1. bookVolumen 20 (2018): Edición 1 (June 2018)
Detalles de la revista
Primera edición
04 May 2009
Calendario de la edición
2 veces al año
Acceso abierto

The Prospects of Transdisciplinary Approach to Promote Learners’ Cognitive Interest in Natural Science for Sustainable Development

Publicado en línea: 26 Jun 2018
Volumen & Edición: Volumen 20 (2018) - Edición 1 (June 2018)
Páginas: 5 - 19
Detalles de la revista
Primera edición
04 May 2009
Calendario de la edición
2 veces al año

All, A., Plovie, B., Nuriez Castellar, E. P., & Van Looy, J. (2017). Pre-test influences on the effectiveness of digital-game based learning: A case study of a fire safety game. Computers & Education, 114, 11, 24–37.10.1016/j.compedu.2017.05.018Search in Google Scholar

Badura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Search in Google Scholar

Barr, N., Pennycook, G., Stolz, J. A., & Fugelsang J. A. (2015). The brain in your pocket: Evidence that smartphones are used to supplant thinking. Computers in Human Behaviour, 48, 473–480.10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.029Search in Google Scholar

Bernstein, J. H. (2015). Transdisciplinarity: A review of its origins, development, and current issues. Journal of Research Practice, 11(1), Article R 1.Search in Google Scholar

Bregant, I., Stožer, A., & Cerkvenik, M. (2010). Molecular reduction: reality or fiction? Synthese, 72(30), 437–450.10.1007/s11229-008-9401-zSearch in Google Scholar

Briede, L. (2015). The relationship between mathematics teachers teaching approaches and 9th grade students mathematical self [Doctoral dissertation], Daugavpils: Daugavpils University.10.1515/jtes-2016-0003Search in Google Scholar

Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association.Search in Google Scholar

Cedere, D., Jurgena, I., & Gedrovics, J. (2015). Longitudinal research on the change of Grade 9 pupils’ cognitive interests in sciences (2003–2013). In V. Dislere (Ed.), Engineering for Rural Development. Proceedings of the 14th International Scientific Conference (pp. 742–747). Jelgava: Latvia University of Agriculture.Search in Google Scholar

Cedere, D., Jurgena, I., Helmane I., Tiltiņa-Kapele, I., & Praulīte, G. (2015). Cognitive interest: problems and solutions in the acquisition of science and mathematics in schools of Latvia. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 14(4), 424–434.10.33225/jbse/15.14.424Search in Google Scholar

Cedere, D., Jurgena, I., & Kalnina S. (2017). Prospective teachers’ opinion about the content of modern basic education in the science context. In V. Dislere (Ed.), Rural Environment, Education, Personality. Proceedings of the 10th International Scientific Conference (pp. 63–69). Jelgava: Latvia University of Agriculture.Search in Google Scholar

Cedere, D., Jurgena, I., & Praulite, G. (2016). Possibilities of promoting students’ cognitive interest in science subjects. In V. Dislere (Ed.), Engineering for Rural Development. Proceedings of the 15th International Scientific Conference (pp. 511–516). Jelgava: Latvia University of Agriculture.Search in Google Scholar

Cedere, D., Jurgena, I., & Targamadze, V. (2018). Interest of Latvian and Lithuanian students in science and mathematics. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(1), 31–42.10.33225/jbse/18.17.31Search in Google Scholar

Dincer, S., & Doganay, A. (2017). The effects of multiple-pedagogical agents on learners’ academic success, motivation, and cognitive load. Computers & Education, 111, 74–100.10.1016/j.compedu.2017.04.005Search in Google Scholar

Eilks, I. (2015). Science education and education for sustainable development – justifications, models, practices and perspectives. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(1), 149–158.10.12973/eurasia.2015.1313aSearch in Google Scholar

Flogie, A., & Aberšek, B. (2015). Transdisciplinary approach of science technology, engineering and mathematics education. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 14(6), 779–789.10.33225/jbse/15.14.779Search in Google Scholar

