[
1. Woodward R, Cullington D W, Daly A F, Vassie P R, Haardt P, Kashner R, Astudillo R, Velando C, Godart B & Cremona C: “Bridge management in Europe (BRIME) -Deliverable D14”. Final Report, 2001.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Hurt M & Schrock S: “Highway Bridge Maintenance Planning and Scheduling”. Chapter 1, “Introduction”, 2016, pp. 1–30.10.1016/B978-0-12-802069-2.00001-5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Khan M A: “Accelerated Bridge Construction”, Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, USA, 2015, pp. 53–102.10.1016/B978-0-12-407224-4.00002-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Powers N, Frangopol D M, Al-Mahaidi R & Caprani C: “Maintenance, safety, risk, management and life-cycle performance of bridges”, CRC Press, London, UK, 2018, p. 219–225.10.1201/9781315189390
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Darbani B M & Hammad A: “Critical review of new directions in bridge management systems”. Computing in Civil Engineering, 2007, pp. 330–337.10.1061/40937(261)41
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Boje C, Guerriero A, Kubicki S & Rezgui Y: “Towards a semantic Construction Digital Twin: Directions for future”. Automation in Construction, Vol. 114, No. 103179, 2020.10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103179
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Grieves M & Vickers J: “Digital Twin: mitigating unpredictable, undesirable emergent behavior in complex systems”, Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Complex Systems, Springer, Cham, 2017, pp. 85–113.10.1007/978-3-319-38756-7_4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Cimino C, Negri E & Fumagalli L: “Review of digital twin applications in manufacturing”. Computers in Industry, Vol. 113, No. 103130, 2019.10.1016/j.compind.2019.103130
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Lu Q, Parlikad A K, Woodall P, Don Ranasinghe G, Xie X, Liang Z, Konstantinou E, Heaton J & Schooling J: “Developing a Digital Twin at Building and City Levels: Case Study of West Cambridge Campus”. Journal of Management in Engineering, Vol. 36, No. 05020004, 2020.10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000763
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. ELSEVIER: “Scopus”, ELSEVIER, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.scopus.com/. [Accessed 2021].
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Morgenthal G, Hallermann N, Kersten J, Taraben J, Debus P, Helmrich M & Rodehorst V: “Framework for automated UAS-based structural condition assessment of bridges”. Automation in Construction, Vol. 97, pp. 77–95, 2019.10.1016/j.autcon.2018.10.006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Omer M, Margetts L, Hadi Mosleh M, Hewitt S & Parwaiz M: “Use of gaming technology to bring bridge inspection to the office”. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, Vol. 15, No. 10, 2019, pp. 1292–1307.10.1080/15732479.2019.1615962
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Isailovic D, Stojanovic V, Trapp M, Richter R, Hajdin R & Döllner J: “Bridge damage: Detection, IFC-based semantic enrichment and visualization”. Automation in Construction, Vol. 112, No. 103088, 2020.10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103088
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Popescu C, Täljsten B, Blanksvärd T & Elfgren L: “3D reconstruction of existing concrete bridges using optical methods”. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, Vol. 15, No. 7, 2019, pp. 912-924.10.1080/15732479.2019.1594315
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Delgado J M D, Butler L J, Gibbons N, Brilakis I, Elshafie M Z E B & Middleton C: “Management of structural monitoring data of bridges using BIM”. Bridge Engineering, Vol. 170, 2017, pp. 204-218.10.1680/jbren.16.00013
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Butler L J, Elshafie M Z E B & Middleton C R: “Pervasive Fibre-optic sensor networks in bridges: a UK case study”. Proceedings, 9th International Conference on Bridge Maintenance, Safety and Management, IABMAS, Melbourne, Australia, 2018, pp.1738-1745.10.1201/9781315189390-237
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Xu Y & Turkan I: “BrIM and UAS for bridge inspections and management”. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, Vol. 27, No. 3, 2019, pp. 785-807.10.1108/ECAM-12-2018-0556
