[
Burlak, A.,2013. Languages, DNA, relationship and contacts. Journal of Language Relationship: International Scientific Periodical, 9, 55—67, available at: <https://www.academia.edu/20060833/Languages_DNA_relationship_and_contacts>10.31826/jlr-2013-090108
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cheney, D. L., Seyfarth R. M., 1998. Why Animals Don’t Have Language. In G. B. Peason (Ed.), The Tanner lectures on human values, Salt Like Sity, UT: University of Utah Press. 174—209., available at: <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/251885739_Why_Animals_Don‘’t_Have_Language/citations>
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cimatti, F., 2016. Wittgenstein on animal (human and non-human) languages. Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations, 15, 42—59, ISSN 1841-2394, available at: <https://www.academia.edu/29338788/WITTGENSTEIN_ON_ANIMAL_HUMAN_AND_NON_HUMAN_LANGUAGES>
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Costa, P., 2017. The Language Animal: A Long Trajectory. Dialogue 56(4), 621—632, available at: <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0012217317000774, https://www.academia.edu/35736726/The_Language_Animal_A_Long_Trajectory?sm=a>10.1017/S0012217317000774
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dediu, D., Levinson, S. C., 2018. Neanderthal language revisited: not only us. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 21, 49—55, available at: <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.01.001>, <https://scinapse.io/papers/2793163934>
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Delahaye, P., 2018. Zoosemiotics 2.0. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique, 31(3), 707—714, available at: <https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-018-9563-z>, <https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11196-018-9563-z#>10.1007/s11196-018-9563-z
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Favareau, D., 2015. Symbols are Grounded not in Things, but in Scaffolded Relations and their Semiotic Constraints (Or How the Referential Generality of Symbol Scaffolding Grows Minds. Biosemiotics, 8(2), 235—255.10.1007/s12304-015-9234-3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Frohlich, D. R., 2014. Biology, Peirce, and Biosemiotics: Commentaires ‘Cénoscopic’ d’unBiologiste. The American Journal of Semiotics, 30(1-2), 173—188, available at: <https://www.academia.edu/21315696/Biology_Peirce_and_Biosemiotics>10.5840/ajs2014301/27
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hockett, C. F., 1960. Logical considerations in the study of animal communication. In Lanyon, W. E.; Tavolga, W. N. (Eds.), Animals sounds and animal communication. American Institute of Biological Sciences, 392—430.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hoffmeyer, J., 2008. Biosemiotics: An examination into the signs of life and the life of signs. Scranton: University of Scranton Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hutto, D. D., 2009. ToM Rules, but It Is Not OK. In: Leudar I., Costall A. (eds) Against Theory of Mind. London. Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 221—238.10.1057/9780230234383_12
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hutto, D. D., 2009. Folk Psychology as Narrative Practice. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 16(6—8), 9—39.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jaroš, F., Maran, T., 2019. Humans on top, humans among the other animals: Narratives of anthropological difference. Biosemiotics, 12(3), 381—403, available at: <https://www.academia.edu/40712011/Humans_on_Top_Humans_among_the_Other_Animals_Narratives_of_Anthropological_Difference>10.1007/s12304-019-09364-w
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jaroš, F., Pudil, M., 2020. Cognitive Systems of Human and Non-human Animals: At the Crossroads of Phenomenology, Ethology and Biosemiotics. Biosemiotics 13(2), 155—177, available at: <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342337131_Cognitive_Systems_of_Human_and_Non-human_Animals_At_the_Crossroads_of_Phenomenology_Ethology_and_Biosemiotics>10.1007/s12304-020-09387-8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kull, K., 2009. Vegetative, Animal, and Cultural Semiosis: The semiotic threshold zones. Cognitive Semiotics, 4 (Spring), 8—27. available at: <https://www.academia.edu/220345/Vegetative_animal_and_cultural_semiosis_The_semiotic_threshold_zones>10.3726/81608_8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kull, K., 2010. Umwelt and modelling. In P. Cobley (Ed.), The Routledge companion to semiotics (pp. 43—56). London, New York: Routledge>
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kull, K., 2014. Zoosemiotics is the study of animal forms of knowing. Semiotica, 2014(198), 299—310, available at: <https://www.academia.edu/6116777/Zoosemiotics_is_the_study_of_animal_forms_of_knowing>10.1515/sem-2013-0101
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kull, K., 2018. Biosemiotics by Giorgio Prodi: A postscript. In: Cimatti, Felice, A Biosemiotic Ontology: The Philosophy of Giorgio Prodi. (Biosemiotics 18.), Berlin: Springer, 135—147, available at: <https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97903-8 https://www.academia.edu/37955881/Biosemiotics_by_Giorgio_Prodi_A_Postscript>
