Acceso abierto

The Planning and Appraisal of Mega Transport Infrastructure Projects Delivered by Public–Private Partnerships: The Case for the Use of Policy-Led Multi-Criteria Analysis

John Ward

John Ward

Bartlett School of Planning, University College LondonLondon,
Buscar este autor en
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Ward, John
, 
Harry T Dimitriou

Harry T Dimitriou

Bartlett School of Planning, University College LondonLondon,
Buscar este autor en
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Dimitriou, Harry T
, 
Brian G Field

Brian G Field

Bartlett School of Planning, University College LondonLondon,
Buscar este autor en
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Field, Brian G
 y 
Marco Dean

Marco Dean

Bartlett School of Planning, University College LondonLondon,
Buscar este autor en
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Dean, Marco
  
30 jul 2019
The Planning and Appraisal of Mega Transport Infrastructure Projects Delivered by Public–Private Partnerships: The Case for the Use of Policy-Led Multi-Criteria Analysis's Cover Image
Acerca de este artículo
Artículo anterior
Artículo siguiente
Cite
Descargar portada
Categoría del artículo: Research Article
Publicado en línea: 30 jul 2019
Páginas: 1992 - 2008
Recibido: 05 sept 2018
Aceptado: 05 nov 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/otmcj-2019-0007
Palabras clave
© 2019 John Ward et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Fig. 1

OMEGA 2 nine clusters of lessons of relevance to PLMCA application to PPPs. Source: Adapted from OMEGA Centre (2012)
OMEGA 2 nine clusters of lessons of relevance to PLMCA application to PPPs. Source: Adapted from OMEGA Centre (2012)

Fig. 2

PPP models and the risk-sharing continuum. Source: adapted from Rodrigue (2017)
PPP models and the risk-sharing continuum. Source: adapted from Rodrigue (2017)

Fig. 3

A typical PPP structure. Source: Dimitriou and Field (2017)
A typical PPP structure. Source: Dimitriou and Field (2017)

Fig. 4

Policy constraints defining the decision-making space in a PLMCA exercise. Source: Dimitriou et al. (2013)
Policy constraints defining the decision-making space in a PLMCA exercise. Source: Dimitriou et al. (2013)

Generic phases and of the PLMCA appraisal process and stakeholders_ Source: Adapted from Belton and Stewart (2002)_

PLMCA framework phasesActors involvedPLMCA steps/activities undertaken within each phase
Phase 1: The problem-structuring phaseClient agency and analyst team (closed approach)Analyst team and project stakeholders (open approach)Step 1.1: Problem definition (including issue analysis)Step 1.2: Design of PLMCAStep 1.3: Context analysis and boundary definitionStep 1.4: Option identificationStep 1.5: Policy analysisStep 1.6: Stakeholder identificationStep 1.7: Scenario building
Phase 2: The model-building phaseAnalyst team (closed approach)Analyst team and project stakeholders (open approach)Step 2.1: Formulation of objective/appraisal criteria (adopting an open or closed process)Step 2.2: Derivation of weightings (adopting an open or closed process)
Phase 3: The model-use phaseAnalyst team (closed approach)Analyst team and project stakeholders (open approach)Step 3.1: Scoring (adopting an open or closed process)Step 3.2: Further development of issues, objective/criteria, options and scenario (adopting an open or closed process)
Idioma:
Inglés
Calendario de la edición:
1 veces al año
Temas de la revista:
Ingeniería, Introducciones y reseñas, Ingeniería, otros
RSS Feed de revista