Heat and Power System as an Independent Source of Electric Power. Case Study

[1] M. Grebski, W. Grebski. Project-based Approach to Engineering Technology Education. Production Engineering Archives, 2019, 25(25) pp. 56-59. https://doi.org/10.30657/pea.2019.25.11 Search in Google Scholar

[2] W. Grebski, M. Grebski. Building an Ecosystem for a New Engineering Program. Management Systems in Production Engineering, 2018, 26(2), 119-123. https://doi.org/10.1515/mspe-2018-0019 Search in Google Scholar

[3] A. Kuzior, M. Grebski, W. Grebski. Marketing of an academic program: case study of an engineering program. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 2021, (1), pp. 56-64. doi:10.21272/mmi.2021.1-05 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[4] R. Wolniak, M. Grebski, B. Skotnicka-Zasadzień. Comparative Analysis of the Level of Satisfaction with the Services Received at the Business Incubators (Hazleton, PA, USA and Gliwice, Poland). Sustainability 2019, 11, 2889. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102889 Search in Google Scholar

[5] M. Grebski, R. Wolniak. Global Perspective for Protecting Intellectual Property – Patenting in USA and Poland. Management Systems in Production Engineering, 2018, 26(2) pp. 106-111. https://doi.org/10.2478/mspe-2018-0017 Search in Google Scholar

[6] W. Grebski, M. Grebski. Keeping Technical Education Aligned to the Needs and Expectations of Industry. Management Systems in Production Engineering, 2016, 22(2), pp. 77-80. doi:10.2478/mspe-01-02-2016 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[7] W. Grebski, M. Grebski. Keeping Higher Education Aligned with the Requirements and Expectations of the Knowledge-Based Economy. Production Engineering Archives, 2018, 21(21), pp. 3-7. doi: 10.30657/pea.2018.21.01 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[8] M. Grebski. Mobility of the Workforce and Its Influence on Innovativeness (Comparative Analysis of the United States and Poland). Production Engineering Archives, 2021, 27(4), pp. 272-276. doi: 10.30657/pea.2021.27.36. Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[9] S.-H., Wei, C.-F., Tan, P. Koomsap, C.-Y. Huang. International dual-degree programs: Learning experience in student’s perspective, International Symposium on Project Approaches in Engineering Education 2020, 10, pp. 193-198. Search in Google Scholar

[10] T. Nitkiewicz, D.H.N. Ayutthaya, M. Koszewska, K. Wiszumirska, M. Wojnarowska, M., P. Koomsap. LOVE model-based assessment of teaching practices within industrial engineering master programs in Poland and Thailand, International Symposium on Project Approaches in Engineering Education 2020, 10, pp. 165-173. Search in Google Scholar

[11] R. Ulewicz, K. Sethanan. Experience with the accreditation of technical studies in Poland and Thailand’s, International Symposium on Project Approaches in Engineering Education, 2020, 10, pp. 149-156. Search in Google Scholar

[12] K. Adderley. et al. Project Methods in Higher Education. SRHE working party on teaching methods: Techniques group. Guildford, Surrey: Society for research into higher education London, 1975. Search in Google Scholar

[13] H. Ahn, W. Miller, P. Sheaffer, V. Tutterow, V. Rapp. Opportunities for installed combined heat and power (CHP) to increase grid flexibility in the U.S. Energy Policy, 2021, 157, 112485. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112485 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[14] O.A. Broesicke, J. Yan, V.M. Thomas, E. Grubert, S. Derrible, J.C. Crittenden. Combined Heat and Power May Conflict with Decarbonization Goals – Air Emissions of Natural Gas Combined Cycle Power versus Combined Heat and Power Systems for Commercial Buildings. Environmental Science & Technology, 2021, 55(15), pp. 10645-10653. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c0098034255514 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[15] Combined Heat and Power Basics: Advanced Manufacturing. Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. https://www.energy.gov/eere/amo/combined-heat-and-power-basics. Search in Google Scholar

[16] A. Czerwińska-Lubszczyk, W. Grebski, M. Jagoda-Sobalak. Cooperation of Universities with Business in Poland and the USA – Perspective of Scientific Environment. Management Systems in Production Engineering, 2020, 28(1), pp. 40-46. https://doi.org/10.2478/mspe-2020-0007 Search in Google Scholar

[17] A. Kuzior, A. Kwilinski, V. Tkachenko. Sustainable development of organizations based on the combinatorial model of artificial intelligence. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 2019, 7(2), pp. 1353-1376. doi:10.9770/jesi.2019.7.2(39) Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[18] P. Breeze. Combined Heat and Power. Academic Press: San Diego, 2017, CA.10.1016/B978-0-12-812908-1.00008-0 Search in Google Scholar

