[
Ackermann, H., Hage, S. R., Ziegler, W., 2014. Brain mechanisms of acoustic communication in humans and nonhuman primates: An evolutionary perspective. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, (6), 529–546.10.1017/S0140525X13003099
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Alexander, V. N., Grimes, V., 2017. Fluid biosemiotic mechanisms underlie subconscious habits. Biosemiotics, 10(3), 337–353.10.1007/s12304-017-9298-3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Albuquerque, N., Guo, K., Wilkinson, A., Savalli, C., Otta, E., Mills, D., 2016. Dogs recognize dog & human emotions. Biology letters, 12(1), 20150883.10.1098/rsbl.2015.0883
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Allman, B. L., Meredith, M. A., 2007. Multisensory processing in “unimodal” neurons: cross-modal sub-threshold auditory effects in cat extrastriate visual cortex. Journal of neurophysiology, 98(1), 545–549.10.1152/jn.00173.2007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baird, B., 1986. Nonlinear dynamics of pattern formation & pattern recognition in the rabbit olfactory bulb. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 22(1–3), 150–175.10.1016/0167-2789(86)90238-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bench, C., Frith, C. D., Grasby, P. M., Friston, K. J., Paulesu, E., Frackowiak, R. S. J., Dolan, R. J., 1993. Investigations of the functional anatomy of attention using the Stroop test. Neuropsychologia, 31(9), 907–922.10.1016/0028-3932(93)90147-R
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Berwick, R. C., Okanoya, K., Beckers, G. J., Bolhuis, J. J., 2011. Songs to syntax: the linguistics of birdsong. Trends in cognitive sciences, 15(3), 113–121.10.1016/j.tics.2011.01.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Boeckh, J., Ernst, K. D., 1987. Contribution of single unit analysis in insects to an understanding of olfactory function. Journal of Comparative Physiology, 161(4), 549–565.10.1007/BF00603661
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bonadonna, F., Sanz-Aguilar, A., 2012. Kin recognition and inbreeding avoidance in wild birds: the first evidence for individual kin-related odour recognition. Animal Behaviour, 84(3), 509–513.10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.06.014
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bonadonna, F., Miguel, E., Grosbois, V., Jouventin, P., Bessiere, J. M., 2007. Individual odor recognition in birds: an endogenous olfactory signature on petrels’ feathers?. Journal of chemical ecology, 33(9), 1819–1829.10.1007/s10886-007-9345-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cafazzo, S., Natoli, E., Valsecchi, P., 2012. Scent-marking behaviour in a pack of free-ranging domestic dogs. Ethology, 118(10), 955–966.10.1111/j.1439-0310.2012.02088.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Call, J., 2011. How artificial communication affects the communication and cognition of the great apes. Mind & Language, 26(1), 1–20.10.1111/j.1468-0017.2010.01408.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Caspers, B. A., Krause, E. T., 2011. Odour-based natal nest recognition in the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata), a colony-breeding songbird. Biology Letters, 7(2), 184–186.10.1098/rsbl.2010.0775
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Catala, A., Grandgeorge, M., Schaff, J. L., Cousillas, H., Hausberger, M. Cattet, J., 2019. Dogs demonstrate the existence of an epileptic seizure odour in humans. Scientific reports, 9(1), 1–7.10.1038/s41598-019-40721-4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chabrolles, L., Coureaud, G., Boyer, N., Mathevon, N., Beauchaud, M., 2017. Cross-sensory modulation in a future top predator, the young Nile crocodile. Royal Society open science, 4(6), 170386.10.1098/rsos.170386
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chafe, W., Tannen, D., 1987. The relation between written and spoken language. Annual Review of Anthropology, 16(1), 383–407.10.1146/annurev.an.16.100187.002123
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Clay, Z., Pople, S., Hood, B., Kita, S., 2014. Young children make their gestural communication systems more language-like: Segmentation and linearization of semantic elements in motion events. Psychological science, 25(8), 1518–1525.10.1177/0956797614533967
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Croll, R. P., 1983. Gastropod chemoreception. Biological Reviews, 58(2), 293–319.10.1111/j.1469-185X.1983.tb00391.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Croset, V., Rytz, R., Cummins, S. F., Budd, A., Brawand, D., Kaessmann, H., Gibson, T. J., Benton, R., 2010. Ancient protostome origin of chemosensory ionotropic glutamate receptors and the evolution of insect taste and olfaction. PLoS Genet, 6(8), 001064.10.1371/journal.pgen.1001064
