This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Atton, C. (2002). Alternative media. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446220153AttonC.2002Sagehttps://doi.org/10.4135/9781446220153Search in Google Scholar
Barnoy, A., & Reich, Z. (2021). The familiarity paradox: Why has digital sourcing not democratized the news? Digital Journalism, 11(6), 1084–1103. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1937254BarnoyA.ReichZ.2021The familiarity paradox: Why has digital sourcing not democratized the news?11610841103https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1937254Search in Google Scholar
Bennett, W. L., & Livingston, S. (2018). The disinformation order: Disruptive communication and the decline of democratic institutions. European Journal of Communication, 33(2), 122–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323118760BennettW. L.LivingstonS.2018The disinformation order: Disruptive communication and the decline of democratic institutions332122139https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323118760Search in Google Scholar
Bruns, A. (2019). Are filter bubbles real? John Wiley & Sons.BrunsA.2019John Wiley & SonsSearch in Google Scholar
Carothers, T., & O’Donohue, A. (Eds.). (2019). Democracies divided: The global challenge of political polarization. Brookings Institution Press.CarothersT.O’DonohueA.(Eds.).2019Brookings Institution PressSearch in Google Scholar
Chadwick, A., Dennis, J., & Smith, A. P. (2015). Politics in the age of hybrid media: Power, systems, and media logics. In A. Bruns, G. Enli, E. Skogerbø, A. O. Larsson, & C. Christensen (Eds.), The Routledge companion to social media and politics (pp. 7–22). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315716299ChadwickA.DennisJ.SmithA. P.2015Politics in the age of hybrid media: Power, systems, and media logicsInBrunsA.EnliG.SkogerbøE.LarssonA. O.ChristensenC.(Eds.),722Routledgehttps://doi.org/10.4324/9781315716299Search in Google Scholar
Chambers, S. (2018). Reasonable democracy: Jürgen Habermas and the politics of discourse. Cornell University Press.ChambersS.2018Cornell University PressSearch in Google Scholar
Christians, C. G., Glasser, T., McQuail, D., Nordenstreng, K., & White, R. A. (2010). Normative theories of the media: Journalism in democratic societies. University of Illinois Press.ChristiansC. G.GlasserT.McQuailD.NordenstrengK.WhiteR. A.2010University of Illinois PressSearch in Google Scholar
Cushion, S. (2023). Beyond Mainstream media: Alternative media and the future of journalism. Taylor & Francis.CushionS.2023Taylor & FrancisSearch in Google Scholar
Ekman, M. (2019). Anti-immigration and racist discourse in social media. European Journal of Communication, 34(6), 606–618. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323119886151EkmanM.2019Anti-immigration and racist discourse in social media346606618https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323119886151Search in Google Scholar
Ekman, M., & Widholm, A. (2022). Parasitic news: Adoption and adaption of journalistic conventions in hybrid political communication. Journalism. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849221136940EkmanM.WidholmA.2022Parasitic news: Adoption and adaption of journalistic conventions in hybrid political communicationhttps://doi.org/10.1177/14648849221136940Search in Google Scholar
Ekman, M., & Widholm, A. (2023). Media criticism as a propaganda strategy in political communication. Nordic Journal of Media Studies, 5(1), 115–133. https://doi.org/10.2478/njms-2023-0007EkmanM.WidholmA.2023Media criticism as a propaganda strategy in political communication51115133https://doi.org/10.2478/njms-2023-0007Search in Google Scholar
Engesser. S., Fawzi, N., & Larsson, A. O. (2017). Populist online communication: Introduction to the special issue. Information, Communication & Society, 20(9), 1279–1292. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1328525EngesserS.FawziN.LarssonA. O.2017Populist online communication: Introduction to the special issue20912791292https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1328525Search in Google Scholar
Fletcher, R., & Nielsen, R. K. (2017). Are news audiences increasingly fragmented? A cross-national comparative analysis of cross-platform news audience fragmentation and duplication. Journal of Communication, 67(4), 476–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12315FletcherR.NielsenR. K.2017Are news audiences increasingly fragmented? A cross-national comparative analysis of cross-platform news audience fragmentation and duplication674476498https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12315Search in Google Scholar
Galtung, J. (1996). On the social costs of modernization: Social disintegration, atomie/anomie and social development. Development and Change, 27(2), 379–413. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.1996.tb00596.xGaltungJ.1996On the social costs of modernization: Social disintegration, atomie/anomie and social development272379413https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.1996.tb00596.xSearch in Google Scholar
