[
Angelstam, P. & Mikusiński, G. 1994. Woodpecker assemblages in natural and managed boreal and hemiboreal forest: a review. – Annales Zoologici Fennici 31(1):157–172.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Austin, G. T. 1974. Nesting success of the Cactus Wren in relation to nest orientation. – Condor 76: 216–217. DOI: 10.2307/1366737
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Badis, M. & Hamdi, N. 2022. Nest-site characteristics of Levaillant’s Woodpecker Picus vaillantii endemic of North Africa. – Ostrich 93(1): 70–77. DOI: 10.2989/00306525.2022.2048719
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Baral, R., Czeszczewik, D., Walankiewicz, W., Churski, M., Bhusal, P., Tapa, T. B. & Mikusiński, G. 2018. Characteristics of tree cavities in Sal Shorea robusta forest, Nepal. – Journal of Forest Research 23(4): 214–220. DOI: 10.1080/13416979.2018.1479131
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Batschelet, E. 1981. Circular Statistics in Biology. – Academic Press, London
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bertuzzo, E., Carrara, F., Mari, L., Altermatt, F., Rodriguez Iturbe, I. & Rinaldo, A. 2016. Geomorphic controls on elevational gradients of species richness. – Proceedings National Academy of Sciences 113(7):1737–1742. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1518922113476379226831107
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Blanc, L. A. & Walters, J. R. 2008. Cavity-nest webs in longleaf pine ecosystems. – Condor 110(1): 80–92. DOI: 10.1525/cond.2008.110.1.80
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Blondel, J. 1999. Peuplement d’oiseaux des cédraies méditerranéennes [Populations of birds in the Mediterranean cedar forests]. – Forêt Méditerranéenne 20(4): 191–197. (in French)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
B.N.E.D.E.R (Bureau National d’Etudes pour le Développement Rural) 2010. Étude et expertise sur le dépérissement de la cédraie d’Ouled Yagoub et Chelia [Study and expertise on the decline of the cedar forest of Ouled Yagoub and Chelia]. – Wilaya de Khenchela, Algérie (in French)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bougaham, A. F. 2016. Données numériques sur la reproduction du Pic de Levaillant Picus vaillantii en Algérie [Numerical data on the reproduction of Levaillant’s Woodpecker Picus vaillantii in Algeria]. – Alauda 84(3): 231–235. (in French)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brunetti, M., De Capua, E. L., Macchioni, N. & Monachello, S. 2001. Natural durability, physical and mechanical properties of Atlas cedar (Cedrus atlantica Manetti) wood from Southern Italy. – Annals of Forest Science 58(6): 607–613. DOI: 10.1051/forest:2001148
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Bütler, R., Lachat, T., Krumm, F., Kraus, D. & Larrieu, L. 2020. Field Guide to Tree-related Microhabitats. Descriptions and Size Limits for Their Inventory. – Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL, Birmensdorf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ćiković, D., Barišić, S., Tutiš, V. & Kralj, J. 2014. Nest site and nest-hole characteristics used by Great Spotted Woodpecker Dendrocopos major L. in Croatia. – Polish Journal of Ecology 62(2): 349–360. DOI: 10.3161/104.062.0213
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Conner, R. N. 1975. Orientation of entrances to woodpecker nest-cavities. – Auk 92(2): 371–374. DOI: 10.2307/4084566
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Conway, C. J. & Martin, T. E. 2000. Evolution of passerine incubation behavior: influence of food, temperature, and nest predation. – Evolution, International Journal of Organic Evolution 54(2): 670–85. DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00068.x10937242
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Damoc, I., Sahlean, T., Ion, R., Ion, M. & Meşter, L. E. 2014. Nesting preferences for two woodpecker species (Dendrocopos major and Dendrocopos medius) in Comana Forest, Southern Romania. – Travaux du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle “Grigore Antipa” 57: 35–45. DOI: 10.2478/travmu-2014-0004
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
De Rosa, D., Andriuzzi, W. S. & Di Febbraro, M. 2016. Breeding habitat selection of the Black Woodpecker Dryocopus martius L. in Mediterranean forests. – Avocetta 40: 63–69.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Devictor, V., Mouillot, D., Meynard, C., Jiguet, F., Thuiller, W. & Mouquet, N. 2010. Spatial mismatch and congruence between taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity: the need for integrative conservation strategies in a changing world. – Ecological Letters 13(8): 1030–1040. DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01493.x20545736
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Drapeau, P., Nappi, A., Imbeau, L. & Saint-Germain, M. 2009. Standing deadwood for keystone bird species in the eastern boreal forest: managing for snag dynamics. – The Forestry Chronicle 85(2): 227–234. DOI: 10.5558/tfc85227-2
