[
Ahmed, A. & Dey, M. 2014. A checklist of the winter bird community in different habitat types of Rosekandy Tea Estate of Assam, India. – Journal of Threatened Taxa 6(2): 5478–5484. DOI: 10.11609/jott.o3246.5478-84
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Anderson, M. J. 2001. A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. – Austral Ecology 26(1): 32–46. DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2001.01070.pp.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Báldi, A. 1996. Edge effects in tropical versus temperate forest bird communities: Three alternative hypotheses for the explanation of differences. – Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 42(3): 163–172.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bhagwat, S. A., Willis, K. J., Birks, H. J. B. & Whittaker, R. J. 2008. Agroforestry: a refuge for tropical biodiversity? – Trends in Ecology & Evolution 23(5): 261–267. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2008.01.005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bibby, C., Burgess, N., Hill, D. & Mustoe, S. 2000. Bird Census Techniques (2nd ed.). – Academic Press, London
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Blendinger, P. G. 1999. Facilitation of sap-feeding birds by the White-fronted Woodpecker in the Monte Desert, Argentina. – The Condor 101(2): 402–407. DOI: 10.2307/1370005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Boesing, A. L., Nichols, E. & Metzger, J. P. 2018. Land use type, forest cover and forest edges modulate avian cross-habitat spillover. – Journal of Applied Ecology 55(3): 1252–1264. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.13032
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cavard, X., Macdonald, S. E., Bergeron, Y. & Chen, H. Y. H. 2011. Importance of mixedwoods for biodiversity conservation: Evidence for understory plants, songbirds, soil fauna, and ectomycorrhizae in northern forests. – Environmental Reviews 19: 142–161. DOI: 10.1139/a11-004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chakraborty, P., Lalthanpuia, Sharma, T., Borah, J. & Sarmah, A. 2015. Faunal diversity in a semi-evergreen forest of Bornadi-Khalingduar Complex of Assam, India. – Journal of Threatened Taxa 7(11): 7770–7775. DOI: 11609/jott.o4102.7770-5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chao, A., Ma, K. H. & Hsieh, T. C. 2016. iNEXT (iNterpolation and EXTrapolation) Online: Software for Interpolation and Extrapolation of Species Diversity. – http://chao.stat.nthu.edu.tw/wordpress/software_download/inext-online/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chaplin-Kramer, R., Sharp, R. P., Mandle, L., Sim, S., Johnson, J., Butnar, I., I Canals, L. M., Eichelberger, B. A., Ramler, I., Mueller, C., McLachlan, N., Yousefi, A., King, H. & Kareiva, P. M. 2015. Spatial patterns of agricultural expansion determine impacts on biodiversity and carbon storage. – Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 112(24): 7402–7407. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1406485112
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chettri, A., Sharma, K., Dewan, S. & Acharya, B. K. 2018. Bird diversity of tea plantations in Darjeeling hills, Eastern Himalaya, India. – Biodiversitas 19(3): 1066–1073. DOI: 10.13057/biodiv/d190339
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chowdhury, A., Samrat, A. & Devy, M. S. 2021. Can tea support biodiversity with a few “nudges” in management: Evidence from tea growing landscapes around the World. – Global Ecology and Conservation 31(1): e01801. DOI: 1016/j.gecco.2021.e01801
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Clarke, K. R. 1993. Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. – Australian Journal of Ecology 18(1): 117–143. DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-9993.1993.tb00438.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Clarke, K. R. & Warwick, R. M. 2001. Change in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation. 2nd ed. – Primer-E, Plymouth. Plymouth, United Kingdom
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Climate-Data.org. 2024. Climate Udalguri. – https://en.climate-data.org/asia/india/assam/udalguri-24689/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ellis, E. C. 2021. Land use and ecological change: A 12,000-year history. – Annual Review of Environment and Resources 46: 1–33. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-environ-012220-010822
