Natura 2000 sites as a crucial part of nature conservation? An analysis of landscape development in selected areas of the Czech Republic

Ameztegui, A., Morán-Ordóñez, A., Márquez, A., Blázquez-Casado, Á., Pla, M., Villero, D., ..., & Coll, L. (2021). Forest expansion in mountain protected areas: Trends and consequences for the landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning, 216, 104240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104240 Search in Google Scholar

Anderson, E., & Mammides, C. (2020). Changes in land-cover within high nature value farmlands inside and outside Natura 2000 sites in Europe: A preliminary assessment. Ambio, 49, 1958−1971. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-020-01330-y Search in Google Scholar

Bastian, O. (2013). The role of biodiversity in supporting ecosystem services in Natura 2000 sites. Ecological Indicators, 24, 12–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.05.016 Search in Google Scholar

Bastian, O., Neruda, M., Filipová, L., Machová, I., & Leibenath, M. (2010). Natura 2000 sites as an asset for rural development: the German-Czech Ore Mountains Green network project. Journal of Landscape Ecology, 3(2), 41–58. Search in Google Scholar

Bičík, I., & Jančák, V. (2001). Czech agriculture after 1990. Geografie, 106(4), 209−221. Search in Google Scholar

Concepción, E. D. (2021). Urban sprawl into Natura 2000 network over Europe. Conservation Biology, 35(4), 1063–1072. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13687 Search in Google Scholar

Czech National Council (1992). Act No. 114/1992 Call. On Nature conservation and Landscape protection. Search in Google Scholar

Elkie, P. C., Rempel, R. S., & Carr, A. P. (1999). Patch Analyst User´s Manual. A tool for Quantifying Landscape Structure. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. Northwest Science and Technology Thunder Bay Ontario. Search in Google Scholar

Ellwanger, G., & Reiter, K. (2019). Nature conservation on decommissioned military training areas – German approaches and experiences. Journal for Nature Conservation, 49, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2019.02.003 Search in Google Scholar

ESRI (2020). ArcGIS Desktop: Release 10.8. Redlands, CA: Environmental Systems Research Institute. Search in Google Scholar

European Council (1979). Council Directive 79/409/EEC of 2 April 1979 on the conservation of the wild birds. Search in Google Scholar

European Council (1992). Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora. Search in Google Scholar

European Commission, Directorate-General for Environment, & Sundseth, K. (2015). The EU birds and habitats directives – For nature and people in Europe. Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2779/49288 Search in Google Scholar

European Commission, Directorate-General for Environment (2021). EU biodiversity strategy for 2030: bringing nature back into our lives. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2779/677548 Search in Google Scholar

European Environmental Agency (2006). Land accounts for Europe 1990–2000. EEA, Copenhagen: Towards integrated land and ecosystem accounting. Search in Google Scholar

European Environment Agency (2012). Protected areas in Europe – an overview. https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/protected-areas-ineurope-2012 Search in Google Scholar

European Environment Agency (2024). Natura 2000 Barometer. https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/dashboards/natura-2000-barometer Search in Google Scholar

Feranec, J., Jaffrain, G., Soukup, T., & Hazeu, G. (2010). Determining changes and flows in European landscapes 1990−2000 using CORINE land cover data. Applied Geography, 30(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2009.07.003 Search in Google Scholar

Fraser, R. H., & Pouliot, I. O. D. (2009). Monitoring land cover change and ecological integrity in Canada’s national parks. Remote sensing of Environment, 113, 1397–1409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2008.06.019 Search in Google Scholar

Fuchs, R., Herold, M., Verburg, P. H., & Clevers, J. G. P. W. (2013). A highresolution and harmonized model approach for reconstructing and analysing historic land changes in Europe. Biogeosciences, 10, 1543–1559. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-1543-2013 Search in Google Scholar

Girvetz, E. H., Thorne, J. H., Berry, A. M., & Jaeger, J. A. G. (2008). Integration of landscape fragmentation analysis into regional planning: A statewide multi-scale case study from California, USA. Landscape and Urban Planning, 86(3–4), 205–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.02.007 Search in Google Scholar

Grešlová, P., Laštovička, J., Štych, P., & Kabrda, J. (2023). Land cover flows and land use intensity in the three decades of the post-communist Czechia: Changing trends and driving forces. Anthropocene, 43, 100395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ancene.2023.100395 Search in Google Scholar

Gruber, B., Evans, D., Henle, K., Bauch, B., Schmeller, D. S., Dziock, F., ..., & Dormann, C. F. (2012). “Mind the gap!” – How well does Natura 2000 cover species of European interest? Nature Conservation, 3, 45–63. https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.3.3732 Search in Google Scholar

Guerra, C. A., Rosa, I. M. D., & Pereira, H. M. (2019). Change versus stability: are protected areas particularly pressured by global land cover change? Landscape Ecology, 34, 2779–2790. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-019-00918-4 Search in Google Scholar

Havlíček, M., Skokanová, H., Dostál, I., Vymazalová, M., Pavelková, R., & Petrovič, F. (2018). The consequences of establishing military training areas for land use development – A case study from Libavá, Czech Republic. Land Use Policy, 73, 84–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.01.039 Search in Google Scholar

Havlíček, M., Vyskočil, A., Caletka, M., Sviták, Z., Dzuráková, M., Skokanová, H., & Šopáková, M. (2022). History of using hydropower in the Moravice river basin, Czechia. Water, 14, 916. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14060916 Search in Google Scholar

Hermoso, V., Morán-Ordóñez, A., & Brotons, L. (2018). Assessing the role of Natura 2000 at maintaining dynamic landscapes in Europe over the last two decades: implications for conservation. Landscape Ecology, 33, 1447–1460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-018-0683-3 Search in Google Scholar

Hlaváč, V., Chobot, K., Pešout, P., Havlíček, J., Jeřábková, L., Lacina, D., ..., & Strnad, M. (2021). Ochrana biotopu zvláště chráněných druhů v územním plánování. AOPK ČR. Search in Google Scholar

Jaeger, J. A. G. (2000). Landscape division, splitting index, and effective mesh size: new measures of landscape fragmentation. Landscape Ecology, 15, 115–130. Search in Google Scholar

Janík, T., Bičík, I., & Kupková, L. (2022). Transformation of Czech cultural landscapes over the past two centuries: typology based on model areas. Geografie, 127(3), 241–269. https://doi.org/10.37040/geografie.2022.005 Search in Google Scholar

Janík, T., Skokanová, H., Borovec, R., & Romportl, D. (2021). Landscape changes of rural protected landscape areas in Czechia: From arable land to permanent grassland – from old to new unification? Journal of Landscape Ecology, 14, 88–109. https://doi.org/10.2478/jlecol-2021-0018 Search in Google Scholar

Janík, T., Skokanová, H., Havlíček, M., Borovec, R., & Romportl, D. (2024). Landscape changes in Czech large protected areas 1950−2020: Two different landscapes types on the same path. Journal for Nature Conservation, 81, 126705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2024.126705 Search in Google Scholar

Janík, T., Zýka, V., Borovec, R., Demková, K., & Romportl, D. (2020). Změny krajinného pokryvu ve vybraných chráněných územích Ústeckého kraje: trendy a typologie. Studia Oecologica, 14(1), 3–11. Search in Google Scholar

Jepsen, M. R., Kuemmerle, T., Müller, D., Erb, K., Verburg, P. H., Haberl, H., ..., & Reenberg, A. (2015). Transitions in European land-management regimes between 1800 and 2010. Land Use Policy, 49, 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.07.003 Search in Google Scholar

Kallimanis, A. S., Touloumis, K., Tzanopoulos, J., Mazaris, A. D., Apostolopoulou, E., Stefanidou, S., ..., & Pantis, J. D. (2015). Vegetation coverage change in the EU: patterns inside and outside Natura 2000 protected areas. Biodiversity and Conservation, 24, 579–591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-014-0837-9 Search in Google Scholar

Kenig-Witkowska, M. M. (2017). Natura 2000 – The European Union mechanism for nature conservation: some legal issues. Journal of comparative Urban Law and Policy, 2(1), 198–217. Search in Google Scholar

Kovac, M., Hladnik, D., & Kutnar, L. (2018). Biodiversity in (the Natura 2000) forest habitats is not static: its conservation calls for an active management approach. Journal of Nature Conservation, 43, 250–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2017.07.004 Search in Google Scholar

Křenová, Z., & Kindlmann, P. (2015). Natura 2000 – Solution for Eastern Europe or just a good start? The Šumava National Park as a test case. Biological Conservation, 186, 268–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.03.028 Search in Google Scholar

Kubacka, M., & Smaga, L. (2019). Effectiveness of Natura 2000 areas for environmental protection in 21 European countries. Regional Environmental Change, 19, 2079–2088. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-019-01543-2 Search in Google Scholar

Kupková, L., & Bičík, I. (2016). Landscape transition after the collapse of communism in Czechia. Journal of Maps, 12, 526–531. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2016.1195301 Search in Google Scholar

Kupková, L., Bičík, I., & Jeleček, L. (2021). At the crossroads of European landscape changes: major processes of landscape change in Czechia since the middle of the 19^th century and their driving forces. Land, 10(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10010034 Search in Google Scholar

Kupková, L., Bičík, I., & Najman, J. (2013). Land Cover Changes along the Iron Curtain 1990–2006. Geografie, 118(2), 95–115. https://doi.org/10.37040/geografie2013118020095 Search in Google Scholar

Lasanta, T., Arnáez, J., Pascual, N., Ruiz-Flaño, P., Errea, M. P., & Lana-Renault, N. (2017). Space–time process and drivers of land abandonment in Europe. Catena, 149(3), 810–823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2016.02.024 Search in Google Scholar

Lawrence, A., & Beierkuhnlein, C. (2023). Detecting low fragmented sites surrounding European protected areas – Implications for expansion of the Natura 2000 network. Journal of Nature Conservation, 74, 126398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2023.126398 Search in Google Scholar

Lawrence, A., Friedrich, F., & Beierkuhnlein, C. (2021). Landscape fragmentation of the Natura 2000 network and its surrounding areas. PLoS ONE, 16(10), e0258615. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258615 Search in Google Scholar

Lindenmayer, D. (2018). Small patches make critical contributions to biodiversity conservation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(3), 717–719. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1820169116 Search in Google Scholar

Lipský, Z. (2001). Present land use changes in the Czech cultural landscape: Driving forces and environmental consequences. Moravian Geographical Reports, 9, 2–14. Search in Google Scholar

Lipský, Z., Kupková, L., Chromý, P., Kučera, Z., Brůha, L., Janík, T., …, & Štefanová, E. (2022). Zaniklé krajiny Česka. Zprávy památkové péče, 82(4), 496–508. https://doi.org/10.56112/zpp.2022.4.02 Search in Google Scholar

Mackovčin, P. (2009). Land use categorization based on topographic maps. Acta Pruhoniciana, 91, 5–13. Search in Google Scholar

Mallinis, G., Emmanoloudis, D., & Giannakopoulos, V. (2011). Mapping and interpreting historical land cover/land use changes in a Natura 2000 site using earth observational data: The case of Nestos delta, Greece. Applied Geography, 31(1), 312–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.07.002 Search in Google Scholar

Mammides, C., Zotos, S., & Martini, F. (2024). Quantifying the amount of land lost to artificial surfaces in European habitats: A comparison inside and outside Natura 2000 sites using a quasi-experimental design. Biological Conservation, 293, 110556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110556 Search in Google Scholar

Mareš, P., Rašín, R., & Pipan, P. (2013). Abandoned Landscapes of Former German Settlement in the Czech Republic and in Slovenia. In I. Rotherham (Ed.), Cultural Severance and the Environment. Environmental History 2 (pp. 289–309). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6159-9_20 Search in Google Scholar

Martínez-Fernández, J., Ruiz-Benito, P., & Zavala, M. A. (2015). Recent land cover changes in Spain across biogeographical regions and protection levels: Implications for conservation policies. Land Use Policy, 44, 62–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.11.021 Search in Google Scholar

Miklín, J., & Čížek, L. (2014). Erasing a European biodiversity hot-spot: Open woodlands, veteran trees and mature forests succumb to forestry intensification, succession, and logging in a UNESCO Biosphere Reserve. Journal for Nature Conservation, 22(1), 35–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2013.08.002 Search in Google Scholar

Moser, B., Jaeger, J. A. G., Tappeiner, U., Tasser, E., & Eisel, B. (2007). Modification of the effective mesh size for measuring landscape fragmentation to solve the boundary problem. Landscape Ecology, 22, 447–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-006-9023-0 Search in Google Scholar

Mücher, C. A., Hazeu, G. W., Swetman, R., Gerard, F., Luque, S., Pino, J., & Halada, L. (2009). Historic land cover changes at Natura 2000 sites and their associated landscapes across Europe. In D. Maktav (Ed.), Remote Sensing for a Changing Europe (pp. 226–231). IOS Press. Search in Google Scholar

Nature Conservation Agency of the Czech Republic – NCA (2023). Území připravovaná k vyhlášení. https://www.nature.cz/uzemi-pripravovanak-vyhlaseni Search in Google Scholar

Palmero-Iniesta, M., Espelta, J. M., Gordillo, J., & Pino, J. (2020). Changes in forest landscape patterns resulting from recent afforestation in Europe (1990–2012): defragmentation of pre-existing forest versus new patch proliferation. Annals of Forest Science, 77, 43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-020-00946-0 Search in Google Scholar

Pazúr, R., Feranec, J., Štych, P., Kopecká, M., & Holman, L. (2017). Changes of urbanised landscape identified and assessed by the Urban Atlas data: Case study of Prague and Bratislava. Land Use Policy, 61, 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.11.022 Search in Google Scholar

Pechanec, V., Machar, I., Pohanka, T., Opršal, Z., Petrovič, F., Švajda, J., …, & Málková, J. (2018). Effectiveness of Natura 2000 system for habitat types protection: A case study from the Czech Republic. Nature Conservation, 24, 21–41. https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.24.21608 Search in Google Scholar

Pelc, F. (2018). Ochrana přírody v České republice: Čtvrtstoletí změn a budoucnost. Vesmír, 97, 90–92. Search in Google Scholar

R Core Team (2023). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/ Search in Google Scholar

Rempel, R., Carr, A., & Elkie, P. (2008). Patch Analyst for ArcGIS®. Centre for Northern Forest Ecosystem Research, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. Lakehead University. Search in Google Scholar

Romportl, D. (Ed.) (2017). Atlas fragmentace a konektivity terestrických ekosystémů v České republice. AOPK ČR. Search in Google Scholar

Schumacher, H., & Johst, A. (2015). Natura 2000 and wilderness in former military training grounds. Natur und Landschaft, 90(9/10), 459–464. https://dx.doi.org/10.17433/9.2015.50153361 Search in Google Scholar

Seidl, T., & Chromý, P. (2010). Environmental conservation in military training areas – sources of spatial conflicts? Europa XXI, 21, 103–115. Search in Google Scholar

Šíbl, J., & Klimová, K. (2011). Obnova a manažment biotopov pieskových dún vo vojenskom výcvikovom priestore Záhorie. VTSÚ Záhorie, ŠOP SR, BROZ. Search in Google Scholar

Sklenička, P., Šímová, P., Hrdinová, K., & Salek, M. (2014). Changing rural landscapes along the border of Austria and the Czech Republic between 1952 and 2009: Roles of political, socioeconomic and environmental factors. Applied Geography, 47, 89–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.12.006 Search in Google Scholar

Skokanová, H. (2009). Application of methodological principles for assessment of land use changes trajectories and processes in South-Eastern Moravia for the period 1836–2006. Acta Pruhoniciana, 91, 15–21. Search in Google Scholar

Skokanová, H., Falťan, V., & Havlíček, M. (2016). Driving forces of main landscape change processes from past 200 years in Central Europe – differences between old democratic and post-socialist countries. Ekológia (Bratislava), 35(1), 50–65. https://doi.org/10.1515/eko-2016-0004 Search in Google Scholar

Skokanová, H., Havlíček, M., Klusáček, P., & Martinát, S. (2017). Five military training areas – five different trajectories of land cover development? Case studies from the Czech Republic. Geographia Cassoviensis, 11(2), 201–213 Search in Google Scholar

Skokanová, H., Netopil, P., Havlíček, M., & Šarapatka, B. (2020). The role of traditional agricultural landscape structures in changes to green infrastructure connectivity. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 302, 107071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2020.107071 Search in Google Scholar

Svenningsen, S. R., Levin, G., & Perner, M. L. (2019). Military land use and the impact on landscape: A study of land use history on Danish Defence sites. Land Use Policy, 84, 114–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.02.041 Search in Google Scholar

Watson, J. E. M., Dudley, N., Segan, D. B., & Hockings, M. (2014). The performance and potential of protected areas. Nature, 515, 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13947 Search in Google Scholar

Zbierska, A. (2022). Landscape Changes in Protected Areas in Poland. Sustainability, 14(2), 753. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020753 Search in Google Scholar

Zielińska, K. (2007). The influence of roads on the species diversity of forest vascular flora in Central Poland. Biodiversity Research and Conservation, 5–8, 71–80. Search in Google Scholar

Žoncová, M. (2020). Land Cover Changes in Protected Areas of Slovakia Between 1990 and 2018. Acta Geographica Slovenica, 60(2), 71–89. https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS.7996 Search in Google Scholar

Czech Office for Surveying, Mapping and Cadastre (2002–2006). Raster base map of the Czech Republic, scale 1:10,000. Search in Google Scholar

Czech Office for Surveying, Mapping and Cadastre (2003–2005). Ortophoto of the Czech Republic. Available at: https://ags.cuzk.cz/geoprohlizec/?k=8491. Accessed with wms at: https://geoportal.cuzk.cz/WMS_ORTOFOTO_ARCHIV/WMService.aspx?service=WMS&request=GetCapabilities Search in Google Scholar

Czech Office for Surveying, Mapping and Cadastre (2016–2020). Ortophoto of the Czech Republic. Available at: https://ags.cuzk.cz/geoprohlizec/?k=8491. Accessed with wms at: https://geoportal.cuzk.cz/WMS_ORTOFOTO_ARCHIV/WMService.aspx?service=WMS&request=GetCapabilities Search in Google Scholar

General Staff of the Czechoslovak Army and Central Administration of Geodesy and Cartography (1957–1971). Topographic maps of the Czechoslovakia in the system S-1952, scale 1:10,000. Search in Google Scholar

Central Administration of Geodesy and Cartography (1986–1995). Base maps of Czechoslovakia, scale 1:10,000. Search in Google Scholar

General Staff of the Czechoslovak Army (1952–1956). Czechoslovak military topographic maps, scale 1:25,000. Search in Google Scholar

General Staff of the Czechoslovak Army (1988–1995). Czechoslovak military topographic maps, scale 1:25,000. Search in Google Scholar

Ministry of Agriculture (2016–2020). Land Parcel Information System. Available at: https://eagri.cz/public/app/lpisext/lpis/verejny2/plpis/; accessed via wms at: http://eagri.cz/public/app/wms/public_DPB_PB_OPV.fcgi Search in Google Scholar