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Epron, D. 1997. Effects of drought on photosynthesis and on the thermotolerance of photosystem II in seedlings of cedar (Cedrus atlantica and C. libani). – Journal of Experimental Botany 48(10): 1835–1841. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/48.10.1835
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Evans, M. R., Lank, D., Boyd, W. S. & Cooke, F. 2002. A comparison of the characteristics and fate of Barrow’s Goldeneye and Bufflehead nests in nest boxes and natural cavities. – Condor 104(3): 610–619. DOI: 10.1093/condor/104.3.610
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Fayt, P., Machmer, M. M. & Steeger, C. 2005. Regulation of spruce bark beetles by woodpeckers – a literature review. – Forest Ecology and Management 206(1–3): 1–14. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.10.054
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Gorman, G. 2015. Foraging signs and cavities of some European woodpeckers (Picidae): identifying the clues that lead to establishing the presence of species. – Denisia 36: 87–97.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gorman, G. 2021. Characteristics of nest cavities used by White-backed Woodpecker (Dendrocopos leucotos) in Hungary. – Ornis Hungarica 29(2): 139–150. DOI: 10.2478/orhu-2021-0025
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Hartman, C. A. & Oring, L. W. 2003. Orientation and microclimate of Horned Lark nests: The importance of shade. – Condor 105(1): 158–163. DOI: 10.1093/condor/105.1.158
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Heim de Balsac, H. & Mayaud, N. 1962. Les oiseaux du Nord-est de l’Afrique [Birds of North-West Africa]. – Editions Paul Chevalier, Paris (in French)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hooge, P. N., Stanback, M. T. & Koenig, W. D. 1999. Nest-site selection in the Acorn Woodpecker. – Auk 116(1): 45–54. DOI: 10.2307/4089452
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Huhta, E., Hakkarainen, H. & Lundvall, P. 1998. Bright colours and predation risk of passerines. – Ornis Fennica 75: 89–93.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
IBM 2015. IBM SPSS statistics version 23. – International Business Machines Corp. Boston, USA.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Inouye, R. S., Huntly, N. J. & Inouye, D. W. 1981. Non-random orientation of Gila Woodpecker nest entrances in saguaro cacti. – Condor 83: 88–89. DOI: 10.2307/1367613
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Isenmann, P., Gaultier, T., El Hili, A., Azafzaf, H., Dlensi, H. & Smart, M. 2005. Birds of Tunisia. – SEOF, Paris
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jackson, J. A. & Jackson, B. J. S. 2004. Ecological relationships between fungi and woodpecker cavity sites. – Condor 106(1): 37–49. DOI: 10.1093/condor/106.1.37
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Jansson, G. & Andren, H. 2003. Habitat composition and bird diversity in managed boreal forests. – Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 18(3): 225–236. DOI: 10.1080/02827580308622
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Kerpez, T. A. & Smith, N. S. 1990. Nest-site selection and nest-cavity characteristics of Gila Woodpeckers and Northern Flicker. – Condor 92(1): 193–198. DOI: 10.2307/1368398
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Kosiński, Z. & Ksit, P. 2007. Nest holes of Great Spotted Woodpeckers Dendrocopos major and Middle Spotted Woodpeckers D. medius: Do they really differ in size? – Acta Ornithologica 42(1): 45–52. DOI: 10.3161/000164507781646933
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Kovach, W. L. 2011. Oriana – Circular Statistics for Windows. – Kovach Computing Services, Pentraeth, Wales
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ladjal, M., Epron, D. & Ducrey, M. 2000. Effects of drought preconditioning on thermo tolerance of photosystem II and susceptibility of photosynthesis to heat stress in cedar seedlings. – Tree Physiology 20(18): 1235–1241. DOI: 10.1093/treephys/20.18.123512651486
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Li, P. & Martin, T. E. 1991. Nest site selection and nesting success of cavity-nesting birds in high elevation forest drainages. – Auk 108(2): 405–418.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lõhmus, A. & Remm, J. 2005. Nest quality limits the number of hole-nesting passerines in their natural cavity-rich habitat. – Acta Oecologica 27(2): 125–128. DOI: 10.1016/j.actao.2004.11.001
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Mainwaring, M. C., Wolfenden, A., Read, J. E., Robson, J. M. A., Tomlinson, C. J. & Hartley, I. R. 2016. Feathering the nest: the effects of feather supplementation to Blue Tit nests. – Avian Biology Research 9(2): 89–95. DOI: 10.3184/175815516X14551240159329
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Martin, T. E. & Li, P. 1992. New perspectives on life history traits of open- versus cavity-nesting birds. – Ecology 73(2): 579–592. DOI: 10.2307/1940764
