Cite

Fig. 1

Different geometries of plating, A (left) disc immersed in the solution and B (right) disc mounted to the bottom of the vessel.
Different geometries of plating, A (left) disc immersed in the solution and B (right) disc mounted to the bottom of the vessel.

Fig. 2

Distribution of 210Po between silicates and non-silica matrix in different samples.
Distribution of 210Po between silicates and non-silica matrix in different samples.

Fig. 3

Results of the 210Po determination on different electrodes, the red line represents the certified value for IAEA-447 (dashed line represents the expanded uncertainty for k = 2 of the certified value).
Results of the 210Po determination on different electrodes, the red line represents the certified value for IAEA-447 (dashed line represents the expanded uncertainty for k = 2 of the certified value).

Fig. 4

Scheme of the analytical procedure for polonium determination in soil.
Scheme of the analytical procedure for polonium determination in soil.

Validation parameters of samples from plating optimization experiment, calculations performed for expanded uncertainty (k = 2)

Electrode210Po (Bq·kg−1)Z-scoreU-score
Fe240 ± 140−2.11−0.90
Ag306 ± 240.070.11
Cu (geom. A)291 ± 31−0.61−0.61
Cu (geom. B)301 ± 35−0.10−0.13

Activity concentration of 210Po in soil samples

Sample210Po activity (Bq·kg−1)Type of fertilizer
Soil 168.9 ± 7.7nitrogen
Soil 2195 ± 12phosphate
Soil 312.1 ± 1.8nitrogen
Soil 415.3 ± 2.6nitrogen
eISSN:
1508-5791
Idioma:
Inglés
Calendario de la edición:
4 veces al año
Temas de la revista:
Chemistry, Nuclear Chemistry, Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics, other