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Githiru, M., Karimi, S. & Imboma, T. 2009. Unilever Kenya Ltd. (Kericho): Avifaunal Assessment Report. – Unilever Tea Kenya Ltd.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hammer, O., Harper, D. & Ryan, P. 2001. PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. – Palaeontologia Electronica 4: 1–9.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hansen, M. C., Wang, L., Song, X-P., Tyukavina, A., Turubanova, S., Potapov, P. V. & Stehman, S. V. 2020. The fate of tropical forest fragments. – Science Advances 6(11): eaax8574. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aax8574
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hasan, S. S., Zhen, L., Miah, M. G., Ahamed, T. & Samie, A. 2020. Impact of land use change on ecosystem services: A review. – Environmental Development 34: 100527. DOI: 10.1016/j.envdev.2020.100527
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Imboma, T. S., Ferrante, M., You, M. S., You, S. & Lövei, G. L. 2020. Diversity of bird communities in tea (Camellia sinensis) plantations in Fujian Province, South-Eastern China. – Diversity 12(12): 1–15. DOI: 10.3390/d12120457
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Keyel, A. C., Strong, A. M., Perlut, N. G. & Reed, J. M. 2013. Evaluating the roles of visual openness and edge effects on nest-site selection and reproductive success in grassland birds. – The Auk 130(1): 161–170. DOI: 10.1525/auk.2012.12039
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kottawa-Arachchi, J. D., Gamage, R. N., Ariyarathne, H. A. C. K. & Jayathilake, G. G. 2012. Avifaunal Diversity in a Tea Plantation Ecosystem in the Up-Country of Sri Lanka. – Proceedings of International Forestry and Environment Symposium 15. DOI: 10.31357/fesympo.v15i0.194
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Li, H-D., Tang, L., Jia, C., Holyoak, M., Fründ, J., Huang, X. & Xiao, Z. 2020. The functional roles of species in metacommunities, as revealed by metanetwork analyses of bird-plant frugivory networks. – Ecology Letters 23(8): 1252–1262. DOI: 10.1111/ele.13529
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lindell, C. A., Riffell, S. K., Kaiser, S. A., Battin, A. L., Smith, M. L. & Sisk, T. D. 2007. Edge responses of tropical and temperate birds. – The Wilson Journal of Ornithology 119(2): 205–220. DOI: 10.1676/05-133.1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Magneville, C., Loiseau, N., Albouy, C., Casajus, N., Claverie, T., Escalas, A., Leprieur, F., Maire, E., Mouillot, D. & Villéger, S. 2022. mFD: an R package to compute and illustrate the multiple facets of functional diversity. – Ecography 2022: e05904. DOI: 10.1111/ecog.05904
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Menke, S., Böhning-Gaese, K. & Schleuning, M. 2012. Plant–frugivore networks are less specialized and more robust at forest–farmland edges than in the interior of a tropical forest. – Oikos 121(10): 1553–1566. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.20210.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McCollin, D. 1998. Forest edges and habitat selection in birds: a functional approach. – Ecography 21(3): 247–260. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.1998.tb00562.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mola, M., Ejigu, D. & Yitayih, Y. 2021. Species composition, relative abundance, and habitat association of avifauna in Zegie Peninsula Forest Patches and associated wetlands, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia. – International Journal of Zoology 2021(1): 9928284. DOI: 10.1155/2021/9928284
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Moura, N. G., Lees, A. C., Andretti, C. B., Davis, B. J. W., Solar, R. R. C., Aleixo, A., Barlow, J., Ferreira, J. & Gardner, T. A. 2013. Avian biodiversity in multiple-use landscapes of the Brazilian Amazon. – Biological Conservation 167: 339–348. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.08.023
