A Combined-Index Study on the Influence of Earthquake Incidence Angle on the Seismic Performance of Reinforced Concrete Plan-Asymmetric Buildings

[1]Smeby W. & Der Kiureghian(1985). Modal combination rules for multicomponent earthquake excitation. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 13(1), 1-12. DOI: 10.1002/eqe.4290130103.10.1002/eqe.4290130103Search in Google Scholar

[2]Cheng F. Y. & Ger J. F. (1990). The effect of multicomponent seismic excitation and direction on response behavior of 3-D structures. In Proceedings of the Fourth U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 20-24 May 1990 (pp. 5-14). California, Palm Springs.Search in Google Scholar

[3]Lopez O.A. & Torres R. (1997). The critical angle of seismic incidence and maximum structural response. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 26(9), 881-94. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199709)26:9<881::AID-EQE674>3.0.CO;2-R.10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199709)26:9<881::AID-EQE674>3.0.CO;2-RSearch in Google Scholar

[4]Lopez OA., Chopra AK. & Hernandez JJ. (2000). Critical response of structures to multicomponent earthquake excitation. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 26(12), 1759-1778. DOI: 10.1002/1096-9845(200012)29:12<1759::AID-EQE984>3.0.CO;2-K.10.1002/1096-9845(200012)29:12<1759::AID-EQE984>3.0.CO;2-KSearch in Google Scholar

[5]Tezcan SS. & Alhan C. (2001). Parametric analysis of irregular structures under seismic loading according to the new Turkish Earthquake Code. Engineering Structures, 23(6), 600–9. DOI: 10.1016/S0141-0296(00)00084-5.10.1016/S0141-0296(00)00084-5Search in Google Scholar

[6]Khoshnoudian F. & Poursha M. (2004). Responses of three-dimensional buildings under bi-directional and unidirectional seismic excitations. In Proceedings of the thirteenth world conference on earthquake engineering, 1-6 August 2004. Vancouver, B.C., Canada.Search in Google Scholar

[7]Athanatopoulou AM. (2005). Critical orientation of three correlated seismic components. Engineering Structures, 27(2), 301–12. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.10.011.10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.10.011Search in Google Scholar

[8]Abdel Raheem S. E., Ahmed M. M. M., Ahmed M. M. & Abdel-shafy A. G. A. (2018). Evaluation of plan configuration irregularity effects on seismic response demands of L-shaped MRF buildings. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 16(9), 3845–3869. DOI: 10.1007/s10518-018-0319-7.10.1007/s10518-018-0319-7Search in Google Scholar

[9]Tsourekas A. & Athanatopoulou A. & Kostinakis k. (2021). Maximum mean square response and critical orientation under bi-directional seismic excitation. Engineering Structures, 233(1), 111881. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.111881.10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.111881Search in Google Scholar

[10]Hosseini M. & Salemi A. (2008). Studying the effect of earthquake excitation on the internal forces of steel building’s elements by using nonlinear time history analyses. In Proceedings of the 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 12-17 October 2008. Beijing, China.Search in Google Scholar

[11]Ahmet C., Ebru K. (2017). Earthquake incidence angle influence on seismic performance of reinforced concrete buildings. Sigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences, 35(4), 609-631. “Retrieved from https://eds.yildiz.edu.tr/AjaxTool/GetArticleByPublishedArticleId?PublishedArticleId=2505 in July 2021”.Search in Google Scholar

[12]European Union, CEN. (2004). EC8 (EN1998-1:2004) - Guide to Design of structures for earthquake resistance - Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. Brussels. European Committee for Standardization.Search in Google Scholar

[13]Rigato A.B. & Medina R.A (2007). Influence of angle of incidence on seismic demands for inelastic single-storey structures subjected to bi-directional ground motions. Engineering Structures, 29(10), 2593-2601. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.01.008.10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.01.008Search in Google Scholar

[14]Nguyen V.T. & Kim D. (2013). Influence of incident angles of earthquakes on inelastic responses of asymmetric-plan structures. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 45(3), 373-389. DOI: 10.12989/sem.2013.45.3.373.10.12989/sem.2013.45.3.373Search in Google Scholar

