[
Abowd, J.M. 2021. Declaration of John M. Abowd. Case no. 3:21-CV-211-RAH-ECM-KCN, U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Alabama. Available at: https://censusproject.files.wordpress.com/2021/04/2021.04.13-abowd-declaration-alabama-v.-commerce-ii-final-signed.pdf.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Abowd, J., R. Ashmead, R. Cumings-Menon, S. Garfinkel, M. Heineck, C. Heiss, and R. Johns. 2022. “The 2020 Census Disclosure Avoidance System TopDown Algorithm.” Harvard Data Science Review 2. Available at: https://hdsr.mitpress.mit.edu/pub/7evz361i (accessed May 2023).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Abowd, J.M., G.L. Benedetto, S.L. Garfinkel, S.A. Dahl, A.N. Dajani, M. Graham, and M.B. Hawes. 2020. The Modernization of Statistical Disclosure Limitation at the U.S. Census Bureau. Available at: https://www.census.gov/library/working-papers/2020/adrm/CED-WP-2020-009.html (accessed May 2023).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bach, F. 2022. “Differential Privacy and Noisy Confidentiality Concepts for European Population Statistics.” Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, 10: 642–687. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smab044.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dajani, A.N., A.D. Lauger, P.E. Singer, D. Kifer, J.P. Reiter, A., Machanavajjhala, S.L. Garfinkel, S.A. Dahl, M. Graham, V. Karwa, H. Kim, P. Leclerc, I.M. Schmutte, W.N. Sexton, L. Vilhuber, and J.M. Abowd. 2017. “The modernization of statistical disclosure limitation at the U.S. Census Bureau.” In: Census Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting, September 14 – 15, Suitland MD, USA. Available at: https://www.census.gov/library/video/2017/2017-09-sac.html (accessed May 2023).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dinur, I., and Nissim. 2003. “Revealing Information While Preserving Privacy.” In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGART Symposium on Principles of Database Systems: 202-210, June 9–12, 2003, San Diego CA, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/773153.773173.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dwork, C., N. Kohli, and D. Mulligan. 2019. “Differential Privacy in Practice: Expose Your Epsilons!” Journal of Privacy and Confidentiality 9(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.29012/jpc.689.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Flaxman, A.D., and O. Keyes. 2022. “The Risk of Linked Census Data to Transgender Children: A Simulation Study,” In: 2020 Census Data Products: Workshop on the Demographic and Housing Characteristics Files, June 21–22, Washington D.C. Available at: https://www.nationalacademies.org/event/06-21-2022/docs/DF3CD148E8CAEC0B93FB88C4A7820AC2D54503ACDD18?noSaveAs=1 (accessed June 2022).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Garfinkel, S. 2023. “Legacy Statistical Disclosure Limitation Techniques Were Not An Option for the 2020 US Census of Population and Housing.” Journal of Official Statistics, this issue.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hawes, M. 2022. “Reconstruction and Reidentification of the Demographic and Housing Characteristics File (DHC)”, Presentation to the Census Scientific Advisory Committee, September 29–30, 2022, Washington D.C. Available at: https://www2.census.gov/about/partners/cac/sac/meetings/2022-09/presentation-reconstruction-and-re-dentification-of-dhc-file.pdf (accessed March 2023).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jarmin, R. 2019. Census Bureau Adopts Cutting Edge Privacy Protection for 2020 Census. Available at: https://www.census.gov/newsroom/blogs/random-samplings/2019/02/-census_bureau_adopts.html (accessed May 2023).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Keyes, O., and A.D. Flaxman. 2022. “How Census Data Put Trans Children at Risk.” Scientific American 21. Available at: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-census-data-put-trans-children-at-risk/ (accessed May 2023).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McKenna, L. 2019. Disclosure Avoidance Techniques Used for the 1960 Through 2010 Decennial Censuses of Population and Housing Public Use Microdata Samples Research and Methodology Directorate, U.S. Census Bureau. Available at: https://www.census.gov/library/working-papers/2019/adrm/CED-WP-2019-007.html (accessed May 2023).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Menger, G. 2021. “Using 2020 Census Data.” Applied Geographic Solutions. Available at: https://appliedgeographic.com/2021/09/using-2020-census-data/ (accessed May 2023).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Muralidhar, K., J. Domingo-Ferrer. 2023. “Database Reconstruction Is Not So Easy and Is Different from Reidentification.” Journal of Official Statistics, this issue.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McKenna, L. 2019. U.S. Census Bureau Reidentification Techniques. Research and Methodology Directorate, U.S. Census Bureau. Available at: https://www2.census.gov/adrm/CED/Papers/CY19/2019-04-Reidentification%20studies-20210331FinRed.pdf (accessed May 2023).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Muralidhar, K. 2022. “A Re-Examination of the Census Bureau Reconstruction and Reidentification Attack.” In Privacy in Statistical Databases – PSD 2022, Paris, France. Springer: 312–323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13945-1.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ruggles, S. 2018. Implications of Differential Privacy for Census Bureau Data Dissemination, Institute for Social Research and Data Innovation, University of Minnesota. Available at: https://apps.bea.gov/fesac/meetings/Ruggles%20Presentation%20Revised.pdf (accessed May 2023).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Samarati, P. 2001. “Protecting Respondents Identities in Microdata Release.” IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 13(6): 1010–1027.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zayatz, L., J. Lucero, P. Massell, A. Ramanayake. 2009. Disclosure Avoidance for Census 2010 and American Community Survey Five-year Tabular Data Products, Census Bureau Research Report RRS2009-10. Available at: https://www.census.gov/content/-dam/Census/library/working-papers/2009/adrm/rrs2009-10.pdf (accessed May 2023).
]Search in Google Scholar
