[Banaszek, A., Bogomolov, P., Feoktistova, N., La Haye, M., Monecke, S., Reiners, T. E., Rusin, M., Surov, A., Weinhold, U. & Ziomek, J. 2020. Cricetus cricetus. – The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2020: e. T5529A111875852. DOI: 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2020-2.RLTS.T5529A111875852.en (Downloaded on 04 October 2020.)]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Bihari, Z. 2004. A hörcsög (Cricetus cricetus) magyarországi elterjedésének változása az elmúlt 50 év alatt [Changes in the distribution of Hamster (Cricetus cricetus) in Hungary during the past fifty years]. – Természetvédelmi Közlemények 11: 559−566. (in Hungarian with English Summary)]Search in Google Scholar
[Bihari, Z. 2007. Mezei hörcsög Cricetus cricetus (Linnaeus, 1758) [European Hamster]. – In: Bihari, Z., Csorba, G. & Heltai, M. (eds.) Magyarország emlőseinek atlasza [Atlas of mammals in Hungary]. – Kossuth Kiadó, Budapest, pp. 176−178. (in Hungarian with English Summary)]Search in Google Scholar
[Bihari, Z., Horváth, M., Lanszki, J. & Heltai, M. 2008. Role of the Common Hamster (Cricetus cricetus) in the diet of natural predators in Hungary. – In: Millesi, E., Winkler, H. & Hengsberger, R. (eds.) The Common Hamster (Cricetus cricetus): Perspectives on an endangered species. Austrian Academy of Sciences, Wien. – Biosystematics and Ecology Series 25: 61–68.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cserkész, T. 2017. A mezei hörcsög aktuális helyzete [The current distribution of the European Hamster]. – In: Holes, A. (ed.) Magyarország környezeti állapota 2016 [The state of the environment in Hungary in 2016]. – Herman Ottó Intézet, Budapest, pp. 76–81. (in Hungarian)]Search in Google Scholar
[Heisler, L. M., Somers, C. M. & Poulin, R. G. 2016. Owl pellets: a more effective alternative to conventional trapping for broad-scale studies of small mammal communities. – Methods in Ecology and Evolution 7(1): 96–103. DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.12454]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Horváth, G., Jurčević Agić, I., Merdić, E., Tórizs, I. & Purger, J. J. 2007. Small mammal monitoring based on the analysis of owl pellets. – In: Purger, J. J. (ed.) Manual for the investigation of biodiversity along the Drava River. – University of Pécs, pp. 203–217. (in Croatian)]Search in Google Scholar
[Horváth, Gy. 1998. Kisemlős (Mammalia) faunisztikai vizsgálatok a gyöngybagoly (Tyto alba) köpetanalízise alapján a Dráva mentén (1995–1997) [The investigation of the small mammal fauna of the River Dráva plain region, based on the analysis of Barn Owl (Tyto alba) pellets between 1995–1997]. – Dunántúli Dolgozatok (Publicationes Transdanubiensis) Természettudományi Sorozat (Studia Pannonica) 9: 475–488. (in Hungarian with English Summary)]Search in Google Scholar
[Horváth, Gy. 1999. A gyöngybagoly (Tyto alba Scop., 1769) köpetvizsgálatának tíz éve Baranya megyében (1985–1994) [Ten years of Barn Owl (Tyto alba Scop., 1769) pellet analysis in county Baranya]. – Állattani Közlemények 84: 63–77. (in Hungarian with English Summary)]Search in Google Scholar
[Kondor, T. & Cserkész, T. 2017. A mezei hörcsög (Cricetus cricetus) populációs trendjének és elterjedésének változása Magyarországon [Changes in the population trend and distribution of the European Hamster (Cricetus cricetus) in Hungary]. – Bükki Emlőstani Kutatócsoport Egyesület, Eger, pp. 18. (in Hungarian)]Search in Google Scholar
[Kryštufek, B. 1987. Hrček (Cricetus cricetus Linnaeus, 1758; Rodentia, Mammalia) edini stepski sesalec v slovenski favni [Hamster (Cricetus cricetus Linneaeus, 1785; Rodentia, Mammalia) the only steppe mammal in the Slovene fauna]. – Varstvo Narave 13: 93–98. (in Slovenian with English Summary)]Search in Google Scholar
[Kryštufek, B., Hoffmann, I. E., Nedyalkov, N., Pozdnyakov, A. & Vohralík, V. 2020. Cricetus cricetus (Rodentia: Cricetidae). – Mammalian Species 52(988): 10–26. DOI: 10.1093/mspecies/seaa001]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Mikuska, J. & Vuković, S. 1980. Kvalitativna i kvantitativna analiza ishrane kukuvije drijemavice, Tyto alba Scop. 1769, na području Baranje, sa posebnim osvrtom na rasprostranjenost sitnih sisavaca [Qualitative and quantitative analysis of the diet of Common Barn-owl, Tyto alba Scop. 1769, in Baranja region, with a focus on the distribution of small mammals]. – Larus (31–32): 269–288. (in Croatian with German Summary)]Search in Google Scholar
[Mikuska, J., Pivar, G. & Pančić, S. 1978. Analiza ishrane kukuvije drijemavice, Tyto alba Scop. 1769, na području Specijalnog zoološkog rezervata „Kopački rit” i okoline s posebnim osvrtom na faunu sitnih sisavaca [Diet analysis of Common Barn-owl, Tyto alba Scop. 1769, in the area of the Special Zoological Reserve “Kopački rit” and the surrounding area, with a focus on the fauna of small mammals]. – Priroda Vojvodine 4: 45–46. (in Serbo-Croatian).]Search in Google Scholar
