Acceso abierto

Leveraging ChatGPT for Enhanced Logical Analysis in the Theory of Constraints Thinking Process

   | 11 may 2024

Cite

Arqum M., and More D. (2023). Aplying TOC Thinking Process Tools in Managing Challenges of Supply Chain Finance: a Case Study.” International Journal of Services and Operations Management 15.4 (2013): 389. Web. Search in Google Scholar

Chen Y., Andiappan M., Jenkin T., and Ovchinnikov A. (2023). A Manager and an AI Walk into a Bar: Does ChatGPT Make Biased Decisions Like We Do? http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4380365 Search in Google Scholar

Dettmer, H. W. (2007). The Logical Thinking Process: A Systems Approach to Complex Problem Solving, Amer Society for Quality; 2 edition. Search in Google Scholar

Escape Velocity Labs. (2022). ChatGPT imitates logical reasoning surprisingly well https://medium.com/@evlabs/chatgpt-imitates-logical-reasoning-surprisingly-well-f88b1ac8d6f7, downloaded: July 18th 2023 Search in Google Scholar

Fischer R., Luczak-Roesch M., and Karl J. (2023). What does chatgpt return about human values? exploring value bias in chatgpt using a descriptive value theory. http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.03612 Search in Google Scholar

Frąckiewicz, M. (2023). The Challenges of Addressing Bias and Stereotyping in ChatGPT Prompt Generation https://ts2.space/en/the-challenges-of-addressing-bias-and-stereotyping-in-chatgpt-prompt-generation/, downloaded: July 18th 2023 Search in Google Scholar

Gaspar, M., Cristovão, L., and Tenera, A. (2019). Theory of Constraints Thinking Processes on Operational Lean Programs Management Improvement: An Energy Producer Company Case. In: Camarinha-Matos, L., Almeida, R., Oliveira, J. (eds) Technological Innovation for Industry and Service Systems. DoCEIS 2019. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 553. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17771-3_11 Search in Google Scholar

Goldratt, E. M. (2008). Necessary but not sufficient: The theory of constraints and management. North River Press Search in Google Scholar

Hackaday. (2023). ChatGPT Powers A Different Kind Of Logic Analyzer. https://hackaday.com/2023/04/06/chatgpt-powers-a-different-kind-of-logic-analyzer/, downloaded: July 18th 2023 Search in Google Scholar

Hanmeng L., Ruoxi N., Zhiyang T., Jian L., Qiji Z., and Yue Z. (2023). Evaluating the Logical Reasoning Ability of ChatGPT and GPT-4. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369911689_Evaluating_the_Logical_Reasoning_Ability_of_ChatGPT_and_GPT-4] Search in Google Scholar

Holt J., and Aljaž, T. (2020), EM 526 Lecture materials, Washington State University Search in Google Scholar

Scheinkopf L. J. (1999). Thinking for a Change: Putting the TOC Thinking Processes to Use, CRC Press; 1st edition Search in Google Scholar

Zamfiroiu A., Vasile D., and Savu D. (2023). ChatGPT–A Systematic Review of Published Research Papers. Informatica Economica. 2023;27(1):5-16. PMID: 36981544 Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
1581-1832
Idioma:
Inglés
Calendario de la edición:
4 veces al año
Temas de la revista:
Business and Economics, Business Management, Management, Organization, Corporate Governance