in Deliberative Democracy: Competing Theories, Their Blind Spots and Complementarities. Journal of Political Philosophy 18(1): 32–63.10.1111/j.1467-9760.2009.00342.xSearch in Google Scholar

Bacik, G. (2011): The Nationalist Action Party in the 2011 elections: The limits of oscillating between state and society. Insight Turkey, 13(4), 171.Search in Google Scholar

Benhabib, S. (Ed.). (2021): Democracy and difference: Contesting the boundaries of the political. Princeton University Press.10.2307/j.ctv1nxcvsvSearch in Google Scholar

Bohman, J. F. (1990): Communication, ideology, and democratic theory. American Political Science Review 84(1): 93–109.10.2307/1963631Search in Google Scholar

Bohman, J. – Rehg, W. (Eds.). (1997): Deliberative democracy: Essays on reason and politics. MIT press.10.7551/mitpress/2324.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Condit, C. M. (1993): The critic as empath: Moving away from totalizing theory. Western Journal of Communication (includes Communication Reports) 57(2): 178–190.10.1080/10570319309374441Search in Google Scholar

Dryzek, J. S. (1990): Discursive democracy: Politics, policy, and political science. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781139173810Search in Google Scholar

Dryzek, J. S. (2002): Deliberative democracy and beyond: Liberals, critics, contestations. Oxford University Press on Demand.10.1093/019925043X.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Felicetti, A. – Niemeyer, S. – Curato, N. (2016): Improving deliberative participation: connecting mini-publics to deliberative systems. European Political Science Review 8(3): 427–448.10.1017/S1755773915000119Search in Google Scholar

Fishkin, J. S. (1997): The voice of the people: Public opinion and democracy. Yale university press.Search in Google Scholar

Fishkin, J. S. – Luskin, R. C. (2005): Experimenting with a democratic ideal: Deliberative polling and public opinion. Acta politica 40(3): 284–298.10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500121Search in Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1980): The history of sexuality: interview. Oxford Literary Review, 4(2), 3–14.10.3366/olr.1980.002Search in Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1972): The archaeology of knowledge and the discourse on language. New York: Pantheon.Search in Google Scholar

Fraser, N. (1989): Unruly practices: Power, discourse, and gender in contemporary social theory. U of Minnesota Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gerhards, J. (1997): Diskursive versus liberale Öffentlichkeit: Eine empirische Auseinandersetzung mit Jürgen Habermas. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 49(1): 1–34.Search in Google Scholar

Gutmann, A. – Thompson, D. F. (1998): Democracy and disagreement. Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Habermas, J. (1981): Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns [Theory of communicative action]. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Search in Google Scholar

Habermas, J. (1991): The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. MIT press.Search in Google Scholar

Habermas, J. (2005): Concluding comments on empirical approaches to deliberative politics. Acta politica 40(3): 384–392.10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500119Search in Google Scholar

Habermas, J. (2015): Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. John Wiley & Sons.Search in Google Scholar

Himmelroos, S. (2020): Discourse quality in deliberative citizen forums – a comparison of four deliberativemini-publics.Journal of Deliberative Democracy 13(1).10.16997/jdd.269Search in Google Scholar

Holzinger, K. (2004): Bargaining through arguing: an empirical analysis based on speech act theory. Political Communication 21(2): 195–222.10.1080/10584600490443886Search in Google Scholar

Hürriyet. (2009): Baykal’dan Kürt Açılımı Açıklaması. 24 August 2009.Search in Google Scholar

Laclau, E. – Mouffe, C. (2014): Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics (Vol. 8). Verso Books.Search in Google Scholar

Lord, C. – Tamvaki, D. (2013): The politics of justification? Applying the ‘Discourse Quality Index’ to the study of the European Parliament. European Political Science Review 5(1): 27–54.10.1017/S1755773911000300Search in Google Scholar