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Mennill, D. J. & Ratcliffe, L. M. 2004. Nest cavity orientation in Black-capped Chickadees Poecile atricapillus: do the acoustic properties of cavities influence sound reception in the nest and extra-pair matings? – Journal of Avian Biology 35(6): 477–482. DOI: 10.1111/j.0908-8857.2004.03351.x
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Mikusiński, G., Gromadzki, M. & Chylarecki, P. 2001. Woodpeckers as indicators of forest bird diversity. – Conservation Biology 15(1): 208–217. DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.99236.x
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Moussouni, A. & Boubaker, Z. 2015. Diversité des oiseaux de la cédraie de Djurdjura (Est de l’Algérie) [Diversity of birds in the cedar forest of Djurdjura]. – Revue Forestière Française 58(5): 421–436. (in French with English Summary)10.4267/2042/59956
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Newton, I. 1994. The role of nest sites in limiting the numbers of hole-nesting birds: a review. – Biological Conservation 70(3): 265–276. DOI: 10.1016/0006-3207(94)90172-4
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Nilsson, S. G. 1986. Evolution of hole-nesting in birds: on balancing selection pressures. – Auk 103(2): 432–435.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pakkala, T., Kouki, J. & Tiainen, J. 2006. Top predator and interference competition modify the occurrence and breeding success of a specialist species in a structurally complex forest environment. – Annales Zoologici Fennici 43(2): 96–111.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Perktas, U., Barrowclough, G. F. & Growth, J. G. 2011. Phylogeography and species limits in the Green Woodpecker complex (Aves: Picidae): Multiple Pleistocene refugia and range expansion across Europe and the Near East. – Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 104(3): 710–723. DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2011.01750.x
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Pons, J. M., Olioso, G., Cruaud, C. & Fuchs, J. 2010. Phylogeography of the Eurasian Green Woodpecker (Picus viridis). – Journal of Biogeography 38(2): 311–325. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2010.02401.x
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Ricklefs, R. E. & Hainsworth, F. R. 1969. Temperature regulation in nestling Cactus Wrens: the nest environment. – Condor 71(1): 32–37. DOI: 10.2307/1366045
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Short, L. L. 1979. Burdens of the Picid hole excavating habit. – The Wilson Bulletin 91(1): 16–28.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Smith, K. W. 2006. The implications of nest site competition from Starlings Sturnus vulgaris and the effect of spring temperatures on the timing and breeding performance of Great Spotted Woodpeckers Dendrocopos major in southern England. – Annales Zoologici Fennici 43(2): 177–185.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Snow, D. W., Gillmor, R. & Perrins, C. M. 1998. The birds of the Western Palearctic: Non-passerines. – Oxford University Press
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tamungang, S. A., Kougoum, P. G. N. & Teguia, A. 2016. Nest characteristics for the conservation of the Grey Parrot in Cameroon. – Journal of Ecology and The Natural Environment 8(9): 142–154. DOI: 10.5897/JENE2016.0601
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Touihri, M., Villard, M. A. & Charfi-Cheikhrouha, F. 2015. Nesting habitat requirements of two species of North African woodpeckers in native oak forest. – Bird Study 62(3): 386–393. DOI: 10.1080/00063657. 2015.1049511
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Valette, J. C. 1990. Inflammabilité des espèces forestières méditerranéennes: Conséquences sur la combustibilité des formations forestières [Flammability of Mediterranean forest species: Consequences on the combustibility of forest formations]. – Revue Forestière Française 42: 76–92. (in French)10.4267/2042/26171
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Virkkala, R. 2006. Why study woodpeckers? The significance of woodpeckers in forest ecosystems. – Annales Zoologici Fennici 43(2): 82–85.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wachob, D. G. 1996. A microclimate analysis of nest-site selection by Mountain Chickadees. – Journal Field Ornithology 67(4): 525–533.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wan, T., Hu, J. F., Jiao, Z. B., Wen, J. B. & Luo, Y. Q. 2008. Nest-cavity characteristics of the Great Spotted
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Woodpecker Dendrocopos major in shelter plantations of west Inner Mongolia. – Forestry Studies in China 10(1): 36–40. DOI: 10.1007/s11632-008-0010-1
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Wiebe, K. L. 2001. Microclimate of tree cavity nests: is it important for reproductive success in Northern Flickers? – The Auk 118(2): 412–421. DOI: 10.1093/auk/118.2.412
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
