[
Aboal, Diego et al. 2018. “How Effective and Innovation Support Programs to Stimulate Innovation ? Evidence grom Paraguay.” Documentos de Trabajo LACEA 017233. Available at https://www.bcu.gub.uy/Comunicaciones/Jornadas%20de%20Economa/Diego_Aboal.pdf (last accessed 4. April 2021).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Albors-Garrigos, Jose and Rosa Rodrigues Barrera. 2011. “Impact of Public Funding on a Firm’s Innovation Performance: Analysis of Internal and External Moderating Factors.” International Journal of Innovation Management 15(6), 1297 – 1322.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Alvarez, Roberto, Bravo, Claudio and Zahler, Andrés. 2013. “Impact Evaluation of Innovation Programs in the Chilean Services Sector.” Documento de trabajo / Working Paper No 2013 (SS-IP)-02. Available at http://www.cinve.org.uy/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/DT-N%C2%B0-2013_SS-IP_-02-Zahler-U-Diego-Portales.pdf (last accessed 4. April 2021).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Arrow, Kenneth J. 1962. “Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention.” Princeton University Press: 219 – 236.10.1007/978-1-349-15486-9_13
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bondonio, Danielle et al. 2015. “Counterfactual Impact Evaluation of Enterprise Support Programmes: Evidence from a Decade of Subsidies to Italian Firm.” ERSA conference papers, European Regional Science Association. Available at https://ideas.repec.org/p/wiw/wiwrsa/ersa15p1619.html (last accessed 4. April 2021).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bronzini, Rafaello and Paolo Piselli. 2009. “Determinants of Long-Run Regional Productivity with Geographic Spillovers: The Role of R&D, Human Capital and Public Infrastructure.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 2(39), 187 – 199.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cerar Godec, Lucia and Jože Benčina. 2018. “Impact of Active Labour Market Policy Programs on Employment in the EU During the Crisis.” Central European Public Administration Review 16(1), 31 – 50.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Choi, Joonwhan and Jaegul Lee. 2017. “Repairing the R&D Market Failure: Public R&D Subsidy and the Composition of Private R&D.” Research Policy 46(8), 1465 – 1478.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Czarnitzki, Dirk and Cindy Lopes Bento. 2011. “Counterfactual Impact Evaluation of Cohesion Policy: Examples from Support to Innovation and Research.” Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Work package 2 Final Report. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/information/evaluations/pdf/impact/ciewp2_final.pdf (last accessed DATE).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Czarnitzki, Dirk, Bernd Ebersberger and Andreas Fier. 2007. “The Relationship between R&D Collaboration, Subsidies and R&D Performance: Empirical Evidence from Finland and Germany.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 22(7), 1347 – 1366.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Czarnitzki, Dirk, Petr Hanel and Julio Miguel Rosa. 2011. “Evaluating the Impact of R&D Tax Credits on Innovation: A Microeconomic Study on Canadian Firms.” Research Policy 20(2), 217 – 229.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy. 2017. “The Impact of Public Support for Innovation on Firm Outcomes.” Available at https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/604841/innovation-public-support-impact-report-2017.pdf (last accessed 4. April 2021).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
D’Este, Pablo et al. 2012. “What Hampers Innovation ? Revealed Barriers versus Deterring Barriers.” Research Policy 41(2), 483 – 488.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dodgston, Mark and John Bessant. 1996. Effective Innovation Policy: A New Approach. London: International Thomson Business Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dodgston, Mark, D. Gann and A. Satter. 2005. Think, Play, Do: Technology, Innovation and Organization. London: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dodgston, Mark et al. 2011. “System Thinking, Market Failure, and the Development of Innovation Policy: The Case of Australia.” Reserach Policy 40(9), 1145 – 1156.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ďurčeková, Ina. 2020. Verejná podpora podnikových inovácií a jej účinnosť. Dizertačná práca. Banská Bystrica: Ekonomická fakulta UMB v Banskej Bystrici.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dvouletý, Ondřej and Ivana Blažkov. 2019. “Assessing the Microeconomic Effect of Public Subsidies on the Performance of Firms in the Czech Food Processing Industry: A Counterfactual Impact Evaluation.” Agribusiness 35(3), 394 – 422.10.1002/agr.21582
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Edquist, Charles. 1997. Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations. London: Pinter.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Edquist, Charles and Susana Borrás. 2013. “The Choice of Innovation Policy Instruments.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 80(8), 1513 – 1522.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eggink, Maria. 2013. “The Components of Innovation System: A Conceptual Innovation System Framework.” Journal of Innovation and Business Best Practices 1, 1 – 12.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European Commission. 2013. Design and Commissioning of Counterfactual Impact Evaluations. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eurostat. 2017. Community Innovation Survey 2014. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/-/DDN-20170124-2 (last accessed 4. April 2021).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eurostat. 2020. “R&D Expenditure: Eurostat Statistics Explained.” Available at https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=R_%26_D_expenditure (last accessed 4. April 2021).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Falk, Rahel. 2007. “Measuring the Effects of Public Support Schemes on Firms’ Innovation Activities: Survey Evidence from Austria.” Research Policy 36(5), 665 – 679.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Government Office of the Slovak Republic. 