[19] İ. Eke. Combined heat and power economic dispatch by Taguchi-based filled function. Engineering Optimization, 2022, pp. 1-15. doi:10.1080/0305215x.2022.2034802 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[20] M. Ingaldi, D. Klimecka-Tatar. People’s Attitude to Energy from Hydrogen – from the Point of View of Modern Energy Technologies and Social Responsibility. Energies, 2020, 13(24), 6495, https://doi.org/10.3390/en13246495 Search in Google Scholar

[21] A. Kuzior, A. Kwilinski, I. Hroznyi. The Factorial-Reflexive Approach to Diagnosing the Executors’ and Contractors’ Attitude to Achieving the Objectives by Energy Supplying Companies. Energies 2021, 14, 2572. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14092572 Search in Google Scholar

[22] U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) (2021). Hybrid Energy Systems: Opportunities for Coordinated Research. National Renewable Energy Laboratory: Golden, CO. DOE/GO-102021-5447. https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy21osti/77503.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

[23] A. Chittum, K. Nate. Challenges Facing Combined Heat and Power Today: A State-by-State Assessment: Report IE111. American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy: Washington, D.C. 2011. https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2013/11/f4/ie111.pdf Search in Google Scholar

[24] W. Ko, J. Kim. Generation Expansion Planning Model for Integrated Energy System Considering Feasible Operation Region and Generation Efficiency of Combined Heat and Power. Energies 2019, 12, 226. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12020226 Search in Google Scholar

[25] C.N. Markides. Low-Concentration Solar-Power Systems Based on Organic Rankine Cycles for Distributed-Scale Applications: Overview and Further Developments. Frontiers in Energy Research, 2015, 3. doi:10.3389/fenrg.2015.00047 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[26] P. Pourghasem, F. Sohrabi, F. Jabari, B. Mohammadi-Ivatloo, S. Asadi. Combined Heat and Power Stochastic Dynamic Economic Dispatch Using Particle Swarm Optimization Considering Load and Wind Power Uncertainties. In Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, pp. 143-169. (Studies in Systems, Decision and Control; 2020, Vol. 262). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34050-6_7 Search in Google Scholar

[27] G. Prinsloo & R. Dobson. Combined solar heat and power with microgrid storage and layered smartgrid control toward supplying off-grid rural villages. Energy Science & Engineering, 2015, 3(2), pp. 135-144. doi:10.1002/ese3.57 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[28] J. Ye, R. Yuan. Integrated Natural Gas, Heat, and Power Dispatch Considering Wind Power and Power-to-Gas. Sustainability 2017, 9, 602. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9040602 Search in Google Scholar

[29] R. De Souza, M. Casisi, D. Micheli, M. Reini. A Review of Small – Medium Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Technologies and Their Role within the 100% Renewable Energy Systems Scenario. Energies 2021, 14, 5338. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14175338 Search in Google Scholar

[30] K. Yun, H. Cho, R. Luck, P.J. Mago. Real-time combined heat and power operational strategy using a hierarchical optimization algorithm. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A: Journal of Power and Energy, 2011, 225(4), pp. 403-412. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041296710394287 Search in Google Scholar

[31] K. Almutairi, S.J. Hosseini Dehshiri, S.S. Hosseini Dehshiri, A. Mostafaeipour, A.X. Hoa, K. Techato. Determination of optimal renewable energy growth strategies using SWOT analysis, hybrid MCDM methods, and game theory: A case study. International Journal of Energy Research, 2021, 46(5), pp. 6766-6789. doi:10.1002/er.7620 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[32] R. Karim, F. Muhammad-Sukki, M. Hemmati, M.S. Newaz, H. Farooq, M.N. Muhtazaruddin, M. Zulkipli, J.A. Ardila-Rey. Paving towards Strategic Investment Decision: A SWOT Analysis of Renewable Energy in Bangladesh. Sustainability 2020, 12, 10674. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410674 Search in Google Scholar

[33] S.E. Uhunamure, K. Shale. A SWOT Analysis Approach for a Sustainable Transition to Renewable Energy in South Africa. Sustainability 2021, 13, 3933. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073933 Search in Google Scholar

[34] A. Alexandrov, Characteristics of Single-item Measures in Likert Scale Format. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 2010, 8(1), pp. 1-12. Search in Google Scholar

[35] A. Pacana, D. Siwiec. Universal Model to Support the Quality Improvement of Industrial Products. Materials 2021, 14, 7872. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14247872870848034947466 Search in Google Scholar

[36] R. Ulewicz, D. Siwiec, A. Pacana, M. Tutak, J. Brodny. Multi-Criteria Method for the Selection of Renewable Energy Sources in the Polish Industrial Sector. Energies 2021, 14, 2386. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14092386 Search in Google Scholar

[37] M. Grebski, M. Mazur. Social climate of support for innovativeness, Production Engineering Archives, 2022, 28(1), pp. 110-116, doi: 10.30657/pea.2022.28.12 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar