This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
BIGANZOLI L., RIGAMONTI L., GROSSO M. 2018. 25th CIRP Life Cycle Engineering (LCE) Conference. 30 April – 2 May 2018. Copenhagen. Denmark Intermediate bulk containers re-use in the circular economy: an LCA evaluation. Procedia CIRP 69. 827–832.BIGANZOLIL.RIGAMONTIL.GROSSOM.201825th CIRP Life Cycle Engineering (LCE) Conference30 April – 2 May 2018CopenhagenDenmark Intermediate bulk containers re-use in the circular economy: an LCA evaluation. Procedia CIRP 69.827832Search in Google Scholar
CAMPOLONGO F., CARIBONI J., SALTELLI A. 2007. An effective screening design for sensitivity analysis of large models. Environ Model Softw. 22, 1509–1518.CAMPOLONGOF.CARIBONIJ.SALTELLIA.2007An effective screening design for sensitivity analysis of large models2215091518Search in Google Scholar
CELLURA M., LONGOA S., MISTRETTA M. 2011. Sensitivity analysis to quantify uncertainty in Life Cycle Assessment: The case study of an Italian tile. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15, 4697–4705.CELLURAM.LONGOAS.MISTRETTAM.2011Sensitivity analysis to quantify uncertainty in Life Cycle Assessment: The case study of an Italian tile1546974705Search in Google Scholar
DEKKER E., ZIJP M.C., VAN DE KAMP M.E., TEMME E.H.M, VAN ZELM R. 2020. A taste of the new ReCiPe for life cycle assessment: consequences of the updated impact assessment method on food product LCAs. Int J Life Cycle Assess 25, 2315–2324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-019-01653-3.DEKKERE.ZIJPM.C.VAN DE KAMPM.E.TEMMEE.H.MVAN ZELMR.2020A taste of the new ReCiPe for life cycle assessment: consequences of the updated impact assessment method on food product LCAs2523152324https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-019-01653-3.Search in Google Scholar
DERWENT R.G., JENKIN M.E., SAUNDERS S.M. 1996. Photochemical ozone creation potentials for a large number of reactive hydrocarbons under European conditions. Atmospheric Environment 30, 2: 181–199.DERWENTR.G.JENKINM.E.SAUNDERSS.M.1996Photochemical ozone creation potentials for a large number of reactive hydrocarbons under European conditions302181199Search in Google Scholar
EUROPEAN COMMISSION. 2020. Communication from the commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability Towards a Toxic-Free Environment, COM(2020) 667 final, Brussels.EUROPEAN COMMISSION2020Search in Google Scholar
EUROPEAN COMMISSION. 2022. Proposal for a Regulation of the Euopean Parliamant and of the Council establishing a framework for setting ecodesign requirements for sustainable products and repealing Directive 2009/125/EC, COM(2022) 142 final 2022/0095 (COD), Brussels.EUROPEAN COMMISSION2022Search in Google Scholar
EUROPEAN COMMISSION. 2023. Communication from the commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and Committee of the Regions. A green deal industrial plan for the net-zero age, COM(2023) 62 final, Brussel.EUROPEAN COMMISSION2023Search in Google Scholar
FAVA J.A. 1991. Technical framework for life-cycle assessment. Washington: SETAC and SETAC Foundation for Environmental Education.FAVAJ.A.1991WashingtonSETAC and SETAC Foundation for Environmental EducationSearch in Google Scholar
FENG H., ZHAO J., HOLLBERG A, HABERT G. 2023. Where to focus? Developing a LCA impact category selection tool for manufacturers of building materials. Journal of Cleaner Production 405: 136936. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136936.FENGH.ZHAOJ.HOLLBERGAHABERTG.2023Where to focus? Developing a LCA impact category selection tool for manufacturers of building materials405136936DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136936.Search in Google Scholar
GHG PROTOCO. http://www.ghgprotocol.org/ for the latest version of the standard (accessed 20 Octobrt 2023).GHG PROTOCOhttp://www.ghgprotocol.org/ for the latest version of the standard (accessed 20 Octobrt 2023)Search in Google Scholar
GRADIN K.T., ÅSTRÖM A.H. 2020. Comparative life cycle assessment of car disc brake systems—case study results and method discussion about comparative. LCAs. Int J of LCA 25: 350–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-019-01704-9.GRADINK.T.ÅSTRÖMA.H.2020Comparative life cycle assessment of car disc brake systems—case study results and method discussion about comparative25350362https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-019-01704-9.Search in Google Scholar
