Spread of tweets in climate discussions: A case study of the 2019 Nobel Peace Prize announcement
, y
06 jul 2021
Acerca de este artículo
Publicado en línea: 06 jul 2021
Páginas: 96 - 117
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/njms-2021-0006
Palabras clave
© 2021 Yan Xia et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 3

Figure 4

Figure 5

Tweet features for coding
Mocking | Does the tweet make fun of an entity at its expense? (yes/no) | |
Incivility | Does the tweet contain uncivil language? (yes/no) | |
Call to Action | Does the tweet call on others to behave in a certain way? (yes/no) | |
Ingroup Praise | Does the tweet speak of the ingroup in a positive manner? (yes/no) | |
Outgroup Criticism | Does the tweet speak of the outgroup in a negative manner? (yes/no) | |
Science | Does the tweet invoke “science” or “facts” as support? (yes/no) | |
Hashtags |
Machine extracted count of hashtags used in the tweet. | |
Mentions |
Machine extracted count of users mentioned in the tweet. | |
Solutions | Does the tweet present solutions to addressing climate change? (yes/no) | |
Movement | Does the tweet emphasise the strength of the pro-climate movement? (yes/no) | |
Anti-international | Does the tweet speak negatively of international organisations? (yes/no) | |
Hypocrisy | Does the tweet claim that supporters are hypocritical or inconsistent? (yes/no) | |
Conspiracy | Does the tweet claim that climate policy is a front for other agendas? (yes/no) |
Effects of the explanatory variables on tweet virality, activist and sceptic groups
Mocking | 0.0 | |
Call to Action | 0.0 | |
0.9 | ||
1.5 | ||
−2.7 | ||
12.3 | ||
Solution | 0.0 | |
0.5 | ||
1.7 | ||
−32.3∼46.4 | ||
Mocking | 0.0 | |
16.2 | ||
14.5 | ||
Ingroup Praise | 0.0 | |
−7.9 | ||
Science | 0.0 | |
Anti-international | 0.0 | |
10.1 | ||
Conspiracy | 0.0 | |
1.6 | ||
1.1 | ||
−27.3∼26.5 |
Most- and least-viral tweet pairs in the sceptic group
Climate crisis is a hoax Immigration is too high Corporate welfare and supply management must be eliminated The budget can be balanced within two years |
||