[15]Magliulo G., Petrone C & Maddaloni G. (2014). Influence of earthquake direction on the seismic response of irregular plan RC frame buildings. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 13(2), 243-256. DOI: 10.1007/s11803-014-0227-z.10.1007/s11803-014-0227-zSearch in Google Scholar

[16]Cantagallo C., Camata G. & Spacone E. (2015). Influence of ground motion selection methods on seismic directionality effects. Earthquakes and Structures, 8(1), 185–204. DOI: 10.12989/eas.2015.8.1.185.10.12989/eas.2015.8.1.185Search in Google Scholar

[17]Fujii K. (2020). Evaluating the Effect of the Directivity of Bidirectional Ground Motion on an Irregular Building: The Former Uto City Hall. In Proceedings 9th European Workshop on the Seismic Behaviour of Irregular and Complex Structures Lisbon, 15-16 December 2020 (pp. 156-165). Lisbon.Search in Google Scholar

[18]Kassem M., Nazri F. & Farsangi E. (2019). Development of seismic vulnerability index methodology for reinforced concrete buildings based on nonlinear parametric analyses. MethodsX, 6, 199-211. DOI: 10.1016/j.mex.2019.01.006.10.1016/j.mex.2019.01.006636060930766800Search in Google Scholar

[19]European Union, CEN. (2004). EC2 (1992-1-1: 2004) - Guide to Design of concrete structures - Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings. Brussels. European Committee For StandardizationSearch in Google Scholar

[20]Crainic L. & Munteanu M. (2013). Seismic Performance of Concrete Buildings. London, UK. Taylor & Francis Ltd.Search in Google Scholar

[21]CSI (2017). ETABS [Structural and Earthquake Engineering Computer Software]. California: Computers and Structures, Inc.Search in Google Scholar

[22]CSI (2019). SAP2000 [Structural and Earthquake Engineering Computer Software]. California: Computers and Structures, Inc.Search in Google Scholar

[23]Anagnostopoulos S., Kyrkos M. & Stathopoulos K. (2015). Earthquake induced torsion in buildings: critical review and state of the art. Earthquakes and Structures, 2(2), 305-377. DOI:10.12989/eas.2015.8.2.30510.12989/eas.2015.8.2.305Search in Google Scholar

[24]Mander J. B., Priestley M. J. N. & Park R. (1988a). Theoretical Stress-Strain Model for Confined Concrete. Journal of Structural Engineering, 114: 1804-1826. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE) 0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804).Search in Google Scholar

[25]SAP2000 (2010). Technical Note: Material Stress-Strain Curves. Computers and Structures, Inc. CSI Analysis Reference Manual for SAP2000.Search in Google Scholar

[26]FEMA 356 (2000). Prestandard and Commentary for Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings. Prepared by the American Society of Civil Engineers for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C.Search in Google Scholar

[27]ASCE 7-16 (2016). Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures. Reston, Virginia: American Society of Civil Engineers.Search in Google Scholar

[28]F.I. Belheouane & M. Bensaibi. (2013). Assessment of vulnerability curves using vulnerability index method for reinforced concrete structures, World Acad. Sci. Eng. Technol. Int. J. Civ. Archit. Sci. Eng; 7:153–156.Search in Google Scholar

[29]MDLPA. (2013). P100-1/2013-Seismic Design Code - Part 1: Design rules for buildings. Bucharest (in Romanian).Search in Google Scholar

[30]California Earthquake Authority, Caltrans Department of Transportation & Pacific Gas and Electric Company. (2013, April). Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER). Retrieved Jun 17, 2021, from https://ngawest2.berkeley.edu/.Search in Google Scholar

[31]Lavan O. & De Stefano M. (2013). Seismic Behaviour and Design of Irregular and Complex Civil Structures. Vol. 24 (Netherlands: Springer) ISBN 978-94-007-5377-8.10.1007/978-94-007-5377-8Search in Google Scholar