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Culbert, B. M., Gilmour, K. M., Balshine, S., 2019. Social buffering of stress in a group-living fish. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 286(1910), 20191626.10.1098/rspb.2019.1626
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Curtis, J. T., Liu, Y., Wang, Z., 2001. Lesions of the vomeronasal organ disrupt mating-induced pair bonding in female prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster). Brain research, 901(1–2), 167–174.10.1016/S0006-8993(01)02343-5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dasgupta, S., Biswas, A., Abraham, A., Das, S., 2008. Adaptive computational chemotaxis in bacterial foraging algorithm. In 2008 International Conference on Complex, Intelligent and Software Intensive Systems (pp. 64–71). IEEE.10.1109/CISIS.2008.6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Derby, C. D., Kozma, M. T., Senatore, A., Schmidt, M., 2016. Molecular mechanisms of reception and perireception in crustacean chemoreception: a comparative review. Chemical Senses, 41(5), 381–398.10.1093/chemse/bjw057
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Døving, K. B., Trotier, D., 1998. Structure and function of the vomeronasal organ. Journal of Experimental Biology, 201(21), 2913–2925.10.1242/jeb.201.21.2913
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Emery, D. G., 1992. Fine structure of olfactory epithelia of gastropod molluscs. Microscopy research and technique, 22(4), 307–324.10.1002/jemt.1070220402
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Engen, T., 1972. The effect of expectation on judgments of odor. Acta Psychologica, 36(6), 450–458.10.1016/0001-6918(72)90025-X
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Favaro, L., Gamba, M., Cresta, E., Fumagalli, E., Bandoli, F., Pilenga, C., Isaja, V., Mathevon, N., Reby, D., 2020. Do penguins’ vocal sequences conform to linguistic laws?. Biology Letters, 16(2), 20190589.10.1098/rsbl.2019.0589
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gardiner, J. M., Atema, J., 2010. The function of bilateral odor arrival time differences in olfactory orientation of sharks. Current Biology, 20(13), 1187–1191.10.1016/j.cub.2010.04.053
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Garland, E. C., Castellote, M., Berchok, C. L., 2015. Beluga whale (Delphinapterus leucas) vocalizations and call classification from the eastern Beaufort Sea population. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 137(6), 3054–3067.10.1121/1.4919338
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Giuggioli, L., Bartumeus, F., 2010. Animal movement, search strategies and behavioural ecology: a cross-disciplinary way forward. Journal of Animal Ecology, 79(4), 906–909.10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01682.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
González, J., Barros-Loscertales, A., Pulvermüller, F., Meseguer, V., Sanjuán, A., Belloch, V., Ávila, C., 2006. Reading cinnamon activates olfactory brain regions. Neuroimage, 32(2), 906–912.10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.03.037
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gwinner, H., Berger, S., 2008. Starling males select green nest material by olfaction using experience-independent and experience-dependent cues. Animal Behaviour, 75(3), 971–976.10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.08.008
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Havlíček, J., Roberts, S. C., 2013. The perfume-body odour complex: an insightful model for culture–gene coevolution?. In Dehnhard M. (Eds.), Chemical signals in vertebrates 12, New York, NY: Springer, pp. 185–195.10.1007/978-1-4614-5927-9_14
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Horowitz, A., 2017. Smelling themselves: Dogs investigate their own odours longer when modified in an “olfactory mirror” test. Behavioural processes, 143, 17–24.10.1016/j.beproc.2017.08.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hothersall, B., Harris, P., Sörtoft, L., Nicol, C. J., 2010. Discrimination between conspecific odour samples in the horse (Equus caballus). Applied animal behaviour science, 126(1–2), 37–44.10.1016/j.applanim.2010.05.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jackson, D. E., Ratnieks, F. L., 2006. Communication in ants. Current biology, 16(15), R570–R574.10.1016/j.cub.2006.07.015
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jendrny, P., Schulz, C., Twele, F., Meller, S., von Köckritz--Blickwede, M., Osterhaus, A. D. M. E., Ebbers, J., Pilchová, V., Pink, I., Welte, T., Manns, M. P., 2020. Scent dog identification of samples from COVID-19 patients–a pilot study. BMC infectious diseases, 20(1), 1–7.10.1186/s12879-020-05281-3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jones, K. E., Dashfield, K., Downend, A. B., Otto, C. M., 2004. Search-and-rescue dogs: an overview for veterinarians. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 225(6), 854–860.10.2460/javma.2004.225.854
