This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Bolin, N., Grusell, M., & Nord, L. (2022). Politik är att vinna: De svenska partiernas valkampanjer [Politics is to win: The Swedish parties’ election campaigns]. Timbro förlag.BolinN.GrusellM.NordL.2022Politik är att vinna: De svenska partiernas valkampanjer [Politics is to win: The Swedish parties’ election campaigns]Timbro förlagSearch in Google Scholar
Bossetta, M., & Schmøkel, R. (2023). Cross-platform emotions and audience engagement in social media political campaigning: Comparing candidates’ Facebook and Instagram images in the 2020 US election. Political Communication, 40(1), 48–68, https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2022.2128949BossettaM.SchmøkelR.2023Cross-platform emotions and audience engagement in social media political campaigning: Comparing candidates’ Facebook and Instagram images in the 2020 US electionPolitical Communication4014868https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2022.2128949Search in Google Scholar
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oaBraunV.ClarkeV.2006Using thematic analysis in psychologyQualitative Research in Psychology3277101https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oaSearch in Google Scholar
Carr, C. T., & Hayes, R. A. (2015). Social media: Defining, developing, and divining. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 23(1), 46–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2015.972282CarrC. T.HayesR. A.2015Social media: Defining, developing, and diviningAtlantic Journal of Communication2314665https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2015.972282Search in Google Scholar
Chadwick, A. (2013). Politics and communications in the hybrid media system. Hanover Communications Blog. http://www.hanovercomms.com/2013/10/politics-and-communications-in-the-hybrid-media-system/ChadwickA.2013Politics and communications in the hybrid media systemHanover Communications Bloghttp://www.hanovercomms.com/2013/10/politics-and-communications-in-the-hybrid-media-system/Search in Google Scholar
Chadwick, A., & Stromer-Galley, J. (2016). Digital media, power, and democracy in parties and election campaigns: Party decline or party renewal? The International Journal of Press/Politics, 21(3), 283–293. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161216646731ChadwickA.Stromer-GalleyJ.2016Digital media, power, and democracy in parties and election campaigns: Party decline or party renewal?The International Journal of Press/Politics213283293https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161216646731Search in Google Scholar
Davis, A. (2019). Political communication: A new introduction for crisis times. Polity Press.DavisA.2019Political communication: A new introduction for crisis timesPolity PressSearch in Google Scholar
Demicom. (2010). Election campaign party interviews 2010. Demicom, Mid Sweden University.Demicom2010Election campaign party interviews 2010Demicom, Mid Sweden UniversitySearch in Google Scholar
Demicom. (2014). Election campaign party interviews 2014. Demicom, Mid Sweden University.Demicom2014Election campaign party interviews 2014Demicom, Mid Sweden UniversitySearch in Google Scholar
Demicom. (2018). Election campaign party interviews 2018. Demicom, Mid Sweden University.Demicom2018Election campaign party interviews 2018Demicom, Mid Sweden UniversitySearch in Google Scholar
Demicom. (2022). Election campaign party interviews 2022. Demicom, Mid Sweden University.Demicom2022Election campaign party interviews 2022Demicom, Mid Sweden UniversitySearch in Google Scholar
Dimitrova, D. V., Shehata, A., Strömbäck, J., & Nord, L. W. (2014). The effects of digital media on political knowledge and participation in election campaigns: Evidence from panel data. Communication Research, 41(1), 95–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650211426004DimitrovaD. V.ShehataA.StrömbäckJ.NordL. W.2014The effects of digital media on political knowledge and participation in election campaigns: Evidence from panel dataCommunication Research41195118https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650211426004Search in Google Scholar
Grusell, M., & Nord, L. (2020). Setting the trend or changing the game? Professionalization and digitalization of election campaigns in Sweden. Journal of Political Marketing, 19(3), 258–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2016.1228555GrusellM.NordL.2020Setting the trend or changing the game? Professionalization and digitalization of election campaigns in SwedenJournal of Political Marketing193258278https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2016.1228555Search in Google Scholar
Guetterman, T. C., & Fetters, M. D. (2018). Two methodological approaches to the integration of mixed methods and case study designs: A systematic review. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(7), 900–918. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218772641GuettermanT. C.FettersM. D.2018Two methodological approaches to the integration of mixed methods and case study designs: A systematic reviewAmerican Behavioral Scientist627900918https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218772641Search in Google Scholar