Flogie, A., Dolonec, K., & Aberšek, B. (2015). Transdisciplinarity in education is near. In V. Lamanauskas, V. Šlekiené, & I. Raguliené (Eds.), State-of-the art and future perspectives. Proceedings of the 11th International Baltic Symposium on Science and Technology Education (BalticSTE2015) (pp. 45–47). Šiauliai: Scientia Socialis Press.Search in Google Scholar

Helds, J. (2006). Mācīšanās kā konstruktīvs un sistēmisks jēdziens [Learning as a constructive and systemic notion]. In I. Maslo (Ed.), No zināšanām uz kompetentu darbību [From knowledge to competent activity] (pp. 31–44). Rīga: LU Akadē-miskais apgāds.Search in Google Scholar

Holzkamp, K. (1995). Lernen. Subjektwissenschaftliche Grundlegung. Frankfurt: Studien-ausgabe.Search in Google Scholar

Honey, M., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber, H. (Eds.) (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=18612Search in Google Scholar

Jihyun, L., & Hyoseon, C. (2017). What affects learners’ higher-order thinking in technology-enhanced learning environments? The effects of learner factors. Computers & Education, 115(12), 143–152.Search in Google Scholar

Jurgena, I., Cedere, D., & Keviša I. (2015). Innovative and traditional elements in the work of academic staff: The views of pre-service teachers. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 17(2), 74–90.10.1515/jtes-2015-0012Search in Google Scholar

Kapenieks, J., & Salite, I. (2012). Action research for creating knowledge in an e-learning environment. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 14(2), 111–129.10.2478/v10099-012-0012-xSearch in Google Scholar

Kapenieks, J. (2016). Educational action research to achieve the essential competencies of the future. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 18(1), 95–110.10.1515/jtes-2016-0008Search in Google Scholar

Klein, J. T. (2015). Reprint of ‘Discourses of transdisciplinarity: Looking back to the future.’ Futures, 65, 10–16.10.1016/j.futures.2015.01.003Search in Google Scholar

Klein, J. T. (2001). The discourse on transdisciplinarity: An expanding global field. In J. Thompson Klein, W. Grossenbacher-Mansury, R. Hāberli, A. Bill, R. W. Scholz, & M. Welti (Eds.), Transdisciplinarity: Joint problem solving among science, technology, and society: An effective way of managing complexity (pp. 35–45), Basel, Switzerland: Birkhāuser.Search in Google Scholar

Lamanauskas, V. (2011). Ten theses on modern natural science education. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 33, 5–8.Search in Google Scholar

Lopez-Huertas, M. (2013). Reflexions on multidimensional knowledge: Its influence on the Foundation of knowledge organization. Knowledge Organization, 40(6), 400–407.10.5771/0943-7444-2013-6-400Search in Google Scholar

Madni, A. M. (2007). Transdisciplinarity: Reaching beyond disciplines to find connections. Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science, 11(1), 1–11.Search in Google Scholar

McCrindle, M. (2014). The ABC of XYZ. McCrindle Research Pty Ltd.Search in Google Scholar

McGregor, S. L. T. (2015). The Nicolescuian and Zurich approaches to transdisciplinarity. Integral Leadership Review, 15(2), 6–16.Search in Google Scholar

Migdley, C., & Urdan, T. (2001). Academic self-handicapping and performance goals: A further examination. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 61–75.10.1006/ceps.2000.1041Search in Google Scholar

Mladkova, L. (2017). Learning habits of generation Z students. Proceedings of the European Conference on Knowledge Management, ECKM, 2, 698–703.Search in Google Scholar

Montuori, A. (2008). Foreword: Transdisciplinarity. In B. Nicolescu (Ed.), Transdisciplinarity: Theory and Practice (pp. 9–17). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.Search in Google Scholar

Muravska, T., & Ozoliņa, Ž. (Eds.) (2012). Starpdisciplinaritāte sociālajās zinātnēs: vai tā sniedz atbildes uz mūsdienu izaicinājumiem augstākajā izglītībā un pētniecībā [Transdisciplinarity in social sciences: does it provide answers to contemporary challenges in higher education and research]? Rīga: LU Akadēmiskais apgāds.Search in Google Scholar