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Donato V, Biagini C, Bertini G & Marsugli F: “Challenges and opportunities for the implementation of H-BIM with regards to historical infrastructures: a case study of the Ponte Giorgini in Castiglione della Pescaia (Grosseto - Italy)”. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol. XLII-5/W1, 2017, pp.253-260.10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-5-W1-253-2017
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. Riveiro B, Jauregui D V, Arias P, Armesto J & Jiang R: “An innovative method for remote measurement of minimum vertical underclearance in routine bridge inspection”. Automation in Construction, Vol. 25, 2012, pp. 34–40.10.1016/j.autcon.2012.04.008
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. Sacks R, Kedar A, Borrmann A, Ma L, Brilakis I, Hüthwohl P, Daum S, Kattel U, Yosef R, Liebich I, Barutcu B E & Muhic S: “SeeBridge as next generation bridge inspection: Overview, information delivery manual and model view definition”. Automation in Construction, Vol. 90, 2018, pp. 134–145.10.1016/j.autcon.2018.02.033
]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. Banfi F, Barazzetti L, Previtali M & Roncoroni F: “Historic BIM: a new repository for structural health monitoring”. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol. XLII-5/W1, 2017.10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-5-W1-269-2017
]Search in Google Scholar
[
22. Cha G, Park S & Oh T: “A Terrestrial LiDAR-Based Detection of Shape Deformation for Maintenance of Bridge Structures”. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 145(12), No. 04019075, 2019.10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001701
]Search in Google Scholar
[
23. Barazzetti L, Banfi F, Brumana R, Previtali M & Roncoroni F: “BIM from laser scans... not just for buildings: NURBS-based parametric modeling of a medieval bridge”. ISPRS Annals of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol. III-5, 2016, pp. 51-56.10.5194/isprsannals-III-5-51-2016
]Search in Google Scholar
[
24. McKenna T, Minehane M, O’Keeffe B, O’Sullivan G & Ruane K: “Bridge information modelling (BrIM) for a listed viaduct”. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Bridge Engineering, Vol. 170, 2017, pp.1-12.10.1680/jbren.16.00007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
25. León-Robles C A, Reinoso-Gordo J F & González-Quiñones J J: “Heritage building information modeling (H-BIM) applied to a stone bridge”. International Journal of Geo-Information, Vol. 8, No. 121, 2019.10.3390/ijgi8030121
]Search in Google Scholar
[
26. Borin P & Cavazzini F: “Condition assessment of RC bridges. Integrating machine learning, photogrammetry and BIM”, ISPRS - International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol. XLII-2/W15, 2019, pp.201-208.10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W15-201-2019
]Search in Google Scholar
[
27. Stavroulaki M E, Riveiro B, Drosopoulos G A, Solla M, Koutsianitis P & Stavroulakis G E: “Modelling and strength evaluation of masonry bridges using terrestrial photogrammetry and finite elements”. Advances in Engineering Software, Vol. 101, 2016, pp. 136-148.10.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.12.007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
28. Abu Dabous S, Yaghi S, Alkass S & Moselhi O: “Concrete bridge deck condition assessment using IR Thermography and Ground Penetrating Radar technologies”. Automation in Construction, Vol. 81, 2017, pp. 340-354.10.1016/j.autcon.2017.04.006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
29. Alani A M, Aboutalebi M & Kilic G: “Integrated health assessment strategy using NDT for reinforced concrete bridges”. NDT&E International, Vol. 61, 2014, pp. 80-94.10.1016/j.ndteint.2013.10.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
30. Conde B, Ramos L F, Oliveira D V, Riveiro B & Solla M: “Structural assessment of masonry arch bridges by combination of non-destructive testing techniques and threedimensional numerical modelling: Application to Vilanova bridge”. Engineering Structures, Vol. 148, 2017, pp. 621-638.10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.07.011
]Search in Google Scholar
[
31. Mathworks: “MATLAB”. MathWorks, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.mathworks.com/products/matlab.html. [Accessed 2021].
]Search in Google Scholar
[
32. McGuire B, Atadero R, Clevenger C & Ozbek M: “Bridge information modeling for inspection and evaluation”. Journal of Bridge Engineering, Vol. 21(4), No. 04015076, 2016.10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000850
]Search in Google Scholar
[
33. Microsoft: “Excel”, Microsoft, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.microsoft.com/svse/microsoft-365/excel. [Accessed 2021].
