This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Ajana, B. (2017). Digital health and the biopolitics of the quantified self. Digital Health, 3, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207616689509AjanaB.2017Digital health and the biopolitics of the quantified self3118https://doi.org/10.1177/205520761668950910.1177/2055207616689509Search in Google Scholar
Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Duke University Press.BennettJ.2010Duke University PressSearch in Google Scholar
Breault, R. A. (2016). Emerging issues in duoethnography. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 29(6), 777–794. 10.1080/09518398.2016.1162866BreaultR. A.2016Emerging issues in duoethnography29677779410.1080/09518398.2016.1162866Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Cann, C., & DeMeulenaere, E. (2010). Forged in the crucibles of difference: Building discordant communities. Penn GSE Perspectives on Urban Education, 7(1), 41–53.CannC.DeMeulenaereE.2010Forged in the crucibles of difference: Building discordant communities714153Search in Google Scholar
Chang, H., Hernandez, K.-A. C., & Ngunjiri, F. W. (2012). Collaborative autoethnography. Left Coast Press.ChangH.HernandezK.-A. C.NgunjiriF. W.2012Left Coast PressSearch in Google Scholar
Cifor, M., & Garcia, P. (2019). Inscribing gender: A duoethnographic examination of gendered values and practices in fitness tracker design. Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Scholar Space, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, 2132–2141. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/59652CiforM.GarciaP.2019Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Scholar SpaceHonolulu, Hawaii, USA21322141http://hdl.handle.net/10125/5965210.24251/HICSS.2019.259Search in Google Scholar
Clark, M. I., & Thorpe, H. (2020). Towards diffractive ways of knowing women's moving bodies: A Baradian experiment with the fitbit–motherhood entanglement. Sociology of Sport Journal, 37(1), 12–26. https://doi.org/10.1123/ssj.2018-0173ClarkM. I.ThorpeH.2020Towards diffractive ways of knowing women's moving bodies: A Baradian experiment with the fitbit–motherhood entanglement3711226https://doi.org/10.1123/ssj.2018-017310.1123/ssj.2018-0173Search in Google Scholar
Coia, L., & Taylor, M. (2009). Co/autoethnography: Exploring our teaching selves collaboratively. In L. Fitzgerald, M. Heston, & D. Tidwell (Eds.), Research methods for the self-study of practice (Vol. 9) (pp. 3–16). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9514-6_1CoiaL.TaylorM.2009Co/autoethnography: Exploring our teaching selves collaborativelyInFitzgeraldL.HestonM.TidwellD.(Eds.),9316Springerhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9514-6_110.1007/978-1-4020-9514-6_1Search in Google Scholar
Deleuze, G. (1992). Postscript on the societies of control. October, 59, 3–7. https://www.jstor.org/stable/778828DeleuzeG.1992Postscript on the societies of control5937https://www.jstor.org/stable/77882810.4324/9781315242002-3Search in Google Scholar
Edensor, T. (2012). Introduction: Thinking about rhythm and space. In T. Edensor (Ed.), Geographies of rhythm: Nature, place, mobilities and bodies (pp. 1–18). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315584430EdensorT.2012Introduction: Thinking about rhythm and spaceInEdensorT.(Ed.),118Routledgehttps://doi.org/10.4324/978131558443010.4324/9781315584430Search in Google Scholar
Ellis, C., & Bochner, A. P. (2000). Autoethnography, personal narrative, and personal reflexivity. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.) (pp. 733–768). Sage.EllisC.BochnerA. P.2000Autoethnography, personal narrative, and personal reflexivityInDenzinN. K.LincolnY. S.(Eds.),2nd ed.733768SageSearch in Google Scholar
Fotopoulou, A., & O’Riordan, K. (2017). Training to self-care: Fitness tracking, biopedagogy and the healthy consumer. Health Sociology Review, 26(1), 54–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/14461242.2016.1184582FotopoulouA.O’RiordanK.2017Training to self-care: Fitness tracking, biopedagogy and the healthy consumer2615468https://doi.org/10.1080/14461242.2016.118458210.4324/9781315108285-5Search in Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (2015). Politics, philosophy, culture: Interviews and other writings 1977–1984. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203760031FoucaultM.2015Routledgehttps://doi.org/10.4324/978020376003110.4324/9780203760031Search in Google Scholar
