[
1. Abduljabbar, R. L., Liyanage, S. & Dia, H. (2021). The role of micro-mobility in shaping sustainable cities: A systematic literature review. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 92, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.10273410.1016/j.trd.2021.102734
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Aguilera-García, Á., Gomez, J., Sobrino, N., & Díaz, J. J. V. (2021). Moped Scooter Sharing: Citizens’ Perceptions, Users’ Behavior, and Implications for Urban Mobility. Sustainability, 13(12), 6886. https://doi:10.3390/su1312688610.3390/su13126886
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Aguilera-García, Á., Gomez, J. & Sobrino, N. (2020). Exploring the adoption of moped scooter-sharing systems in Spanish urban areas. Cities, 96, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.10242410.1016/j.cities.2019.102424
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Bieliński, T., & Ważna, A. (2020). Electric Scooter Sharing and Bike Sharing User Behaviour and Characteristics. Sustainability, 12(22), 9640. https://doi:10.3390/su1222964010.3390/su12229640
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Eccarius, T., & Lu, C-C. (2018). Exploring Consumer Reasoning in Usage Intention for E-Scooter Sharing. Transportation Planning Journal, 47(4), 271–296. https://doi.org/10.6402/TPJ
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Eccarius, T., & Lu, C-C. (2020). Adoption intentions for micro-mobility — Insights from electric scooter sharing in Taiwan. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 84, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.10232710.1016/j.trd.2020.102327
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Flores, P. J., & Jansson, J. (2021). The role of consumer innovativeness and green perceptions on?green innovation use: The case of shared e-bikes and e-scooters. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.195710.1002/cb.1957
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Franckle, R. L., Dunn, C. G., Vercammen, K. A., Dai, J., Soto, M. J. & Bleich, S. N. (2020). Facilitators and barriers to bikeshare use among users and non-users in a socioeconomically diverse urban population. Preventive Medicine Reports, 20, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.10118510.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101185
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Jurczak M. (2019). Koncepcje zrównoważonej logistyki miejskiej w wybranych polskich miastach [Concepts of Sustainable Urban Logistics in Selected Polish Cities]. Ekonomika i Organizacja Logistyki 4(2), DOI: 10.22630/EIOL.2019.4.2.1110.22630/EIOL.2019.4.2.11
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Lee, H., Baek, K., Chung, J-H. & Kim, J. (2021). Factors affecting heterogeneity in willingness to use e-scooter sharing services. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 92, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.10275110.1016/j.trd.2021.102751
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Liao, F. & Correia, G. (2020). Electric carsharing and micromobility: A literature review on their usage pattern, demand, and potential impacts. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, DOI: 10.1080/15568318.2020.186139410.1080/15568318.2020.1861394
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Machado, C., de Salles Hue, N., Berssaneti, F., & Quintanilha, J. (2018). An Overview of Shared Mobility. Sustainability, 10(12), 4342. http://doi:10.3390/su1012434210.3390/su10124342
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Malarska A. (2005). Statystyczna analiza danych wspomagana programem SPSS [Statistical Data Analysis Aided by SPSS]. Wydawnictwo SPSS Polska, Kraków.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Milakis, D., Gebhardt, L., Ehebrecht, D. & Lenz, B. (2020) Is micro-mobility sustainable? An overview of implications for accessibility, air pollution, safety, physical activity and subjective wellbeing. In: Carey Curtis (red.), Handbook of Sustainable Transport, 180–189. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.10.4337/9781789900477.00030
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Mitra, R. & Hess, P. M. (2021). Who are the potential users of shared e-scooters? An examination of socio-demographic, attitudinal and environmental factors. Travel Behaviour and Society, 23, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2020.12.00410.1016/j.tbs.2020.12.004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Reck, D. J. & Axhausen, K. W. (2021). Who uses shared micro-mobility services? Empirical evidence from Zurich, Switzerland. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 94, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.10280310.1016/j.trd.2021.102803
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Sanders, R. L., Branion-Calles, M. & Nelson, T. A. (2020). To scoot or not to scoot: Findings from a recent survey about the benefits and barriers of using E-scooters for riders and non-riders. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 139, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2020.07.00910.1016/j.tra.2020.07.009
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Sojkin, B. & Michalak, S. (2019). Innowacyjność zachowań mieszkańców aglomeracji poznańskiej na rynku usług transportowych [Innovative Behavior of the Inhabitants of Poznań Agglomeration on the Market of Transport Services]. Marketing Instytucji Naukowych i Badawczych, 33, DOI: 10.2478/minib-2019-0040
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. Wortmann, C., Syré, A. M., Grahle, A., & Göhlich, D. (2021). Analysis of Electric Moped Scooter Sharing in Berlin: A Technical, Economic and Environmental Perspective. World Electric Vehicle Journal, 12(3), 96. doi:10.3390/wevj1203009610.3390/wevj12030096
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. Zhu, R., Zhang, X., Kondor, D., Santi, P. & Ratti, C. (2020). Understanding spatio-temporal heterogeneity of bike-sharing and scooter-sharing mobility. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 81, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2020.10148310.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2020.101483
]Search in Google Scholar
, 