]Search in Google Scholar
[
34. Huthwohl P, Brilakis I, Borrmann A & Sacks R: “Integrating RC bridge defect information into BIM models”. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, Vol. 32(3), No. 04018013, 2018, pp. 1–14.10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000744
]Search in Google Scholar
[
35. Jeonga S, Hou R, Lynch J P, Sohn H & Law K H: “An information modeling framework for bridge monitoring”. Advances in Engineering Software, Vol. 114, 2017, pp. 11-31.10.1016/j.advengsoft.2017.05.009
]Search in Google Scholar
[
36. AUTODESK: “Revit”, AUTODESK, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.autodesk.com/products/revit/overview. [Accessed 2021].
]Search in Google Scholar
[
37. Boddupalli C, Sadhu A, Rezazadeh Azar E & Pattyson S: “Improved visualization of infrastructure monitoring data using Building Information Modeling”. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, Vol. 15, No. 9, 2019, pp. 1247-1263.10.1080/15732479.2019.1602150
]Search in Google Scholar
[
38. Kritzinger W, Karner M, Traar G, Henjes J & Sihn W: “Digital Twin in manufacturing: a categorical literature review and classification”. IFAC PapersOnLine, Vol. 51, No. 11, 2018, pp. 1016-1022.10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.474
]Search in Google Scholar
[
39. Negri E, Fumagalli L & Macchi M: “A review of the roles of Digital Twin in CPS-based production systems”. Procedia Manufacturing, Vol. 11, 2017, pp. 939-948.10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.198
]Search in Google Scholar
[
40. Sacks R, Brilakis I, Pikas E, Xie H & Girolami M: “Construction with digital twin information systems”. Data-Centric Engineering, Vol. 1, No. E14, 2020.10.1017/dce.2020.16
]Search in Google Scholar
[
41. Khajavi S H, Motlagh N H, Jaribion A, Werner L C & Holmstrom J: “Digital Twin: Vision, benefits, boundaries, and creation for buildings”. IEEE Access, Vol. 7, 2019, pp. 147406-147419.10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2946515
]Search in Google Scholar
[
42. Shim C S, Dang N S, Lon S & Jeon C H: “Development of a bridge maintenance system for prestressed concrete bridges using 3D digital twin model”. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, Vol. 15, No. 10, 2019, pp. 1319-1332.10.1080/15732479.2019.1620789
]Search in Google Scholar
[
43. Lu R & Brilakis I: “Digital twinning of existing reinforced concrete bridges from labelled point clusters”. Automation in Construction, Vol. 105, No. 102837, 2019.10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102837
]Search in Google Scholar
[
44. Ye C, Butler L, Calka B, Iangurazov M, Lu Q, Gregory A, Girolami M & Middleton C: “A digital twin of bridges for structural health monitoring”, Proceedings, 12th International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring - IWSHM, Stanford, USA, 2019.10.12783/shm2019/32287
]Search in Google Scholar
[
45. FHWA: “Bridge Preservation and Maintenance in Europe and South Africa”, Washington D.C., USA, 2005.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
46. Mirzaei Z, Adey B T, Klatter L & Thompson P: “The IABMAS Bridge Management Committee Overview of Existing Bridge Management Systems”, International Association for Bridge Maintenance and Safety (IABMAS), Sapporo, Japan, 2014.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
47. Helmerich R, Niederleithinger E, Algernon D, Streicher D & Wiggenhauser H: “Bridge inspection and condition assessment in Europe”. Transportation Research Record, Vol. 2044, 2008, pp. 31–38.10.3141/2044-04
]Search in Google Scholar
[
48. Thompson P D, Small E P, Johnson M & Marshall A R: “The Pontis Bridge Management System”. Structural Engineering International, Vol. 8(4), 1998, pp. 303–308.10.2749/101686698780488758
]Search in Google Scholar
[
49. Gholami M, Sam A R M & Jamaludin M Y: “Assessment of Bridge Management System in Iran”. Procedia Engineering, Vol. 54, 2013, pp. 573-583.10.1016/j.proeng.2013.03.052
]Search in Google Scholar
[
50. Mendonça T, Brito V & Milhazes F: “Aplicação de gestão de obras de arte - GOA - nova geração” (Bridge management application – GOA – new generation). BETAR Consultores Ltda., Lisbon, 2010 (in Portuguese).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
51. Mocoso Y F M: “Modelos de Degradação para Aplicação em Sistemas de Obras de Arte Especiais – OAEs” (Degradation models for bridge application systems) (PhD Thesis), University of Brasília, Brasília, Brazil, 2017 (in Portuguese).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