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kaissling, K. E., 1996. Peripheral mechanisms of pheromone reception in moths. Chemical Senses, 21(2), 257–268.10.1093/chemse/21.2.257
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Keller-Costa, T., Canário, A. V., Hubbard, P. C., 2015. Chemical communication in cichlids: a mini-review. General and comparative endocrinology, 221, 64–74.10.1016/j.ygcen.2015.01.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kemp, S. E., Gilbert, A.N., 1997. Odor intensity and color lightness are correlated sensory dimensions. The American journal of psychology, 110(1), 35.10.2307/1423699
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lambrechts, M. M., Dos Santos, A., 2000. Aromatic herbs in Corsican blue tit nests: the ‘Potpourri’ hypothesis. Acta Oecologica, 21(3), 175–178.10.1016/S1146-609X(00)00122-3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lewis, A., 2020. In Search of a Unified Theory of Sensory Perception: Possible Links between the Vibrational Mechanism of Olfaction and the Evolution of Language. Biosemiotics, 1–10.10.1007/s12304-020-09380-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lisberg, A. E., Snowdon, C.T., 2009. The effects of sex, gonadectomy and status on investigation patterns of unfamiliar conspecific urine in domestic dogs, Canis familiaris. Animal Behaviour, 77(5), 1147–1154.10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.12.033
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lötsch, J., Kringel, D., Hummel, T., 2019. Machine learning in human olfactory research. Chemical Senses, 44(1), 11–22.10.1093/chemse/bjy067
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Malassis, R., Rey, A., Fagot, J., 2018. Non-adjacent dependencies processing in human and non-human primates. Cognitive Science, 42(5), 1677–1699.10.1111/cogs.12617
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Maraci, Ö., Engel, K., Caspers, B. A., 2018. Olfactory communication via microbiota: what is known in birds?. Genes, 9(8), 387.10.3390/genes9080387
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Maran, T., 2017. Mimicry and meaning: Structure and semiotics of biological mimicry, 16. Springer, Berlin.10.1007/978-3-319-50317-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McGuire, B., Bemis, K. E., 2017. Scent marking in shelter dogs: effects of body size. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 186, 49-55.10.1016/j.applanim.2016.11.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McKenna, M. F., Cranford, T. W., Berta, A., Pyenson, N. D., 2012. Morphology of the odontocete melon and its implications for acoustic function. Marine Mammal Science, 28(4), 690–713.10.1111/j.1748-7692.2011.00526.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Meredith, M. A., Stein, B. E., 1986. Visual, auditory, and somatosensory convergence on cells in superior colliculus results in multisensory integration. Journal of neurophysiology, 56(3), 640–662.10.1152/jn.1986.56.3.640
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Miller, L. R., Gutzke, W. H., 1999. The role of the vomeronasal organ of crotalines (Reptilia: Serpentes: Viperidae) in predator detection. Animal Behaviour, 58(1), 53–57.10.1006/anbe.1999.1126
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mollo, E., Fontana, A., Roussis, V., Polese, G., Amodeo, P., Ghiselin, M. T., 2014. Sensing marine biomolecules: smell, taste, and the evolutionary transition from aquatic to terrestrial life. Frontiers in chemistry, 2(92).10.3389/fchem.2014.00092
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nikonov, A. A., Butler, J. M., Field, K. E., Caprio, J., Maruska, K. P., 2017. Reproductive and metabolic state differences in olfactory responses to amino acids in a mouth brooding African cichlid fish. Journal of Experimental Biology, 220(16), 2980–2992.10.1242/jeb.157925
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Panda, H., 2010. Perfumes and Flavours Technology Handbook: Perfume making formulations, Delhi, India: Asia Pacific Business Press inc.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Peng, Y., Gillis-Smith, S., Jin, H., Tränkner, D., Ryba, N. J., Zuker, C. S., 2015. Sweet and bitter taste in the brain of awake behaving animals. Nature, 527(7579), 512–515.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pennartz, C. M., 2009. Identification and integration of sensory modalities: neural basis and relation to consciousness. Consciousness and cognition, 18(3), 718–739.10.1016/j.concog.2009.03.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Phillips, D. W., 1975. Distance chemoreception-triggered avoidance behavior of the limpets Acmaea (Collisella) limatula and Acmaea (Notoacmea) scutum to the predatory starfish Pisaster ochraceus. Journal of Experimental Zoology, 191(2), 199–209.10.1002/jez.1401910207