Jones, P., & Warren, S. (2016). Time, rhythm and the creative economy. Transactions of the institute of British geographers, 41(3), 286–296. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12122JonesP.WarrenS.2016Time, rhythm and the creative economy413286296https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.1212210.1111/tran.12122Search in Google Scholar
Kristensen, D., & Ruckenstein, M. (2018). Co-evolving with self-tracking technologies. New Media & Society, 20(10), 3624–3640. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818755650KristensenD.RuckensteinM.2018Co-evolving with self-tracking technologies201036243640https://doi.org/10.1177/146144481875565010.1177/1461444818755650Search in Google Scholar
Latour, B. (1992). Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In W. Bijker, & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology-building society: Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 225–259). MIT Press.LatourB.1992Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifactsInBijkerW.LawJ.(Eds.),225259MIT PressSearch in Google Scholar
Lazar, A., Koehler, C., Tanenbaum, J., & Nguyen, D. H. (2015). Why we use and abandon smart devices. Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, 635–646. https://doi.org/10.1145/2750858.2804288LazarA.KoehlerC.TanenbaumJ.NguyenD. H.2015Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing635646https://doi.org/10.1145/2750858.280428810.1145/2750858.2804288Search in Google Scholar
Lefebvre, H. (2004). Rhythmanalysis: Space, time and everyday life (G. Moore, Trans.). Continuum. (Original work published 1992). https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472547385LefebvreH.2004MooreG.Trans.Continuum(Original work published 1992). https://doi.org/10.5040/978147254738510.5040/9781472547385Search in Google Scholar
Lefebvre, H., & Régulier, C. (2004). Attempt at the rhythmanalysis of Mediterranean cities. In H. Lefebvre, Rhythmanalysis: Space, time and everyday life (G. Moore, Trans.) (pp. 87–100). (Original work published 1992). Continuum. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472547385.0008LefebvreH.RégulierC.2004Attempt at the rhythmanalysis of Mediterranean citiesInLefebvreH.MooreG.Trans.87100(Original work published 1992).Continuumhttps://doi.org/10.5040/9781472547385.000810.5040/9781472547385.0008Search in Google Scholar
Lomborg, S., Thylstrup, N. B., & Schwartz, J. (2018). The temporal flows of self-tracking: Checking in, moving on, staying hooked. New Media and Society, 20(12), 4590–4607. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818778542LomborgS.ThylstrupN. B.SchwartzJ.2018The temporal flows of self-tracking: Checking in, moving on, staying hooked201245904607https://doi.org/10.1177/146144481877854210.1177/1461444818778542Search in Google Scholar
Lund, D. E., & Nabavi, M. (2008). A duo-ethnographic conversation on social justice activism: Exploring issues of identity, racism, and activism with young people. Multicultural Education, 15(4), 27–32.LundD. E.NabaviM.2008A duo-ethnographic conversation on social justice activism: Exploring issues of identity, racism, and activism with young people1542732Search in Google Scholar
Lupton, D. (2013). Understanding the human machine. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 32(4), 25–30. https://doi.org/10.1109/MTS.2013.2286431LuptonD.2013Understanding the human machine3242530https://doi.org/10.1109/MTS.2013.228643110.1109/MTS.2013.2286431Search in Google Scholar
Lupton, D. (2016a). Digital companion species and eating data: Implications for theorising digital data-human assemblages. Big Data & Society, 3(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715619947LuptonD.2016aDigital companion species and eating data: Implications for theorising digital data-human assemblages3115https://doi.org/10.1177/205395171561994710.1177/2053951715619947Search in Google Scholar
Lupton, D. (2016b). The quantified self: A sociology of self-tracking. Polity Press.LuptonD.2016bPolity PressSearch in Google Scholar
Maturo, A., & Moretti, V. (2018). Digital health and the gamification of life: How apps can promote a positive medicalization. Emerald Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78754-365-220181002MaturoA.MorettiV.2018Emerald Publishinghttps://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78754-365-22018100210.1108/9781787543652Search in Google Scholar