52. Liao H K & Yau N J: “Development of Various Bridge Condition Indices for Taiwan Bridge Management System”, Proceedings, 28th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction, Seoul, Korea, 2011, pp.911-916.10.22260/ISARC2011/0168
]Search in Google Scholar
[
53. Safi M, Sundquist H, Karoumi R & Racutanu G: “Development of the Swedish bridge management system by upgrading and expanding the use of LCC”. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, Vol. 9(12), 2013, pp. 1240-1250.10.1080/15732479.2012.682588
]Search in Google Scholar
[
54. Mirzaei Z, Adey B T, Klatter L & Thompson P: “The IABMAS bridge management committee overview of existing bridge management systems”, International Association for Bridge Maintenance and Safety (IABMAS), Sapporo, Japan, 2014.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
55. Chan B, Guan H, Hou L, Jo J, Blumenstein M & Wang J: “Defining a conceptual framework for the integration of modelling and advanced imaging for improving the reliability and efficiency of bridge assessments”. Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring, Vol. 6, 2016, pp. 703-714.10.1007/s13349-016-0191-6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
56. Hendy C, Brock C & Nicholls T: “Management of the M4 Elevated Section substructures”. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Bridge Engineering, No. 1600006, 2017.10.1680/jbren.16.00006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
57. Previtali M, Barazzetti L, Banfi F & Roncoroni F: “Informative content models for infrastructure load testing management: The Azzone Visconti bridge in Lecco”. ISPRS - International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol. XLII-2/W11, 2019, pp. 995-1001.10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W11-995-2019
]Search in Google Scholar
[
58. Tao F, Zhang M, Liu Y & Nee A Y C: “Digital twin driven prognostics and health management for complex equipment”. CIRP Annals, Vol. 67, 2018, pp. 169-172.10.1016/j.cirp.2018.04.055
]Search in Google Scholar
[
59. Brilakis I & Ariyachandra M: “Application of Railway Topology for the Automated Generation of Geometric Digital Twins of Railway Masts”. ECPPM 2021 – eWork and eBusiness in Architecture, Engineering and Construction, 2021, pp. 373-380.10.1201/9781003191476-52
]Search in Google Scholar
[
60. Dibernardo S: “Integrated modelling systems for bridge asset management - case study”, Structures Congress, Reston, USA, 2012, pp. 483-493.10.1061/9780784412367.043
]Search in Google Scholar
[
61. Brady K C, O’Reilly M, Bevc L, Znidaric A, O’Brien E & Jordan R: “Cost 345 - Procedures required for the assessment of highway structures - Final report”. European Co-operation in the Field of Scientific and Technical Research, Brussels, Belgium, 2009.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
62. Zhao Z, Gao Y, Hu X, Zhou Y, Zhao L, Qin G, Guo J, Liu Y, Yu C & Han D: “Integrating BIM and IoT for smart bridge management”, Proceedings, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Vol. 371, No. 022034, 2019.10.1088/1755-1315/371/2/022034
]Search in Google Scholar
[
63. Zhu J, Tan Y, Wang X & Wu P: “BIM/GIS integration for web GIS-based bridge management”. Annals of GIS, Vol. 27(1), 2020, pp. 99-109.10.1080/19475683.2020.1743355
]Search in Google Scholar
[
64. Marzouk M M & Hisham M: “Bridge information modelling in sustainable bridge management”. Proceedings, International Conference on Sustainable Design and Construction - ICSDC, Kansas City, USA, 2011, pp. 457-466.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
65. Wan C, Zhou Z, Li S, Ding Y, Xu Z, Yang Z, Xia Y & Yin F: “Development of a bridge management system based on the building information modelling technology”. Sustainability, Vol. 11, No. 4583, 2019.10.3390/su11174583
]Search in Google Scholar
[
66. Hallberg D & Racutanu G: “Development of the Swedish bridge management system by introducing a LMS concept”. Materials and Structures, Vol. 40, 2007, pp. 627-639.10.1617/s11527-006-9175-z
]Search in Google Scholar
[
67. Shafto M, Conroy M, Doyle R, Glaessgen E, Kemp C, LeMoigne J & Wang L: “DRAFT Modeling, Simulation, Information Technology & Processing Roadmap”, Technology Area 11, 2010.
]Search in Google Scholar
