Demystifying progressive design build: implementation issues and lessons learned through case study analysis
y | 22 abr 2020
Acerca de este artículo
Article Category: Case Study
Publicado en línea: 22 abr 2020
Páginas: 2095 - 2108
Recibido: 15 dic 2019
Aceptado: 10 feb 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/otmcj-2020-0006
Palabras clave
© 2020 Luming Shang et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
The main proposal evaluation criteria in the WCUP project
| 1 | Essential characteristics of, and general approach to, managing the DB project (e.g., the understanding of the PDB method) |
| 2 | Engineering approach (e.g., the team’s strategy to develop the project in terms of functionality and quality of the work) |
| 3 | Approach to building architecture and urban design (e.g., how to stick to the UW architectural goal) |
| 4 | Management and approach to design development (e.g., the means of interaction within the team and between the team and owner during the design) |
| 5 | Management and completing approach to design and construction (e.g., how changes during the project design and construction will be managed) |
| 6 | Management and approach to commissioning and training (e.g., how the team will train the UW staff to allow the smooth transition to operations) |
| 7 | Ability to meet time and budget requirements |
| 8 | Acceptance of contract, bonding, and insurance (as a pass/fail decision) |
| 9 | Workload factor (e.g., impact of activities outside the project that may affect the team’s ability to carry out the work) |
| 10 | Location of the team (as it may affect the communication capability during the work) |
| 11 | Price factor, including the percentage rate for overhead and profit of the DB contractor |
| 12 | MBWE (minority- and women-owned enterprise) outreach plan |
Evaluation criteria used during the RFQ phase
| 1 | Technical qualification (e.g., technical skills and experiences) |
| 2 | Capability to perform the work (e.g., team’s organizational structure and management) |
| 3 | Financial capacity (as a pass/fail decision) |
| 4 | Relevant past performance (e.g., past experience of the similar projects) |
| 5 | Design excellence on a limited budget and schedule (e.g., examples of achieving high levels of quality for projects respecting time and budget) |
| 6 | Safety (e.g., the past safety records and accident prevention plans) |