Economic development instruments employed following the closure of an industrial plant – the example of Polish municipalities
22 nov 2024
Acerca de este artículo
Publicado en línea: 22 nov 2024
Páginas: 34 - 40
Recibido: 26 nov 2023
Aceptado: 21 ago 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/mgrsd-2023-0048
Palabras clave
© 2024 Magdalena Cybulska, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.

Map. 1.

Mann–Whitney U test results for the two groups of municipalities being compared
The municipality’s policy is aimed at the development of entrepreneurship among residents | 48.64 | 47.08 | 0.752 |
Local authorities cooperate with local entrepreneurs (e.g. in the form of a municipal economic council) | 45.27 | 49.74 | 0.412 |
There are local business environment institutions in the municipality (i.e. local development agencies or local entrepreneurship centres) | 46.00 | 52.32 | 0.201 |
An economic activity/activation zone is located in the municipality | 43.46 | 53.46 | 0.053 |
The municipality offers free investment areas | 43.75 | 53.28 | 0.055 |
The zone/investment areas in the municipality are intended for investors who want to conduct business in specific industries | 38.31 | 48.08 | 0.056 |
The municipality offers investors a system of tax incentives (e.g. property tax exemptions) | 44.00 | 52.89 | 0.098 |
Local authorities financially support newly established enterprises in the municipality (e.g. through loan and guarantee funds) | 46.68 | 48.65 | 0.652 |
The municipality cooperates with external institutions (such as the Polish Investment and Trade Agency or the Regional Investor Service Centre) in activities aimed at attracting investors | 43.46 | 52.60 | 0.090 |