Nafus, D., & Sherman, J. (2014). This one does not go up to 11: The quantified self movement as an alternative big data practice. International Journal of Communication, 8, 1785–1794. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/2170NafusD.ShermanJ.2014This one does not go up to 11: The quantified self movement as an alternative big data practice817851794https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/2170Search in Google Scholar
Norris, J., & Sawyer, R. (2012). Toward a dialogic method. In J. Norris, R. Sawyer, & D. Lund (Eds.), Duoethnography: Dialogic methods for social, health, and educational research (pp. 9–40). Left Coast Press.NorrisJ.SawyerR.2012Toward a dialogic methodInNorrisJ.SawyerR.LundD.(Eds.),940Left Coast Press10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199757404.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Pantzar, M., & Ruckenstein, M. (2017). Living the metrics: Self-tracking and situated objectivity. Digital Health, 3, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207617712590PantzarM.RuckensteinM.2017Living the metrics: Self-tracking and situated objectivity3110https://doi.org/10.1177/205520761771259010.1177/2055207617712590Search in Google Scholar
Pantzar, M., Ruckenstein, M., & Mustonen, V. (2018). Social rhythms of the heart. Health Sociology Review, 26(1), 22–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/14461242.2016.1184580PantzarM.RuckensteinM.MustonenV.2018Social rhythms of the heart2612237https://doi.org/10.1080/14461242.2016.118458010.4324/9781315108285-3Search in Google Scholar
Parviainen, J. (2016). Quantified bodies in the checking loop: Analyzing the choreographies of biomonitoring and generating big data. Human Technology, 12(1), 56–73. https://doi.org/10.17011/ht/urn.201605192620ParviainenJ.2016Quantified bodies in the checking loop: Analyzing the choreographies of biomonitoring and generating big data1215673https://doi.org/10.17011/ht/urn.20160519262010.17011/ht/urn.201605192620Search in Google Scholar
Reigeluth, T. (2014). Why data is not enough: Digital traces as control of self and self-control. Surveillance & Society, 12(2), 243–354. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v12i2.4741ReigeluthT.2014Why data is not enough: Digital traces as control of self and self-control122243354https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v12i2.474110.24908/ss.v12i2.4741Search in Google Scholar
Salmela, T., Valtonen, A., & Lupton, D. (2019). The affective circle of harassment and enchantment: Reflections on the LURA Ring as an intimate research device. Qualitative Inquiry, 25(3), 260–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800418801376SalmelaT.ValtonenA.LuptonD.2019The affective circle of harassment and enchantment: Reflections on the LURA Ring as an intimate research device253260270https://doi.org/10.1177/107780041880137610.1177/1077800418801376Search in Google Scholar
Sanders, R. (2017). Self-tracking in the digital era: Biopower, patriarchy and the new biometric body projects. Body & Society, 23(1), 36–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034x16660366SandersR.2017Self-tracking in the digital era: Biopower, patriarchy and the new biometric body projects2313663https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034x1666036610.1177/1357034X16660366Search in Google Scholar
Schüll, N. D. (2016a). Data for life: Wearable technology and the design of self-care. BioSocieties, 11, 317–333. https://doi.org/10.1057/biosoc.2015.47SchüllN. D.2016aData for life: Wearable technology and the design of self-care11317333https://doi.org/10.1057/biosoc.2015.4710.1057/biosoc.2015.47Search in Google Scholar
Schüll, N. D. (2016b). Sensor technology and the time-series self. Continent, 5(1), 24–29.SchüllN. D.2016bSensor technology and the time-series self512429Search in Google Scholar
Sharon, T., & Zandbergen, D. (2016). From data fetishism to quantifying selves: self-tracking practices and the other values of data. New Media & Society, 19(11), 1695–1709. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816636090SharonT.ZandbergenD.2016From data fetishism to quantifying selves: self-tracking practices and the other values of data191116951709https://doi.org/10.1177/146144481663609010.1177/1461444816636090Search in Google Scholar