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kull, K., 2019. Steps towards the natural meronomy and taxonomy of semiosis: Emon between index and symbol? Sign Systems Studies 47(1/2), 88—104, available at: <https://doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2019.47.1-2.03 https://www.academia.edu/39765119/Steps_towards_the_natural_meronomy_and_taxonomy_of_semiosis_Emon_between_index_and_symbol>10.12697/SSS.2019.47.1-2.03
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mahler, M. S., Pine, F., Bergman, A., 1975. The psychological birth of the human infant. Symbiosis and individuation. New York: Basic Booka, Inc., Publishers.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Maran, T. et al., 2016. Animal umwelten in a changing world. Tartu: University of Tartu Press, available at: <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/310828174_Animal_Umwelten_in_a_Changing_World_Zoosemiotic_Perspectives>10.26530/OAPEN_620672
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Martinelli, D., 2010. A critical companion to zoosemiotics: People, paths, ideas. Dordrecht: Springer, available at: <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321609704_A_Critical_Companion_to_Zoosemiotics_People_Paths_Ideas>, <https://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=en-US&sl=en&tl=ru&u= https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/bfm:978-90-481-9249-6%252F1.pdf?error%3Dcookies_not_supported%26code%3Db-981c832-5a44=41-cf-7b0d93119-ba29d5b&usg-ALkJrhjF08uxgQguqP7sRx6sLQHIUutOgQ>
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mithen, S., 2005. The singing Neanderthals: The origins of music, language, mind, and body. London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson, available at: <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/41571921_The_singing_Neanderthals_The_origins_of_music_language_mind_and_body>
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Morris, C., 1955 [1946]. Signs, Language, and Behavior. New York: George Braziller.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Olay, C., 2020. Self-interpreting Language Animal: Charles Taylor’s Anthropology. In: Kulcsár-Szabó Z., Lénárt T., Simon A., Végső R. (Eds.), Life After Literature. Numanities—Arts and Humanities in Progress, vol 12. Cham, Springer, available at: <https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33738-4_9>
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Peirce, C. S., 2000 [1965-1967]. Izbrannyye filosofskiye proizvedeniya. Per. s angl. K. Golubovich, K. Chukhrukidze, T. Dmitriyeva. Moskwa: Logos. (In Russian). Trans. from Peirce C. S. Collected Papers. Ed. by C. Hart-shorne and P. Weiss; Arthur W. Burks. Vol. 1—8. Cambridge—Mass.: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1965—1967, available at: <https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B3S-kpls80DCOThKZ2VYeEhSakU/view>
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Reznikova, Z., 2017. Studying Animal Language Without Translation: An Insight From Ants. Switzerland: Edition First Publisher: Springer International Publishing, available at: <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319683236_Studying_Animal_Language_Without_Translation_An_Insight_From_Ants>10.1007/978-3-319-44918-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Savage-Rumbaugh, S.. Rumbaugh, D., Fields, W., 2009. Empirical kanzi: The ape language controversy revisited, Skeptic. 15(1), 25—33.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sebeok, T. A., 1990. Essays in zoosemiotics. Toronto: Victoria College in the University of Toronto.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Seyfarth, R. M., Cheney., D. L., 2018. Edited by Michael L. Platt. The Social Origins of Language, Princeton: Princeton University Press. x—167, available at: <https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400888146-003>
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shabanov, P. D., Lebedev A. A., 2007. Zoosotsial’noye povedeniye krys. [Zoosocial behavior of rats]. Obzory po klinicheskoy farmakologii i lekarstvennoy terapii. [Reviews of clinical pharmacology and drug therapy]. 5(3), 2—79, available at: <https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/zoosotsialnoe-povedenie-krys/viewer>
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Taylor, C., 2016. The Language Animal: The Full Shape of the Human Linguistic Capacity .Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, available at: <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321812983_The_Language_Animal_The_Full_Shape_of_the_Human_Linguistic_Capacity_Cambridge_MA_Londres_Belknap_Press_of_Harvard_University_Press_352_pp>
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wendler, H., 2020. Philosophical Primatology: Reflections on Theses of Anthropological Difference, the Logic of Anthropomorphism and Anthropodenial, and the Self-other Category Mistake Within the Scope of Cognitive Primate Research. Biological Theory 15, 61—82.10.1007/s13752-019-00337-3
]Search in Google Scholar