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nogueira, O. M. A., Palmeirim, A. F., Peres, C. A. & dos Santos-Filho, M. 2021. Synergistic effects of habitat configuration and land-use intensity shape the structure of bird assemblages in human-modified landscapes across three major neotropical biomes. – Biodiversity and Conservation 30(13): 3793–3811. DOI: 10.1007/ s10531-021-02275-8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pigot, A. L., Trisos, C. H. & Tobias, J. A. 2016. Functional traits reveal the expansion and packing of ecological niche space underlying an elevational diversity gradient in passerine birds. – Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 283: 20152013. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2015.2013
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Prokop, P. 2018. Tea plantations as a driving force of long-term land use and population changes in the Eastern Himalayan piedmont. – Land Use Policy 77: 51–62. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.05.035
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Renner, S. C. & Rappole, J. H. 2011. Bird diversity, biogeographic patterns, and endemism of the Eastern Himalayas and Southeastern Sub-Himalayan mountains. – Ornithological Monographs 70: 153–166. DOI: 10.1525/om.2011.70.1.153
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Singh, M. & Bhagwat, S. 2013. Tropical agricultural production, conservation and carbon sequesteration conflicts: oil palm expansion in South East Asia. – In: Fang, Z. (ed.) Biofuels. – IntechOpen, London, UK, pp. 39–71. DOI: 10.5772/52420
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sodhi, N. S. 2002. The effects of food-supply on Southeast Asian forest birds. – Ornithological Science 1(1): 89–93. DOI: 10.2326/osj.1.89
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sreekar, R., Mohan, A., Das, S., Agarwal, P. & Vivek, R. 2013. Natural windbreaks sustain bird diversity in a tea-dominated landscape. – PLOS One 8(7): e70379. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070379
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Subasinghe, K. & Sumanapala, A. P. 2014. Biological and functional diversity of bird communities in natural and human modified habitats in northern flank of Knuckles mountain forest range, Sri Lanka. – Biodiversitas 15(2): 200–205. DOI: 10.13057/biodiv/d150212
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Theobald, D. M., Kennedy, C., Chen, B., Oakleaf, J., Baruch-Mordo, S. & Kiesecker, J. 2020. Earth transformed: detailed mapping of global human modification from 1990 to 2017. – Earth System Science Data 12(3): 1953–1972. DOI: 10.5194/essd-12-1953-2020
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tinya, F., Kovács, B., Bidló, A., Dima, B., Király, I., Kutszegi, G., Lakatos, F., Mag, Z., Márialigeti, S., Nascimbene, J., Samu, F., Siller, I., Szél, G. & Ódor, P. 2021. Environmental drivers of forest biodiversity in temperate mixed forests – A multi-taxon approach. – Science of the Total Environment 795: 148720. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148720
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Watson, J. E. M., Whittaker, R. J. & Dawson, T. P. 2004. Habitat structure and proximity to forest edge affect the abundance and distribution of forest-dependent birds in tropical coastal forests of southeastern Madagascar. – Biological Conservation 120(3): 311–327. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2004.03.004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wilman, H., Belmaker, J., Simpson, J., de la Rosa, C., Rivadeneira, M. M. & Jetz, W. 2014. EltonTraits 1.0: Species-level foraging attributes of the world’s birds and mammals. – Ecology 95(7): 2027. DOI: 10.1890/13-1917.1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Willmer, J. N. G., Püttker, T. & Prevedello, J. A. 2022. Global impacts of edge effects on species richness. – Biological Conservation 272: 109654. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109654
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wu, J., Hu, J., Zhao, X. Sun, Y. & Hu, G. 2023. Role of tea plantations in the maintenance of bird diversity in Anji County, China. – PeerJ 11: e14801. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.14801
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zakaria, M., Rajpar, M. N., Moradi, H. V. & Rosli, Z. 2014. Comparison of understorey bird species in relation to edge-interior gradient in an isolated tropical rainforest of Malaysia. – Environment, Development and Sustainability 16(2): 375–392. DOI: 10.1007/s10668-013-9482-9
]Search in Google Scholar