GROEN E.A., HEIJUNGS R., BOKKERS E.A.M., de Boer I.J.M. 2014. Sensitivity analysis in life cycle assessment, proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Life Cycle Assessment in the Agri-Food Sector. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/28341726.GROENE.A.HEIJUNGSR.BOKKERSE.A.M.de BoerI.J.M.2014https://www.researchgate.net/publication/28341726.Search in Google Scholar
GRZESIK K., USARZ M. 2016. A life cycle assessment of the municipal waste management system in Tarnów. Geometrics and environmental engineering 10, 2. http://dx.doi.org/10.7494/geom.2016.10.2.29.GRZESIKK.USARZM.2016A life cycle assessment of the municipal waste management system in Tarnów102http://dx.doi.org/10.7494/geom.2016.10.2.29.Search in Google Scholar
HEIJUNGS R. 2002. The use of matrix perturbation theory for addressing sensitivity and uncertainty issues in LCA. In: Proceedings of the fifth international conference on ecobalance - practical tools and thoughtful principles for sustainability. Tsukaba, Japan. Tokyo: the society of non-traditional technology; 77–80.HEIJUNGSR.2002The use of matrix perturbation theory for addressing sensitivity and uncertainty issues in LCAIn:Tokyothe society of non-traditional technology7780Search in Google Scholar
HEIJUNGS R., HUIJBREGTS M.A. 2004. A review of approaches to treat uncertainty in LCA. In: iEMSs 2004 International Congress “Complexity and integrated resources management.”HEIJUNGSR.HUIJBREGTSM.A.2004A review of approaches to treat uncertainty in LCAIn:Search in Google Scholar
HEIJUNGS R., SUH S., KLEIJN R. 2005. Numerical approaches to life cycle interpretation – the case of the ecoinvent ‘96 database. Int J of LCA 10: 103–112.HEIJUNGSR.SUHS.KLEIJNR.2005Numerical approaches to life cycle interpretation – the case of the ecoinvent ‘96 database10103112Search in Google Scholar
HUIJBREGTS M.A.J. 1998. Application of uncertainty and variability in LCA. Part I. A general framework for the analysis of uncertainty and variability in life cycle assessment. Int J of LCA 3, 5: 273–80.HUIJBREGTSM.A.J.1998Application of uncertainty and variability in LCA. Part I. A general framework for the analysis of uncertainty and variability in life cycle assessment3527380Search in Google Scholar
HUIJBREGTS M.A.J., BREEDVELD L., HUPPES G., KONING A., OERS L., SUH S. 2003. LCA normalisation data for the Netherlands (1997/1998), Western Europe (1995) and the World (1990 and 1995). Normalisation figures for environmental life-cycle assessment: The Netherlands (1997/1998), Western Europe (1995) and the world (1990 and 1995). Journal of Cleaner Production: 737–748.HUIJBREGTSM.A.J.BREEDVELDL.HUPPESG.KONINGA.OERSL.SUHS.2003LCA normalisation data for the Netherlands (1997/1998), Western Europe (1995) and the World (1990 and 1995). Normalisation figures for environmental life-cycle assessment: The Netherlands (1997/1998), Western Europe (1995) and the world (1990 and 1995)737748Search in Google Scholar
HUIJBREGTS M.A.J, STEINMANN Z.J.N, ELSHOUT P.M.F, STAM G., VERONES F., VIERA M., ZIJP M., HOLLANDER A., VAN ZELM R. 2017. ReCiPe2016: a harmonised life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level. Int J Life Cycle Assess 22, 138–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1246-y.HUIJBREGTSM.A.JSTEINMANNZ.J.NELSHOUTP.M.FSTAMG.VERONESF.VIERAM.ZIJPM.HOLLANDERA.VAN ZELMR.2017ReCiPe2016: a harmonised life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level22138147https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1246-y.Search in Google Scholar
KONING A., SCHOWANEK D., DEWAELE J., WEISBROD A., GUINEE J. 2010. Uncertainties in a carbon footprint model for detergents; quantifying the confidence in a comparative result. Int J of LCA 15: 79–89.KONINGA.SCHOWANEKD.DEWAELEJ.WEISBRODA.GUINEEJ.2010Uncertainties in a carbon footprint model for detergents; quantifying the confidence in a comparative result157989Search in Google Scholar