Gerbaudo, P. (2018). Social media and populism: An elective affinity? Media, Culture and Society, 40(5), 745–753. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443718772192GerbaudoP.2018Social media and populism: An elective affinity?405745753https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443718772192Search in Google Scholar
Gorwa, R. (2019). What is platform governance? Information, Communication & Society, 22(6), 854–871. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1573914GorwaR.2019What is platform governance?226854871https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1573914Search in Google Scholar
Hase, V., Boczek, K., & Scharkow, M. (2023). Adapting to affordances and audiences? A cross-platform, multi-modal analysis of the platformization of news on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and Twitter. Digital Journalism, 11(8), 1499–1520.HaseV.BoczekK.ScharkowM.2023Adapting to affordances and audiences? A cross-platform, multi-modal analysis of the platformization of news on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and Twitter11814991520Search in Google Scholar
Heft, A., Mayerhöffer, E., Reinhardt, S., & Knüpfer, C. (2020). Beyond Breitbart: Comparing right-wing digital news infrastructures in six western democracies. Policy & Internet, 12(1), 20–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.219HeftA.MayerhöfferE.ReinhardtS.KnüpferC.2020Beyond Breitbart: Comparing right-wing digital news infrastructures in six western democracies1212045https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.219Search in Google Scholar
Holt, K., Ustad Figenschou, T., & Frischlich, L. (2019). Key dimensions of alternative news media. Digital Journalism, 7(7), 860–869. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1625715HoltK.Ustad FigenschouT.FrischlichL.2019Key dimensions of alternative news media77860869https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1625715Search in Google Scholar
Jungherr, A., & Schroeder, R. (2021). Digital transformations of the public arena. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009064484JungherrA.SchroederR.2021Cambridge University Presshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781009064484Search in Google Scholar
Kaiser, J., & Rauchfleisch, A. (2019). Integrating concepts of counterpublics into generalised public sphere frameworks: Contemporary transformations in radical forms. Javnost – The Public, 26(3), 241–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2018.1558676KaiserJ.RauchfleischA.2019Integrating concepts of counterpublics into generalised public sphere frameworks: Contemporary transformations in radical forms263241257https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2018.1558676Search in Google Scholar
Kefford, G., Dommett, K., Baldwin-Philippi, J., Bannerman, S., Dobber, T., Kruschinski, S., Kruikemeier, S., & Rzepecki, E. (2022). Data-driven campaigning and democratic disruption: Evidence from six advanced democracies. Party Politics, 29(3), 448–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688221084039KeffordG.DommettK.Baldwin-PhilippiJ.BannermanS.DobberT.KruschinskiS.KruikemeierS.RzepeckiE.2022Data-driven campaigning and democratic disruption: Evidence from six advanced democracies293448462https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688221084039Search in Google Scholar
Kossowska, M., Kłodkowski, P., Siewierska-Chmaj, A., Guinote, A., Kessels, U., Moyano, M., & Strömbäck, J. (2023). Internet-based micro-identities as a driver of societal disintegration. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02441-zKossowskaM.KłodkowskiP.Siewierska-ChmajA.GuinoteA.KesselsU.MoyanoM.StrömbäckJ.2023Internet-based micro-identities as a driver of societal disintegration101110https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02441-zSearch in Google Scholar
Krzyżanowski, M., Ekman, M., Nilsson, P. E., Gardell, M., & Christensen, C. (2021). Uncivility, racism, and populism: Discourses and interactive practices in anti- & post-democratic communication. Nordicom Review, 42(S1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2021-0003KrzyżanowskiM.EkmanM.NilssonP. E.GardellM.ChristensenC.2021Uncivility, racism, and populism: Discourses and interactive practices in anti- & post-democratic communication42S1315https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2021-0003Search in Google Scholar
Krämer, B. (2017). Populist online practices: The function of the internet in right-wing populism. Information, Communication & Society, 20(9), 1293–1309. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1328520KrämerB.2017Populist online practices: The function of the internet in right-wing populism20912931309https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1328520Search in Google Scholar
Larsson, A. O. (2020). Right-wingers on the rise online: Insights from the 2018 Swedish elections. New Media & Society, 22(12), 2108–2127. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819887700LarssonA. O.2020Right-wingers on the rise online: Insights from the 2018 Swedish elections221221082127https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819887700Search in Google Scholar
