[Abernathy, W. J., & Utterback, J. M. (1975). Innovation and the evolving structure of the firm. Working Paper HBS–75–18. Boston: Harvard University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bieńkowska, A., Kral, Z., & Zabłocka-Kluczka, A. (2017). IT tools used in the strategic controlling process: Polish national study results. In I. Šimberová, A. Kocmanová & F. Milichovský (Eds.), Perspectives of Business and Entrepreneurship Development in Digital Age: Economics, Management, Finance and System Engineering from the Academic and Practioners Views (pp. 75-84). Brno: Brno University of Technology.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chen, Y. S., Lin, M. J. J., & Chang, C. H. (2009). The positive effects of relationship learning and absorptive capacity on innovation performance and competitive advantage in industrial markets. Industrial Marketing Management, 38(2), 152–158, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2008.12.00310.1016/j.indmarman.2008.12.003]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Corso, M., & Paolucci, E. (2001). Fostering innovation and knowledge transfer in product development through information technology. International Journal of Technology Management, 22(1/2/3), 126–148, http://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2001.00295810.1504/IJTM.2001.002958]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Daghfous, A. (2004). Absorptive capacity and the implementation of knowledge-intensive best practices. S.A.M. Advanced Management Journal, 69(2), 21–27.]Search in Google Scholar
[Davenport, T.H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working Knowledge. How Organizations Manage What They Know, Boston: HBSP.]Search in Google Scholar
[Davila, T., Epstein, M. J., & Shelton, R. D. (Eds.). (2006). The creative enterprise: Managing innovative organizations and people, Greenwood Publishing Group.]Search in Google Scholar
[Davis, F. D. (1985). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: theory and results, Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.]Search in Google Scholar
[Delone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003), The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30, http://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.1104574810.1080/07421222.2003.11045748]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Dewett, T., & Jones, G. R. (2001). The role of information technology in the organization: a review, model and assessment. Journal of Management, 27(3), 313–346, http://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(01)00094-010.1016/S0149-2063(01)00094-0]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Dobni, C. B. (2010). The relationship between an innovation orientation and competitive strategy. International Journal of Innovation Management, 14(02), 331-357, https://doi.org/10.1142/S136391961000266010.1142/S1363919610002660]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Drucker, P. (2014). Innovation and entrepreneurship. Routledge.10.4324/9781315747453]Search in Google Scholar
[Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D.C., & Nelson R.R. (2004). The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Financial Accounting Standards Board (1978). Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts No. 1, Objectives of Financial Reporting by Business Enterprises. Stanford: FASB.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gunday, G., Ulusoy, G., Kilic, K., & Alpkan, L. (2011). Effects of innovation types on firm performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 133(2), 662–676, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.05.01410.1016/j.ijpe.2011.05.014]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Hilligoss, B., & Rieh, S.Y. (2008). Developing a unifying framework of credibility assessment: construct, heuristics, and interaction in context. Information Processing & Management, 44(4), 1467–1484, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2007.10.00110.1016/j.ipm.2007.10.001]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Janampa, R., Melendez, K., & Dávila, A. (2018). Information Technology Service Management Processes for Very Small Organization: A Proposed Model. In J. Mejia et al. (Eds.), Trends and Applications in Software Engineering: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Software Process Improvement (CIMPS 2018) (Vol. 865, pp. 55–68). Springer, http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01171-0_510.1007/978-3-030-01171-0_5]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Kim, S. (2010). Questioners’ credibility judgments of answers in a social question and answer site. Information Research, 15(2), from http://InformationR.net/ir/15-2/paper432.html]Search in Google Scholar
[Kotler, P., Keller, K. L. (2012). Marketing Management, 14th ed., Global Edition, New Jersy: Prentice Hall.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lyytinen, K. (1987). Different perspectives on information systems: problems and solutions. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 19(1), 5–46, http://doi.org/10.1145/28865.2886710.1145/28865.28867]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Mai, J.E. (2013). The quality and qualities of information. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(4), 675–688, http://doi.org/10.1002/asi.2278310.1002/asi.22783]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Niu, N., Da Xu, L., & Bi, Z. (2013). Enterprise information systems architecture – Analysis and evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 9(4), 2147–2154, http://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2013.223894810.1109/TII.2013.2238948]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., & Byosière, Ph. (2001). The Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation: Understanding the Dynamic Process of Creating Knowledge. In M. Dierkes, A. B. Antal, J. Child & I. Nonaka (Eds.), Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge (pp. 491–517), New York: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nguyen, T. H., Newby, M., & Macaulay, M. J. (2015). Information technology adoption in small business: Confirmation of a proposed framework. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(1), 207–227, http://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.1205810.1111/jsbm.12058]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Oslo Manual (2005). Oslo Manual: Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data. Paris: OECD. Retrieved fromhttps://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/science-and-technology/oslo-manual_9789264013100-en]Search in Google Scholar
