[
Avery, R.J., Bryant, W.K., Mathios, A., Kang, H. and Bell, D. (2006). Electronic course evaluations: Does an online delivery system influence student evaluations? The Journal of Economic Education, 37(1), 21–37.10.3200/JECE.37.1.21-37
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bedggood, R.E. and Donovan, J.D. (2012). University performance evaluations: what are we really measuring?. Studies in higher education, 37(7), 825-842.10.1080/03075079.2010.549221
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Beleche, T., Fairris, D. and Marks, M. (2012). Do course evaluations truly reflect student learning? Evidence from an objectively graded post-test. Economics of Education Review, 31(5), 709–719.10.1016/j.econedurev.2012.05.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brennan, J. and Shah, T. (2000). Managing quality in higher education: An international perspective on institutional assessment and change. Buckingham, UK: OECD, SRHE and Open University Press
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Braga, M., Paccagnella, M. and Pellizzari, M. (2014). Evaluating students’ evaluations of professors. Economics of Education Review, 41, 71–88.10.1016/j.econedurev.2014.04.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Covrig, M., Goia Agoston, S.I., Igreţ, R.Ş., Marinaş, C.V., Olariu, A.A. and Roman, M. (2022). Discovering the tutors’ perspective on the quality of internship programs in a pandemic context. Management & Marketing, 17(3).10.2478/mmcks-2022-0017
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chetty, R., Friedman, J.N. and Rockoff, J.E. (2014b). Measuring the impacts of teachers II: Teacher valueadded and student outcomes in adulthood, American Economic Review, 104(9), 2633–2679.10.1257/aer.104.9.2633
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dabasi-Halász, Z., Kiss, J., Manafi, I., Marinescu, D.E., Lipták, K., Roman, M. and Lorenzo-Rodriguez, J. (2019). International youth mobility in Eastern and Western Europe–the case of the Erasmus+ programme. Migration Letters, 16(1), 61-72.10.33182/ml.v16i1.626
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dill, D.D. (2000) Designing Academic Audit: lessons learned in Europe and Asia, Quality in Higher Education, Vol. 6, No. 310.1080/13538320020005945
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ewing, A.M. (2012). Estimating the impact of relative expected grade on student evaluations of teachers. Economics of Education Review, 31(1), 141–154.10.1016/j.econedurev.2011.10.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goos, M., Salomons, A. (2015). Measuring teaching quality in higher education: assessing selection bias in course evaluations Res High Educ (2017) 58:341–364 DOI 10.1007/s11162-016-9429-8.10.1007/s11162-016-9429-8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hanushek, E.A., Kain, J.F., O’Brien, D.M. and Rivkin, S.G. (2005). The market for teacher quality. NBER Working Papers 11154, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.10.3386/w11154
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning. A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Abingdon, England: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ho, D.E. and Shapiro, T.H. (2008). Evaluating course evaluations: An empirical analysis of a Quasiexperiment at the stanford law school, 2000–2007, Journal of Legal Education, 58(388).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jacob, B.A. and Lefgren, L. (2008). Can principals identify effective teachers? Evidence on subjective performance evaluation in education. Journal of Labor Economics, 26(1), pp.101–136.10.1086/522974
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jannecke, W-J., Stensaker, B., Gr⊘gaard, J.B. (2002). Student Satisfaction: Towards an empirical deconstruction of the concept, Quality in Higher Education, 8:2, pp. 183-19510.1080/1353832022000004377
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Korka, M. (Ed.). (2009). Educaţie de calitate pentru piaţa muncii – Quality Education for Labor Market, Bucureşti: Editura Universitară, pp. 9 – 30.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MacNell, L., Driscoll, A. and Hunt, A. (2015). Whats in a name: Exposing gender bias in student ratings of teaching, Innovative Higher Education, 40(4), pp. 291–303.10.1007/s10755-014-9313-4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marsh, H.W. (2007). Students’ evaluations of university teaching: A multidimensional perspective. chapter 9. The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education: an evidence-based perspective (pp. 319–384). Springer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McPherson, M.A., Jewell, R.T. and Kim, M. (2009). What determines student evaluation scores? A random effects analysis of undergraduate economics classes. Eastern economic journal, 35(1), pp. 37–51.10.1057/palgrave.eej.9050042
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nulty, D.D. (2008). The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: What can be done? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(3), pp. 301–314.10.1080/02602930701293231
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Roman, M., Plopeanu, A.P. (2021). The effectiveness of the emergency eLearning during COVID-19 pandemic. The case of higher education in economics in Romania. International Review of Economics Education, 37, 100218.10.1016/j.iree.2021.100218
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Roman, M., Suciu, C. (2007). International Mobility of Romanian Students in Europe: From Statistical Evidence to Policy Measures (No. 16439). University Library of Munich, Germany.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sapri, M., Kaka, A., Finch, E. (2009). Factors That Influence Student’s Level of Satisfaction with Regards to Higher Educational Facilities Services. Malaysian Journal of Real Estate Volume 4, No 1.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Spooren, P., Brockx, B., Mortelmans, D. (2013). On the validity of student evaluation of teaching: The state of the art, Review of Educational Research, 83(4), pp. 598–642.10.3102/0034654313496870
]Search in Google Scholar