Nicolescu, B. (2010). Methodology of transdisciplinarity – Levels of Reality, Logic of the Included Middle and Complexity. Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering & Science, 1(1), 19–38.10.22545/2010/0009Search in Google Scholar

OECD (2016). PISA 2015 Results (Volume I): Excellence and Equity in Education. Paris: PISA, OECD Publishing. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264266490-en10.1787/9789264266490-enAbierto DOISearch in Google Scholar

Osborne, J. (2014). Teaching scientific practices: Meeting the challenge of change. International Journal of Science Education, 25(2), 177-196.Search in Google Scholar

Padurean, A., & Cheveresan, C. T. (2010). Transdisciplinarity in education. Journal Plus Education, 6(1), 127–133.Search in Google Scholar

Pešakovič, D., Flogie, A., & Aberšek, B. (2014). Development and evaluation of a competence-based teaching process for science and technology education, Journal of Baltic Science Education, 13(50), 740-755.10.33225/jbse/14.13.740Search in Google Scholar

Piaget, J. (1972). The epistemology of interdisciplinary relationships. In Centre for Educational Research and Innovation (CERI), Interdisciplinarity: Problems of Teaching and research in universities, Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 127–139.Search in Google Scholar

Pipere, A. (2016). Envisioning complexity: Towards a new conceptualization of educational research for sustainability. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 7(2), 68–91.10.1515/dcse-2016-0017Search in Google Scholar

Potvin, P., & Hasni, A. (2014). Interest, motivation and attitude towards science and technology at K-12 levels: a systematic review of 12 years of educational research. Studies in Science Education, 50(1), 85–129.10.1080/03057267.2014.881626Search in Google Scholar

Salīte, I. (2015). Searching for sustainability in teacher education and educational research: Experiences from the Baltic and Black Sea Circle Consortium for Educational Research. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 6(1), 21–29.Search in Google Scholar

Salite, I., Drelinga, E., Iliško, Dz., Oļehnoviča, E., & Zariņa, S. (2016). Sustainability from the transdisciplinary perspective: An action research strategy for continuing education program development. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 18 (2), 135–152.10.1515/jtes-2016-0020Search in Google Scholar

Salīte, I., Gedžūne, G. & Gedžūne, I. (2009). Educational action research for sustainability: Seeking wisdom of insight in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 11(2), 14–30.10.2478/v10099-009-0037-ySearch in Google Scholar

Sjøberg, S., & Schreiner, C. (2010). The ROSE project. An overview and key findings. Retrieved from https://roseproject.no/network/countries/norway/eng/nor-Sjoberg-Schreiner-overview-2010.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Latvijas Republikas Ministru kabinets [The Cabinet of Ministers of the Republic of Latvia] (2013). Noteikumi par valsts pamatizglītības standartu, pamatizglītības mācību priekšmetu standartiem un pamatizglītības programmu paraugiem [Regulations on national standard of basic education, subject standards of basic education and sample basic education curricula]. Retrieved from http://likumi.lv/doc.php?id=259125Search in Google Scholar

Underwool, J. D. M., & Farrington-Flint, L. (2015). Learning and the e-generation. West Sussex: Wiley, Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Weinberger, D. (2011). Too big to know: Rethinking knowledge now that the facts aren’t the facts, experts are everywhere, and the smartest person in the room is the room. New York, NY: Basic.Search in Google Scholar

Valsts izglītības satura centrs [National Centre for Education]. Mācību priekšmetu programmu paraugi pamatizglītībā [Samples of subject curricula in primary education]. Retrieved from http://www.visc.gov.lv/vispizglitiba/saturs/programmas_pam_izgl.shtmlSearch in Google Scholar

Volk, M., Cotič, M., Zajc, M., & Istenic Starcic, A. (2017). Tablet-based cross-curricular maths vs. traditional maths classroom practice for higher-order learning outcomes, Computers & Education, 114, 11, 1–23.Search in Google Scholar

Artículos recomendados de Trend MD

Planifique su conferencia remota con Sciendo