2015. Hodnotenie vybraných intervencií ŠF a KF využitím metód Counterfactual Impact Evaluation. Záverečná správa. Úrad vlády SR. Centrálny koordinačný orgán. Available at http://www.nsrr.sk/download.php?FNAME=1444742081.upl&ANAME=Hodnotenie+vy-bran%C3%BDch+intervenci%C3%AD+%C5%A0F+a+KF+vyu%C5%BE-it%C3%ADm+met%C3%B3d+CIE+-+Z%C3%A1vere%C4%8D-n%C3%A1+spr%C3%A1va.pdf (last accessed 24 March 2020).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Herrera, Liliana and Heijs, Joost. 2004. “The distribution of R&D subsidies and its effect on the final outcome if innovation policy.” The Druid Summer Conference 2004 od Industrial Dynamics, Innovation and Devlopment. Elsinore Denmark, June 14 – 16. 2004.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hoffman, István. 2018. “Some Thoughts on the Administration of the Regional Development in the Member States of the EU: In the Light of the Role of the Municipal Bodies.” Central European Public Administration 16(1), 7 – 29.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hud, Martin and Katrin Hussinger. 2015. “The Impact of R&D Subsidies during the Crisis.” Research Policy 44(10), 1844 – 1855.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Khandker, Shahidur et al. 2009. Handbook on Impact Evaluation. London: Library Press.10.1596/978-0-8213-8028-4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Leibowicz, Benjamin D. 2018. “Welfare Improvement Windows for Innovation Policy.” Research Policy 47(2), 390 – 398.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lešková, Alexandra and Valéria Némethová. 2016. “Podpora vs. výsledky: Meranie dopadov regionálnej politiky Európskej únie.” Regionální rozvoj mezi teorií a praxí 4, 1 – 12.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mamede, Ricardo, et al. 2015. “Counterfactual Impact Evaluation of EU Funded Enterprise Support in Portugal.” WP 2015 / 05, Dinamia’cet. Available at https://repositorio.iscte-iul.pt/bitstream/10071/10729/1/DINAMIA_WP_2015-05.pdf (last accessed 27. October 2020).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mandl, Ulrike, Adriaan Dierx and Fabienne Ilzkovitz. 2008. “The Effectiveness and Efficiency of Public Spending.” Economic Paper 301. Brussels: European Communities.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marino, Marianna et al. 2016. “Additionality or Crowding-out ? An Overall Evaluation of Public R&D Subsidy on Private R&D Expenditure.” Research Policy 45(9), 1715 – 1730.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mihau, Diana, et al. 2010. “Efficiency, Effectiveness and Performance of the Public Sector.” Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting 4(1), 132 – 147.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ministry of Economy of the Slovak Republic. 2014. Plán hodnotení Operačného programu Konkurencieschopnosť a hospodársky rast na programové obdobie 2007 – 2013. Ministerstvo hospodárstva SR. Available at https://www.economy.gov.sk/eu-a-fondy/eurofondy/po-2004-2006-a-2007-2013/operacny-program-konkurencieschopnost-a-hospodarsky-rast-zakladne-dokumenty/monitorovanie-a-hodnotenie/hodnotenie (last accessed 24 March 2020).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Némethová, Valéria et al. 2019. “Public Support for Firms in Lagging Regions: Evaluation of Innovation Subsidy in Slovakia.” Science and Public Policy 46(2), 173 – 183.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nyikos, Györgyi and Zsuzsanna Kondor. 2019. “The Hungarian Experiences with Handling Irregularities in the Use of EU Funds.” NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy 12(1), 113 – 134.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
OECD. 2019. “Innovation Indicators.” Available at http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/innovation-indicators-2019.xlsx (last accessed 17. November 2020).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pisár, Peter et al. 2020. “The Contribution of Innovation Actors into Business R&D Funding: Does the Substitution Effect of Public Support Work in the EU ?” E a M: Ekonomie a Management 23(1), 121 – 134.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Potluka, Oto and Milan Špaček. 2013. “Postupy a metody kontrafaktuálních dopadových evaluací pro Operační program Zaměstnanost v období 2014 – 2020.” Omega TA ČR TS010083. Available at https://www.mpsv.cz/documents/20142/848077/Metodika_CIE_MPSV_131015.pdf/cbe02b6d-4042-6801-14a5-1f40cd597a7d (last accessed 24. January 2021).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Radicic, Dragana et al. 2016. “The Impact of Innovation Support Programs on Small and Medium Enterprises Innovation in Traditional Manufacturing Industries: An Evaluation for Seven European Union Regions.” Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 34(8), 1425 – 1452.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Reinkowski, Janina et al. 2011. “Do Public Subsidies Add to Private Sector R&D Activity ? Microeconomic Evidence for Regional Innovation Policy in East Germany.” GERFA. Available at http://www-sre.wu.ac.at/ersa/ersaconfs/ersa10/ERSA2010finalpaper1071.pdf (last accessed 10. March 2021).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Šipikal, Miroslav, Peter Pisár and Viera Labudová. 2013. “Are Subsidies Really Needed ? The Case of EU Regional Policy in the Czech and Slovak Republic.” E a M: Ekonomie a Management 16(4), 30 – 41.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Šipikal, Miroslav and Valéria Szitásiová. 2020. Metódy hodnotenia programov a projektov. Bratislava: Ekonóm.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Šipikal Miroslav et al. 2017. “Evaluation of Innovation Support from EU Funds in the Manufacturing of Wood and Wood Products in the Slovak Republic.” Acta Facultatis Xylologiae Zvolen 59(2), 167 – 180.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Spielkamp, Alfred and Cyril Rammer. 2009. “Financing of Innovation: Thresholds and Options.” Management & Marketing 4(2), 3 – 18.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
White, Howard. 2009. “Theory Based Impact: Evaluation: Principles and Practice.” 3ie Working Papers 06(2009). Available at https://gwbweb.wustl.edu/Resources-and-Initiatives/Professional-Development/Documents/White-3ie-2009.pdf (last accessed 4. April 2021).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wing, Coady, Kosali Simon and Ricardo A. Bello-Gomez. 2018. “Designing Difference in Diferences Studies: Best Practices for Public Health Policy Research.” Annual Review of Public Health 39, 453 – 469.
]Search in Google Scholar