Lecheler, S., & Kruikemeier, S. (2016). Re-evaluating journalistic routines in a digital age: A review of research on the use of online sources. New Media & Society, 18(1), 156–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815600412LechelerS.KruikemeierS.2016Re-evaluating journalistic routines in a digital age: A review of research on the use of online sources181156171https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815600412Search in Google Scholar
Lee, E. J., & Tandoc Jr., E. C. (2017). When news meets the audience: How audience feedback online affects news production and consumption. Human Communication Research, 43(4), 436–449. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12123LeeE. J.TandocE. C.Jr.2017When news meets the audience: How audience feedback online affects news production and consumption434436449https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12123Search in Google Scholar
Lischka, J. A., & Messerli, M. (2016). Examining the benefits of audience integration: Does sharing of or commenting on online news enhance the loyalty of online readers? Digital Journalism, 4(5), 597–620. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2015.1068128LischkaJ. A.MesserliM.2016Examining the benefits of audience integration: Does sharing of or commenting on online news enhance the loyalty of online readers?45597620https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2015.1068128Search in Google Scholar
Maurer, P. (2022). Populism and social media. In A. Ceron (Ed.), Encyclopedia of technology & politics (pp. 37–42). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800374263.populism.social.mediaMaurerP.2022Populism and social mediaInCeronA.(Ed.),3742Edward Elgarhttps://doi.org/10.4337/9781800374263.populism.social.mediaSearch in Google Scholar
Mayerhöffer, E., & Schwartz, S. A. (2020). Fake eller partisk? Hyperpartiske onlinemedier i den danske valgkamp 2019 [Fake or partisan: Hyperpartisan online media in the Danish election campaign 2019]. In S. N. Just, & T. Gulbrandsen (Eds.), FV19: Politisk kommunikation på digitale medier [FV19: Political communication on digital media] (pp. 203–226). Samfundslitteratur.MayerhöfferE.SchwartzS. A.2020Fake eller partisk? Hyperpartiske onlinemedier i den danske valgkamp 2019 [Fake or partisan: Hyperpartisan online media in the Danish election campaign 2019]InJustS. N.GulbrandsenT.(Eds.),203226SamfundslitteraturSearch in Google Scholar
Moffitt, B. (2016). The global rise of populism: Performance, political style, and representation. Stanford University Press.MoffittB.2016Stanford University PressSearch in Google Scholar
Nielsen, R. K., & Fletcher, R. (2023). Comparing the platformization of news media systems: A cross-country analysis. European Journal of Communication, 38(5), 484–499. https://doi.org/10.1177/02673231231189NielsenR. K.FletcherR.2023Comparing the platformization of news media systems: A cross-country analysis385484499https://doi.org/10.1177/02673231231189Search in Google Scholar
Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2019). Cultural backlash: Trump, Brexit, and authoritarian populism. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108595841NorrisP.InglehartR.2019Cambridge University Presshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781108595841Search in Google Scholar
Perloff, R. M. (2022) The dynamics of political communication: Media and politics in a digital age. Routledge.PerloffR. M.2022RoutledgeSearch in Google Scholar
Picha Edwardsson, M., Al-Saqaf, W., & Nygren, G. (2023). Verification of digital sources in Swedish newsrooms: A technical issue or a question of newsroom culture? Journalism Practice, 17(8), 1678–1695. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2021.2004200Picha EdwardssonM.Al-SaqafW.NygrenG.2023Verification of digital sources in Swedish newsrooms: A technical issue or a question of newsroom culture?17816781695https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2021.2004200Search in Google Scholar
Powers, E., Koliska, M., & Guha, P. (2019). ‘Shouting matches and echo chambers’: Perceived identity threats and political self-censorship on social media. International Journal of Communication, 13, 3630–3649.PowersE.KoliskaM.GuhaP.2019‘Shouting matches and echo chambers’: Perceived identity threats and political self-censorship on social media1336303649Search in Google Scholar
Reinemann, C., Aalberg, T., Esser, F., Strömbäck, J., & de Vreese, C. (2017). Populist political communication: Toward a model of its causes, forms, and effects. In T. Aalberg, F. Esser, C. Reinemann, J. Strömbäck, & C. de Vreese (Eds.), Populist political communication in Europe (pp. 12–25). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315623016ReinemannC.AalbergT.EsserF.StrömbäckJ.de VreeseC.2017Populist political communication: Toward a model of its causes, forms, and effectsInAalbergT.EsserF.ReinemannC.StrömbäckJ.de VreeseC.(Eds.),1225Routledgehttps://doi.org/10.4324/9781315623016Search in Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. A., Nelimarkka, M., & Larsson, A. O. (2022). Populist platform strategies: A comparative study of social media campaigning by Nordic right-wing populist parties. Information, Communication & Society, 26(16), 3220–3238. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2022.2147397SchwartzS. A.NelimarkkaM.LarssonA. O.2022Populist platform strategies: A comparative study of social media campaigning by Nordic right-wing populist parties261632203238https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2022.2147397Search in Google Scholar