KORONEOS C.J., NANAKI E.A. 2012. Integrated solid waste management and energy production - a life cycle assessment approach: the case study of the city of Thessaloniki. Journal of Cleaner Production 27: 141–150.KORONEOSC.J.NANAKIE.A.2012Integrated solid waste management and energy production - a life cycle assessment approach: the case study of the city of Thessaloniki27141150Search in Google Scholar
KOWALSKI Z., KULCZYCKA J., GÓRALCZK M. 2007. Ekologiczna ocena cyklu życia procesów wytwórczych (LCA). PWN. Warszawa.KOWALSKIZ.KULCZYCKAJ.GÓRALCZKM.2007PWNWarszawaSearch in Google Scholar
MUTEL C., DE BAAN L., HELLWEG S. 2013. Two-step sensitivity testing of parameterized and regionalized life cycle assessments: methodology and case study. Environ Sci Technol. 47: 5660–5667.MUTELC.DE BAANL.HELLWEGS.2013Two-step sensitivity testing of parameterized and regionalized life cycle assessments: methodology and case study4756605667Search in Google Scholar
SALTELLI A., ANNONI P., AZZINI I., CAMPOLONGO F., RATTO M., TARANTOLA S. 2010. 2010. Variance based sensitivity analysis of model output. Design and estimator for the total sensitivity index. Comput Phys Commun 181: 259–270.SALTELLIA.ANNONIP.AZZINII.CAMPOLONGOF.RATTOM.TARANTOLAS.20102010. Variance based sensitivity analysis of model output. Design and estimator for the total sensitivity index181259270Search in Google Scholar
SALTELLI A., RATTO M., ANDRES T., CAMPOLONGO F., CARIBONI J., GATELLI D., SAISANA M., TARANTOLA S. 2008. Global sensitivity analysis: the primer. John Wiley & Sons.SALTELLIA.RATTOM.ANDREST.CAMPOLONGOF.CARIBONIJ.GATELLID.SAISANAM.TARANTOLAS.2008John Wiley & SonsSearch in Google Scholar
SAMSON-BRĘK I., GABRYSZEWSKA M., WRZOSEK J., GWOREK B. 2019. Life cycle assessment as a tool to implement sustainable development in the bioeconomy and circular economy. IntechOpen. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.84664.SAMSON-BRĘKI.GABRYSZEWSKAM.WRZOSEKJ.GWOREKB.2019Life cycle assessment as a tool to implement sustainable development in the bioeconomy and circular economy10.5772/intechopen.84664Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
SOBOL' I.M. 2001. Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates. Math Comput in Simul. 55: 271–280.SOBOL'I.M.2001Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates55271280Search in Google Scholar
UNFCCC (UNITED NATIONS FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE). Global Warming Potentials (IPCC Second Assessment Report). https://unfccc.int/process/transparency-and-reporting/greenhouse-gas-data/greenhouse-gas-data-unfccc/global-warming-potentials (accessed 7 November 2023).UNFCCC (UNITED NATIONS FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE)https://unfccc.int/process/transparency-and-reporting/greenhouse-gas-data/greenhouse-gas-data-unfccc/global-warming-potentials (accessed 7 November 2023).Search in Google Scholar
URBANREC. 2019. https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/documents/downloadPublic?document-Ids=080166e5ca036579&appId=PPGMS (accessed 7 November 2023).URBANREC2019https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/documents/downloadPublic?document-Ids=080166e5ca036579&appId=PPGMS (accessed 7 November 2023).Search in Google Scholar
WEI W., LARREY LASSALLE P., FAURE T., DUMOULIN N., ROUX P., MATHIAS J.D. 2015. How to conduct a proper sensitivity analysis in life cycle assessment: taking into account correlations within LCI data and interactions within the LCA calculation model. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49: 377−385. DOI: dx.doi.org/10.1021/es502128k.WEIW.LARREY LASSALLEP.FAURET.DUMOULINN.ROUXP.MATHIASJ.D.2015How to conduct a proper sensitivity analysis in life cycle assessment: taking into account correlations within LCI data and interactions within the LCA calculation model49377385dx.doi.org/10.1021/es502128kOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
WMO (WORLD METEOROLOGICAL ORGANIZATION). 2021. Arctic ozone depletion reached record level. https://public.wmo.int/en/media/news/record-breaking-2020-ozone-hole-closes. (accessed 16 October 2023).WMO (WORLD METEOROLOGICAL ORGANIZATION)2021https://public.wmo.int/en/media/news/record-breaking-2020-ozone-hole-closes. (accessed 16 October 2023).Search in Google Scholar