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pitcher, B. J., Briefer, E. F., Baciadonna, L., McElligott, A. G., 2017. Cross-modal recognition of familiar conspecifics in goats. Royal Society open science, 4(2), 160346.10.1098/rsos.160346
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Plenderleith, M., Oosterhout, C. V., Robinson, R. L., Turner, G.F., 2005. Female preference for conspecific males based on olfactory cues in a Lake Malawi cichlid fish. Biology Letters, 1(4), 411–414.10.1098/rsbl.2005.0355
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Proops, L., McComb, K., Reby, D., 2009. Cross-modal individual recognition in domestic horses (Equus caballus). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(3), 947–951.10.1073/pnas.0809127105
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ortega, A., Zhulin, I. B., Krell, T., 2017. Sensory Repertoire of Bacterial Chemoreceptors, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews Oct 2017, 81(4), e00033-17.10.1128/MMBR.00033-17
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Queiroz, J., Emmeche, C., Kull, K., El-Hani, C., 2011. The biosemiotic approach in biology: Theoretical bases and applied models. Information and living systems: Philosophical and scientific perspectives, 91–130.10.7551/mitpress/9780262201742.003.0005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ravignani, A., Dalla Bella, S., Falk, S., Kello, C. T., Noriega, F., Kotz, S. A., 2019. Rhythm in speech and animal vocalizations: a cross-species perspective. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1453(1), 79.10.1111/nyas.14166
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Reed, R. R., 2004. After the holy grail: establishing a molecular basis for Mammalian olfaction. Cell, 116(2), 329–336.10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00047-9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Reiger, I., 1979. Scent rubbing in carnivores. Carnivore, 2(1), 17–25.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Richards, S., Goswami, U., 2019. Impaired recognition of metrical and syntactic boundaries in children with developmental language disorders. Brain sciences, 9(2), 33.10.3390/brainsci9020033
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rogers, J., Pullum, G. K., 2011. Aural pattern recognition experiments and the subregular hierarchy. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 20(3), 329–342.10.1007/s10849-011-9140-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sabiniewicz, A., Tarnowska, K., Świątek, R., Sorokowski, P., Laska, M., 2020. Olfactory-based interspecific recognition of human emotions: horses (Equus ferus caballus) can recognize fear and happiness body odour from humans (Homo sapiens). Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 230, 105072.10.1016/j.applanim.2020.105072
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Saslow, C. A., 2002. Understanding the perceptual world of horses. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 78(2–4), 209–224.10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00092-8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schwenk, K., 1995. Of tongues and noses: chemoreception in lizards and snakes. Trends in ecology & evolution, 10(1), 7–12.10.1016/S0169-5347(00)88953-3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schmidt, R., Kunc, H. P., Amrhein, V., Naguib, M., 2008. Aggressive responses to broadband trills are related to subsequent pairing success in nightingales. Behavioral Ecology, 19(3), 635–641.10.1093/beheco/arn021
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shimamura, M., Yasue, H., Ohshima, K., Abe, H., Kato, H., Kishiro, T., Goto, M., Munechika, I., Okada, N., 1997. Molecular evidence from retroposons that whales form a clade within even-toed ungulates. Nature, 388(6643), 666–670.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Siljander, E., Gries, R., Khaskin, G., & Gries, G. 2008. Identification of the airborne aggregation pheromone of the common bed bug, Cimex lectularius. Journal of chemical ecology, 34(6), 708–718.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sorensen, P. W., Hara, T. J., Stacey, N. E., Goetz, F. W., 1988. F prostaglandins function as potent olfactory stimulants that comprise the postovulatory female sex pheromone in goldfish. Biology of Reproduction, 39(5), 1039–1050.10.1095/biolreprod39.5.1039
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sourakov, A., Duehl, A., Sourakov, A., 2012. Foraging behavior of the blue morpho and other tropical butterflies: the chemical and electrophysiological basis of olfactory preferences and the role of color. Psyche, 2012.10.1155/2012/378050