Mansbridge, J. (1999): Everyday talk in the deliberative system. In Deliberative Politics: Essays on Democracy and Disagreement. Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Milliyet. (2009): Bahçeli: İhanet Projelerine Katkıda Bulunmamızı Beklemek Akıl Tutulması. 29 September.Search in Google Scholar

O’Flynn, I. A. N. (2007): Divided societies and deliberative democracy. British Journal of Political Science 37(4): 731–751.10.1017/S0007123407000397Search in Google Scholar

Ok, E. (2011): Are we becoming more distant?Exploring the nature of social polarization along ethnic lines in the city of Izmir. Unpublished MA Thesis, Istanbul, Sabaci University.Search in Google Scholar

Parlak, İ. – Öztürk, A. (2009): 2009–2015 Araliğinda Açilim Süreçlerine Yönelik Siyasi Parti Söylemleri Üzerine Karşilaştirmali Bir Analiz. LAÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 6(2), 87–114.Search in Google Scholar

Pedrini, S. (2014): Deliberative capacity in the political and civic sphere. Swiss Political Science Review 20(2): 263–286.10.1111/spsr.12074Search in Google Scholar

Rasch, B. E. (2011): Legislative debates and democratic deliberation in parliamentary systems. In Oslo-Yale International Workshop on Epistemic Democracy in Practice. Yale University, New Haven: 20–22.Search in Google Scholar

Rawls, J. (2020): A theory of justice. Harvard university press.10.2307/j.ctvkjb25mSearch in Google Scholar

Sarigil, Z., & Fazlioglu, O. (2013): Religion and ethno-nationalism: Turkey’s Kurdish issue. Nations and Nationalism, 19(3), 551–571.10.1111/nana.12011Search in Google Scholar

Şentürk, B. (2012): Bazılarının yası daha az tutulur: şiddet ve Kürt sorunu. Praksis, 28, 1–15.Search in Google Scholar

Setälä, M. (2014): Deliberative minipublics: Involving citizens in the democratic process. ECPR press.Search in Google Scholar

Stahl, B. C. (2004): Whose discourse? A comparison of the Foucauldian and Habermasian concepts of discourse in critical IS research. AMCIS 2004 Proceedings, 538.Search in Google Scholar

Steenbergen, M. R. – Bächtiger, A. – Spörndli, M. – Steiner, J. (2003): Measuring political deliberation: A discourse quality index. Comparative European Politics 1(1): 21–48.10.1057/palgrave.cep.6110002Search in Google Scholar

Steiner, J. (2012): The foundations of deliberative democracy: Empirical research and normative implications. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139057486Search in Google Scholar

Steiner, J. – Bächtiger, A. – Spörndli, M. – Steenbergen, M. R. (2005): Deliberative politics in action. Analysing parliamentary discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511491153Search in Google Scholar

TBMM Tutanak Dergisi (Grand National Assembly of Turkey Minutes), 13 November 2009.Search in Google Scholar

TBMM Tutanak Dergisi (Grand National Assembly of Turkey Minutes), 3 November 2009.Search in Google Scholar

Ugarriza, E. – Caluwaerts, D. (Eds.). (2014): Democratic Deliberation in Deeply Divided Societies: From Conflict to Common Ground. Springer.10.1057/9781137357816Search in Google Scholar

Ünal, M. C. (2016): Is it ripe yet? Resolving Turkey’s 30 years of conflict with the PKK. Turkish Studies, 17(1), 91–125.10.1080/14683849.2015.1124020Search in Google Scholar

Warren, M. E. (2007): Institutionalizing deliberative democracy. In Deliberation, participation and democracy, pp. 272–288. Palgrave Macmillan, London.10.1057/9780230591080_13Search in Google Scholar

Young, I. M. (2001): Activist challenges to deliberative democracy. Political theory 29(5): 670–690.10.1177/0090591701029005004Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
1801-3422
Idioma:
Inglés
Calendario de la edición:
2 veces al año
Temas de la revista:
Social Sciences, Political Science, other, International Relations