Springer, N., Engelmann, I., & Pfaffinger, C. (2015). User comments: Motives and inhibitors to write and read. Information, Communication & Society, 18(7), 798–815. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.997268SpringerN.EngelmannI.PfaffingerC.2015User comments: Motives and inhibitors to write and read187798815https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.997268Search in Google Scholar
Strömbäck, J. (2005). In search of a standard: Four models of democracy and their normative implications for journalism. Journalism Studies, 6(3), 331–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700500131950StrömbäckJ.2005In search of a standard: Four models of democracy and their normative implications for journalism63331345https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700500131950Search in Google Scholar
Strömbäck, J. (2023). Political alternative media as a democratic challenge. Digital Journalism, 11(5), 880–887. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2023.2178947StrömbäckJ.2023Political alternative media as a democratic challenge115880887https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2023.2178947Search in Google Scholar
Strömbäck, J., & Kiousis, S. (2014). Strategic political communication in election campaigns. In C. Reinemann (Ed.), Political communication (pp. 109–128). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110238174StrömbäckJ.KiousisS.2014Strategic political communication in election campaignsInReinemannC.(Ed.),109128De Gruyter Moutonhttps://doi.org/10.1515/9783110238174Search in Google Scholar
Susen, S. (2017). Jürgen Habermas: Between democratic deliberation and deliberative democracy. In R. Wodak, & B. Forchtner (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language and politics (pp. 43–66). Routledge.SusenS.2017Jürgen Habermas: Between democratic deliberation and deliberative democracyInWodakR.ForchtnerB.(Eds.),4366RoutledgeSearch in Google Scholar
Van Leuven, S., Kruikemeier, S., Lecheler, S., & Hermans, L. (2018). Online and newsworthy. Digital Journalism, 6(7), 798–806. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2018.1498747Van LeuvenS.KruikemeierS.LechelerS.HermansL.2018Online and newsworthy67798806https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2018.1498747Search in Google Scholar
Veneti, A., Lilleker, D. G., & Jackson, D. (2022). Between analogue and digital: A critical exploration of strategic social media use in Greek election campaigns. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 19(1), 50–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2021.1913689VenetiA.LillekerD. G.JacksonD.2022Between analogue and digital: A critical exploration of strategic social media use in Greek election campaigns1915064https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2021.1913689Search in Google Scholar
Wallace, J. (2018). Modelling contemporary gatekeeping: The rise of individuals, algorithms and platforms in digital news dissemination. Digital Journalism, 6(3), 274–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1343648WallaceJ.2018Modelling contemporary gatekeeping: The rise of individuals, algorithms and platforms in digital news dissemination63274293https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1343648Search in Google Scholar
Wang, S. (2021). Moderating uncivil user comments by humans or machines? The effects of moderation agent on perceptions of bias and credibility in news content. Digital Journalism, 9(1), 64–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2020.1851279WangS.2021Moderating uncivil user comments by humans or machines? The effects of moderation agent on perceptions of bias and credibility in news content916483https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2020.1851279Search in Google Scholar
Webster, J. G., & Ksiazek, T. B. (2012). The dynamics of audience fragmentation: Public attention in an age of digital media. Journal of Communication, 62(1), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01616.xWebsterJ. G.KsiazekT. B.2012The dynamics of audience fragmentation: Public attention in an age of digital media6213956https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01616.xSearch in Google Scholar
Volkmer, I. (2003). The global network society and the global public sphere. Development, 46, 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1011637003046001566VolkmerI.2003The global network society and the global public sphere46916https://doi.org/10.1177/1011637003046001566Search in Google Scholar
Yarchi, M., Baden, C., & Kligler-Vilenchik, N. (2021). Political polarization on the digital sphere: A cross-platform, over-time analysis of interactional, positional, and affective polarization on social media. Political Communication, 38(1–2), 98–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1785067YarchiM.BadenC.Kligler-VilenchikN.2021Political polarization on the digital sphere: A cross-platform, over-time analysis of interactional, positional, and affective polarization on social media381–298139https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1785067Search in Google Scholar