[Palmius, J. (2007). Criteria for measuring and comparing information systems. In: Proceedings of the 30th Information Systems Research Seminar in Scandinavia IRIS 2007, 11-14.8.2007 (pp. 823–846). Murikka, Tampere, Finland.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pereira, E. T., & Fernandes, A. J. (2018). Are the most innovative SMEs the most competitive ones? Theory and Applications in the Knowledge Economy, 77. Conference Theory and Applications in the Knowledge Economy – TAKE 2018, Poznan, July 11-13, 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rehm, S. V., Goel, L., & Junglas, I. (2016). Information management for innovation networks—an empirical study on the “who, what and how” in networked innovation. International Journal of Information Management, 36(3), 348–359, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.11.00410.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.11.004]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Safa, N. S., Von Solms, R., & Furnell, S. (2016). Information security policy compliance model in organizations. Computers & Security, 56, 70–82, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2015.10.00610.1016/j.cose.2015.10.006]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Sage, A.P., & Rouse, W.B. (1999). Information Systems Frontiers in Knowledge Management. Information Systems Frontiers, 1(3), 205–219, http://doi.org/10.1023/A:101004621083210.1023/A:1010046210832]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Liao, S.-H., (2003). Knowledge Management technologies and applications – literature review from 1995-2002. Expert Systems with Applications, 25(2), 155-164, http://doi.org/10.1016/S0957-4174(03)00043-510.1016/S0957-4174(03)00043-5]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Soto-Acosta, P., Popa, S., & Martinez-Conesa, I. (2018). Information technology, knowledge management and environmental dynamism as drivers of innovation ambidexterity: a study in SMEs. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(4), 824–849, http://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-10-2017-044810.1108/JKM-10-2017-0448]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Tidd, J., & Bessant, J. R. (2018). Managing innovation: integrating technological, market and organizational change. John Wiley & Sons.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tödtling, F., Lehner, P., & Kaufmann, A. (2009). Do different types of innovation rely on specific kinds of knowledge interactions? Technovation, 29(1), 59–71, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.05.00210.1016/j.technovation.2008.05.002]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Tomaél, M.I. (2000). Fontes de informação na Internet: acesso e avaliação das disponíveis nos sites de universidades, Seminário Nacional de Bibliotecas Universitárias, Florianópolis, Vol. 6.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tushman, M. L., & Anderson, P. (1986). Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(3), 439–465, http://doi.org/10.2307/239283210.2307/2392832]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Tusubira, F., & Mulira, N. (2004). Integration of ICT in organizations: Challenges and best practice recommendations based on the experience of Makerere University and other organizations. In F.F. Tusubira & N. K. Mulira (Eds.), Universities: taking a leading role in ICT enabled human development (pp. 6–13). Kampala, Uganda: Phanton Solutions.]Search in Google Scholar
[Trantopoulos, K., von Krogh, G., Wallin, M. W., & Woerter, M. (2017). External knowledge and information technology: Implications for process innovation performance. MIS Quarterly, 41(1), 287-300, http://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2017/41.1.1510.25300/MISQ/2017/41.1.15]Search in Google Scholar
[Tworek, K. (2018). Reliability of information systems in organization in the context of banking sector: Empirical study from Poland. Cogent Business & Management, 5(1), 1522752, http://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2018.152275210.1080/23311975.2018.1522752]Search in Google Scholar
[Tworek, K. (2019). Aligning IT with business. Springer, Cham, http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11563-010.1007/978-3-030-11563-0]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Tworek, K., Walecka-Jankowska, K., & Zgrzywa-Ziemak, A. (2019). Information Systems Reliability and Organizational Performance. In Information Systems Architecture and Technology: Proceedings of 39th International Conference on Information Systems Architecture and Technology – ISAT 2018 (pp. 201–210). Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Vol. 854. Springer Cham, http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99993-7_1810.1007/978-3-319-99993-7_18]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Utterback, J.M. (1975). A dynamic model of process and product innovation. Omega, 3(6), 639–656, http://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0483(75)90068-710.1016/0305-0483(75)90068-7]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Walecka-Jankowska, K. (2015). Relationship between knowledge management and innovation. Social Sciences, 90(4), 55–66, http://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ss.90.4.1426010.5755/j01.ss.90.4.14260]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Xu, H., Sharma, S. K., & Hackney, R. (2005). Web services innovation research: towards a dual-core model. International Journal of Information Management, 25(4), 321–334, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2005.04.00410.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2005.04.004]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Zahedi, F. (1987). Reliability of information systems based on the critical success factors-formulation. MIS Quarterly, 11(2), 187–203, http://doi.org/10.2307/24936210.2307/249362]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Zaliwski A.: Korporacyjne bazy wiedzy [Corporate knowledge bases], PWE, Warszawa 2000.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zgrzywa-Ziemak, A. (2015). The impact of organisational learning on organisational performance. Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, 23(4), 98–112, http://doi.org/10.7206/mba.ce.2084-3356.15910.7206/mba.ce.2084-3356.159]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar