Urban revitalisation within the historical quarter: A comprehensive analysis of a medium sized city in Romania

1Aigwi, I. E., Egbelakin, T., & Ingham, J. (2018). Efficacy of adaptive reuse for the redevelopment of underutilised historical buildings: Towards the regeneration of New Zealand’s provincial town centres. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 36(4), 385–407. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBPA-01-2018-0007Search in Google Scholar

2Arbaci, S., & Tapada-Berteli, T. (2012). Social inequality and urban regeneration in Barcelona city centre: Reconsidering success. European Urban and Regional Studies, 19(3), 287–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776412441110Search in Google Scholar

3Aykaç, P. (2019). Musealization as an Urban Process: The Transformation of the Sultanahmet District in Istanbul’s Historic Peninsula. Journal of Urban History, 45(6), 1246–1272. https://doi.org/10.1177/0096144219853775Search in Google Scholar

4Balsas, C. J. L. (2000). City center revitalization in Portugal: Lessons from two medium size cities. Cities, 17(1), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-2751(99)00049-9Search in Google Scholar

5Balsas, C. J. L. (2007). City Centre Revitalization in Portugal: A Study of Lisbon and Porto. Journal of Urban Design, 12(2), 231–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574800701306328Search in Google Scholar

6Beretić, N., & Talu, V. (2020). Social Housing as an Experimental Approach to the Sustainable Regeneration of Historic City Centers: An Ongoing Study of Sassari City, Italy. Sustainability, 12(11), Article 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114579Search in Google Scholar

7Boeri, A., Gaspari, J., Gianfrate, V., Longo, D., & Pussetti, C. (2016). The adaptive reuse of historic city centres. Bologna and Lisbon: Solutions for urban regeneration. TECHNE – Journal of Technology for Architecture and Environment, 12, 230–237. https://doi.org/10.13128/Techne-19357Search in Google Scholar

8Bürkner, H.-J., & Totelecan, S. G. (2018). Assemblages of Urban Leisure Culture in Inner-City Bucharest. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 42(5), 786–806. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12630Search in Google Scholar

9Chelcea, L. (2003). Ancestors, Domestic Groups, and the Socialist State: Housing Nationalization and Restitution in Romania. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 45(4), 714–740. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417503000331Search in Google Scholar

10Chelcea, L. (2006). Marginal Groups in Central Places: Gentrification, Property Rights and Post-Socialist Primitive Accumulation (Bucharest, Romania). In G. Enyedi, & Z. Kovács (Eds.), Social Changes and Social Sustainability in Historical Urban Centres: The case of Central Europe (pp. 127–146).Search in Google Scholar

11Day, K., Anderson, C., Powe, M., McMillan, T., & Winn, D. (2007). Remaking Minnie Street: The Impacts of Urban Revitalization on Crime and Pedestrian Safety. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 26(3), 315–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X06297257Search in Google Scholar

12depthmapX development team (2020). depthmapX (0.8.0) [Computer software].Search in Google Scholar

13Dokmeci, V., Altunbas, U., & Yazgi, B. (2007). Revitalisation of the Main Street of a Distinguished Old Neighbourhood in Istanbul. European Planning Studies, 15(1), 153–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310601016788Search in Google Scholar

14Doratli, N. (2005). Revitalizing historic urban quarters: A model for determining the most relevant strategic approach. European Planning Studies, 13(5), 749–777. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310500139558Search in Google Scholar

15Ford, L., Klevisser, F., & Carli, F. (2008). Ethnic Neighborhoods and Urban Revitalization: Can Europe use the American Model? Geographical Review, 98(1), 82–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1931-0846.2008.tb00289.xSearch in Google Scholar

16Ge, T., Hou, W., & Xiao, Y. (2023). Study on the Regeneration of City Centre Spatial Structure Pedestrianisation Based on Space Syntax: Case Study on 21 City Centres in the UK. Land, 12(6), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12061183Search in Google Scholar

17GEA (2009). Studiu privind identificarea obiectivelor strategice pentru revitalizarea centrului istoric al Craiovei (p. 48). GEA Strategy and Consulting. https://primariacraiova.ro/pozearticole/userfiles/files/01/16748.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

18Gehl, J. (2011). Life Between Buildings: Using Public Space. Island Press.Search in Google Scholar

19Gehl, J. (2013). Cities for People. Island Press.Search in Google Scholar

20Gheorghiu, T. O. (2017a). The Protection of Historic urban Centres of Romania, a Complicated Issue. Historia Urbana, XXV(25), 7–33. Search in Google Scholar

21Gheorghiu, T. O. (2017b). Urbanistic and Architectural Realities in the Historical Centers of Cities on the Lower Mureş River. Patrimonium Banaticum, VII, 183–208.Search in Google Scholar

22Giddings, B., Charlton, J., & Horne, M. (2011). Public squares in European city centres. URBAN DESIGN International, 16(3), 202–212. https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2011.6Search in Google Scholar

23Grazuleviciute-Vileniske, I., & Urbonas, V. (2014). Urban regeneration in the context of post-Soviet transformation: Lithuanian experience. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 15(6), 637–643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2014.01.002Search in Google Scholar

24Grodach, C., & Ehrenfeucht, R. (2016). Urban Revitalization: Remaking Cities in a Changing World. Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

25Grodach, C., & Loukaitou-Sideris, A. (2007). Cultural development strategies and urban revitalization. A survey of US cities. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 13(4), 349–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286630701683235Search in Google Scholar

26Heath, T., Oc, T., & Tiesdell, S. (2013). Revitalising Historic Urban Quarters (2^nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080516271 Search in Google Scholar

27Horbliuk, S., & Dehtiarova, I. (2021). Approaches to Urban Revitalization Policy in Light of the Latest Concepts of Sustainable Urban Development. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 7(3), 46–55. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2021-7-3-46-55Search in Google Scholar

28Ilovan, O. R., Adorean, E. C., Gligor, V., Maroşi, Z., Dulamă, M.-E., & Voicu, C.-G. (2018). Inhabitants’ perceptions of the central squares and quality of life in Cluj-Napoca, Romania. Territorial Identity and Development, 3(2), 104–133.Search in Google Scholar

29Kelly, G., & Hosking, K. (2008). Nonpermanent Residents, Place Attachment, and “Sea Change” Communities. Environment and Behavior, 40(4), 575–594. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916507302246Search in Google Scholar

30Larsen, K. (2005). New Urbanism’s Role in Inner-city Neighborhood Revitalization. Housing Studies, 20(5), 795–813. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673030500214068Search in Google Scholar

31Lei, H., & Zhou, Y. (2022). Conducting Heritage Tourism-Led Urban Renewal in Chinese Historical and Cultural Urban Spaces: A Case Study of Datong. Land, 11(12), 2122. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11122122Search in Google Scholar

32Lewicka, M. (2005). Ways to make people active: The role of place attachment, cultural capital, and neighborhood ties. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(4), 381–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.10.004Search in Google Scholar

33Li, J., Krishnamurthy, S., Pereira Roders, A., & van Wesemael, P. (2020). Community participation in cultural heritage management: A systematic literature review comparing Chinese and international practices. Cities, 96, 102476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102476Search in Google Scholar

34Light, D., Creþan, R., Voiculescu, S., & Jucu, I. S. (2020). Introduction: Changing Tourism in the Cities of Post-communist Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 22(4), 465–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/19448953.2020.1775405Search in Google Scholar

35Local Committee Craiova (2017). Decision no. 170 regarding the local taxes for the year 2017. Craiova City Hall. https://impozite.primariacraiova.ro/Docs/HCL_CRAIOVA_2017.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

36Madanipour, A. (2010). Whose Public Space? International case studies in urban design and development. Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

37Mısırlısoy, D., & Günçe, K. (2016). Adaptive reuse strategies for heritage buildings: A holistic approach. Sustainable Cities and Society, 26, 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2016.05.017Search in Google Scholar

38Mohamad, W. S. N. W., & Said, I. (2014). A review of variables of urban street connectivity for spatial connection. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 18, 012173. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/18/1/012173Search in Google Scholar

39Murzyn, M. A. (2006). View of ‘Winners’ and ‘Losers’ in the Game: The Social Dimension of Urban Regeneration in the Kazimierz quarter in Krakow. In G. Enyedi, & Z. Kovács (Eds.), Social Changes and Social Sustainability in Historical Urban Centres: The case of Central Europe (pp. 81–106).Search in Google Scholar

40Nedučin, D., Krklješ, M., & Gajić, Z. (2019). Post-socialist context of culture-led urban regeneration – Case study of a street in Novi Sad, Serbia. Cities, 85, 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.11.024Search in Google Scholar

41Nistor, S. (2006). Romania’s Urban Architectural Heritage: Between Neglect and Revitalization. (p. 10).Search in Google Scholar

42Niþă, A. (2021). Rethinking Lynch’s “The Image of the City” Model in the Context of Urban Fabric Dynamics. Case Study: Craiova, Romania. Journal of Settlements and Spatial Planning, 7, 5–14. https://doi.org/10.24193/JSSPSI.2021.7.02Search in Google Scholar

43Niþulescu, D. C. (2006). Procesul de gentrificare a spaþiilor de locuit urbane. Concept şi explicaþii alternative. Calitatea vieþii, 17(3–4), 281–293.Search in Google Scholar

44Özbil, A., Yeşiltepe, D., & Argın, G. (2015). Modeling walkability: The effects of street design, street-network configuration and land-use on pedestrian movement. Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 12(3), 189–207.Search in Google Scholar

45Ozus, E., & Dokmeci, V. (2005). Effects of Revitalization in Historical City Center of Istanbul. International Real Estate Review, 8(1), 144–159.Search in Google Scholar

46Pafka, E., Dovey, K., & Aschwanden, G. D. (2020). Limits of space syntax for urban design: Axiality, scale and sinuosity. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 47(3), 508–522. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808318786512Search in Google Scholar

47Pascariu, G., & Pascariu, S. (2002). Urban Regeneration and Community Building in Historic Centres, Romania. Planning Studies and Practice-Journal of Singapore Institute of Planners, 4(1), 43–56.Search in Google Scholar

48Pavel, S., & Jucu, I. S. (2020). Urban transformation and cultural evolution of post-socialist European cities. The case of Timisoara (Romania): From ‘Little Vienna’ urban icon to European Capital of culture (ECoC 2021). City, Culture and Society, 20, 100296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2019.100296Search in Google Scholar

49Polanska, D. (2008). Decline and revitalization in post-communist urban context: A case of the Polish city—Gdansk. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 41(3), 359–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2008.06.002Search in Google Scholar

50Popescu, L., Niþă, A., & Iordache, C. (2020). Place Identity, Urban Tourism and Heritage Interpretation: A Case Study of Craiova, Romania. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 22(4), 494–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/19448953.2020.1775401Search in Google Scholar

51Popescu, L., Vîlcea, C., & Niþă, A. (2022). Reclaiming the Face of the City. Can Third-Places Change Place Attachment? Craiova as Case Study. Preserving and Constructing Place Attachment in Europe, 257–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09775-1_15Search in Google Scholar

52Raco, M. (2003). Remaking Place and Securitising Space: Urban Regeneration and the Strategies, Tactics and Practices of Policing in the UK. Urban Studies, 40(9), 1869–1887. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098032000106645Search in Google Scholar

53Radoslav, R., Branea, A.-M., & Găman, M. S. (2013). Rehabilitation through a holistic revitalization strategy of historical city centres – Timisoara, Romania. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 14(3), e1–e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2012.11.031Search in Google Scholar

54Rashid, M. (2019). Space Syntax: A Network-Based Configurational Approach to Studying Urban Morphology. In L. D’Acci (Ed.), The Mathematics of Urban Morphology (pp. 199–251). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12381-9_10Search in Google Scholar

55Rhodes, J. (2016). Revitalizing the neighborhood: The practices and politics of rightsizing in Idora, Youngstown. Urban Geography, 40(2), 215–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2016.1258179Search in Google Scholar

56Rich, M. A., & Tsitsos, W. (2016). Avoiding the ‘SoHo Effect’ in Baltimore: Neighborhood Revitalization and Arts and Entertainment Districts. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 40(4), 736–756. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12376Search in Google Scholar

57Ripp, M., & Rodwell, D. (2016). The governance of urban heritage. The Historic Environment: Policy and Practice, 7(1), 81–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/17567505.2016.1142699Search in Google Scholar

58Roberts, P., & Skyes, H. (2000). Urban Regeneration. A Handbook. Sage. Rollero, C., & De Piccoli, N. (2010). Place attachment, identification and environment perception: An empirical study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(2), 198–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.12.003Search in Google Scholar

59Roşu, L. (2015). The urban transformations of a post-socialist city centre. The socialist relicts and current identity of Iaşi historical city centre. Lucrările Seminarului Geografic ‘Dimitrie Cantemir’, 40, 159–170. https://doi.org/10.15551/lsgdc.v40i0.15Search in Google Scholar

60Rousseau, M. (2009). Re-imaging the City Centre for the Middle Classes: Regeneration, Gentrification and Symbolic Policies in ‘Loser Cities’. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33(3), 770–788. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2009.00889.xSearch in Google Scholar

61Sagan, I., & Grabkowska, M. (2012). Urban Regeneration in Gdańsk, Poland: Local Regimes and Tensions Between Top-Down Strategies and Endogenous Renewal. European Planning Studies, 20(7), 1135–1154. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.674347Search in Google Scholar

62Şahin Körmeçli, P. (2023). Analysis of Walkable Street Networks by Using the Space Syntax and GIS Techniques: A Case Study of Çankırı City. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 12(6), 216. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi12060216Search in Google Scholar

63Schwab, W. A. (1981). Urban neighborhood revitalization: Theoretical and empirical issues. Journal of Urban Affairs, 3(3), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9906.1981.tb00126.xSearch in Google Scholar

64Scott, J. W., & Kühn, M. (2012). Urban Change and Urban Development Strategies in Central East Europe: A Selective Assessment of Events Since 1989. European Planning Studies, 20(7), 1093–1109. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.674345Search in Google Scholar

65Ślebocka, M. (2021). The Social Aspect of Revitalization – The Lodz City Case Study. Finanse i Prawo Finansowe, 2(30), 161–179. Smagacz-Poziemska, M. (2008). The revitalization of urban space: Social changes in Krakow’s Kazimierz and the Ticinese district in Milan. Edizioni Plus – Pisa University Press. https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/146595Search in Google Scholar

66Stan, L. (2006). The roof over our heads: Property restitution in Romania. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 22(2), 180–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523270600661011Search in Google Scholar

67Stanilov, K. (2007). The Post-Socialist City: Urban Form and Space Transformations in Central and Eastern Europe after Socialism. Springer Science and Business Media.Search in Google Scholar

68Sun, X. (2013). Comparative Analysis of Urban Morphology: Evaluating Space Syntax and Traditional Morphological Methods. University of Gävle, Faculty of Engineering and Sustainable Development, Department of Industrial Development, IT and Land Management.Search in Google Scholar

69Sutton, A. S. (2008). Urban Revitalization in the United States: Policies and Practices (United States Urban Revitalization Research Project, p. 70). Graduate School of Architecture, Planning and Preservation Columbia University.Search in Google Scholar

70Szczepańska. (2011). Democratic by design? Applying Space Syntax to studying spatial coexistence of diverse users MA.Search in Google Scholar

71Szczepańska, J. (2011). Demokracja przez projekt? – wykorzystanie teorii space syntax do zrozumienia współobecności różnych użytkowników w przestrzeni publicznej (No. 196114) [Praca magisterska, Uniwersytet Warszawski] (p. 30–33). https://www.academia.edu/2553302Search in Google Scholar

72Tanrıkul, A. (2023). The Role of Community Participation and Social Inclusion in Successful Historic City Center Regeneration in the Mediterranean Region. Sustainability, 15(9), 7723. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097723Search in Google Scholar

73Throsby, D. (2016). Investment in urban heritage conservation in developing countries: Concepts, methods and data. City, Culture and Society, 7(2), 81–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2015.11.002Search in Google Scholar

74Tiesdell, S., Oc, T., & Heath, T. (2016). Revitalising Historic Urban Quarters (2016^th ed.). Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

75Tosics, I. (2005). City development in Central and Eastern Europe Since 1990: The impact of internal forces. In Transformation of cities in Central and Eastern Europe: Towards globalization (pp. 44–78). The United Nations University Press.Search in Google Scholar

76Ungureanu, A. (September 2003). Centrul istoric al Craiovei, reabilitat cu 11 mil. euro din fonduri UE. In zona se vor mai putea face doar restaurante si magazine. Wall Street Journal. https://www.wall-street.ro/articol/Real-Estate/154404/centrul-istoric-al-craiovei-reabilitat-cu-11-mil-euro-din-fonduri-ue.html#grefSearch in Google Scholar

77van Nes, A., & Yamu, C. (2021). Introduction to Space Syntax in Urban Studies. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59140-3 Search in Google Scholar

78Vehbi, B. O., & Hoşkara, Ş. Ö. (2009). A Model for Measuring the Sustainability Level of Historic Urban Quarters. European Planning Studies, 17(5), 715–739. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310902778201Search in Google Scholar

79Vesalon, L., & Creþan, R. (2019). ‘Little Vienna’ or” European avant-garde city”? Branding narratives in a Romanian city. Journal of Urban and Regional Analysis, 11(1), 19–34.Search in Google Scholar

80Vigdor, J. L. (2010). Is urban decay bad? Is urban revitalization bad too? Journal of Urban Economics, 68(3), 277–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2010.05.003Search in Google Scholar

81Vîlcea, C., Avram, S., & Florescu, C. (2018). Using GIS methods to analyze spatial characteristics of urban transportation system in Craiova city. Forum Geografic, XVII(1), 82–89. https://doi.org/10.5775/fg.2018.139.iSearch in Google Scholar

82Vîlcea, C., & Şoşea, C. (2020). A GIS-based analysis of the urban green space accessibility in Craiova city, Romania. Geografisk Tidsskrift-Danish Journal of Geography, 120(1), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/00167223.2020.1766365Search in Google Scholar

83Wiig, A. (2018). Secure the city, revitalize the zone: Smart urbanization in Camden, New Jersey. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 36(3), 403–422. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654417743767Search in Google Scholar

84Yamu, C., van Nes, A., & Garau, C. (2021). Bill Hillier’s Legacy: Space Syntax—A Synopsis of Basic Concepts, Measures, and Empirical Application. Sustainability, 13(6), 3394. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063394Search in Google Scholar

85Yunitsyna, A., & Shtepani, E. (2023). Investigating the socio-spatial relations of the built environment using the Space Syntax analysis – A case study of Tirana City. Cities, 133, 104147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.104147Search in Google Scholar

86Zielenbach, S. (2000). The Art of Revitalization: Improving Conditions in Distressed Inner-City Neighborhoods. Routledge.Search in Google Scholar