Acceso abierto

Organisational culture of construction companies in Lagos State, Nigeria


Cite

Fig. 1

Organisational culture framework. Source: Schein (2004).
Organisational culture framework. Source: Schein (2004).

Fig. 2

Corrected relationships between dimensions. Source: Ginevičius and Vaitkūnaitė (2006).
Corrected relationships between dimensions. Source: Ginevičius and Vaitkūnaitė (2006).

Fig. 3

The Competing Values Framework. Source: Cameron and Quinn (2006).
The Competing Values Framework. Source: Cameron and Quinn (2006).

Fig. 4

Scree plot
Scree plot

Fig. 5

Organisational culture profile
Organisational culture profile

Summary of factors and corresponding mean score

FactorsMeanRank
Strategic direction
• The company works with specific strategies, plans and a long-term goal4.09702
• The company reflects a leader showing direction and employees “follow” it4.02904
• If a client is dissatisfied, it is duly noted and removed3.89867
• There is continuous improvement of service quality3.93436
Communication
• Managers advices and attitudes are always at variance2.970122
• Managers are authoritative2.927524
• The person who is the leader of a work group is often recognised as being more important than the company2.131429
• Employees and/or managers often misunderstand each other2.358227
Adaptability
• Employees most often agree when solving problems or conflicts4.08703
• Existing rules and norms show more of direction than restrictions3.558012
• Sometimes there are situations when norms are only partially followed2.962723
• It is difficult for employees to adapt to changes in culture and they sometimes resist it2.619426
Involvement
• There is investigation of product characteristics and personnel needs3.469718
• Employees have favourable conditions for decision making and for giving various ideas, suggestions, notes and so on3.601411
Reward orientation
• Training programmes are encouraged to enhance skills of employees3.558012
• New or other important information reaches employees in due time3.558012
• There are fringe benefits and managers prioritise the welfare of employees3.150421
Agreement
• Employees agree about most rules, norms and values3.477916
• Employees have too much freedom and autonomy2.420327
Coordination and integration
• Different departments (groups) have many common things (goals, tasks etc.)3.529414
• There are created good conditions for the interesting work, therefore employees get used to their work willingly3.639710
• Reward system is correct (employees get paid according to the results and efforts)3.239119
Organisational learning
• Managers are eager to advise employees and motivate with charisma3.81628
• Team approach is used more often than individual work especially when solving important questions on a project4.08703
Confidence in leadership
• Sanctions and punishment are sometimes overlooked, i.e., managers get away from regulations and try another solution2.782625
• There is great dependence on the leaders of the company3.79719

Factor analysis: rotated component matrix

FactorsComponents
Factor 1Factor 2Factor 3Factor 4Factor 5Factor 6Factor 7Factor 8Factor 9
The company works with specific strategies, plans and a long-term goal0.780
The company reflects a leader showing direction and employees “follow it”0.772
If a client is dissatisfied, it is duly noted and removed0.594
There is continuous improvement of service quality0.547
Managers’ advices and attitudes are always at variance0.799
Managers are authoritative0.726
The person who is the leader of a work group is often recognised as being more important than the company0.537
Employees and/or managers often misunderstand each other0.501
Employees most often agree when solving problems or conflicts0.842
Existing rules and norms show more of direction than restrictions0.530
Sometimes there are situations when norms are only partially followed0.527
There is investigation of product characteristics and personnel needs0.820
Employees have favourable conditions for decision making and for giving ideas, suggestions and so on0.510
Factor Analysis. Rotated Component Matrix
Training programmes are encouraged to enhance skill of employees0.743
Feedback, new or other important information reaches employee in due time0.709
There are fringe benefits and managers prioritise the welfare of employees0.511
Employees agree about most rules, norms and values0.786
Employees have too much freedom and autonomy0.642
Different departments (groups) have many common things (goals, tasks etc.)0.816
There are created good conditions for the interesting work, therefore employees get used to their work willingly0.661
Reward system is correct (employees get paid according to results and efforts)0.584
Managers are eager to advise employees and motivate with charisma0.759
Team approach is used more than individual work especially when solving important questions on a project0.647
Sanctions and punishment are sometimes overlooked, i.e., managers get away from regulations and try another solution0.857
There is great dependence on the leaders of the company0.703

Factor analysis, Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) index and Bartlett’s test

KMO and Bartlett’s test
KMO measure of sampling adequacy0.575
Bartlett’s test of sphericityApprox. Chi-Square1,515.086
Df435
Sig.0.000

Organisational culture profile

Dominant characteristicsMeanOverall rank
Clan culture (CC)3.46814
Adhocracy culture (AC)3.56223
Market culture (MC)3.61881
Hierarchy culture (HC)3.60362
Organisational leadershipRank
There is mentoring (CC)3.32614
Entrepreneur, innovator or a risk-taker (AC)3.47792
Hard-driver, producer or competitor (MC)3.34563
Coordinator, organiser or an efficiency expert (HC)3.70291
Management of employees
Presence of teamwork, consensus, and participation (CC)3.52173
Innovation, freedom and uniqueness is encouraged (AC)3.68122
Production and achievement orientation (MC)4.00721
Security of employment (job stability) and predictability (HC)3.44124
Organisational glue
Existence of loyalty and tradition (CC)3.24644
Innovation and development (AC)3.53623
Focus on production and goal accomplishment (MC)4.08701
Rules and Policies (HC)3.65652
Strategic emphases
Participative and comfortable atmosphere (CC)3.35513
Dynamics and readiness (AC)3.52171
Atmosphere is competitive and confrontational (MC)3.24264
There is permanence and stability (HC)3.40582
Criteria of success
There is sensitivity to customers, concern for people (CC)3.89131
Product leader and innovator (AC)3.59423
Market penetration and market share (MC)3.41184
Dependable delivery, smooth scheduling of task (HC)3.81162

General information of respondents

Frequency (f)Percentage
Educational qualification
OND64.3
HND3122.1
BSc6244.3
MBA/MArch/MSc3927.9
NCE21.4
Respondent's profession
Architect3021.4
Builder5539.3
Engineer2618.6
Quantity surveyor21.4
Accountant21.4
Facility manager42.9
Office manager96.4
Public admin/secretary128.6
Total140100
Year of company's operation
0–51913.6
10-Jun3827.1
15-Nov3525
16–202417.1
Above 202417.1
Total140100
Number of years of professional experience
0–56546.4
10-Jun5640
15-Nov117.9
16–2042.9
Above 2042.9
Total140100
Respondents’ professional qualification
NSE2014.3
NIA2014.3
NIOB2820
NIQS21.4
NIM85.7
CIPM21.4
ICAN42.9
OSH23.6
No qualification5438.6
Total140100
Types of project
Public2014.3
Private8963.6
Both3122.1
Total140100

Total variance explained

FactorsTotal Eigen valuePercentage of varianceCumulative percentage
Strategic direction5.31817.72617.726
Communication2.8999.66227.388
Adaptability2.5308.43335.820
Involvement2.0636.87542.695
Reward orientation1.6605.53448.229
Agreement1.4944.98153.210
Coordination and integration1.4284.76057.970
Organisational learning1.3094.36262.332
Confidence in leadership1.1933.97866.310
eISSN:
1847-6228
Idioma:
Inglés
Calendario de la edición:
Volume Open
Temas de la revista:
Engineering, Introductions and Overviews, other