[Mikuska, J., Tvrtković, N. & Džukić, G. 1979. Collecting and analysis of bird pellets as one more important methods for studying the fauna of Mammals in Yugoslavia. – Archives of Biological Sciences 29(3–4): 157–160.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nechay, G. 2000. Status of Hamsters: Cricetus cricetus, Cricetus migratorius, Mesocricetus newtoni and other hamster species in Europe. – Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg, France, Nature and Environment Series 106.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nechay, G. 2008. Peak numbers of Cricetus cricetus (L.): do they appear simultaneously? – In: Millesi, E., Winkler, H. & Hengsberger, R. (eds.) The Common Hamster (Cricetus cricetus): Perspectives on an endangered species. – Austrian Academy of Sciences, Wien. – Biosystematics and Ecology Series 25: 69–77.]Search in Google Scholar
[Petrov, B. M. 1992. Mammals of Yugoslavia: Insectivores and Rodents. – Natural History Museum in Belgrade, Special issues 37: 1–186.]Search in Google Scholar
[Purger, J. J. 1998. A Dráva mente Somogy megyei szakaszának kisemlős (Mammalia) faunája, gyöngybagoly, Tyto alba (Scopoli, 1769) köpetek vizsgálata alapján [Small mammal fauna of the region of Drava river in county Somogy (Hungary), obtained by Barn Owl, Tyto alba (Scopoli, 1769) pellet analysis]. – Dunántúli Dolgozatok (Publicationes Transdanubiensis) Természettudományi Sorozat (Studia Pannonica) 9: 489–500. (in Hungarian with English Summary)]Search in Google Scholar
[Ružić, A. 1978. Distribution and abundance of the Common Hamster (Cricetus cricetus Linnaeus, 1758; Rodentia, Mammalia) in Yugoslavia. – Biosistematika 4(1): 203–208. (in Serbo-Croatian with English Summary)]Search in Google Scholar
[Surov, A., Banaszek, A., Bogomolov, P., Feoktistova, N. & Monecke, S. 2016. Dramatic global decrease in the range and reproduction rate of the European Hamster Cricetus cricetus. – Endangered Species Research 31: 119–145. DOI: 10.3354/esr00749]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Szép, D., Horváth, G. F., Krčmar, S. & Purger, J. J. 2018. Connection between prey composition and the landscape structure in the hunting area of Barn Owls (Tyto alba) in Baranja (Croatia). – Periodicum Biologorum 120(2–3): 125–233. DOI: 10.18054/pb.v120i2-3.6650]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Szép, D., Klein, Á. & Purger, J. J. 2017. The prey composition of the Barn Owl (Tyto alba) with respect to landscape structure of its hunting area (Zala County, Hungary). – Ornis Hungarica 25(2): 51–64. DOI: 10.1515/orhu-2017-0015]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Taylor, I. R. 1994. Barn Owls: Predator – Prey Relationships and Conservation. – Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 304 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tissier, M. L., Handrich, Y., Robin, J-P., Weitten, M., Pevet, P., Kourkgy, C. & Habold, C. 2016. How maize monoculture and increasing winter rainfall have brought the hibernating European Hamster to the verge of extinction. – Scientific Reports 6: 25531. DOI: 10.1038/srep25531485866827150008]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Tores, M., Motro, Y., Motro, U. & Yom-Tov, Y. 2005. The Barn Owl – a selective opportunist predator. – Israel Journal of Zoology 51(4): 349–360. DOI: 10.1560/7862-9E5G-RQJJ-15BE]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Tórizs, I. 2010. A gyöngybagoly [Tyto alba (Scop.) 1769] monitorozása a Drávaszögben, különös tekintettel a táplálkozásbiológiára [Monitoring of the Common Barn-owl (Tyto alba (Scop.) 1769) in Baranja, with special regard to feeding biology]. – MS Thesis, University of West Hungary, Sopron, 67 p. (in Hungarian)]Search in Google Scholar
[Tórizs, I. 2011. Gyöngybagolyvédelem a Drávaszögben [The conservation of Common Barn-owl in Baranja]. – Rovátkák 3: 34–54. (in Hungarian)]Search in Google Scholar
[Torre, I., Arrizabalaga, A. & Flaquer, C. 2004. Three methods for assessing richness and composition of small mammal communities. – Journal of Mammalogy 85(3): 524–530. DOI: 10.1644/BJK-112]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Tvrtković, N. 2006. Hrčak / Common Hamster Cricetus cricetus (Linnaeus, 1758). – In: Tvrtković, N. (ed.) Crvena knjiga sisavaca Hrvatske [Red book of mammals of Croatia]. – Ministry of Culture, State Institute for Nature Protection, Republic of Croatia, Zagreb, pp. 87–88. (in Croatian)]Search in Google Scholar
[Weinhold, U. 2008. Draft European action plan for the conservation of the Common Hamster (Cricetus cricetus L., 1758). – Convention on the conservation of European wildlife and natural habitats, 28th Meeting of the Standing Committee, Council of Europe, Strasbourg, France, 36 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Yom-Tov, Y. & Wool, D. 1997. Do the Contents of Barn Owl Pellets Accurately Represent the Proportion of Prey Species in the Field? – The Condor 99(4): 972−976. DOI: 10.2307/1370149]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