Internetstiftelsen. (2022). Svenskarna och internet 2022 [Swedes and the internet 2022]. https://svenskarnaochinternet.se/app/uploads/2022/10/internetstiftelsen-svenskarna-och-internet-2022.pdfInternetstiftelsen2022Svenskarna och internet 2022[Swedes and the internet 2022]. https://svenskarnaochinternet.se/app/uploads/2022/10/internetstiftelsen-svenskarna-och-internet-2022.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Jungherr, A. (2016a). Four functions of digital tools in election campaigns: The German case. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 21(3), 358–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161216642597JungherrA.2016aFour functions of digital tools in election campaigns: The German caseThe International Journal of Press/Politics213358377https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161216642597Search in Google Scholar
Jungherr, A. (2016b). Twitter use in election campaigns: A systematic literature review. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 13(1), 72–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2015.1132401JungherrA.2016bTwitter use in election campaigns: A systematic literature reviewJournal of Information Technology & Politics1317291https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2015.1132401Search in Google Scholar
Karlsen, R. (2009). Campaign communication and the internet: Party strategy in the 2005 Norwegian election campaign. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 19(2), 183–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457280902799030KarlsenR.2009Campaign communication and the internet: Party strategy in the 2005 Norwegian election campaignJournal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties192183202https://doi.org/10.1080/17457280902799030Search in Google Scholar
Karlsen, R., & Enjolras, B. (2016). Styles of social media campaigning and influence in a hybrid political communication system: Linking candidate survey data with Twitter data. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 21(3), 338–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161216645335KarlsenR.EnjolrasB.2016Styles of social media campaigning and influence in a hybrid political communication system: Linking candidate survey data with Twitter dataThe International Journal of Press/Politics213338357https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161216645335Search in Google Scholar
Kefford, G., Dommett, K., Baldwin-Philippi, J., Bannerman, S., Dobber, T., Kruschinski, S., Kruikemeier, S., & Rzepecki, E. (2022). Data-driven campaigning and democratic disruption: Evidence from six advanced democracies. Party Politics, 29(3), 448–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688221084039KeffordG.DommettK.Baldwin-PhilippiJ.BannermanS.DobberT.KruschinskiS.KruikemeierS.RzepeckiE.2022Data-driven campaigning and democratic disruption: Evidence from six advanced democraciesParty Politics293448462https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688221084039Search in Google Scholar
Kreiss, D., Lawrence, R. G., & McGregor, S. C. (2018). In their own words: Political practitioner accounts of candidates, audiences, affordances, genres, and timing in strategic social media use. Political Communication, 35(1), 8–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2017.1334727KreissD.LawrenceR. G.McGregorS. C.2018In their own words: Political practitioner accounts of candidates, audiences, affordances, genres, and timing in strategic social media usePolitical Communication351831https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2017.1334727Search in Google Scholar
Kruschinski, S., & Haller, A. (2017). Restrictions on data-driven political micro-targeting in Germany. Internet Policy Review, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.14763/2017.4.780KruschinskiS.HallerA.2017Restrictions on data-driven political micro-targeting in GermanyInternet Policy Review64https://doi.org/10.14763/2017.4.780Search in Google Scholar
Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. Sage.KvaleS.BrinkmannS.2009Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewingSageSearch in Google Scholar
Larsson, A. O. (2017). Going viral? Comparing parties on social media during the 2014 Swedish election. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 23(2), 117–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856515577891LarssonA. O.2017Going viral? Comparing parties on social media during the 2014 Swedish electionConvergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies232117131https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856515577891Search in Google Scholar