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stevenson, R. J., 2010. An initial evaluation of the functions of human olfaction. Chemical senses, 35(1), 3–20.10.1093/chemse/bjp083
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Telewski, F. W., 2006. A unified hypothesis of mechanoperception in plants. American journal of botany, 93(10), 1466–1476.10.3732/ajb.93.10.1466
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Thünken, T., Waltschyk, N., Bakker, T. C., Kullmann, H., 2009. Olfactory self-recognition in a cichlid fish. Animal Cognition, 12(5), 717–724.10.1007/s10071-009-0231-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tomás, G., Merino, S., Martínez-de la Puente, J., Mo-reno, J., Morales, J., Rivero-de Aguilar, J., 2013. Nest size and aromatic plants in the nest as sexually selected female traits in blue tits. Behavioral Ecology, 24(4), 926–934.10.1093/beheco/art015
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tricas, T. C., Kajiura, S. M., Summers, A. P., 2009. Response of the hammerhead shark olfactory epithelium to amino acid stimuli. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 195(10), 947–954.10.1007/s00359-009-0470-3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ierusalimsky, V. N., Balaban, P. M., 2010. Two morphological sub-systems within the olfactory organs of a terrestrial snail, Brain Research, 1326, 68–74.10.1016/j.brainres.2010.02.060
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Verhagen, J. V., Engelen, L., 2006. The neurocognitive bases of human multimodal food perception: sensory integration. Neuroscience & biobehavioral reviews, 30(5), 613–650.10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.11.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Villamayor, P. R., Cifuentes, J. M., Fernandez de Troconiz, P., Sanchez-Quinteiro, P., 2018. Morphological and immunohistochemical study of the rabbit vomero-nasal organ. Journal of anatomy, 233(6), 814–827.10.1111/joa.12884
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vladimirov, N., Sourjik, V., 2009. Chemotaxis: how bacteria use memory. Biological chemistry, 390(11), 1097–1104.10.1515/BC.2009.130
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wang, L., Anderson, D. J., 2010. Identification of an aggression-promoting pheromone and its receptor neurons in Drosophila. Nature, 463(7278), 227–231.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Weeks, J. W., Crowell-Davis, S. L., Heusner, G., 2002. Preliminary study of the development of the Flehmen response in Equus caballus. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 78(2–4), 329–335.10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00110-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wells, D. L., 2012. Dogs as a diagnostic tool for ill health in humans. Alternative Therapies in Health & Medicine, 18(2).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wilson, D., Wharton, T., 2006. Relevance and prosody. Journal of pragmatics, 38(10), 1559–1579.10.1016/j.pragma.2005.04.012
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wysocki, C. J., Preti, G., 2004. Facts, fallacies, fears, and frustrations with human pheromones. The Anatomical Record Part A: Discoveries in Molecular, Cellular, and Evolutionary Biology: An Official Publication of the American Association of Anatomists, 281(1), 1201–1211.10.1002/ar.a.20125
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yopak, K. E., Lisney, T. J., Collin, S. P., 2015. Not all sharks are “swimming noses”: variation in olfactory bulb size in cartilaginous fishes. Brain Structure and Function, 220(2), 1127–1143.10.1007/s00429-014-0705-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zald, D. H., Pardo, J. V., 1997. Emotion, olfaction, and the human amygdala: amygdala activation during aversive olfactory stimulation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 94(8), 4119–4124.10.1073/pnas.94.8.4119
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zelano, C., Sobel, N., 2005. Humans as an animal model for systems-level organization of olfaction. Neuron, 48(3), 431–454.10.1016/j.neuron.2005.10.009
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zellner, D. A., Kautz, M. A., 1990. Color affects perceived odor intensity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16(2), 391.10.1037/0096-1523.16.2.391
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zeng, Y., Lou, S. L., Liao, W. B., Jehle, R., Kotrschal, A., 2016. Sexual selection impacts brain anatomy in frogs and toads. Ecology and Evolution, 6(19), 7070–7079. 10.1002/ece3.2459
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gray, R. 2017. The Many Reasons Why Dogs Might Roll in Smelly Poo, BBC. Available at: <http://www.bbc.com/earth/story/20170608-the-many-reasons-why--dogs-might-roll-in-smelly-poo>.
]Search in Google Scholar