Maxwell, J. A., & Loomis, D. M. (2003). Mixed methods design: An alternative approach. In A. Tashakkori, & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 241–272). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506335193MaxwellJ. A.LoomisD. M.2003Mixed methods design: An alternative approachInTashakkoriA.TeddlieC.(Eds.),Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research241272Sagehttps://doi.org/10.4135/9781506335193Search in Google Scholar
Panebianco, A. (1988). Political parties: Organization & power. Cambridge University Press.PanebiancoA.1988Political parties: Organization & powerCambridge University PressSearch in Google Scholar
Plasser, F., & Plasser, G. (2002). Global political campaigning: A worldwide analysis of campaign professionals and their practices. Praeger.PlasserF.PlasserG.2002Global political campaigning: A worldwide analysis of campaign professionals and their practicesPraegerSearch in Google Scholar
Russmann, U. (2022). Social media as strategic campaign tool: Austrian political parties use of social media over time. In D. Taras, & R. Davis (Eds.), Electoral campaigns, media, and the new world of digital politics (pp. 263–282). University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.12013603RussmannU.2022Social media as strategic campaign tool: Austrian political parties use of social media over timeInTarasD.DavisR.(Eds.),Electoral campaigns, media, and the new world of digital politics263282University of Michigan Presshttps://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.12013603Search in Google Scholar
Römmele, A., & Gibson, R. (2020). Scientific and subversive: The two faces of the fourth era of political campaigning. New Media & Society, 22(4), 595–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448193979RömmeleA.GibsonR.2020Scientific and subversive: The two faces of the fourth era of political campaigningNew Media & Society224595610https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448193979Search in Google Scholar
Schmitt-Beck, R. (2007). New modes of campaigning. In R. J. Dalton, & H.-D. Klingemann (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political behaviour (pp. 744–764). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199270125.001.0001Schmitt-BeckR.2007New modes of campaigningInDaltonR. J.KlingemannH.-D.(Eds.),The Oxford handbook of political behaviour744764Oxford University Presshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199270125.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. A., Nelimarkka, M., & Larsson, A. O. (2022). Populist platform strategies: A comparative study of social media campaigning by Nordic right-wing populist parties. Information, Communication & Society, 26(16), 3218–3236. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2022.2147397SchwartzS. A.NelimarkkaM.LarssonA. O.2022Populist platform strategies: A comparative study of social media campaigning by Nordic right-wing populist partiesInformation, Communication & Society261632183236https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2022.2147397Search in Google Scholar
Steffan, D., & Venema, N. (2020). New medium, old strategies? Comparing online and traditional campaign posters for German Bundestag elections, 2013–2017. European Journal of Communication, 35(4), 370–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323120903681SteffanD.VenemaN.2020New medium, old strategies? Comparing online and traditional campaign posters for German Bundestag elections, 2013–2017European Journal of Communication354370388https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323120903681Search in Google Scholar
Tambini, D. (2018). Social media power and election legitimacy. In M. Moore, & D. Tambini (Eds.), Digital dominance: The power of Google, Amazon, Facebook, and Apple (pp. 265–293). Oxford University Press.TambiniD.2018Social media power and election legitimacyInMooreM.TambiniD.(Eds.),Digital dominance: The power of Google, Amazon, Facebook, and Apple265293Oxford University PressSearch in Google Scholar
Taras, D., & Davis, R. (Eds.). (2022). Electoral campaigns, media, and the new world of digital politics. University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.12013603TarasD.DavisR.(Eds.).2022Electoral campaigns, media, and the new world of digital politicsUniversity of Michigan Presshttps://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.12013603Search in Google Scholar
Veneti, A., Lilleker, D. G., & Jackson, D. (2022). Between analogue and digital: A critical exploration of strategic social media use in Greek election campaigns. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 19(1), 50–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2021.1913689VenetiA.LillekerD. G.JacksonD.2022Between analogue and digital: A critical exploration of strategic social media use in Greek election campaignsJournal of Information Technology & Politics1915064https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2021.1913689Search in Google Scholar